[old version] Secret military flying saucer research: Project 1794

Project 1794 is from the early 50's, by the United States Air Force and AVRO Aircraft. It used to be secret, but in 2012 the information has been declassified. I was really hyped when I found these two reports online at the National Archives, placed a link on my IFO site so that others could find it, but it didn't really get picked up. Kind of understand why: on the National Archives these pictures are not that easy to view, and they didn't color correct the scans. The video I made here is in 4K, so you can read all the pages clearly. (more than 200 pages!)
So yes; a flying saucer! This was serious research, about how to build a real flying saucer, not a UFO of course, but disc shaped aircraft called: Silverbug, Y-2, and the prototype P.V. 704.
They were designed to be VTOL (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) fly supersonic and at extremely high altitudes. Up to Mach 3+ and a 100,000 feet.
These specifications are not of a jet fighter. When flying this high and fast, think instead of what has been build in the 60's: the Lockheed SR-71 "Blackbird".
The 2 original reports can be found at "the National Archives".
www.archives.gov
Project 1794
Final Development Summary Report
catalog.archives.gov/id/6920770
Program Planning Report
Project 1794 Extension Program
catalog.archives.gov/id/6981836
Access Restriction(s) & Use Restriction(s): Unrestricted
The main character of this story is John Carver Meadows Frost, a man who's work has been a great inspiration to me, for his many way-out-there aircraft designs. He for example is also the father of the AVRO car.
But yea: Silverbug has never flown? Is that really so?
One of the clearest UFO photos ever made, shows a disc shaped flying something that looks remarkably similar to the designs in Project 1794. These photos were taken by Photographer Ed Keffel and reporter João Martins. They spotted this UFO at Barra da Tijuca, Brazil, on May the 7th 1952.
So; the UFO photos are from 1952, and these final reports are from 1956 and 1957...
If any of you happen to go visit area 51, you may find the Silverbug craft there.
Please make some good photos, that would be awesome!

[@maxmustardman298]

Nice presentation, and good job restoring the pages. Could have gone without the engine noise though ;)

[@anoren4480]

GOD BLESS You, brother for all you do. Hope to see more soon.

[@heavymeddle28]

This makes me even more confident in my belief that roswell was nothing else but either USSR or USA having some cold War experimental shit that ended up in the desert. Thanks for the video. Really appreciate it 😊

[@aarona5522]

You want confidence ? First go to 1930 Check out Henri Coanda's work Then go to 1940 and see the work of Viktor Schaberger .. Then get rid of the turbines and propellers and you will have a more efficient technology....................

[@heavymeddle28]

@@aarona5522 cool. I have to check it out. Thanks 😊

[@heavymeddle28]

@@aarona5522 i can't find anything from h coanda in the 1930s. Only 60s. Do you have any ideas how I can search? I'm really really REALLY interested 😊

[@heavymeddle28]

@@aarona5522 and just for clarification... Do you mean Victor schauberger? Or is it schaberger? Because I found some really interesting stuff about v schauberger. My intention isn't to nitpick a spelling error. Absolutely not. You've given me a lot of great info. Just wanna make sure... 😊

[@LLULL-yn1rr]

UFOs can changes shape, dissapear, reply, duplicate etc And there are ufo shightings since centuries ago.

[@senben9180]

Thanks a lot for this information. Very well researched and great you showed proof of one of them flying on a real ufo photo sighting. Great job

[@RSEFX]

Nice report, thank you.

[@Metropolis-gh6bc]

1977, Fort Irwin, California, while our battalion was conducting desert warfare training, at least my entire platoon one night got to see a flying saucer show. Extremely fast, no noise, 90 degree turns in an instant. Not from outer space, Made in America!🇺🇸

[@brianlee9310]

Ooh tell me more please?😊

[@elmexicanruso9498]

No son los unicos que lograron construir ese tipo de Aeronaves

[@c6jones720]

I wish they revisited some of these older projects, just think what we could do with modern computer technology and control systems to a project like this

[@Moodymongul]

imho, I think they have been :) ..and also updating things like Zeppelin tech (using modern materials etc). I heard US Homeland Defence flew large, black, triangular zeppelins at night (for years after 9/11) which were used to record all electrical signals across many US cities (basically, a panic project ..in case there were other secret 'cells' hiding in major cities - they 'read' everyones cellphones, computers etc).

[@c6jones720]

@@Moodymongul Somebody in the lifter community mentioned something like that. A large triangular vehicle (actually some sort of airship), using electrostatic propulsion, and so silent

[@joswi4177]

Who's to say they haven't?

[@DANTHETUBEMAN]

Worked for the flying wing

[@stormblazer5165]

@@c6jones720 the tr3b 🥰🥰

[@JussiTuukkanen]

Thank you for sharing. This looks more like a cover for the real technologies we are looking for ( i mean obviously it is ) but very interesting still

[@Moodymongul]

apparently the engineers that worked directly with the craft were so scared of it sending debris out (at supersonic speed), that the project heads had to order a protective barrier to surround the craft during live testing! Can you imagine standing anywhere near a full size prototype in test. A part from noise, the engine vibrations must have been intense on the body :)

[@callemoslosbrutose4807]

THANKS A LOT FOR SHARING. SECRETS ARE FINALLY UNVEILED.

[@Trebseig]

Yes finally! Project 1794 is from the early 50's, and these 2 reports have been declassified in 2012. That is 56 YEARS AFTER the Project 1794's Final Development Summary Report. Not much has to or can stay secret for soo long! Though the details were secret, project 1794 was not unknown. The program was canceled in 1961. "In September 2012, Michael Rhodes, a technician at the National Declassification Center (NDC) in College Park, Md., donned white cotton gloves, entered a climate-controlled room, and opened a cardboard file box. soon realized that the file box contained highly unusual material." Sources: www.popularmechanics.com/military/a8699/declassified-americas-secret-flying-saucer-15075926/ declassification.blogs.archives.gov/2012/09/20/how-to-build-a-flying-saucer/ I had a copy of all the reports pages on my computer for many years, from soon after it got online at the National Archives. I expected that many people would make video's about this extraordinary project, but not much appeared on KZbin, so I just had to share this, in high quality (4K).

[@brianlee9310]

​@Giesbert Nijhuis the link went crazy . Is this the only source?

[@brianlee9310]

​@Giesbert Nijhuis it's loud is this the same as an actual ufo my God I must know how this works!!! Great scott!!!

[@hcontini]

Greetings. Question. If you have a magnetic disk on a wheel bearing facing another magnetic disk on a wheel bearing, would the magnetic repel create a spin and that spin create power and create a magnetic field that could levitate?

[@tommy12345abc]

Also was it able to fly at 45 degree angles and did it leave any trails/visible emissions/trails?

[@one_64th_missing30]

Great stuff! Thx!

[@uptoneTV]

great report ... agree that the engine noise was cool for a few seconds but gets old.

[@wookieeMan06]

There was also called project silver bug, 1794 was Avro naming

[@iainriley617]

Great piece, But I still think that the Avrocar was actually a cover story to hide the fact that Silverbug worked better than expected to the point it destroyed it's first test rig on an over run. Plus as shown in the final paper the air force we're working on the same thing off sight once the proof of concept was excepted. Avro we're used as a scape goat and the Project went deep black.. But love you found the paperwork I have been looking for for years .👏👏

[@liamcjbeistle3274]

as you have demonstrated it is about completing the circuit of the vortex. Lift buoyancy inertia

[@muhammadmuhaiminhisham7387]

It might interest you to know that, which is what are they so-called UFO or Flying Saucer or somewhat Advanced Technology, is actually the technology that came from 1800's century or more precisely at the time of NIkola Tesla's life.

[@karlaug4450]

4:02 - to the very end , just mute it , because there isn´t any talking at all , only a motor sounds very loud .

[@ttvphilswifft8682]

Astounding

[@Trebseig]

It is quite incredible right? To find so much information about such an incredible design that has been a secret for some 62 years. And thus strange that it didn't get much attention, especially on KZbin. This is the closest whe have ever been to making a real flying saucer. That by the way is not the goal (not the goal to make something looking like a UFO), the reasons to go disc shaped are: large surface (for flying high where the air is thin), low air resistance (small frontal surface, extremely thin wing profile), large inner space, and a very strong structure.

[@ttvphilswifft8682]

@@Trebseig I couldn't agree more, you are a gem of a human being

[@Unknown-sg4tv]

Safety Time machine Key Points Short version 1. Automatic door lock.2:11 2. Goes invisible. 3. Moves objects over it.

[@Unknown-sg4tv]

Safety Time Machine Key Points 1. Automatic door lock. 2. Goes invisible. 3. Moves objects over it. 4. Has camera/TV inside. 5. Can stand extreme weather. 6. Can stand extreme radiation. 7. Has rocket fuel. 8. Rocket fuel fades extremely fast in the sky. 9. Automatic probability control. Automatically makes the probability certain that history doesn't change on it's own. 10. Uses wormholes to time travel.

[@terrellclane8715]

Awesome!

[@xsvrrx]

i've seen this before but i didn't release this back then when i was a kit but this was the us air forces and NASA first attempt at thrust vectoring technology. that really didnt get a break though until 1997

[@RobertHarrisMIB]

And the Agro was a publicity stunt to debunk arbitrarily research.

[@JimEdmiston]

Giesbert, you mention the "Storm Area 51" event in this video - are you familiar with Bob Lazar's story? The creator of the SA51 event has said that he was inspired by Bob Lazar's recent appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience. Project 1974 would be a great RC airplane project, although I can't think of an RC design more challenging...

[@Trebseig]

Yes, I mentioned the upcoming "Storm Area 51" event, September 20th 2019. What will happen that day? I hope that no one gets hurt. If this area is kind of what we think it is, I would not be surprised if there are more developed versions of Project 1794 stored there, under a cover of dust. This Project 1794 stuff is real! I personally don't expect anything alien, but who knows. Bob Lazar's story... yes I know about that, but all that talk makes me dizzy, would like see something real. To make a RC version of Project, that would be fun! And indeed challenging, especially its stability. Not just a quadcopter within a disc, that would be lame. Anyone up for this challenge?!

[@JimEdmiston]

@@Trebseig I was very disappointed when the mass production Millennium Falcon was a quadcopter with a shroud, and I share your sentiment for wanting a hypothetical Project 1794 to be made as close to scale as possible, especially with the propulsion system being some sort of airjet - not a multirotor. I think Bob's story is compelling but I only really care if there is something in there that helps with replicating the technology. I'm currently more interested in replicating Joseph Newman's machine. There are a few videos on my channel right now, and I'll be publishing more soon.

[@Trebseig]

@@JimEdmiston I saw your youtube channel, you're a maker as well :-) interesting motor you are working on. I placed a comment. Ah; a Joseph Newman's machine... well, then keep extraordinary good track of your input and output. A good RC version of Project 1794, should at least have a large powerful inner centrifugal fan. I am now listening to "Joe Rogan Experience #1315 - Bob Lazar & Jeremy Corbell" (halfway, it is long!) . He sounds honest but the stuff he is saying is, well: alien. IF true then wow brainfreeze exponential!

[@Trebseig]

@@JimEdmiston So Jim, I listened to the whole interview (Joe Rogan Experience #1315 - Bob Lazar & Jeremy Corbell kzbin.info/www/bejne/eHa6q2eJjcusebM ). Very entertaining at least. I like how they are thinking, and I want to believe. 9 different alien space ships... If this is real.. wow WOW.

[@JimEdmiston]

@@Trebseig would be nice, right? Too bad we can't know for sure. Thanks for your comment on my video. It is a very youngc project with limited resources but I will continue nonetheless. I will respond to your comment on my video as soon as I have time to provide a thoughtful response.

[@RSEFX]

There are questions re: the photos, as lighting direction between the craft and ground appear to be in conflict.

[@pchv7587]

Hi Giesbert I want to know your thoughts about the true shape of what is a magnetic field. Is it a single torus? A double torus? Torus = vortex ring What do you think of the analogy between vortex ring/ magn field and hurricanes (embeded hot and cold vortices)? Thank you

[@Trebseig]

Well; a single torus. If it be a double torus (stuck together) then you would have 2 north poles and one south pole around the middle, or the other way around (I don't know if the N or the Z side sucks). Vortex rings are intriguing! The analogy between these 3? Hmm: a vortex ring in air is a thing of motion. I don't know if magnetic field is in motion.. it has a similar shape but it doesn't seem to move, nor does it lose energy over time. I see a magnetic field as a static distortion of space. A hurricane is a vortex between 2 surfaces, not in a ring. The vortex ring is quite off topic here. I made a video about a Double Toroidal Vortex Based Particle, here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/r3nSYq2lrdJ0oa8

[@pchv7587]

@@Trebseig ok i saw your videos. I like coanda effect and double torus. Electromagn equations are quasi the same as fluid mechanic. Electricity=ether=fluid. Coil = vortex ring. Magnets do have a vortex Coils have north and south. Shape of the earth is lie. Astronauts/Nasa lie so you cant figure out true mecanism of magnetism. Hidden knowledge. Shape of the earth reveals true shape of magn field : toroid. Sunlight heatt while moonlight cools. Sun and moon cercling in the very center of the torus doughtnut ring. Hurricane again cold and hot layers. Look for anatomy of hurricane in google you will see truth. www.google.com/search?q=hurricane+anatomy&client=ms-android-samsung&prmd=inv&sxsrf=ACYBGNQRyujFKcdl5e_LpObjgCNw8zUMFA:1570896532951&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi37szOjZflAhULyoUKHSjfDAYQ_AUoAXoECA8QAQ&biw=412&bih=751&dpr=1.75#imgrc=NuHQNwE5kRV3-M Smoke ring = water ring = ether ring = EMfield images.app.goo.gl/SKqQvcMQjnnnx14u7 images.app.goo.gl/L2P73inz13JZomh79 In electriciry + goes one way - the other Same with hot and cold layers Look rank hilsh vortex tube. Look at Leap frogging phenomena. Look at Dan bergerud masterpieice of understanding vortex ring behaviour same light with interface water/solvant showing diffraction/refraction/reflexion. Must watch Thank you

[@wakematta]

WOW and this project was before the Roswell crash (1947)

[@urmom8353]

I’m sure if they tried doing this today with the modern day technology we have it would work. Years from now we boutta be having wars with planets instead of countries like in Star Wars 😂

[@octaviusgalacticus2253]

It would be so cool if they actually did this

[@godsownlunatics9650]

Project 1974 rings more than a bell, rung my crown off my delta and blew my head clean off

[@Ilvedrppr]

Area 51raiders: coincidence i think not

[@Trebseig]

As mentioned; these reports have been declassified in 2012, 56 YEARS AFTER the Project 1794's secret 'Final Development Summary Report'. But 7 years before the 'storm area 51' event. I did work towards having this video ready before the event on September 20 2019. OMG, that was lame.. 2 million people saying "I'll come", 2000 showed up, 200 walked to the entrance.. True: there was no real organization, and all was canceled, but come on people: get off your lazy butt, grab your musical instrument, just go anyhow and have a unique small musical party. Kudos to the ones who went!

[@Adam-fl9uc]

0:41 keep in mind this is all rocket fuel around the pilot. If it would explode he would completely vaporize by definition. Another thing is that a lot of the projects from that time had projected/estimated claims of reaching way over mach 2 which didn't survive the tests. For example kingfish project was supposed to fly up to mach10! in 1950s they claimed to create the plane that we saw in top gun 2. Despite king fish design being passed to cia (if I am not mistaken), the original base project was cancelled for the blackbird design. They did however test using nuclear engines on a plane so it led to a speculation that in 1960 an fish/egg shaped plane with nuclear propulsion was produced that somehow behaves like the ufos but that is just a speculation. There was a nice documentary supplement to the grusch interview where they did speculate on some of the people involved but truth is even if the technology defying physics as we know it is true then it is unlikely it was anything like the speculated tech. Some people suspect the so called ion drift/thrust but its just a speculation. 1794 was despite the shape still a conventional project. Round shapes were still an idea developed by convair in the sixties for the anti rocket countermeasures (being itself also a round shaped drone/rocket) but despite ending in another proposal of a space reentry circular shaped craft the conventional saucer niche ended between 60 and the 70s

[@Hesbonful]

My laptop is levitating after watching this...

[@m.plus.2705]

it's easy to do at home now uses 100% pure magnesium sheets

[@DANTHETUBEMAN]

That a flamable material, carbon fiber and kevlar are stronger

[@tommy12345abc]

Was this thing silent?

[@Pavel_Poluian]

There is an interesting design of aircraft, but they rarely talk about it, because this thing is secret. The topic of pulsed plasma thrusters has been developed since the early 60s (see PPT - Pulsed plasma thruster) - they are usually designed for spacecraft. But we will talk about a little-known design - these are plasma propulsion panels for aircraft, where the same Pulsed plasma thruster, but reduced to the size of a pencil and stacked in the form of cells in the panel. The design resembles a conventional plasma TV screen, where there are also discharge cells that activate the glow of pixels on the screen. And plasma propulsion panels have long discharge cells, the arrester has a railgun architecture (just rail contacts or coaxial), and the ionized discharge air is accelerated there by the Lorentz force to enormous speeds - a kind of ramjet engine is obtained. Just imagine! - tens of thousands of small ramjet engines assembled in a panel and firing plasma synchronously with a huge frequency (hundreds of kilohertz). Thus, plasma propulsion panels create lift by pulsed emission of plasma jets from railgun cells. There are tens of thousands of cells in the panel, they shoot at a frequency of hundreds of kilohertz, a huge pulse is obtained, and the plasma swirls the air into toroidal rings - the aircraft is held on this air cushion. Horizontal acceleration is created by the same plasma panels on the sides of the device (they glow, from the side they look like "portholes"). Such devices like "triangle" or "disk" have been observed for a long time, they are mistaken for alien ones - but these are terrestrial devices. They are classified and used for espionage and secret actions. Pulsed electromagnetic technology generates microwave radiation, therefore it is harmful to health. They rarely fly - only military missions. Therefore, they are not suitable for a citizen. This maintained the secrecy. Now they are already declassifying - many people know about this secret technique. When declassified, they will be used for cargo airships. But there is a danger that they are now going to be adapted to deliver small nuclear charges to decision-making centers - such means of delivery are not specified anywhere, are not conventional. This lowers the threshold for starting a war. It would be necessary to declassify them as soon as possible. That's why I'm writing about it. However, I have written before - starting with the book "The Elimination of UFOs" and many articles. There are also videos on my KZbin channel - "Declassified UFO" and "UFO Anatomy".🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮

[@ccfmfg]

I almost bought that UFO at a Wright Patterson Air Force base Garage Sale a few years back but some Guys in Black beat Me to it.

[@Phil-nz9ux]

The jet engines, were for the "old ones", now we have the very high tension.

[@ben_jamin160]

whats that noise bro ? its like when you give a phumbs up on messanger and it makes that wee noise

[@mitropoulosilias]

so just like a carrier based vertical take off jet airplane... using a jet engine and a asystem to redirect the exhaust gases..

[@wonderfulcounsellor3932]

Incessant noise...

[@JimEdmiston]

It's the beautiful sound of jet engines in resonance...

[@Trebseig]

Aah, the sound of a gas turbine engine, either you love it or you hate it. I love it except for the very loud high frequencies, that I filtered out a bit in this video.

[@MelloCello7]

@@Trebseig I understand your love for it, but it's extremely intolerable for head phone users and for younger users who are highly sensitive to higher frequencies. To have it for that long a duration excludes unnecessarily people who just want to enjoy your content. Please consider the above points, Thankyou

[@Trebseig]

Once a video is online, it cannot be changed anymore. While making this video I did filter out quite some high frequencies, but I could have tuned it down a bit more. I listen to my videos with good speakers, but not headphones. Sorry, will pay even more attention next time.

[@MelloCello7]

@@Trebseig I really appreciate the attention you give to us the fans, and the obvious love and passion you put in your videos! Please have a wonderful day!

[@Xeno_Bardock]

Can you do a vortex experiment video where you create clockwise and counter-clockwise rotating concentric cylinders of vortexes with fan or vacuum pump? So you are emulating birkeland currents which has clockwise and counter-clockwise rotating cylinders of electromagnetic fields. Check Donald Scott's videos on birkeland current.

[@Xeno_Bardock]

Also check this image on birkeland current cross section. This should give you an idea. i.imgur.com/7ZPgZ3Z.jpg

[@taylorwestmore4664]

Check out Jean-Pierre Petit PhD interview in Prague here on KZbin. He explains how to construct a spiral or toroidal vortex flow around magnetohydrodynamic aerodynes shaped like discs, sphere and cylinders or wings. They can exceed Mach 1 without making a sonic boom, by accelerating and decelerating air plasma around the frame using the electromagnetic (ExB) force, and increasing the speed of sound in the plasma by both heating and the long range EM forces transmitting force at near the speed of light. There are several plasma airspike designs that you can find images of wind tunnels tests where it has blunted or eliminated the sonic boom up to Mach 2. Thomas Townsend Brown's designs for disc shaped asymmetrical capacitor thrusters would have also had this desirable low drag effect, and if you could see the ions and electrons moving around it, you would likely see Birkeland currents forming the vortex.

[@joecarretero9404]

Hi, if you draw inspiration from Einstein's Philadelphia Experiment that is an introduction to harnessing ufo technology well at least the early stages of development. The problem was at the time was steering the technology which seemed to have gotten away from the experimenters and not using humans was there biggest downfall. If the documented technology can be restarted I am sure more improvements can be made. Underground in Aera 51 is a huge hangar which has an array of captured or found ufo's which offer a delight of possible development capabilities however advanced the technology is. If the American government was more open to civilian know how I am sure more knowledge can open up the ufo technology debate, its a very interesting area which has been secreted away from the general public whom in my opinion are more intelligent than the scientific research team assigned to it.

[@MrCcfly]

lol einstein is only poppet or idiot by nature ,his experiments are can i put pants today right ,,,

[@jonathanmoreno3224]

Is there UFO technology able to disappear?

[@MrCcfly]

yea it is called block

[@INDIAN-pb7ix]

Well Indias Vaimanika Shastra has been used by USA i think Vaimanika Shastra consist information about all this.

[@data112]

Hello Giesbert, how are you? I hope you can read this comment, you can greatly improve that project, that centrifugal turbine has to have magnetic bearings, that is a key point, 99 percent efficiency, without friction, that is very low consumption, and if you want to improve even more the things instead of using centrifugal force, that was the first thing that was used, in the first ships, later they realized that the magnetic centrifugal force is even better, you do it in a couple of ways, there are more things too, I can tell you, big hug

[@MaxBrix]

Could you clarify your use of UFO? In some places you refer to this craft as not a UFO. But then you say a photo of a UFO is this aircraft.

[@Trebseig]

U.F.O. = Unidentified Flying Object. The photos from Brazil show an unidentified flying object. I identify that UFO as equal to the designs in project 1794, both from the early 50's, but I can not proof it. Project 1794 was real, the proof is in this video. There were only designs? I don't really believe that. I can believe they didn't fly up to expectations, and the project was canceled, with a bit of shame. No aliens, no anti gravity, just a very fascinating secret military project. Who has proof of them being build, flown, and flown in Brazil? Leave a comment!

[@RSEFX]

@@Trebseig The Brazil photos have been generally been dismissed as fakes based on conflicts in lighting directions between the shadows on the landscape and the angle of light on the sky object. But there is still room for alternate thoughts about the supposed lighting conflict.

[@MrCcfly]

russians get hands on this project too but they use cone shape not disc

[@EfficientEnergyTransformations]

Putting jet engines on such a geometry would have been waste. Jet engines are not efficient for air propulsion considering the BTUs they waste . There are other thermodynamic transformers that are the perfect prime mover engines for such a construction, as in addition by their design construction (out of the box ) provide the gyroscopic effect for the stability of the object. Look for combination of Tesla turbine in conjunction with Tesla pump, one is the prime move the other propeller.

[@Trebseig]

Any jet engine from the early 50's is fuel inefficient compared to today's, and even today's jet engines are terrible fuel inefficient if you use them for VTOL thrust. But look at the bigger picture: The aircrafts from Project 1794 were ment to do this: A - VTOL or STOL take-off (thus no runway and no heavy landing gear) B - climb steep to extremely high altitudes (main reason for the large disc surface) C - accelerate to supersonic, to just beyond Mach 3 (and getting ram air in the air intake) There is a lot going on. The 6 viper jets may have had a relative good power to weight ratio (I am not sure), which can be more fuel efficient than having heavy fuel efficient jets. These jets in some designs are used to drive a large central fan -increasing efficiency. And when at supersonic cruise speed, they enjoy ram compressed air. And because these jets are in wing-body, they do not give any air resistance. The gyroscopic effect of 6 jet engines wil certainly help with stability. Personally, I guess that Project 1794's biggest problem was stability, and that much of what they learned from Project 1794 could be applied to the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird. You suggest using the Tesla turbine/compressor. Maybe useful. I can imagine John Carver Meadows Frost has considered that, as he could clearly think far out of the box.

[@JimEdmiston]

"Jet engines are not efficient for air propulsion considering the BTUs they waste" Excluding novelty engines which are not mass-produced, jet engines (specifically turbofan-style) are the most thermally efficient engines in production. Tesla turbines are cool and all but you still need something to spin them - they are not prime movers. "There are other thermodynamic transformers that are the perfect prime mover engines for such a construction." Can you name some of these?

[@olanlevan8470]

I can put a jet engine in my VCR or TV and apply for a patent and make wild claims about its function but that doesn't mean it'll fly. Same thing with a hubcap you can add a jet engine to it and make wild claims about its function. But seriously 6 jet engines in a vehicle that initially creates no lift and needs lift just to carry that much weight seems outrageous. And if it created lift you wouldn't need 6 engines, one or 2 would be enough. And stability. Stability against what?. Is it flying or levitating.

[@williamschram]

Great content. Do everyone a favor and cut out the turbine noise.

[@tammyl3726]

VERTICAL!!!!

[@mc4952]

Future is near !

[@fukhue8226]

In reality it flew at 3 feet off the ground at 20 mph. What ever gave the design engineers the idea this thing would fly at 100,000 feet while going over mach 3?

[@Trebseig]

You are confused with the Avro Canada VZ-9 Avrocar. The crafts from project 1794 are completely different.

[@ronniejblake3729]

Silly rabbit this was so that we could say we failed, but we fail up-ward

[@DANTHETUBEMAN]

A police officer in texas saw this fighter jet being tested fly along a river bed. This matches his discrimination

[@Djeseret]

Today, the design exists... but it doesn't look like this, it can outmaneuver ordinary aircraft, but it can't do what a UFO can do, so there is no risk that you can confuse them for each other in the air if you know something about aeronautics, physics and propulsion systems. So no, this does not... solve the ufo question, sorry...

[@Henry-bq5vd]

Why aren’t they working on developing this technology and perfecting the concept today with our technology

[@nicknorthcutt7680]

They already have, it's highly classified and not public though

[@terrinewman5954]

the avro car never got past 30 mph and not higher than 3 to 5 feet off the ground! project was run out of canada

[@cyberneticinterfacemodular3996]

Avro Canada special projects never really got off the ground.

[@MrCcfly]

just look at these pics again mand there is 5 more sightings and finaly one crash in rosevel

[@cyberneticinterfacemodular3996]

@@MrCcfly Where his your data??.

[@russianagent9175]

1794....the global reset Mudflood Buildings

[@tammyl3726]

Beam me up Scotty!!!!

[@snakeplissken1583]

Build a working scale model.

[@RobertHarrisMIB]

The report states clearly that it was built, AND it flew. Can't you read?

[@liamcjbeistle3274]

figure 20 page 31 still not copied many sheets that fold open were left shut when copied. The fact is a variant of this did fly! Still not disclosed

[@bugsbunny3488]

Don't play this video at night it will bother your neighbour's f,n vacume cleaner noise

[@satriorudi1979]

Now us have one

[@QuoraHarshEntrepreneur]

flying sphere circle not saucer what i am thinking of

[@zbigniewszalast9719]

This is German Nazi :Haunebu and future TR-3a Astra and TR-3b Aurora

[@mistervacation23]

It's not a real flying saucer I blew that up and it's just a paper plate with a gob of potato salad on it

[@369frequencyandvibration]

That sound is tedious

[@MasterIvo]

In reality back then they already had real "ufo's" develepod, based on the AEther ring vortex pressure

[@Trebseig]

What are: real "UFOs"? You sound sure, how can you be sure? I love vortex rings! And space is not nothing. Let's call it aether, for it needs a name.

[@Trebseig]

Heee, jou Engels klinkt net zoals het mijne: Nederlands. Ik woon in Amsterdam.

[@MasterIvo]

Inderdaad@@Trebseig Ik woon in Eindhoven, vlak bij. Ik ben groot fan van de ring vortex, en vind jou videos en foto's fantastisch. Is het OK als ik beeld materiaal van je gebruik in een toekomstige video (met jou naam en link vermeld)? Ik weet het natuurlijk niet zeker, maar vermoed sterk dat er al een hoop ufo's rondvliegen die hier op aarde zijn gebouwd gebaseerd op Aether ring vortex technology. Hoe je het ook wilt noemen, een vacuum is zeker niet leeg :)

[@Trebseig]

@@MasterIvo Thanks, en ja: als je een deel van een filmpje van mij wil gebruiken voor een video die voornamelijk een creatie van jou is, en mijn website vermeld www.laesieworks.com dan heb je mijn oké. Ben benieuwd. Je bent deep into vage dingen (zie ik op je kanaal -met eigen werk). Interessant!

[@MasterIvo]

LoL vage dingen ja! Electrische ringvortex :) Super tof, bedankt voor je toestemming, ik zal je website vermelden, en je voorwaarden eren. Geen idee wanneer de video af is, schiet niet op met dit lekkere weer :) maar ik stuur je een berichtje als t zover is.

[@oksanadaurova]

SO WHAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS air SOUNDs???!

[@oksanadaurova]

And i heard the background voice s lol

[@georgsteidl2249]

Uhhm, I honestly doubt this a lil bit. Coanda interesting

[@jimmybutler3728]

But you are talking about jet powered not the anti-gravet magnetic powered crafts of yesteryear.

[@Trebseig]

Yes; this is amazing technology from the 50's. Did you expect alien technology? Project 1794 is real, not a science fiction movie.

[@jimmybutler3728]

What you are talking about is within the airspace of the earth not out side of it, or even rocket driven power sources or even the electronic magnetic anti gravety power sources.

[@Trebseig]

Yes; this is amazing technology from the 50's. Did you expect alien technology? Project 1794 is real, not a science fiction movie.

[@ronniejblake3729]

Re-engineering spins so fast that it's. Wait I want you to take a week barring or out of a junk yard clean it really good or even buy a new one clean it with decreased, now take and hold it with you fingers in the middle. Take an high pressure air hose blow it to make it spin, by the way do this outside because it will fly off your hand up in the sky this is the same concept as a flying sauser

[@cyberneticinterfacemodular3996]

German saucer technology.

[@OLTTWFNMW]

Vicktor Shauberger? Nikola Tesla? Project Blue Book? The X File's/Fringe/The Truth is ♾️

[@nosaltiesandrooshere7488]

Die Triebwerksgeräusche hättest du dir sparen können!

[@LordWillyGee]

Even if they give out the whole set of the plan? This was so poor performance it wouldn't even make this a long-range anything's! 6 jet engines, and the range was 0-1000 mile with only 2 hour flying time? That starting and it drinks the gas/JP. They build 2, and 1 crash. The control and 2 engine problems?

[@stefanschleps8758]

Seven minutes of engine noise? Really?! No sub. for you. (Did you stop to consider the thousands that had headphones on?!)

[@Trebseig]

Sorry for your ears. Tip: there is a volume button.

[@robertblackshear8963]

Think they gave up. Think again.

[@aaronharmon7085]

I design these with much simpler and efficient engineering. My design is much faster and more maneuverable and it runs on water!!!

[@Xighor]

Cool than Publish your files to the public snd proof it works unless you're crazy of course..

[@NosemWDupke]

I think theyr bilding that coz they cant figure out the technology of real flying soucers Of beings from other planets.

[@mrbigsmizzy]

Really good job at the audio to speak in the native language dialect

[@devpanwar1277]

Tornado

[@deborahduthie4519]

Harrier Jump jet used this technology vertical launch /landing, or am I thinking of the Hovercraft tech... knowledge is always useful in design.

[@xbeattv6851]

Hmm

[@jimmybutler3728]

Can't you get more up to date?

[@JimEdmiston]

Dude, one comment is enough. If you can't appreciate the content, move along. Giesbert has had on his website for some time now information about these types of craft and has also written that he has little interest in unidentified craft. This video and his other work focus on 100% real AND explainable technology that humans have already worked with, but I believe he wants to incorporate his vortex propulsion system into the design.

[@jimmybutler3728]

@@JimEdmiston Good advice to all.

[@ttvphilswifft8682]

@@jimmybutler3728I can kinda tell that the "advice" was solely meant for you only because people perceive you as an asshole........you should learn something new for your sake because knowledge is power and power is utility

[@Trebseig]

Project 1794 has been declassified in 2012, some 62 years after the fact.

[@Trebseig]

@@JimEdmiston Hey Jim, you have seen my site! :-) (..I need to update my site, most of the IFO part is ±15 years old) Nice reply, and indeed: my interest is in real disc shaped VTOL aircraft, not UFOs. Unusual aircraft that I call IFOs (Identified Flying Objects).

[@justthink3375]

I could do without the sound effects

[@cyberneticinterfacemodular3996]

I have all this data in my vault system and more.

[@williamrathwell766]

Avrocar and

[@joecrowe7062]

A real flying saucer I bet has no moving parts in it,runs on electromagnetic energy

[@davidmyersretiredaerospace8038]

?.

[@tamaraking2374]

And everybody thought UFOs or extraterrestrial lol

[@Trebseig]

Yes; most will be terrestrial or optical illusions, but imaginge if 1 in every UFO IS extraterrestrial.. Hello ET!

[@whatabouttheearth]

This is the realist documentary you can probably find on UFOs: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ipLHlHSHbLyYZ5o The disinfo is based on a dualistic mechanism Weather Balloon = disinfo Experimental Human Craft = real Extraterrestrial life = disinfo Non "saucer" UFOs are more than likely variations of 'flying wing' and 'Delta wing' craft, or big light shows (probably using drones)

[@salesnaldo7634]

TUDO. BOBAGEM. !

[@robertoolavd243]

Que.. Traduzcan.. EN.. Español.. No.. Entiendo.. LO.. Que. Disen.. Chile

[@zidanpragata3140]

the EARTH is FLAT

[@qaraniqioqaraniqio2542]

its actually a helicopter, you'll never get to the next galaxy with this, so dump!

[@JBMoney.]

Sorry but thumbs down 👎 for sound effects didn't need it at all try music next time smh🙉

[@Brad1andonly]

That turbine noise in the background is so fucking annoying! What did you even put that in your video? Also why did you keep it going the whole entire video?

[@Trebseig]

I like the sound of gas turbines, and I mainly used the sound of the same type of gasturbine as was used in this Project 1794 design. It contained 9 of these engines! Can you imagine the noise!! But specially for you I placed a volume button at the bottom of the video. Actually: I reduced some of the high pitched frequencies, but especially with a headphone on it can be intens. Sorry. SORRY!

[@data112]

@@Trebseig trabajo con unas bobinas toroidales, y son tremendas, generan vortices magneticos muy poderosos, baja y alta frecuencia. magnetico electrico, tendrias que experimentar con eso, y mejorarias mucho tus experimentos, usando rodamientos magneticos, pasivos o activos I work with toroidal coils, and they are tremendous, they generate very powerful magnetic vortices, low and high frequency. electric magnetic, you would have to experiment with that, and it would greatly improve your experiments, using magnetic bearings, passive or active