Set Theory : Distributive laws (Written Proof)

[@YuvarajMadha]

Very nicely Explained and you are actually going to save my exam tomorrow.

[@weird4003]

Bro?

[@benedictding]

Thank you for providing such clear and easy understanding proofs.

[@antipsikiyatriKizi]

Best proof on KZbin!

[@MyFFFFingTube]

This proof is very good, however as some people have pointed out it lacks just a tiny bit of information/comments to be complete. What you proved is that left side (LS) of each equality is a subset of the right side (RS) (you showed that all element in LS are also in RS). In order to show that the sets are equal you must also show that the RS is part of the LS. Fortunately it is just the same proof backwards, however it is important to note this very anal step if the proof is to be complete. That goes for most proofs with sets. Sets A=B if: 1.A subset of B 2.B subset of A

[@bhagyashreeurao7931]

true

[@77Evangelico]

You're right

[@mrinmoyde2530]

Right

[@lawalayinla2908]

Ma can you help me proof the following set

[@iambot8041]

What did u write in the 11th line💀

[@natashazulu7229]

Really well explained, thank you!

[@michaelaterkucmalek5839]

I have enjoyed your lecture madam

[@gayathrik1803]

Very good explanation mam

[@sthwalotv1586]

Well explained thank you very useful

[@singhravi9653]

Well explained. thank you very much

[@MrNobody-wl4ce]

You save me from my Assignment 🥺

[@VongaiMatizanadzo]

Well explained thank you

[@DanishAli-oc9dv]

Good Explain

[@studyindia607]

Nice teaching ma'am ❤️❤️❤️

[@RajeshKamboj]

A very good explanation mam, thanx a lot. Your voice is very sweet :)

[@MathsSmart]

+Rajesh Kamboj Thank you !

[@jaddu6918]

Good explanation

[@davidlasry3559]

Well done!! Thank you for your help

[@MIbtehajKhan]

Thanks Ma'am, you explained really well. God bless you.

[@muhammadhabibumuhammad701]

Nice one

[@markchiyuka8781]

Thanks for that i really appreciate the way u teach

[@louise1021]

Thanks so much! It's hard to find a good explanation like yours.

[@amanxo1]

THANK YOU SO SO MUCH!

[@ashitoshdangat8890]

nice explanation

[@harshnayak3243]

loved it mam

[@divyanggupta488]

Nice

[@juderono211]

Thank you so much

[@dheepdsouza]

Thank you ma'am

[@satishbania5882]

Mam is your name Mahima Chaturvedi?

[@justicealearner2357]

I love your videos... I'd like to acclaim your way of teaching.

[@abuhuraira3858]

Thanks

[@AryanSingh-zw2if]

Thanks mam

[@ankitraina4047]

litt..thanks

[@chhavi069]

Thank u ma'am😊

[@almidahngwenyama9364]

you are a star, thanks a lot

[@Bicycle.dreaming]

Thank you so much Ma'am!

[@akshaykrishnak7696]

Thanks a lot mam for such a good explanation..

[@DanielSColao]

Great video! Thanks!

[@anugrahmasih6347]

Wrong method, we have to prove that both of them are subset of each other

[@toptrendenglishsongs4034]

i agree

[@Soosnathan]

Right?^^

[@meltmks]

where is the left proofs ???

[@surendraediga7607]

really more helpfull thanks a lot

[@qwertysingh3229]

ye associative law hai , distributive nhi

[@boorlehemanth4518]

good explanation mam.

[@creative9605]

❤️❤️❤️

[@rajaryanagrawal1207]

how do u prove (a n b) u (a - b) = a

[@acidtoe1278]

probably too late but here goes x e A and x e B or x e A and x e B' which means x e A and x e B or x e B' (B or B' together create the universal set) x e A and x e U (a intersection with universal set is equal to the first set) x e A therefore (a n b) u (a-b) is a subset of a proving the other subset is just the reverse of all the steps

[@joeatethebeans1981]

🍪have a cookie :)

[@premkumar-fb4gt]

Thanks ur the gods for all

[@omgrider1339]

O

[@bushra7352]

I love you❤❤❤❤❤

[@nithishkumarmaari1209]

I love you

[@ShivKumar-hj1ce]

You should also proved the conversely. Ok👍

[@charymn8947]

mam I hope this two laws may be correct but in NDA book as you told it is not there I have confused really can you clarify my doubt please please help me from my trouble

[@musaibmemon8412]

very clever people

[@EsperanceBG]

thank you!

[@hudahuda5477]

thank you very much . but can't you a proof the other sides . I mean the left and right . thank you again

[@adeldaman]

Its the same thing backwards once you prove one side....

[@hudahuda5477]

Adel El-Frih oh.thanx😊

[@ShivKumar-hj1ce]

you have not completely proved this law

[@surendraediga7607]

commutative law associative law identity law complement law double complement law universal bonds law absarption law set difference law should be explained by u it will be more helpful for us pls mam load that video early

[@Follow_the_damn_train]

Thank you ❤️❤️

[@gnation855]

Thanks