SEM113 - Reference

What is the relation between a word and an object and how can we define this relationship? This superficially trival questions stands in the center of this E-Lecture where J. Handke discusses types of reference, the notion of concepts and briefly looks at prototype theory.

[@hasanhawari4880]

The best teacher who teaches linguistics using advanced tech in KZbin and maybe the whole world. Big heart Prof Handke! Keep up the good work Prof and the rest of the team.

[@astraldreamhead193]

Thank you so much for your wonderful videos, I am so grateful. Your ability to teach is really focused, I thoroughly enjoyed your video lecutres.

[@hannatay8142]

informative lecture.. helping me to get better understanding via different point of view

[@fatimahal-shammiri5244]

Good illustration. Thanks

[@prolitcom]

Thanks, an outstanding lecture.

[@AmeerPlays]

Thank you so much for this lecture, it was really helpful!

[@ShahKhalid-ex6gf]

Great one lecture

[@ravycheang9342]

we can classify the types of references into 3 three types because we have some deixis like article or adv. However, in Khmer language, we do not have article, so how can we recognize which one is definite, indefinite or generic reference?

[@mariaisabelcatafesta5613]

I would like to know what types of activities would you recommend to reach the prototypes put into practice in activities? I was so thankful! Please, help me.

[@safaayham2847]

Thank you!

[@thehealer3312]

thanx alots

[@majakruszyniak1079]

I have a question is it possible for you to make a video about definiteness ?

[@kimijully7797]

What helps identify the referent of a referring expression in an utterance or a conversation? Give an example.

[@03riyamoniakter56]

Please,, i want to learn the definition of definite,indefinite and generic reference.

[@octamalakian1530]

Sir, excuse me, in 4.12, I see in the box there the word of 'PDE'. What does it stand for? Thanks

[@oer-vlc]

Present-Day English

[@octamalakian1530]

@@oer-vlc Thanks, Prof.

[@berlinaroids]

I do understand that "Love" is to abstract a lexeme to define conditions, yet I still fail to understand why "house" is as well. Couldn't one put at least a label such as (e.g) [+ SOLID] on it?

[@berlinaroids]

or [+ INANIMATE]

[@oer-vlc]

At 15:00 it is meant that not HOUSE is "abstract" but the definition of meaning in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions is too abstract - a case of unwanted ambiguity.

[@berlinaroids]

AH, I see! Thank you very much for answering that quickly.

[@user-js6wg2tx2s]

好😄

[@americarasin8905]

1:35 Denotation

[@americarasin8905]

3:13 Definite Reference

[@americarasin8905]

5:03 Indefinite Reference

[@americarasin8905]

10:45 Onomatopoeia

[@americarasin8905]

14:05 Conditions

[@americarasin8905]

15:50 Prototype

[@RobAGabor]

Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.

[@ungefiezergreeter6034]

Small*

[@nestycb6702]

In spanish cocks say "cocorocó". Like English but with a different vowel, and less talkative than german HAHA