Searle: Philosophy of Language, lecture 3

[@justindorsheimer4857]

These lectures are helping me survive the drive through Kansas

[@AlexandrePorto]

This and the philosophy of mind courses are greatly increasing my knowledge, thanks Searle.

[@tmylaw8040]

Presenting originality on using language, esp. connecting psychological complexity or reality.

[@deeproporoy]

Love Sally.

[@anastasiiaiurshina6825]

Does anyone have the reading list?

[@danielcabral7589]

Best ending LOL

[@thenjulzsaid]

your lectures are amazing.

[@cbone6754]

Sure would be nice if we could either see what hes written on the board or if there were lecture notes. This is hard to hold in your working memory all at once..

[@radt250]

"unzählige", to be accurate :) (uncountable amounts of ... )

[@justbede]

Language does not "represent" reality. Wittgenstein has nothing against classifications. For instance, we can classify certain activities as "games". What he says is that there is no "essence" of games, something common to all of them. They are like members of a family, and carry "family resemblances", but not a common essence. And bs, after bs...from js.

[@hatehypocrisy1]

what the fuck is he talking about?

[@Open-6]

Language.