SGC Reveal, Missing the Mark?!?! HOF RC's and More!

[@DiamondyardSportscards]

Great variety of stuff, my friend. I agree, you certainly got some love on those. Indian Gum are just outstanding, love the Monte and the Roberts RCs.

[@stuke1976]

Nice return, that Medicine man card is really cool.

[@michaelcreeden1560]

Love that 62 Aaron All-Star. I just got mine back from SGC as a 6.5 as well.

[@alltimesportscards]

Good call on the 62 Aaron. I've had cards that look like that where SGC gives a 5.5

[@vintagesanctuary]

John, thank you for another awesome reveal video! 😊 I wonder if SGC had some relatively new graders on your order? Remember the '52 Topps Willie Mays PSA Authentic I bought at the National last year? I just got it back from SGC today (sent it to SGC in the PSA slab for crossover) and it got a numerical grade! It is in my latest video!

[@Doors067]

I don't like over-rated cards You sir are the true collector and truly unique

[@jamespinette9403]

Good show, nice reveal. The only one I disagree on is the 62 AllStar Aaron. Imo, that looks like a solid 6.5 grade to me , very clean card with minute touches on the corners.

[@jpwiscobaseballcards1192]

I have a Morinaga card that is miscut wide on one side. From that example I know the cards were surrounded by white on the sheet, so there is no way yours was miscut too large since all the borders are fully cream. I guess it is possible it was miscut too thin or short although it just looks off center to me. Nice card regardless!

[@ClementeCollector]

More proof, the grading companies can’t identify the trimmers. Scary. Definitely feels like SGC was way too lenient with the grades. Maybe all the same grader and he was new. Do you feel bulk submitters get you better grades at PSA or SGC?

[@frankspicci9994]

Good video bro. I like some of those cards for sure.

[@mikeorz111]

Fun sub overall!

[@RHDHfan]

I'd be interested in that 55 Berra if you want to move it as is? I need one for a set I'm finishing. Let me know how I can contact you...

[@thebatterycarlylerood]

You didn't share the back of the card; but, usually when a card is labeled as a "miscut", it's because part of the card is "missing." And by "missing", I don't mean that there's paper loss. I mean that some of the text on the back got cut off or some of the picture on the front was trimmed off or shifted off. Your card looks nice on the front, so I'm guessing that maybe the back isn't aligned properly and maybe you see some of the next card on the back or some of your card is cut off?

[@TalkingBallCards]

Thanks for watching, the back of the card is all there though! All the text and or border intact!

[@vintagepsaandmore473]

Pulling my hair out on those 56’s.......

[@nathanmulkey]

Sometimes we see what we want to see.

[@TalkingBallCards]

I can’t really say that I want to see lower grades, rather, just expect accurate ones. Just calling it like I see it!

[@nathanmulkey]

@@TalkingBallCards .....exactly

[@sw1217]

While I like the tux on most vintage cards, I'm not a fan of '71 Topps in a Tux. The black on black just doesn't do it for me. That would be an easy sell for me.