R5II is for action/sports/wildlife. R5 is good enough for landscape and portraits. Thanks for staying neutral without bias against any brands. By the way, Canon USA told me cRaw is also 14 bit. That is awesome. I will use cRaw to shoot birds and don’t worry too much about blowing the buffer.
@alexfungsir2 ай бұрын
@@kennethlui2268 Thanks for sharing.
@kenikwok9732 ай бұрын
多謝馮Sir分享!
@alantang64002 ай бұрын
多謝Fung Sir 開箱分享,我現在還用緊R5,因為我較喜歡影運動和打雀,R5 II 啲改進較R3適合,不過要等貨源充足和價錢回落少少先考慮😀
@alexfungsir2 ай бұрын
@@alantang6400 正如我在片內介紹,如拍攝一般風景,人像,寵物及小朋友,R5已經足夠應付有餘,而拍攝動態亦有很好的表現,R5 mk II 的功能視乎你是否用得到,如果是專注運動及打雀,將會用得好開心😁
@winniewong6610Ай бұрын
請教一下 我主要追星及影演唱會 用緊 canon R5 配 100-500鏡 覺得追焦有啲慢 現考慮換 R5 mark II 但睇睇吓又覺得sony A7R5 都幾好 高啲像素,而且枝100-400鏡光圈大2級 想問吓老師意見,覺得邊部機追焦較好? 應該換 R5 mark II 還是轉會sony? 謝謝!
@alexfungsirАй бұрын
@@winniewong6610 如果追星或影演唱會,目的應該係影星,R5 Mk II 有人臉注册,影相時追焦以注册人臉優先,防止追錯其他上,而R5 Mk II對焦速度和準確度,都比較R5 好好多,放心upgrade 去R5 Mk II 吧!
@winniewong6610Ай бұрын
@@alexfungsir A7R5 都有注冊人面追焦功能,2者效果係差不多? 枝鏡又有冇影響呢?
@alexfungsirАй бұрын
@@winniewong6610 兩部機我都用過,如果講追焦效果,R5 Mk II 比較好,另外Sony支100-400M鏡頭,已經太舊,亦都未知幾時會出新鏡,如果只係換R5 Mk II,相對鏡頭唔使換,似乎最簡單。
@winniewong6610Ай бұрын
@@alexfungsir 多謝老師意見🙇🏻♀️
@alexfungsirАй бұрын
@@winniewong6610 有問題隨時歡迎搵我😁
@onelok2 ай бұрын
期待測試
@leungedward90732 ай бұрын
多謝Fung sir 勁呀
@alexfungsir2 ай бұрын
@@leungedward9073 多謝收看支持🙏🏻
@chorkaichan81182 ай бұрын
我買R5 參加了5年升級計劃 今次買機有10%拆扣😁
@alexfungsir2 ай бұрын
有啲咁好嘅升級計劃真係好,10%都成三千蚊,可以買多四粒電。我都訂多四粒電俾R5mkII。
@waichan70122 ай бұрын
我都有,不過唔用,分分鐘遲一年半載8折😅
@edmundcheung50412 ай бұрын
馮 sir 請講下R5ll 多重曝光,是否 Raw 出來都係 Raw?
@alexfungsir2 ай бұрын
@@edmundcheung5041 似乎係JPG Multiple exposures are captured as JPEG [Large: Image quality 8] images. Even when [Shooting: Img type/size] is set to RAW only, these images are captured as JPEG [Large: Image quality 8] images.
@edmundcheung50412 ай бұрын
@@alexfungsir 真係 Canon 特性……行前一步要後退二步!🤣🤣🙏
@leowong912 ай бұрын
多謝fung sir 分享 , 想請問一下用機身提高像素後再用電腦提高相片像素唔知會有什麼有趣結果呢?