Shakespeare, Bacon Enigma (1996)

[@floranderson2251]

Any discussion of Masonic, Rosicrucian, Kabbalistic or Occult themes in relationship to the Bible will necessarily have to touch on the person of King James who ordered the work on the Bible to be done, as well as on Sir Francis Bacon who is said to have headed up the team that produce the Shakespeare writings and the King James Version of the Bible. As you will see, both men sought to leave their personal 'marks' on the new Bible. James used the Rose and Thistle as his personal insignia. If this idea is new to you, I suggest that you do some web searches related to King James I (who was James VI of Scotland, son of Catholic Mary Queen of Scots, before Queen Elizabeth died childless); you might want to focus on his connection to Masonry and his sexual orientation. Next you should read up on Bacon and how he is looked at in relationship to the KJV Bible and the works attributed to Shakespeare, then his involvement in Masonry and Rosicrucianism. As the story goes Hamlet (with the play with in a play) is a little Bacon, meaning that Bacon wrote the Shakespeare plays, and when the KJV was translated there were 47 (46 + 1) people working on; looking at Psalm 46 we see that the 46th word from the top is 'shake' and the 46th from the bottom is 'spear'. Shakespeare was said to be 46 in 1611 when the KJV was first published. You will recall that Herod's Temple in Jerusalem took 46 years to build, as is pointed out in John 2:19-20. This throws a new light on the Bible. A debate now rages on the internet concerning two questions, 1) did the Masons and Rosicrucians supervise the editing of the KJV, and 2) if so, what are we to make of the fact? Of course there are those who say that there is no way that Masons or Rosicrucains defiled God's Word, while others say that the KJV is imperfect because of Bacon's involvement. It's kind of hard to dismiss the Rosicrucian pelican on the title page. But my favorite view point that has been expressed during this debate is epressed by the Cutting Edge Ministeries on a web page where they proclaim: Cursory Examination of Original 1611 KJV Title Page Reveals Blatant, Obvious Rosicrucian Symbols, but "even though some of the most evil men in world history had their hands on the King James Bible from the inside out, they could not change one bit of the text! The text remained as perfect a translation as possible in the English world." So, yes evil people did the work of compiling the KJV, but divine intervention preserved the integrity of God's Word. Evil was no match for good (in this version of the legend). From where I sit, it is apparent that the Bible bears the same Masonic and Kabbalistic signatures as the DC map does. .

[@juggmkj]

Flor anderson interesting, well said. Leading me down a rabbit hole =(

[@09authentic09]

So, are you suggesting that "God's" word was alerted or not. Eye for one assume that Francis Bacon is the author of the book through and through for some of the same reasons you mentioned in your comment. Eye obviously could be wrong.

[@MAVENdeNYC]

Or Bacon could have been the most divine man of his time, an angel or ascended master, or became one after his Works. And the Rose is also Bacon’s symbol for Rosicrucian, since he was a member, if not its founder or chief Administrator. Also, the idea of the Holy Bible now known as the 1611 KJV May have been Bacon’s all along.

[@erapublicationsorg860]

Agreed

[@WSTL1]

@@MAVENdeNYC if Masons had anything to do with the KJV it's a masonic work. Perhaps it reveals many truths to be Freemason adept, I think it adds yet another layer of dirt to dig thru who those they farm, namely everybody else.

[@jaybee4653]

My recent book The Royal Secret reveals new startling information on Francis Bacon as Shakespeare but has met the usual barrage of refusals and denigration by those such as the BBC and others whose pockets are lined by the myth of the Swan of Avon. The Royal Secret is available on Amazon or on Smashwords.

[@cityslickerchickens5835]

It makes complete sense how Hollywood worships Shakespearean writings, and it secretly coincides with the common man being cooled to follow the romanticized king James version. Wow!

[@MAVENdeNYC]

@18:12 also if the H and E are included they spells “Authored” while keeping it symmetrical.

[@keisi1574]

They left out he. Him. Hymn. Hmmm. Hum. Ohm. mmmmm...

[@littledan6994]

What gets me is.... English was wrote and spoke alot differently in "shakespeares" time... but when you find and read these supposed "hidden" messages... they are read like we speak English today??

[@juggmkj]

freedumb labowski English was written and spoken...not wrote or spoke. Fuckkkkk. Fitting name.

[@littledan6994]

Jugg MKJ how about you get off your high horse and calm your passions. You obviously knew what I meant and could of corrected me without being a complete prick about it 👍👏✊

[@MAVENdeNYC]

Actually, though English was not yet standardized at that time, each individual was usually consistent with his/her spelling. Also, it’s probably safe to say that most words in the Plays were spelled similarly, if not the same as we spell them in our times.

[@keisi1574]

@@juggmkj & blah blah blaw diggidy dong ding dang blibbidy blah blabberder blaw %

[@creepychris420]

Historians are there to destroy myths - love that. But I do agree, I think Sir Francis Bacon probably is the true author of the works written under the name Shakespeare. Smart dude lol.

[@jamesstephens1059]

Creepy Chris the Bible?

[@garymeats9323]

Sir Thomas Meautys wrote for Sir Frances Bacon, everything that needed to write. Sir Thomas Meautys went to law school, he took over Bacons place in the law school, also he was an France ambassador to the king, , things after Bacon died came from Sir Thomas Meautys

[@juggmkj]

Gary Meats Youza dummy, learn to engrish pwease

[@garymeats9323]

Jugg MKJ thank you. Butthead, but after my accident, it's hard for me to even write completely sentences

[@juggmkj]

Gary Meats well you should get a hold of Stephen Hawking's old wheelchair setup to help form complete, coherent sentences... since he is done with it

[@argh9743]

And,how you doing?

[@kelvinkersey5058]

is there no dna from Elizabeth and Bacon available? Has anyone tried to find similar coded messages that Kim Kardashian or Justin Bieber wrote the plays? The code in the 'long word' in love's labours lost (given in full by Durning Lawrence) is very compelling

[@johnhuntley3317]

I wouldn't know Kevin, I only made the video. It is quite ironic really, I was born in Stratford-Upon-Avon. World War 2 evacuee, should be ashamed of myself. Traitor !

[@brownholecharles]

How is Thomas last name is spelled ? Tried to find more info but can't quite make out his last name to conduct a successful web search .. Brokerman? Boccerman ? thank you

[@RobNewcomer]

@@Jacquelynhodson Thomas Bokenham www.amazon.com/History-Bacon-Shakespeare-Controversy-Thomas-Bokenham/dp/0862930030/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1544058374&sr=1-1

[@philthycat1408]

14min 35sec . Turn page upside dowm and its a man with a spear.

[@michaelrowsell1160]

Bacon died before some of the plays were written

[@richardpaschal2218]

Not true. Bacon died in April, 1626.

[@somerledislay9987]

Were you there when they were written , some people believe there`s only four Gospels others believe John Dee was just an alchemist

[@josephinemiller68]

They were on the right track but these are weak as anagrams and are not really symmetrical. DVere is more likely the author. The cyphers are a multitude and much cleaner.

[@renewableenergyhomes]

Henry Nevil's name also appears.

[@onefeather2]

If you watch Cracking the Shakespeare Code, on you tube or Amazon it is I thought very interesting. Love codes and mysteries.

[@T0varisch]

It's been solved. Bacon is involved and I am not getting into a discussion into genetics, but we know who Shake-speare was, it was Edward De Vere, Bacon's uncle, poshest bloke in England, ever. Go see Alexander Waugh who will be on your right and keep watching. You need the decryption of the sonnets.

[@richardpaschal2218]

De Vere was not Bacon's uncle.

[@the17thearlofoxford38]

No.

[@apotheoic8865]

William Shakespeare did not exist. His plays were masterminded in 1589 by Francis Bacon, who used a Ouija board to enslave play-writing ghosts.

[@SB-ug2wd]

That would be immensely arduous

[@somerledislay9987]

Bacon bastard son of a so called virgin , Dee the Crowley of his day and Walsingham completes the sham nothing dark to see here but in the name give up the game if you Will just shake the spear Yeh the first Lizzie was as Christian as the second , Here be Dragons

[@JAMAICADOCK]

Something profound happened to the screwball comedy writer Shakespeare. That profundity was probably Bacon. The comedies definitely fit Shakespeare's country bumpkin background, I think that's when he came to the attention of Bacon, and his order of the Helmet. But Bacon wouldn't have wanted to take any credit, that's why he was such a great Rosicrusian. He was willing to give up his ego for the greater good of posterity. A Hermetic adept doesn't care for fame, only for the general cause of wisdom

[@floranderson2251]

Shakespeare did not exist!! Elizabeth I Bacon's mother was Shakespeare! Elizabeth wrote Shakespeare sonnets'

[@apotheoic8865]

William Shakespeare did not exist. His plays were masterminded in 1589 by Francis Bacon, who used a Ouija board to enslave play-writing ghosts.

[@GravityBoy72]

Nah... that FRA TUDOR AUTHOR anagram business is rubbish.

[@jimmyjohnston8287]

Beware 'Admundsen'.

[@pbredder]

Not very convincing to me.