OMG I am your fan sir 😊 you are amazing. Only by the help of your video I am able to clear my limitations bare act successfully 🙏
@unnatiagarkar9471 Жыл бұрын
You have tought the subject really nicely sir. It is helping the understand the concept and also to recollect even without getting stuck in the legal words. Thank you again...
@ayushsainik70164 жыл бұрын
Sir you exactly explain what reqiures for student not useless things and really conceptual ... Best videos on law i have ever seen .. and they are helpful for me ..
@susmitamaitra2733 Жыл бұрын
Very helpful video..I have watched all the videos relating to Limitation Act.. Well explained👌
@kamleshbarot989 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely Amazing Heartly and Rights Saying Word's, Good luck for future life Opportunity and Benefits in all fields. LimitationsAct1963 Article (65) & (27)12yrs, Actual Possession Applicable A Suit for Possession.
@preetivyas6635 Жыл бұрын
Awesome Too much helpful your teaching to us🎉😊
@shalushekhawat51042 жыл бұрын
You explain with lucidity. Extremely helpful videos
@aryanyadav102 жыл бұрын
I watched all your videos of LIMITATION ACT ....and even of SRA ...the way you explained everything is impeccable ....i would share this video as much as I can with my fellow friends who are preparing for judiciary
@avinashkumarverma3485 Жыл бұрын
Your understanding and the way u teach us is excellent
@LegalPathshala Жыл бұрын
Thanks alot god bless you always Do share with others also 🙏
@rajveersinghchauhan98483 жыл бұрын
Nice vedio 👌....kya zabardast samjhatein Hain aap ekdam desi language main
@karansincharge Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir. You’ve put my mind at ease. God bless you ❤
@Anymi54 жыл бұрын
Your videos are amazing...!! U explained each detail very deeply...!! Thank you so so much!!!
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
thanks
@mansiagrawal14444 жыл бұрын
your videos are too helpful for us...Thank you so much for such a detailed explanation. Your way of teaching is amazing and we can easily understand the whole section without any doubt.
@victormike31498 ай бұрын
Best video hai bhai. Thanks .
@sonasharma44134 жыл бұрын
your vidoes are good and explained detail very deeply Bhut bhut shukriya sir 🙏
@nehayadav48463 жыл бұрын
sir ur way of teaching is very well. pls make more videos on cpc as soon as possible.
@saimasaima25344 жыл бұрын
Thankyou so mach sir easy samjh aya aapki awaz bahut achchi h 👍
@anupriya40033 ай бұрын
Very good🎉
@devendrathakur60173 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir phli bar limitations smjh Aaya
@LegalPathshala3 жыл бұрын
Do share with others also
@zalaabhijeetsinh41014 жыл бұрын
Good information sir.. Ye pagdi system pe jo shop 30 years se Ho usme bhi yahi judgment harega please answer digit sirji..
@K_A_Mod2 жыл бұрын
Love ur videos 👍
@kamleshbarot989 Жыл бұрын
Civil court or Revenue court laws direction apply or not? Which is best for Adverse Possession Article (65) and (27) Extinguished of right to Property.
@hemantkumar-gc3nf2 жыл бұрын
Every section explains is very well
@luvish72474 жыл бұрын
Really a great teacher with excellent skills to explain the technicalities of the provision
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot Do share with others also U can join us for online classes of judiciary contact 8950476640
@KamalK03023 ай бұрын
Sir property me movable bhi include hogi, ? Anny example with judgement?
@salism0b2 жыл бұрын
Sir excellent videos
@abhishek51173 жыл бұрын
Plz add Case...rajender prasad vs. Santa singh ...nice explain...
@CyrusJain Жыл бұрын
bohot vadya video ha bhai
@kartikjain48533 жыл бұрын
Owsm Sir👌🏼
@shradhanjalimohanty2865 Жыл бұрын
Sir the time for proving of adverse possession is 12 yrs or 20 yrs ?? In sec. 25 it says about 25 but in this video you've said 12. Which one is correct ??
@mahaktiwari1648 Жыл бұрын
Sir agar kisi ko nahi pata ho by any reason ki koi uski property ki posession le kar betha ha tab? Uska right bhi jaayega?
@habibaman33732 жыл бұрын
excellent job.. ❤❤❤
@ProPakistani-r4t4 жыл бұрын
Every section explained very well
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot Do share with others also 🙏
@ProPakistani-r4t4 жыл бұрын
@@LegalPathshala of course
@aartisharma46314 жыл бұрын
Substantial aspect is given in section 25,26,27 it is not exclusively section -27
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
Very true
@rajeshsoni20763 жыл бұрын
Sir agar samne government property he or usme kisine possession liya hua he to time period kitna hota he or kya right phir us person ka ho jata hain govt property pe??
@omniloquent28422 жыл бұрын
Sir, what might be intent to provide ownership to such person who is in adverse possession?? What rationale behind s.27 of limitations act
@aradhanajena57964 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation ..
@marutibagadi38224 жыл бұрын
Very good video sir information in s.27
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot
@rahulprasad39644 жыл бұрын
what if mr A is not in physical control, possession and mr B has acquired the property for more than 20 years .But mr A has the title and he is paying land revenue of property acquired by mr B.
@saritadevi-mo2kc3 жыл бұрын
Sir I have a question Section 27 applies to suit only Sec 27 does not extinguishthe right in execution proceeding
@sumanbhaiprajapati46643 жыл бұрын
Whether possession taken is also
@lawyerparijat4 жыл бұрын
Nice. Thank you 😊
@madanrauthan8684 жыл бұрын
Nice lecture be regular
@shavanakhan9778 Жыл бұрын
Sir if A had no knowledge that the property is his which is in possession of B in that case sec 27 apply?
@redcriminal79042 жыл бұрын
Nice example
@varshatripathi24494 жыл бұрын
well explained plz mention book for limitation
@rahulprasad39644 жыл бұрын
what if mr A is paying land revenue of the land which mr B is claming of adverse possession.
@saurabhrohilla4873 жыл бұрын
As per the illustration you have stated for the understanding, can't it be called as a permissive possession! As it is a well known fact that consent for possession, either express or implied, be called as permissive possession i.e. a possession that is in the knowledge of the owner or the person having title that is completely opposite to the adverse possession. But under this provision the person having possession must be in adverse possession to make this principle applicable to the issue. Help me to understand it and correct me if I'm wrong, somewhere.
@sumanbhaiprajapati46643 жыл бұрын
Property possessed by a person is also one of the owner of the said property. What is remedy in the matter
@harparkashsingh76603 жыл бұрын
Wahehuru g
@mayankmehta64014 жыл бұрын
Wow great Sir. Your all videos are gud. Sir kya aap coaching class conduct krte ho.
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
Call me on this number 8950476640 or WhatsApp me
@mayankmehta64014 жыл бұрын
Thnk you so much Sir. You r doing a great work.
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
My pleasure
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
@@mayankmehta6401 welcome
@shubhamverma63012 жыл бұрын
Sir,I want to purchase a plot in which present seller bought land from a mother ,her major son and a minor son about 12 years ago . Mother sold property as nomni of minor son without permission of court . Now age of minor child is 23 years . What may be issue in future in buying this property?. If any issue arises then share of minor son will be disputed or whole part of plot including share of mother, major son will be disputed?
@user-fc9ft2ok7t4 жыл бұрын
adverse possession prf krne k lye adhr crd or rsn crd yh ho skta hai kiya
@nightingale40714 жыл бұрын
Nice video sir
@prakashrathod48773 жыл бұрын
Sir, if I am a tenant for more than 12 years, can I take that property under adverse possession?
@anjalikaur80534 жыл бұрын
Sir, In this section can we pursue negligence or reckless of that person who not instituted suit for possession of his property???
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
Yes but it depends upon the facts and circumstances of the case and very from case to case
@sumanbhaiprajapati46643 жыл бұрын
What is the status of co owner of the property. Can it will apply also to co owner of the property.
@parthkopariha2803 жыл бұрын
can a person file a declaration suit on the basis of easement? doesn't it says that easement can only be used as a shield and not as a sword?
@adv.ashwinipande94134 ай бұрын
Sir sec 27 of limitation act kya ye ancentral property ko apply karta hai kya
@swtys95504 жыл бұрын
Sir sec 27 m agar B usko kabja time pura hone k baad lotana chahe to nhi lota skta kya .......??
@dinkermishra18474 жыл бұрын
Sir, what is adverse dispossession ??
@rishidixit45113 жыл бұрын
Guru 🔥🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@purushottammahajan136 Жыл бұрын
Thanks 😊
@shivaniNimade094 жыл бұрын
Well explained 😊
@chandnikhan89494 жыл бұрын
Thank-you so much sir
@JMIC2 жыл бұрын
What is the exceptions of section 27 Of limitation act
@lawschool554 жыл бұрын
Very very good sir ji
@saichiranjeevpradhan9679 Жыл бұрын
So clear
@mukeshkashnia73064 жыл бұрын
I want to know that can I file a suite against government as I have been in possession of their land more than 12 years is section 27 of limitation act applicable against government
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
30 years against government
@mukeshkashnia73064 жыл бұрын
@@LegalPathshala 30 years from the building constructed by them or from the land they acquired from my grand father...
@gajanandsharma89424 жыл бұрын
My father expired in 1983 we remained in possession pacefully till day without mutation of agriculture land of father in 2007 my sister's open mutation by collussion their name with us Can we claim of reverse possession
@ramchandrapatil53683 жыл бұрын
Sir i want this decision is wrong what owner can do adverse possession denied
@tiwari729611 ай бұрын
Sir 12 year or 20 year m confuse ho rh hu thoda section 25 m 20 year h or 27 m 12 year?
@zabasarohi89074 жыл бұрын
Thanks ...sir ....
@jazzkhurana9513 жыл бұрын
How about section 28-32 of Limitation Act ?
@mk151184 жыл бұрын
Sir agar koi govt land DDA land par last 35 years se kabza karke baitha ho to kya vo land uski ho gayi aur use declare kaise karva sakte hai
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
Suit file kr k
@mk151184 жыл бұрын
@@LegalPathshala to DDA use hata nhi sakti kya vha se Delhi me
@mk151184 жыл бұрын
@@LegalPathshala sir agar DDA ne use encroachment karrar diya ho par karyevahi nhi ki ho 35 years se aur zameen Delhi me ho
@geetikatewari66684 жыл бұрын
Sir please sec 29 par bhi lecture bna dijiye..
@musharrafkhan31923 жыл бұрын
bhai aap kafi simplest way main samjhtey ho aap is limitation act ki schedule or kara de because within month my BALLB 9th sem exam shall begin
@bharatjangra30572 жыл бұрын
Bhai ki property par bhi lagu ha kya ya
@samikhyamishra82894 жыл бұрын
Thank u
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot Do share with your friends also You can also join us for online classes of judiciary contact 8950476640
@Shivamgupta-hq1lf3 жыл бұрын
Kya b property bech sakta hai
@amreetrath24103 жыл бұрын
what is the difference between s 27 and s25
@marutibagadi38224 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
Thanks to u also
@sapnabilkhu73254 жыл бұрын
So sweet 😍😇
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot Do share with others also 🙏
@mussavvirkhan3912 Жыл бұрын
Good
@vivekkushwaha53977 ай бұрын
Bhaiya mere father ki job ek jagah h waha quarter bhi mila hai above 20 years ho gaya hai hamen yaha rehte huye hamara voter id or makan no. bhi h kya hum court me appeal kar sakte hai limitation act 1963 29 property wala.
@vivekkushwaha53977 ай бұрын
please reply me
@advsukhisidhu13214 жыл бұрын
Sir sec 25 me to easement right ke liye 20 year jruri hai but sec 27 me 12 year kise sir 27 smj nhi aa rha plz reply me
@hasmukhdalvadi48754 жыл бұрын
sar. limitasan ma dastavej citing kapt thi thay gayo hoi ane malik bhar gam rehto hoi tene 13 varse khabar pade 7/12 kathavta ke hu khatedar mati gyo su pasi tene Bhathai dokiument janva mate revniu ma R t i thi leta ane janta 4 Vars lage se to tema ava kapat karel hoi tema koi limitesan hoi te jaru janav so
@familylawdisputediscriptio53564 жыл бұрын
Guyz where is the telegram link ?
@Anymi54 жыл бұрын
Sir plz make a video on sec 30 pls!
@Anymi54 жыл бұрын
@@LegalPathshala ohk
@samritisingh10303 жыл бұрын
12years or 20 years?
@swtys95504 жыл бұрын
Sir Esme bhi Agar B property dena chahe to wo kyu nhi le skta
@rajivsaikia88363 жыл бұрын
Joi ho adverse possession
@ramchandrapatil53683 жыл бұрын
अच्छा है मगर अवैध कब्जा बिना मोबदला बिना कागजात है तक्रार की हे और असली मालीक ने उसी जमीन कर्ज लिये हैं टैक्स भरते है
@marutibagadi38224 жыл бұрын
Please sir another subject video made in this type sir
@LegalPathshala4 жыл бұрын
Sure will upload soon
@sandeeprao82673 жыл бұрын
Vakeel hone se kaam nhi chalna... paper b hone chaiye kabze k
@karamsingh42794 жыл бұрын
Sec 30 and 31 please upload
@noreenshoukat99934 жыл бұрын
✅✅
@OnkarSingh-mt1qe3 жыл бұрын
Kaya jahi Kanoon faimali land par lagu hota hai brothers & chacha ke sath possissen shirf ek bahi ke pass hai