Considerable shame this was cut short. If chess lessons were as celebrated as the game, I'd have called this Seirawan's Immortal - the whole lecture is the pinnacle of his legendary humour and insights, and he still manages to describe the concepts in a more meaningful manner than any number of the emotionless game analyses one can find on youtube. I think I have a mancrush.
@Jackets994Ай бұрын
Love Yasser’ commentary and stories. Such a deep knowledge of the game
@jasonrawls69599 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately the video ends prematurely.
@Rick-si1re4 жыл бұрын
That's exactly what I just said, I was super into that,......
@recursiveloop9 жыл бұрын
hang on - where is part 2 of this?
@lucassantana699311 ай бұрын
where's the rest of the video? 😢
@StefekBurczymucha11 жыл бұрын
the best story teller in chess world ! :D I want rest !! and more!! :D
@DrummerBoyJason10 жыл бұрын
Great chess player, even better story teller.
@cmdrfun111 жыл бұрын
I really hope they share the rest
@bochum1231238 жыл бұрын
would have been nice if you posted the remaining moves in the video description.
@BJor6411 жыл бұрын
42 minutes and no conclusion?
@chrisMuc196610 жыл бұрын
When will come part 2 of this video?
@dandiaz199347 жыл бұрын
I also really wish that this game was finished... I don't imagine it'd be possible for @Chess Club and Scholastic Center of Saint Louis to reupload, huh? :D (Had to try)
@good_opinion_haver11 жыл бұрын
Where is the rest of the video?
@AtomicMegaNerd11 жыл бұрын
Why the cutoff? :-(
@lucassantana699311 ай бұрын
yasser is always a pleasure to hear
@pward179 жыл бұрын
great speaker
@brabhamfreaman1667 жыл бұрын
That's such a great story! Dzhinzhi should've resigned move 1 to double his return on the mini-blitz tourney.
@BestSpinningMusic11 жыл бұрын
who is Julian?!!! :)))
@Zakdayak10 жыл бұрын
good question....I'm guessing Julian Proleiko
@ayushjena42574 жыл бұрын
We dont know that, but he sure has to be a GM, because Julian never blunders a piece
@rossgeller4223 жыл бұрын
JULIAN THE APOSTATE great roman empire 😃
@benpork85338 жыл бұрын
Does Shirazi appear on the movie Searching for Bobby Fischer? I think he plays a blitz game at the Central Park. He gets embarrassed by other players.
@Ronbo7108 жыл бұрын
Yes. But they call him a GM and he is an IM at that time.
@IngTomT2 жыл бұрын
Too bad the lecture ends too soon. After 15.f4 the evaluation is +0 but after 15...c4 it jumps to +2.85, so it seems this was the critical moment in the match.
@russelladams68819 жыл бұрын
That's Kamran Shirazi, man. Shirazi! The Grandmaster's here. You come to hustle the hustler. Don't look at my clock. My time is fine.
@fabiohellyeah76679 жыл бұрын
+russell adams Innocent Moves :)
@hugorneto9 жыл бұрын
I love yasser, but someone have to teach him how to use the computer for pointing out the moves he's trying to explain. Pointing at the screen is just not helpful...
@jaccoschutter21384 жыл бұрын
how end this game?
@JoelPinaMovies11 жыл бұрын
I've been wondering, what program is used in these lecture videos?
@IScipioI10 жыл бұрын
best intro ever!!!
@kkrol2111 жыл бұрын
According to Houdini after f4 black is better:) And Bxc3 was the best move in the position for black. Sometimes illogical moves are the best
You find the rest here: www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1122931
@davidelederman73376 жыл бұрын
Bxc3 is the best move and in that position according to the engine
@hakaaannnn9 жыл бұрын
can someone expain why dark bishop is more valuable then ligth?
@bionicbuttmuffin77248 жыл бұрын
It not the bishop, but the square. A dark squared bishop is more valuable due to the fact that it is on the same path as the opponent's king.
@Kentasokapellos8 жыл бұрын
Also black played g6, you normally wouldn't push the pawns in front of your king unless you had to (or its in the move order of the opening). The black bishop on g7 controls a lot of centre squares, and defends h6 and f6 that you weakened with g6.
@jimmyalderson16396 жыл бұрын
hakaaannnn because black put all the pawns which were infront of his king on white squares. That means the pawns can only defend white squares, and if they wanted to defend dark squares then they would have to move forwards even more making the king even more unsafe. Usually doing this is fine if you fianchetto your dark bishop on g7, so that the dark squares around your king are also defended. But not only did Shirazi not fianchetto his bishop, but he gave his dark square bishop away. In other words, the dark squares are weak because black has no dark squared bishop, so if white were to attack a single dark square with all his pieces, black would be unable to defend it with all his pieces as his white bishop is unable to attack dark squares. Because the dark squares are weak, white's dark bishop is very powerful As well as this, white has many pawns on white squares, which limit the mobility of his own white squared bishop and so it is of less power. And so the value of the dark bishop goes up because of black's pawns being on white squares, and the attacking value of the white bishop goes down as all of white's pawns are on wte squares. So relative to each other, the dark squared bishop is worth much more than both black's and white's light squared bishops
@GautomChutia-sc8qq6 жыл бұрын
according to chess strtegy light square bishop is strong asset for white than black one.because it can hit f7 square.soft spot.Same way dark square one is strong for black
@Minerva66995 ай бұрын
Kamran shirazi was an IM though
@MrGaia6 жыл бұрын
Your white bishop on D3, why would you even care about it? I figure trading that dead bishop for and active and mortal knight is worth it, right ...?
@svfox2 жыл бұрын
I thought ra4 because I myself am crazy.. I love rook to a4 !!!!!!!
@Cholo89433 жыл бұрын
He saw Rook a4 and Yasser didn't like it 18:50
@benkargosha473611 жыл бұрын
Let me tell you all a secret.. Kamran actually served at Japanese Navy back to world war 2 as a kamikaze pilots !