【攝影教學 #91】Sony A1 vs Canon R5 追焦比較 (A1追焦 EP1) 南生圍(Sony vs Canon 600mm F4) (CC 中文字幕) -Alex Fung

在廠方的定位上，R5是準專業機Prosumer，而A1是旗艦機 Flagship
歡迎訂閱我的KZbin頻道，按小鈴圖案接收最新上載通知。
#稍後還有A1 vs R5的第二集(EP2)和兩集的A1低光拍攝測試，會稍後上載。
【攝影教學 #89】Sony A1 + Zeiss Batis 40mm CF 高解像微距拍攝(追蹤對焦)
• 【攝影教學 #89】Sony A1 + Ze...
【攝影教學 #87】Sony A1 vs A9II 雀鳥實時眼睛自動對焦測試 (FE200-600mm) Bird Eye AF Test 2
• 【攝影教學 #87】Sony A1 vs A...
【攝影教學 #86】Sony A1 雀鳥實時眼睛自動對焦測試 (FE200-600mm) Bird Eye AF Test 1
• 【攝影教學 #86】Sony A1 雀鳥實時...
今天來到南生圍，主要是比較兩部相機， 之前已經使用過數次Sony α1，有網上朋友希望我比較α1和R5的追焦表現，為了相同的測試條件，今次我帶了兩支600mm F4鏡頭，Sony α1配上原廠的FE 600/4 GM再加上1.4X的增距鏡，而Canon R5 配上原廠的600/4 III 及1.4X增距鏡III，這樣兩部相機的測試條件會相近，可以看看追焦的效果如何 ?
大家在網上已經看到不少測試的短片，但和我們實際上應用會有些分別，今次因為是拍攝雀鳥，所以使用較長的鏡頭，而兩支600mm的鏡頭都加上1.4X增距鏡，對相機的對焦或有些微影響，但分別不大，這樣的設定正是我們實際拍攝的情況。
首先我使用α1，大家亦看到拍攝距離較遠，但間中亦可以辨認到雀鳥的眼睛，這隻雀鳥的眼睛並不明顯，以這樣遠的距離仍然間中可以辨認得到，算是不錯，就算辨認不到眼睛，亦可以對焦在頭部或身體。
之後換上Canon EOS R5，同樣配上600mm F4鏡頭和1.4X增距鏡，因為兩個品牌的對焦系統不同，所以看見的對焦點會有一些分別，R5的對焦同樣是準確和快速，至於兩部相機的比較，我覺得兩部的對焦都非常好，但α1有一個雀鳥眼部對焦的專用模式，我覺得α1在雀鳥眼部對焦方面就略為優勝，我相信Canon R5稍後會有firmware update，將雀鳥眼部對焦的表現提升，而大家又覺得這兩部相機的表現如何呢？歡迎留言討論。
希望同大家分享相機鏡頭、攝影、航拍、旅遊的體驗、心得同樂趣，當然亦唔少得美食。
Alex Fung，獲得多個國際性的攝影學會高級名銜（英國皇家攝影學會RPS，美國攝影學會PSA，國際影藝聯盟FIAP），8次獲得世界攝影沙龍十傑（其中旅遊相片組世界第一名），喜好旅遊攝影，對風光、建築及紀實攝影有一定的經驗和心得，希望與各位同好分享。
FRPS, GMPSA, EFIAP/p, FPSEA, FNCPA, FMTRMPC, FGPC, FUAPA, FAPU, APSA, APSHK, SAWIEP, PSA Galaxy (PPDC, PPDM, PIDC, PIDM, ND, PTD), Hon.FMPC, Hon.FPSEA, Hon,FHKYMTPA, Hon.FPSM, Hon.FMDPA, Hon.PSEA, Hon.MPC, Hon.UAPA
我們的KZbin頻道：bit.ly/2SNSBWL
攝影課程及活動： / artfotohk. .
Facebook： / alexfungmy
MeWe : mewe.com/i/ale...

[@arigawong4666]

個人認為R5非旗艦機的說法不太準確，r5本身的整體性能已經抵觸比它早半年出的1dxiii，而r5亦沒有任何性能上明顯有收藏實力吱牙膏，即是r5已經是當時推出時全力一擊的旗艦機，只是為什麼命名5而讓人感覺非旗艦級1，我個人覺得是巿場定位問題，因為當時東奧臨近，canon急忙發表1dxiii和r5，而r5性能明顯比1dxiii優勝，所以為免影響1dxiii銷情，而當時r5流傳售價達5萬，反對聲音相當高，所以把新旗艦無反定義低一級的5，並下降目標售價，一來安慰已買1dxiii的用家，二來增加無反巿場的競爭力，達至用家能以較合理價格購買足以媲美旗艦性能的機種，大大增加話題性重新搶佔巿場。畢竟要轉型，賺錢之前必須先有充分的巿佔份額是營銷之道。但事實上r5本來已經是canon盡全力推出的旗艦級機種。當然科技每日都在進步，昨天的旗艦不代表今天，未來一兩年技術進步了，把新的旗艦級命為1，那就是名正言順的旗艦，但必須要知道，你今天的技術進步了，別人的技術同樣在進步，這種無了期的比較只滿足自己的心情是毫無意義的，買器材買自己用得開心的就對，畢竟最重要的永遠不是器材。

[@user-on3th5cs3t]

比較很明顯,A1 比 R5 好很多. A1基本上 focus 在鳥的身體或眼, 但 R5 有部份只追焦在鳥尾的C眼. 只要各位留心看多幾次就會發現,R5追焦在尾部.

[@peteryungcp]

這個當然...R5係用咗EF轉RF轉接環，這個情況我覺得很正常。

[@lawrencelam1820]

多謝馮sir的精彩製作

[@sanfordlee7279]

多谢老师比较。单从手杋看，个人感觉，R5立体感稍强。

[@kaiyin1988]

感謝分享😍希望Canon快D出番齊RF鏡同埋R1生生性性性D出先有得旗艦機Vs旗艦機

[@jinglianxue948]

老师你好。你的Olympus瞄準器在那里可以买得到呢？我以前都没有用过，所以跟踪飞鳥时好多时候都跟吾上不知去向了。多谢你！

[@alexfungsir]

你好，在旺角星際或上網買都可以。 可以參考這一條片 ： kzbin.info/www/bejne/fWqco52Kgr2kbpY

[@ngj1592]

我在旺角總代理買的，較冷門零售店不一定有。

[@alexfungsir]

@@ngj1592 多謝提供資料給網友參考。

[@user-hx3kc1jl4z]

R5經過EF-RF轉接環再加1.4X非原生鏡接了兩個接環當然比A1吃力得多 硬要比至少不要再加增倍鏡去比，這是基本常識吧 另在內容實在看不出鳥眼的差別，出現鳥眼次數都太少也都是ㄧ閃即過因爲都太遠了沒參考性，別的KZbinr鳥眼適用範圍內測試鳥眼R5是比A1好非常多 R5太遠沒法抓鳥眼還會抓鳥頭再不行才鳥身而A1沒鳥眼就只有鳥身，鳥身A1確實抓得比較緊R5相對飄

[@alexfungsir]

你好，今次是在同一條件下拍攝作比較，拍攝戶外水鳥，明白600mm拍鳥只是僅僅夠用，很多時都要加上1.4X甚至2X，而兩支鏡頭都接上原廠的1.4X，應該是比較接近的安排，又或者說，如果可以近距離接近到一些不怕人的野生水鳥，或可以免去1.4X的增距鏡。 留意到很多朋友都覺得Canon R5用了EF>RF的轉接環，EF鏡頭因為不是原生（native）鏡，會令到對焦速度減慢，而我的看法，EF 都屬於Canon的原生，Canon RF mount 內多了接點，可以加入更多的操控功能（例如鏡頭的操控環），接上新RF鏡頭理論上可以有更快的對焦速度，而接上同廠的EF鏡頭，我覺得對焦速度較原先接上單鏡機時更快，原因可能是R5的對焦系統和單鏡機不同，而這經驗是我使用1DXII和1DXIII作比較的，或者可以說，EF鏡未能發揮R5的所有潛力，當RF600/4面世時，對焦速度或會更上一層樓。在廠方的定位上，R5只是準專業機Prosumer，而A1是旗艦機Flagship，或許真的要找一部Canon的RF 旗艦機作比較才合理。 我並非品牌擁護者，兩套系統我都喜歡使用，因沒有機會借到最新的攝影器材試用，所用的都是自已買的。我的測試只是在拍攝的過程中進行，並非專業和科學，純粹自娛，未能盡善盡美，還請見諒！

[@leunghokei]

謝謝分享, 請問馮sir 用咩雲台? 好多人都用油壓以免鏡頭墮下, 但很不能自由轉動。 但你似乎使用是球體雲台, 又有油壓, 請問有何牌子及型號可推介? 謝謝。

[@alexfungsir]

你好，我有多款雲台，從前多數用wimberley韆鞦架，現在如果要輕便我會用Uniqball或flexshooter，這些都是雙重波頭，只可以上下移動，亦可以左右pan，而如果固定位置拍攝又不需要太多走動，我就會使用油壓頭，因為裝上大炮後移動較為暢順，但缺點是非常重。

[@qc1300]

绝对买索尼

[@sojimmy9461]

多謝師傅 聆聽大家既請求 抬咁多重形武器去為大家作測試 感覺 兩個系統55波 不分上下

[@alexfungsir]

你好，如果時間容許，我都樂意拍攝器材使用的比較，我喜歡實拍，但現場環境有變化，拍攝的主體情況亦會有所改變，短片給大家參考好了，並非相機功能大比拼和分勝負。

[@zsolth9411]

Nǐ hǎo！ May I get a short summary in english about what was your conclusion in your youtube video regarding the Af performance comparing Sony a1+sony 600mm f4+1.4Tc and Canon r5+canon 600mm f4+1.4Tc xiè xiè!!! 我叫霍尔瓦特 佐尔特

[@alexfungsir]

Hello, in general, both camera with 600/4 are very good in tracking the object. Since the A1 have a bird focusing mode, it's more easy to tracking the bird eyes than the R5.

[@sohokeong9739]

👍👍👍

[@kennisliu2278]

謝謝分享, 十分精彩... 有個問題想問下師傳...我是新手影雀, 買了CANON R5 + RF100-500..想問下哪一款腳架比較合適,之前有看到其他影友留言問腳架, 師傳提議leofoto ls-254c lh-30r 二號腳架...咁呢款腳架是否都適合CANON R5 + RF100-500... 謝謝

[@alexfungsir]

你的組合用LeoFoto 2號腳已經可以，如果想好一些，可以考慮Gitzo 2號Mountaineer，再要好一些的可以RRS的2號腳。

[@kennisliu2278]

@@alexfungsir 謝謝!

[@Patrick-zj2rk]

Alex Sir 可唔可以詳細介紹A1的介面功能

[@alexfungsir]

稍後可以製作一個video介紹。

[@lawcecil8246]

有啲疑問，A1係咪有啲位好完全冇追到?例如4:30，還是沒按shutter嗎? A1好好味，不過太貴……

[@alexfungsir]

您好，4:30前後都追到焦點，個人使用A1的經驗，追焦時對焦點間中會突然消失三數秒，之後會再出現，但不會影響追焦，原因不明。

[@wenny520]

alex你好 請問會唔會出一集介紹油壓雲台vs韆鞦架? 新手打雀建議買邊款好d?thx

[@alexfungsir]

你好，攝影教學#7有韆鞦架介紹，而攝影教學#81和#88介紹油壓頭，另外雀鳥攝影內部份video亦有介紹Flex Shooter和Uniqball的鳥攝用波頭，因為我拍攝用的器材都是自已購買的，所以未能盡試市面上其他産品。 如果係新手，鏡頭不是太大枝，可以考慮ifootage Komodo K5油壓頭，可用於一般腳架（不用加裝75mm或100mm碗），大約一千多些少。如果想用韆鞦架，可以考慮Gitzo的 韆鞦架GHFG1，約4千有找。

[@wenny520]

@@alexfungsir 感謝回覆! 我就係睇完你介紹Sachtler ACE XL先心大心細😄 我打算買sigma 150-600 C(1.9kg),裝備重量應該3kg以內(定焦大炮未有能力買) 呢個重量應該買任何一款payload 5kg以上嘅雲台已經可以? 睇完你對Flex Shooter, Uniqball, ACE XL嘅用後感,感覺油壓頭好似好過韆鞦架,細D,pan鏡又穩定 加上4千已經可以一步到位買到Sachtler,所以更加唔知點揀好

[@alexfungsir]

要留意油壓頭比較重，腳架要有碗座先可以用，如果要抵玩，ifootage K5都唔錯。

[@wenny520]

@@alexfungsir 感謝建議🙏🏻

[@serpenteagle001]

請問多數鳥飛不快，為何熱靴還要裝上內紅點?

[@alexfungsir]

因為鏡頭拍攝角度窄，如果不加上瞄準器會很難找到雀鳥。

[@wingk960322]

睇左你所有A1 片。頂唔順，前幾日訂了。但感覺跟R5不相差太多。不過其實打飛 .人反應比較重要。我是比較慢者。多謝熱心分享。

[@alexfungsir]

你好，A1同R5追焦方面其實唔係差咁遠，但追拍高速飛行的雀鳥時，尤其是背景比較雜亂，A1甩焦的機會比較少，追焦亦追得很貼，而近距離影雀，A1的眼晴對焦確實較優勝。正如你所說，人的反應在打飛方面比較重要，如果有好的對焦系統協助，我們可以更專注拍攝。

[@wingk960322]

@@alexfungsir 我就係反應慢.希望買左A1幫幫手.

[@jinkwan0023]

30張跟20張，差10張雖然好多人覺得唔係爭好遠 但影生態多一張就更有可能拍到一個精彩嘅片段 我是R5嘅前用家，A1未出一定係R5玩哂，高像素高速機，仲要準焦7成以上 我諗得佢一部 但R5嘅缺點，真係喺雜亂環境下，唔夠穩定 用R5嘅心得就係，你要對焦第一張嘅時候追到隻雀，之後按落去基本上都有70%打上中焦，但有時候都會甩蕉，甩咗基本上看個人技術 就咁睇A1做到9成以上對焦，對捕捉精彩畫面，確實係難得

[@alexfungsir]

@@jinkwan0023 同意你嘅睇法，講出重點。

[@popoman44]

厲害的評比！

[@alexfungsir]

我只是實拍比較，網上其他的測試使用不同ISO和不同光圈拍同樣的主體，我覺得還厲害呢！

[@popoman44]

實拍影片我比較喜歡💕 謝謝🙏老師

[@kaimingchu801]

alex，你好，R5你用邊個對焦 點設定？謝謝

[@alexfungsir]

你好，片中R5使用全畫面動物眼睛對焦。

[@kaimingchu801]

多謝Alex, 因為上年迷上打雀， 狠心轉系統，而家轉咗用R5 两個月，而家仲摸索緊，追雀我用動物眼晴對焦同闊 區，我用副廠鏡，追焦明顯 較弱，易甩焦，仲有呢條片你係唔係喺大生圍影，因為新手，唔熟影雀位，謝謝

[@kaimingchu801]

唔好意思，啱啱先睇到你條片喺南生圍影，可唔可以講下詳細位置，謝謝

[@alexfungsir]

@@kaimingchu801 是南生圍路的三叉河口位。我有很多條片都在這裏拍的，你可找一找作為參考。

[@kaimingchu801]

@@alexfungsir 謝謝

[@johnli88]

👍

[@user-gs1yc7kl5z]

A1神機！狙擊手殺敵千里！ AI真的可以幫助改善，甚至取代人類很多的工作！ 一個偉大又悲哀的年代！

[@kevinkong6864]

想問下 描準器邊度買好 thxx

[@alexfungsir]

可以到旺角星際，建議Olympus Dot Sight EE-1或Nikon DF-M1 都適合，大約幾百元。

[@kevinkong6864]

@@alexfungsir canonr6 岩用嗎

[@alexfungsir]

@@kevinkong6864 用得到的，係熱靴就可以。

[@JC-Joyful7]

昨天陽光好好，請問有沒有用A1影靚相。

[@alexfungsir]

星期一至五要上班，未能外影！

[@JC-Joyful7]

@@alexfungsir 大家都要揾食，明白嘅。等待更多.分享。

[@alexfungsir]

@@JC-Joyful7 上星期重有三條片未做，稍後會再上載。

[@JC-Joyful7]

@@alexfungsir 辛苦晒

[@kennethlui2268]

Thank you for the great video. Looks like Sony is a bit better. Well, at USD $6500, it should be better. R5 is very good too.

[@kk0619]

R5 Buffler45? A1多少？

[@alexfungsir]

Sony A1的拍壓縮RAW-238，無損壓縮RAW-96，未壓縮RAW-82

[@rambee]

可以分享拍攝位置嗎？

[@alexfungsir]

這個不是什麼秘位，是南生圍路的三叉河口位。我有很多條片都在這裏拍的，你可找一找作為參考。

[@billimono4480]

数毛大法师

[@jacklau6477]

高速飛行重可以咬住雀仔眼睛非常重要,有高手經常影到雀仔追住蟲仔食,只對到身體係絕對見到蟲仔的

[@lunip3678]

多謝老師分享，個人係canon鐵粉，不過睇完條片，都覺得sony優勝

[@alexfungsir]

你好，我都是Canon 的資深用家，由Canon第一代的 1D (4MP)已經開始用，而Sony 由第一代A7R亦開始使用，Sony一向都很進取，經常會給你驚喜！ 另外，A1 係Sony的旗艦機，而R5並非Canon的旗艦機，理論上兩部機並非同一等級。

[@peteryungcp]

@@alexfungsir 同意您的講法，傳聞Canon RF 系統應該會再有旗艦新機在R5之上去應對Sony的A1。不過現階段係像素及推出時間上，用Canon R5 vs Sony A1做比較我覺得都係合理既。只係Canon RF未有原生RF 600mm定焦鳥攝鏡，所以這個比較，從video看Canon R5追飛鳥不及Sony A1我覺得不出奇，都係一個好好的參考。但果要對兩個無反系統的追焦能力評高低，我反而更期待Canon R5+RF 100-500mm與Sony A1+100-400mm GM的比較...兩者都不用轉接環，我覺得這個才是公平的比較。

[@alexfungsir]

@@peteryungcp 可惜兩支zoom鏡我都沒有。

[@peteryungcp]

@@alexfungsir Alex 我現時用Sony無反系統， 我有Sony 100-400mm GM + Sony 1.4X可借你測試，至於RF 100-500mm，可能您就要問問其他影友幫忙啦...請問你有Facebook專頁嗎?

[@alexfungsir]

@@peteryungcp 你好，多謝你的提議，因為Sony 100-400 和 Canon RF100-500 我較少用，所以沒有買，我反而期待Canon出一支類似200-600的RF鏡。 Facebook 在 介紹文字的底部

[@sfwqf]

以前單反年代，三強並立，進入無反年代，Nikon 情況令人憂慮。

[@Rascallucci]

Great work, Alex! Been looking forward to this video for a while. OK, my reaction is this, I think it probably matters less on how the focusing squares overlay look on the screen because we don't know whether the overlay will totally deliver results. To me, what matters most is the result, in other words how the final shots turn out. My only suggestion is it would have been even better if you had cropped a few of the photos and put them side by side A1 vs R5 for more detail comparison. That way, we will have a better idea on the difference in sharpness, resolution, noise , colours, etc. Also, did you notice any difference in hit rate between the two cameras? And did you notice any difference in resolution with the 5 MP difference? My conclusion at this point is I am guessing both cameras deliver very similar results. But, is hard to ignore the difference in price point. Pound for pound, I think I have to admit the R5 is probably better value for money. However, for me, I do have a problem and a dilemma. I am not so pro yet and I am not shooting with big primes. I rely on that one super zoom and I have a strong preference on the Sony FE 200-600mm because it is an internal zoom with a much smoother and shorter throw. Personally, I wouldn't consider the RF 100-500mm as I view it as way overpriced. I have a question for you Alex, do you think it makes sense to adapt the Sigma 150-600mm on the R5 or would I be wasting the potential of the R5? Or do you think I should go with the Sony FE 200-600mm, bite the bullet and go with the A1? What would you do if you were me?

[@peteryungcp]

Hi. I have some opinions hope you don't mind. I think cropped a few of the photos and put them side by side A1 vs R5 for more detail comparison is not fair because 2 cameras have different pixels. In additions, Canon is using EF 600mm with adaptor (since RF 600mm is not announced yet) while Sony is using native E mount 600mm, I think it's a different here as well. However, I think hit rate is a good reference to compare and I hope Alex can roughly give us a percentage here. I hope Alex could compare "native telephoto lens" in this kind of bird photography size by size such as Canon R5 + RF 100-500 + 1.4x vs Sony A1 + GM 100-400 + 1.4x, I am really look forward to this, many thanks!

[@Rascallucci]

@@peteryungcp I understand your point on resolution. But, to me, that is also part of the differences you are paying for. My point is say hypothetically the A1 is more detail than the R5, well you kind of expect that if you will since it has a slightly higher res sensor and you are paying for that price difference too. At that point, it just becomes a personal judgement call whether you would be happy to pay $50K for the A1 or $28K for the R5 for that slight difference in performance. Other than that, Alex is comparing native lenses. Both 600mm f/4 are native, unless you mean you want to see the differences in native zooms as opposed to primes? That would be interesting too. I would love to see him put the FE 200-600mm on the A1. That is the lens I want, but now I am stuck in this dilemma of the 2 bodies. I really don't want to buy the RF 100-500mm if I can help it. It really is way overpriced. The Sony FE 200-600mm has dropped under $12K already while the RF 100-500mm is still over $23K, more than double the price of the Sony which is ridiculous plus internal zooms work so much better than external zooms in my opinion.

[@peteryungcp]

@@Rascallucci Hi. I think for the crop ability 4.5M and 5M pixel is not a very big difference. In additons KZbin also have compression and we can't see exactly how's the difference of outcome photo's sharpness...etc. I think body + lens system consideration is more then just the body issue and hit rate percentage figures I think is a good reference for user needs 600mm prime lens. In additions, my meaning about "native" lens is not realated to the brand of lens but the attached mount of lens. Alex's video using EF 600mm with EF 1.4x plus EF to RF mount converter to attach to R5 body while Sony 600mm is using E mount with 1.4x directly attached to E mount of A1. That's what my meaning of "native" lens. I understand you are interested in Sony 200-600mm lens with A1 body combination. However, Canon RF system don't have any RF native lens with similar 200-600mm just yet. Or you may say using Sigma/Tamron 150-600mm EF mount 3rd partly lens is a good comparison...But in my opinion isn't not fair for Canon R5 body. So, the best native lens comparison at this moment should be Canon R5 + RF 100-500mm + RF 1.4x (overall range should be around 140-700mm) with Sony A1 + GM 100-400mm + E 1.4x (overall range should be 140-560mm) If performance combination of Canon R5 + RF 100-500mm + RF 1.4x is very similar to Sony A1 + GM 100-400mm + E 1.4x, I will go for Canon since investment on lens is better then body. Overwise, I think Sony A1 + 200-600mm is well worth it at this moment. (Please don't forget you can have further options to add sony 1.4x to 200-600mm as well.)

[@Rascallucci]

@@peteryungcp I agree pairing the Sigma 150-600mm on the R5 wouldn't be fair on the R5. That was why I asked Alex whether it would be a bit of a waste using the Sigma on the R5. My issue is I seriously do not like the RF 100-500mm. To me, it is just a faster and more refined version of the Sigma because both are external zooms. I just don't like external zooms. Period. Its inherent problem is so much of the lens is retracted which makes the throw so much longer and stiffer. For the Sony FE 200-600mm, it is only a 1/4 or 90 degrees turn to get from 200mm to 600mm plus the zoom ring is buttery smooth. If you are a Canon shooter coming from the DSLR ranks, you probably will have a EF 70-200mm, be it f/2.8 or f/4. Well, that is how the Sony feels like. My Sigma 150-600mm takes 4 turns when in shooting position to get from 150mm to 600mm and is stiff as hell which makes it absolutely terrible for BIF shots. I don't want to have to go through that again. The Sony FE 200-600mm is generally regarded as the best super zoom for birding. I know you are probably more interested in the FE 100-400mm GM instead, but many Sony birders have sold their FE 100-400mm for the 200-600mm because of the extended reach and versatility.

[@peteryungcp]

@@Rascallucci Well...In my opinion, you have strong preference on internal zoom telephoto lens Sony FE 200-600mm...Apart from Canon RF 100-500mm, they also have 2 new portable valuable lens RF 600mm and 800mm f/11. So I think Canon RF system shouldn't announce something like Sony FE 200-600mm internal zoom in short period of future...(Otherwise who is going to buy RF 600mm and 800mm f/11?) It's clear that you no need to consider Canon any more and go for Sony FE 200-600mm + Sony A1. If you think Sony A1 is too expensive, then go for 2nd hand Sony A9II / A9 first. 2.4M pixel should be enough for most situations.

[@adonleung]

R5 落多咗一個接環，EF to RF🤫

[@peteryungcp]

係呀...所以只是給想入手600mm定焦的影友做參考，我個人覺得不應就此評論Sony A1對焦系統比Canon R5優勝。

[@adonleung]

@@peteryungcp 我估都應該係A1優勢，始終係高一級嘅產品線，但在原生RF鏡下應能再拉近一點

[@SuperD300S]

R5有動物眼睛對焦的

[@SuperD300S]

a1 1秒30張按住快門不到20秒應該冇電？

[@winkwink6986]

R5 本身以經係越級挑戰。加上比對方多一個接環， 係我心目中以經係贏左😁

[@Birdaily]

怎麼看都覺得R5比較好。況且R5還能打其他動物

[@philipchan822]

R5 甩好多 真係一分錢一分貨

[@peteryungcp]

A1遲過R5賣街，優勝也是合理的。同埋EF鏡始終唔係原生RF鏡，咁比較我覺得都只係儘量係相似情況下去做但我仍覺得不太fair。大部份人都相信Canon仲有一部旗艦無反(R1x?)係後面未公佈出來...至於Alex話R5將來可能會有firmware更新...如果Canon仲有一部旗艦無反未出，期望有新firmware update我就不樂觀啦。

[@wonglam21]

對焦系統其實係r5好過a1，只係r5既shutter lag同連拍等等問題比a1差啲，所以影出黎唔中fo既相多啲，半按Sutter你會見到r5係咬得緊過準過a1，所以如果呢套對焦沿用落r1咁比較會有意思好多

[@felixdamith1]

Looks like Canon is leading over the Sony flagship ... great comparison

[@lawrenceyu9382]

R5對焦準好多喎