I do love this guy! I'm in a small investigation at my university, and, well, my play in it contains all these basic concepts to Pragmatics. Furthermore, I'm glad that my mother talked me into studying English, otherwise I wouldn't understand these videos. So, from Lima, Peru, Thank you for making these explanations!
@alansaldana34228 жыл бұрын
La policía del pensamiento le recomendaría citar amigo ( : Un saludo desde México
@oer-vlc12 жыл бұрын
The perlocutionary act denotes the intended effect that the speaker wants to achieve with the illocutionary act. In the case of the example used in this E-Lecture ("Don't do that!"), the warning (illocutionary act) may be intended to "prevent the young child from an electric shock". It is important to note that the intended effect is always special to the respective situation. JH
@GabrielAlves-fl5gq Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, Teacher!!! You helped me to understand what I was reading for a week. I'm glad I found you!!!
@mugdhamodak88823 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir for making the whole uninteresting thing easier and fun.😊
@alpithehun6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much lots of love from Turkey by your fellow colleague
@fatimahal-shammiri52446 жыл бұрын
Marvellous! I finally understand the SA theory in a simple way thanks
@lorenagiselaojeda44514 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making the Speech Act Theory so easy to follow. I couldn't understand it very well before watching this video.
@fatimahal-shammiri52446 жыл бұрын
Thank you, it is a well-illustrated lecture about the theory of speech act.
@jassimmohammed53465 жыл бұрын
A wonderful lecture by a wonderful lecturer , everything was clear, thank you so much and go on presenting such lectures especially on pragmatic theories
@houdazouar61468 жыл бұрын
thank you so much sir your presentation has just enlightened my brain after a struggle with this theory. such a great help
@amordagame24398 жыл бұрын
Your presentation is really enlightening. Thanks for the effort put into this. I'm grateful!
@monthessagacayan3 жыл бұрын
I love how you simplify these terms in 14 minutes. Heheheh glad I watched the video.
@sarahmarie198611 жыл бұрын
The term "promise" suggests that the person who is invited to the party would have less interest in his/her joining the party than the person who invited him/her, because the act of joining the party would be at the expense of the invited person, which, with parties, is usually not the case. Under certain conditions the utterance could be correct, for example, if the invited person is much more popular than the inviting person.
@noneucucnone430710 жыл бұрын
A small observation , minute 6 .41 what is it , not to perform ? It is the action of touching, etc. the socket , it is not the socket it self ,once the socket does not involve any act or consequence by it self Great that this type of videos are on line
@str1ke43411 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for an excellent lecture. I will be using your lectures as a source of reference during my degree an glad i stumbled acros s such excellent tutorials. Thank you
@andresfelipeev4 жыл бұрын
This YT channel is incredible! I'm a foreign language student and I'm really planning to study a master of linguistics in some future, and this channel motivates me to do it! Your explanations are perfectly clear! I've watched your videos since 2 years ago when I studied a course of general linguistics, keep it going! Congrats!
@raisa_cherry355 жыл бұрын
The 'I promise I ll come to your party' with the finger up is hysterical 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@davidmahlum62338 жыл бұрын
Fantastic and Clear explanation! Good work!
@MaithamSarhan6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your hard working but there is one thing you should take in consideration next time your doing a great video like this , Please don’t talk like a book or read from a book, we can read a book at home. The reason why we watch lectures on KZbin is to get clear insights about theories mentioned in books and watching your videos don’t make it easier but it makes it harder. Love and respect ✊
@messengerboymedia10 жыл бұрын
Incredible! Great video! Thank you so much for taking the time to make it!
@SacredGeometryDecoded10 жыл бұрын
You've got to read The User Illusion by Tor Norretranders, you'll love it.
@d.bunker6087 жыл бұрын
Nice summary. You can hear Austin's voice online in the video "J.L. Austin speaks." He talks about how true/false is really a false dichotomy.
@oer-vlc11 жыл бұрын
I'll answer your question in the Questions of the Month Video "February 2013". JH
@vansynong133111 жыл бұрын
Thank you, from Laos. Doing studying Linguistic. Its help a lot.
@mohammedbinelasfar48294 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for your assistance and your support, sir
@dinapuiu17254 жыл бұрын
Well-done. Everything so clearly exemplified.
@medtayebrahali67265 жыл бұрын
really good and explicite presentation.thx
@abdelhalimchouli75318 жыл бұрын
amazingly simplified ! thank you sir
@Rishon3792 жыл бұрын
Thanks a million,Sir 🙏🌹
@jedenastykot1110 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your lectures
@languagedrive9521 Жыл бұрын
Einfach super, vielen Dank! :)
@m.s.k29518 жыл бұрын
love u and ur way of explinations, from Iraq
@maciejukasiewicz766111 жыл бұрын
I guess that will depend on the power relationship between you and that person. Not the actual one, but the power relationship that each speaker BELIEVES he has with the other one. The observer must know what each of them thinks his position of power is before attempting to name the many potential meanings.
@hichemdjilali60497 жыл бұрын
great explanation !
@cristinabociba734310 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation. I would like to find more about speech theory act related to the notions of face (Goffman) and relational work (Locher and Watts.)
@Robertosarau10 жыл бұрын
That's pretty clear. Thanks for this video.
@aleksandrab.62782 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I had trouble understanding it before, but this video really helped!
@jimenaazua572510 жыл бұрын
This was really helpful. Thank you very much
@shaheerasamim80013 жыл бұрын
Excellently explained.! Thank you.!
@yassmineaissi96637 жыл бұрын
thank you it's very helpful 😇😇
@mahenderkujur18428 жыл бұрын
wonderful session
@oer-vlc12 жыл бұрын
Honestly, I do not know whether Chomsky dismisses Searle's approach to speeach acts. But certainly, as far as I know, pragmatics has not been a major goal of Chomsky's research. JH
@tansthegreat9 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, Sir.
@ruin.daniel10 жыл бұрын
What is the general view in the linguistic community about the Searle vs. Derrida debate (or non-debate) about speech acts that happened in the early 70s?
@jiangwei71176 жыл бұрын
thanks for the information
@patcharinkangkha16611 жыл бұрын
Very clear and Thanks a lot
@maqr0ll12 жыл бұрын
Since you brought him up, why does Chomsky dismiss Searl? Would he likewise dismiss pragmatics as making no substantive contribution to linguistics?
@moraddemnati50146 жыл бұрын
just amazing
@icenice94684 жыл бұрын
Thank u so much. it really helped me to understand a lot.
@medievalmusiclover5 жыл бұрын
Well done and good lecture.
@junjunan126512 жыл бұрын
I like the explanation because it's easy to understand. but could you please explain perlocutionary acts more? I don't really understand that
@_ankitaprasad_4 жыл бұрын
This was amazing!
@ohnoferi85233 жыл бұрын
thanks for the insight! but what is speech act now helpful for? what problems does it solve in meaning?
@trisix9911 жыл бұрын
and if not is it really legitimate to analyze language or arguments via logic? Thanks!
@trisix9911 жыл бұрын
is it possible to get full meaning of a sentence or word without pragmatics? Without context?
@rahmadjebbari281611 жыл бұрын
I have a problem with the locution,prellocution and illocution please help!
@olafaris13082 жыл бұрын
Thank you more
@geraldinebaranal23575 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!!!
@benzianabdou37404 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@janaknepal32289 жыл бұрын
very good,
@elenagavrilova3109 Жыл бұрын
thank you!
@YesAhmad4 жыл бұрын
you saved my day
@mohammedbinelasfar48296 жыл бұрын
VERY NICE
@jxxx82134 жыл бұрын
thanks
@thestagbeetle8888 жыл бұрын
How about Rogatives?
@feziwesezzy68305 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@hugo547586 жыл бұрын
Jurgen, in der Tat kannst du to my party coming. :)
@saraalsubaie783110 жыл бұрын
good
@MDYtama5 жыл бұрын
if i watched and subs'ed you, i would not repeat my semantic class in my last year of college.
@parnamedhi2 жыл бұрын
Are all utterances speech acts?
@raphaelmadrid4 жыл бұрын
May I ask what software is being used in this lecture?
@paveethra15 жыл бұрын
thank you
@theallseeingkuma15695 жыл бұрын
I still don't know the difference of Directive and Declaration...
@teejanwaheed12575 жыл бұрын
Good evening my research topic is about 'Speech Act theory in Teaching student's can you help me please with any new idea?