How the Martingale Strategy works in Roulette

[@bettingsystemsguide]

Nice video. (Spoiler alert!) You really had me reconsidering everything I thought I knew about the Martingale staking plan until Leo arrived. (Watch the video till the end to find out.)

[@ShaneHuang88]

Hahaha thanks!

[@bodybuilder2194]

Just because you said it I’m not gonna watch it until the end

[@Nivek57]

@@bodybuilder2194 its a retention bait anyways.

[@krishna011000]

​@@ShaneHuang88hi is there any time difference in online roulette (evolutionary gaming) between 2 countries

[@stevenrapp2714]

Log rolling for a scam vlogger. How sad. It is RANDOM!! Do the math. No system.

[@PrivateUser909]

I’ve seen it hit red 13 times in a row.

[@canigetonesubscriber9664]

same to

[@PunjabiCussBattle]

Me 14

[@calpilk1079]

I swear I lost $170 last night because it hit red 8x

[@brianmabika7588]

I have seen black hit 17 times in a row and 1-18 16 times in a row ,I'm just a roulette amateur and willing to learn more

[@Bar0zz]

Ive seen 18 blacks in a row then a green 😀

[@philw7835]

each round is a discrete probability, which means your next round's odds does not depend on the previous one. Getting a red previously doesn't increase your chance of getting a black. So it all depends on how much money is your comfort level of betting. If you bet long enough, eventually the win rate will become close to that 48% ish. But someone could lose 7 times in a row and scared of keep doubling the bet and decided to call it a day. this becomes a loss. It's only close 100% win if you are bill gates type of rich with a minimum initial bet.

[@einhalbesbrot]

Its the odds of how often a color comes in a row thats getting lower the longer your chain gets

[@sudiptaroy3200]

it does affect, your probabilty of hitting the next one after a series of reds will increase for you to hit black because there is a 50/50 chance

[@alexanderolsson4618]

​@@sudiptaroy3200 no it does not

[@greer2402]

wrong. there are streaks in everything. up and down. but the odds of a random event have to even out. which means what goes up has to go down

[@M4X1]

@@einhalbesbroto

[@DukeLottie]

Turned $60 into $1800 in a few hours but then got greedy and watched it go down to $0

[@theriddler8695]

Most wheels now have Double 0 - (00). I was out in Vegas and they have a bigger racket going….they have 0, 00, and then a Casino Logo slot technically 3 “greens”.

[@brettslaterdebtmastery]

Thanks for the vid, Well maybe I was lucky, I tried it for the first time last night and came out with 110% profit in 1 1/2 hrs

[@DrSchor]

was it the system or luck? you must decide. you cant have it both ways.

[@reikyfoxxe1847]

Long term update? Hows it been working so far

[@mebeingU2]

@@reikyfoxxe1847, Brett can’t reply. He lost everything trying this method and now lives on the streets in Vegas handing out flyers.😅

[@ARMENIO_CULE]

And I've seen 11 rounds without any red number sessions. And actually there was a guy who was playing on red all this time using this very same method. He ended up losing 20470 $ chasing his 10 $ win 🤷‍♂️

[@rahularora9022]

I lost 15000 rupees chasing rs 40 because all of the numbers that came were even and i was betting on odds

[@samadnl8604]

That's why you need to stop at some point Get larger double up margin like 15 or 16 chances . Stop at each 3 losses and go after it comes back to normal and spread the next 3 (this works amazing on the aviator game which is provably fair and can go from one to a million cashing out at 2x) with 15 chances you can alternate between how many times you'll go if it keeps losing (you could do 3.6.6 or 3. 2. 2 .2 .2 .2.2 so many different arrangements. The game also flows like forex up and down that also helps. Peace 🙏

[@adolforodolfo6929]

Not roulette, but here's a completely true story about the danger of not understanding one of the basics of probabilty - that what has just happened has no bearing on the probability of what is about to happen. In my home town, every year, there is a fair. At this fair the local Rotary Club run a little game to raise money for charity. People pay £ 1 to roll 6 dice; if they all come up 6 then they win a car; the car is worth about £20,000. The chances of rolling six 6's are 1/46656. The game is really just for fun and to raise money for charity. There is not a big chance of the car being won, but, just in case, the organisers have an insurance policy so that they don't lose the money spent on the car if somebody does win it. For years, nobody won. Then, one year, somebody did throw six 6's and won the car when the game had only been running a few minutes. This gave the organisers a problem, because now nobody would play anymore and the charity would not make any money. So they discussed it and decided that, since the odds were very long and, especially, that since somebody had just won, so it was even less likely that anyone would win again soon, they could safely carry on, with another car offered as a prize, and the charity would still get some money. About three hours later, somebody threw six 6's, and this time there was no insurance.

[@matthewclay6535]

So true... the ball on a Roulette wheel has no memory!

[@shadowwalker2436]

Big yikes

[@travishouse6295]

I've been playing the same system for years. I play $45 per spin. $5 each on 6, 18, & 29 with $10 on each corner touching my single numbers (example: the corners between 6/8/9/5, 18/20/17/21, 29/33/30/32). I buy in with $225 and that gives me 5 spins. My goal is to hit one of my corner numbers to keep me afloat until I hit a single. When I hit a single it pays $175 + $80 for the corner. I've never actually sat down and done the math but it works at a high rate for me. Also, you have to leave when you hit a single.

[@Sitron_]

With these bets you're expected to lose $1.215 per spin on average on a European wheel and $2.385 on an American wheel.

[@roryp.8567]

I'm zero game 8 and 17 and maybe 21 every now and then!

[@BlackJack22-h3g]

12numbers pick easily lose 10 straight spins.

[@ChristinaOlive]

I do something similar, I recently hit a single twice 3&21 it was a good day so I cashed out. Thanks for the strategy best of luck!!

[@jamesdelgado3885]

Tried this strategy and didn’t hit once in 7 spins. Trash 💩my guy

[@olafpieters]

It's very simple: the wheel has no memory and the bank has one/two slots more than you have.

[@magalyruiz9795]

What do you mean, please.🙏🏼

[@olafpieters]

The wheel doesn't remember what the last outcome was. Each spin is a reset. And the green 0 and/or 00 is the bank's advantage over the player.

[@Tmfz-y9s]

What easy casino game then roulette?​@@olafpieters

[@richvan2128]

⁠@@olafpieterscorrect. I don’t even watch the board. It’s a big mind game. I will say Vegas is the only place I win at roulette due to the max bet allowing for 7-8 spins before I run out of money. But to do that you have to come with a couple thousand and stick to the plan. I’ll never stay on just red or black either. I’ll switch it up and all the 1/2/3 12ths, and columns as they pay 2-1. Over all everytime I’ve gone, I get up big, then lose about half of what I started with, then I make enough to have the trip paid for and call it quits. But most importantly, never gamble money you can’t afford to lose. If I bring $2500 it’s expected that I’ll lose it all. At least that’s the mindset I bring. Once you lose 5-6 times in a row, it can be nerve racking but your best choice is to ride it out.

[@The_Andvarius]

the best way is to open up a casino and do it yourself

[@mynky]

winning probability would actually be 4x (18/37)^3 + (18/37)^1 x 100 = 6.59% chance, so the chance of it hitting the losing side 3x and last spin winning would be 11.15%, while 4x the losing side would be (19/37)^4 x 100 = 6.95%

[@mynky]

so u are wrong on probability, it has a lower chance to win since the losing chance is higher than the winning chance

[@stevenrapp2714]

It’s random. Always a house edge. And BTW there is no giant invisible magician.

[@aprilgates1474]

I’ve personally seen one color come up more than 20 times in a row. If anyone thinks it’s impossible for it to go that way or that long, think again. If maybe rate but…. It happens and happens frequently (maybe not over 20 times everytime) But the stretch happens with the same color often and if you can only martingale 7 times then you’re screwed. 🤷🏼‍♀️ So, I agree with Eric

[@bjornhatesem889]

Then bet on that color no one is saying you have to just pick one color

[@chungus8078]

That's 1 in 1 million probability. Either you gamble allot to see something like that, or are very (un) lucky or the Maschine is rigged

[@therock8288]

I agree I lost 13 straight on the martingale in like 5 mins. $5 k or so to win $1 dollar

[@justdonis1891]

if i have 20 euros what minimum beat i need

[@doeneschliebarske6064]

​@@chungus8078 any 20 times in a row combination has the same low probability, as the probability of any long sequence is lower, the longer the sequence because it just gets more difficult to predict.

[@FatBruceB]

Unfortunately when you eventually hit a losing streak the Martingale system will wipe you out fairly quickly.

[@musthaveV8]

them quit while ur ahead >:)

[@DrSchor]

that is silly. it is only true for those with small bankrolls. large bankrolls can survive anything.

[@kalyambaba4847]

@@DrSchoryou would need DEEP pockets.

[@WillBeddoesMedia]

U need proper big bank roll and a lot of online ones have a 2k limit a 9 loosing streak wich I have been on looses u a lot of money 😂

[@JakeRoehrig]

Couldn't you just keep going until you win then call it quits for the day?

[@rishitapal4128]

Very nice video. A lot of information included in this video. Thank you for making this type of video.

[@TNerdo]

Lowering your start value so you have a longer leg (more redo chance). If you start with $5 then you’ll have 5 chances and if you start with $2 then you’ll have a 6 chances to redeem your loses

[@saulgoodman980]

Your profit would be less that way, and the EV will still turn out negative despite the higher probability

[@TNerdo]

@@saulgoodman980 true true

[@Nivek57]

Minimum betting amount, is how casinos get around this. Also have max so that you cant just make 1 bet and double it until you win.....which will always work unless they put a cap on bets.

[@TNerdo]

@@Nivek57 Yeah I realized this after a while. It’s always best to play on my low minimum and high maximum bet

[@ABpluseAB]

This is the comment i have been looking for. Glad there are still some smart people left

[@bretclaar1663]

I ran a RuneScape casino for a bit back in 2010s I cleaned many people that bet hot or cold 8-10+ times. Runs are where we made our money

[@cristianquaranta9888]

Non ce nessuna speranza di vincere giusto,vuoi dire questo vero

[@Lucky-tt2yq]

the ol' varrock street hustle eh?

[@samtagswitzerland4010]

Shane, this is mathematically wrong. You have to separate between "connected probability" (like in Lotto) and not connected probability (like in roulette). There is absolutely no difference to the probability in a single bet. Win and loss probability is no changing no matter how often you play the game and no matter how you change your bet. Best from a Doctor of Mathematics from Switzerland.

[@fatsdom]

There is no such thing as maths professor, fool.

[@donnieaplin7054]

I agree with you. However if you sit back and watch for let’s say 5 consecutive color rolls (let’s say red) in a row before you start betting on black using this system your now not just betting on a single roll your betting that a black will roll once out of 10 rolls (using his 4 roll martingale bankroll)….if he had a larger bank roll the probability of rolling 10 consecutive colors in a row is 1346 to 1….(this is accounting for a zero and dbl zero being in play) on a 10 dollar table on the tenth roll assuming he lost 6 7 8 and 9th roll he would be at a 160 bet to win 10 profit after replacing previous losses at a ratio of 1346 to 1 …not bad

[@mirko5707]

@@donnieaplin7054 no, probability does not change in roulette no matter what you bet. Its not possible to project the next color. It absolute change nothing against a single bet. It is just in your mind that you evaluate it different. Its different in Lotto or others. Statistics are hard to grap.

[@donnieaplin7054]

You would not be betting on a single roll/bet tho ….by doing what a describe you are betting on a series of rolls that’s the difference

[@mirko5707]

@@donnieaplin7054 there is no series in roulette. There are only single events. You can repeat a single event but it is still a single event with the same probability as a single event. Hard to understand, thats true.

[@shawnluo4230]

I used to be a dealer in the casino, first game was Roulette. I once made the entire board, which was 12 numbers all red, once all black. If some unlucky people playing on martingale, he's gonna be broke😂

[@luellimi]

roulette is hard to beat consistently, especially if you play online as they tend to rig the games with magnets. What worked for me was exploiting some online slot machines for my advantage and playing it in a different way than most do. On avg, making 400 day right now for the last three weeks while still trying to stay under the radar. Pretty good if you ask me😎

[@chickenmcnuggets80]

Exploiting online slot machines?

[@luellimi]

@@chickenmcnuggets80 Right, some casinos tend to have some bugs in their game code, which allows me to predict EXACT moment when the bonus is about to come

[@anthonysporty3395]

Can you teach me bro

[@dirkdiedie]

Very interested in your methods bro

[@ts4gv]

@@anthonysporty3395 he’s clearly full of it. do not start gambling lmao. Get good at & play poker if you want to scratch that itch.

[@nestorgarcia3123]

Good morning....It turns out that reality is another color red, or the color black can repeat up to more than ten consecutive times, you would have to have a very high capital to be able to follow the martingale, and on the other hand there are roulette wheels or casinos that have betting limits so if a color exceeds more than 10 consecutive you are fried total loss..........there is no system or method not even sure to win at roulette,,,,, yes you leave a number out without playing it or you don't bet it, that same number can be repeated up to 4 consecutive times because I have seen it.....conclusion, there is no safe method or system......... You can bet and when you win 2 or 3 times, go out and so on at different times and it's still not safe.

[@Jack-et4ev]

I dont gamble but if you have 4 losing in a row just change the color to black, why stick with red on a losing streak. Black then win and reset

[@Dutchenter]

because you can get a black streak lose aswell if you change lol, its GAMBLING

[@HariKrishna-zu2oj]

I have seen consecutive 43time's only one column repeating.. Multiple times it repeats more than 20times regularly..

[@googlino3866]

Anyone who is involved in roulette and really wants to make money I want to send me only the last three numbers of a live table and I will tell you what you have to play to win most of the time.

[@damirnikolic778]

@@googlino3866 what secret do you have ? I enjoy roulette but it can be tricky if I don't control my emotions

[@CryptoVietMy]

Did you guys see 18 black in a row? I started to placed red at the 5th turn, then 13 left turns only black and 2 times Zero.

[@JaMiE-01]

Seen 13 blacks in a row I've seen 13 reds in row even seen 4 0s in a row lol

[@matthewclay6535]

I was in Vegas one time... and came across a table where BLACK came up 23 times in a row! Not joking.

[@epilzona]

@@matthewclay6535 what happens in Vegas stays at Vegas !

[@MMABones]

@@matthewclay6535 rigged

[@SmartRoulette365]

if you see 0,2 and 10 bet all these 3...until hit. Works!! Also, if you see 23, and 24 close to eachother, start betting on 9...and neighbours.

[@WickedWaynee]

If you had MILLIONS this could work. You’d be able to keep double and double until you win however if you have a small bank roll, it’s not a good idea because I’ve seen it land on red or even black WAY more than 4 times! I’ve seen it hit over 10x in a row and more

[@samijatt4059]

Exactly. Lose 10 in a row and you lose a lot of money

[@JohnDoe-cf8jz]

It can not work regardless of bankroll because there are min and max bet limits.

[@binhdinh6687]

belief me it not work even no limits casino.some it hit 50 red and more.

[@kenstevens7855]

Martingale is no worse than flat betting, if you do it within reason. It actually increases the size of your bets, which is good since the odds are against you. In theory, the best bet at roulette is to bet your whole bankroll at once. But that isn't the most entertaining option. Martingale balances entertainment with the slight improvement in odds coming from larger bets. Regardless it's just a fun way to blow money. You might win, though...

[@GaryLuKOTH]

In my mind, Martingale is worse than flat betting. Roulette is a negative expectation game. You are basically increasing the amount that you are expected to lose.

[@kenstevens7855]

​@@GaryLuKOTH In a negative expectation game, the more bets you make, the more the odds are against you. In a positive expectation game, the more bets you make, the more the odds are in your favor. A card counter doesn't bet his entire bankroll on one bet because he has the advantage. Eventually, if he keeps playing with that advantage, he will beat the house. It's the same for the house when they have the advantage. So making larger bets is better than smaller bets, assuming the bankroll is the same.

[@joeltrain]

You had me going there for a bit! I was like, “no way this smart guy actually believes this is a good idea”. You got me.

[@ShaneHuang88]

Hahaha

[@CarlosSamuel-ms9ee]

@Shane Huang The issue is there are a few people in the comments that have seen the title, but not properly watched the video. Possibly the title isn't the best idea? Even if it does somewhat spoil the 'big reveal'.

[@TwistedAkimoto]

From my experience electronic machine always catch on and i can hear them laughing by coming up with the opposite color over 10+ spins and then BAM a zero or double zero hits to clear out. I've seen this over the years in many many casinos. It happens on the tables as well. They are all controlled. Smartest thing to do is when your up $30 or $300 or $3k cash out and go for a walk. Then come back and play again same strategy or a different one for another $20-$30 or $2k-$3k depending on where your playing and how much you have to play with

[@carloscortez6024]

No, the machines are NOT controlled. It is a normal behavior as predicted by mathematics. And it doesn't matter if you take a break. All is just pure luck.

[@Beanpolr]

​@@carloscortez6024The machines are not USUALLY controlled. There are places that will do it, though usually it will never negatively impact your average gambler. They'll go after big, repeated betters. Most people will quit after a heavy loss.

[@boris9047]

@@carloscortez6024 Agreed!

[@phil4863]

One strategy I do is i do at least two bets( one color and 1 to 18) I also put at least 4 dollars on 0 and 00 shared bet. If I don't win I simply increase on red by 5 dollars( if black came one time red might come so I'll win more than I lost). Try changing the bet based on previous results( if it's three past 19 to 36, most likely it won't repeat so go for 0 and 1to18 for a victory)

[@ignasnavickas2199]

Based on previous results???? They dont gave any influence :DDDDDD

[@ignasnavickas2199]

Have*

[@brehmerrocha3261]

@@ignasnavickas2199 Stop talking shit bro

[@AbelAbelllllll]

worst thing ever, i used to do that and every single day it went 10 in a row in the same , i also caught 27 red in a row, 23 odd in a row, they will destroy you

[@alexgravelle164]

​@@ignasnavickas2199 yes there is 50/50 chance of landing red/black or odd/even; however, law of averages means that after each time of consecutively landing on one colour, the likelihood increases that the next will be a different colour. For example; although it is entirely possible to land 10 consecutive reds, it is highly unlikely.

[@NineballChris]

The key ingredients to use Martingale MM Strategy is to have a Huge Bankroll. I suggest 500 times of the table minimum. Try to have at least 8 levels of Martingale. Have a good place betting strategy. If a players cant win 1 out of 8 then they didn't adjust what the game was doing. Was it chopping? Was it streaking? a good time is to not play every spin/hand. If you lose 3 in a row. Sit out a spin or two to see what is going on. I love the Martingale. I am great looking for trends and knowing when to play the opposite or playing houseway. Know your place betting strategies. Know when to play them and when to switch to another one. All strategies work till they start to cycle. Have to learn when to switch strategies based on what the game is doing. Trends change so you have to adapt. :)

[@donlimonesioyt9644]

Mathematically you’ll still lose. There is no “strategy”. Is it fun? Of course. But due to the large numbers’ law you’ll eventually loose

[@NineballChris]

@@donlimonesioyt9644 True. Things do not go your way at times. But if you play short sessions to get a few wins to make 3%-10% profit. It will protect you better. Of course anything can happen. Any strategy works till it doesn't .

[@carsandstuff365]

I played in Reno about 8 years ago using this .. it does work if you stay small and have capital .. but I did see 13 blacks in a row once on a live real table .!! My rule is wait and jump in on the opposite colour when you see at least 3 black/red in a row .. gives you half more a chance

[@anthonydentice8180]

its classic, cause i know this method mathematically dosent work but ive done the same thing as you but i wait for 6 in a row of colours or odd/evens and ive prob been to the casino mabey 30 times over the years. and only loss once, starting 50, 100, 200, 400 = stop ✋️ prob won mabey 15k doing this. its dam stupid tho, but yeh do this if i cant sit down on a poker table

[@steezywang8537]

That's not how statistics works. If doesn't matter what the past is. Everytime you bet, you are still under 50% to win

[@AJ-yo7rb]

The martingale can work if you have a huge or unlimited bank roll and no table limits or bet increments. you need to be able to double your bet consistently until you win, theoretically you could start with a $1 bet and have a bad streak that ends up a million dollar+ bet just to make back your $1 investment.. then start again with another $1 bet

[@alexalekos]

instead of doubling, you can follow the fibonacci sequence (2,3,5,8,13,21...) i ran it multiple times on simulations and it can win you a tiny amount over long time, but you need to play less than 1/100 of your budget (1/1000 the best, based on game theory)

[@thatsubarulife9817]

That's what I've been playing with. You really need a larger bank role to lower the odds of losing everything on a huge losing streak but it is a good way to slowly make money at a lower risk. Larger bank role and small bets are key.

[@mikeanderson9266]

Our Casino has 0 and 00 (worst odds) how does that impact this system. Twice as many 0s 6:48 mark I feel you wrong because there is no rule that you only have to "roll" your money 4 times! You can roll it 8 times and eventually your color will hit due to pure math odds. However, the Casino does have a dollar amount bet limit stopping too many rolls unless you have a team member helping. Ivy was a proven cheater per say.

[@karimfarangfromthejungle6027]

I like to use the martingayle strategy, but alternate between red/black, hi/low, odd/even.

[@stevethea5250]

But it Shouldn't really make a difference?

[@brianharris606]

Don’t bet on colors, only on high or low and odd or even. Numbers are spaced differently than colors.

[@黃柏豪-f7e]

The house edge makes arbitrage strategies hard to from, though we may still gain profit by taking in consideration of the online site's bonuses with their required wager in it. Chances are those site offers rebate on the valid bets we put on, so in theory, if we have enough rebate percentage and a sufficient bonus within our account, we may walk out as a winner.

[@GAFVM]

online roulette is extra rigged. not only they have the normal edge over players they also use electrostatic to sway things even more in their favor.

[@musthaveV8]

​@@GAFVMita ok not everyone can move when theyre in shock lol

[@JohnGiagnotti]

Hi do you have a strategy on playing about 20 numbers before the clock runs out

[@CrossingWolfi]

Actually, just betting on the same number again and again until this number comes up has a lower expected loss than the martingale strategy. (in casinos with 35 to 1 payout on a number and one zero in the game) In your example with a 10$ bet the expected loss would be 27 cents rather than over a dollar.

[@giacomofilippin2302]

Betting on the same Number until It comes out and betting random numbers until you get one are the same exact thing mathematically speaking

[@jovan2550]

Let it spin for couple times, when it gives 4/5 of same kind then you place the bet on opposite and continue doubling if you lose. That way you have more chances if you can afford 8/9 spins. Only bet money that you can lose. Sorry for my English.

[@adamblesener2916]

I used a similar strat but instead of betting to the amount of four losses, I bet for 6 or 7. I win much less but even by winning a dollar at a time I’ve been able to get 120 dollars an hour doing this

[@Vongvodaydaydo]

Be careful your bank will clear if 7-8 times lost.

[@vision2145]

i use the same strategy and lost 10 times and my bank is clear begining with 5 dollar

[@bhavyac]

I have had a losing streak of 18 :(

[@JOSHL50]

@@bhavyac 18??? wow that's .... unusual

[@JOSHL50]

you can improve your duration if you wait till it hits one color 2-3 times in a row before you start your betting cycle.

[@richardscots-ep4yf]

what if you bet alternate of red and black? does it increase or decrease your chance of winning?

[@fraybumbus9310]

doesn’t matter, red or black is equally likely. it could spin red 20 times in a row or alternate every single time, the wheel doesn’t remember what it last spun

[@mphomakhubo9460]

Actually yes , with alternate betting your chances do increase. It's better than playing one color that's for sure 😂

[@mphomakhubo9460]

At some point the wheel has to play consecutively but most importantly it depends on how long you play. Play long enough and you will lose for sure.

[@mynjeri5469]

The thing is you don't have to place your bet always on red or on black. You can do it alternatively as you wish. Since the payout on black or red is double, it won't affect you. This method is far better than throwing all of the 150 dollars down the drain in one chance

[@JohnDoe-cf8jz]

What is the difference, it will still go down the drain eventually.

[@mynjeri5469]

@Renzo "pTw" Rugnone it won't change any maths. Sometimes either red or black hits multiple times. So if you are betting in one colour only, you may end up loosing all of it. Remember this strategy is not applicable in online casinos. It's fake.

[@FatBruceB]

There is no difference. Each roll has a slightly less than 50% of winning regardless. A streak of alternating colors has the same probability of a streak of the same color happening.

[@lordfarquard9902]

@@JohnDoe-cf8jz maybe I’ve been lucky recently. I’m 12 days in a row playing martingale starting with $635 and setting an end goal of 800 with $5 bets. If I lose 7 on the bounce I’m more than willing to part with my 635. It would need to happen 3 days in a row for me to be a loser now. I calculate that my chances of hitting 800 using this method are roughly 81.2% on any given day. So I’m definitely due a loss.

[@kingfish4200]

You can only double up to table max that’s another advantage for the house

[@mohamadislam1776]

The problem is the max bet I started with £205 then made it up to £350 in about 2.5 hours then they changed max bet to £150 so that means 8 tries then I lose all my money it’s not worth it tbh unless the max bet is like. 12 tries max bet should be 2k and minimum pay like 20p I played on william hill roulette

[@amphindian]

This was a great video but I don't understand why Phil ivy lost his lawsuit. What did he do wrong?

[@nortonredding6124]

Every spin has 51.4% chance to lose, whatever the result is is not removed from the next spin the odds will always be 51.4% chance to lose it doesn’t matter if you martingale or not.

[@defaultusername1145]

No because the odds of it landing red 5 times in a row is much less then it landing on any one of the other spins because you can have it land on black on any of the spins whereas red needs to be hit every time

[@pedropereira1285]

@@defaultusername1145 Its still 51.4%. Doesnt matter if there were 100 reds before, the chance of another red will be the same. For example, you toss a coin and lands heads. Would you say its more probable to land tails next? No. Its still 50/50. Even if you land heads for 100 times in a row, the chance of landing tails again is still 50/50. And that's what he was saying. Regardless of what was before, the chance of you losing is still 51.4% every spin.

[@defaultusername1145]

@@pedropereira1285 the odds of the next spin are not changed for future spins yes but are the chances of a red spin 10 times in a row 51.4% of course not and considering you are testing those odds 10 times the chance of 1 of those 10 spins being black is much higher than them all being red the reason why the house still wins when using this strategy is that how much you win is much lower than how much you lose

[@pedropereira1285]

​@@defaultusername1145 "the odds of the next spin are not changed for future spins" -> Future or past spins dont change the next spin. You are doing the probability wrong. What you are talking about is betting beforehand for the next 10 spins, and thats not how you play roullet. You bet each time before the spin. You dont bet for the next 10 spins. So, the odds of having a red after 5 reds is still 48.6%. All spins are independent. If there are 100 reds in a row, the chance of another red is still 48.6%.

[@defaultusername1145]

@@pedropereira1285 if you are betting double each time and stop at the point of your first win you are doing the same thing as betting on what the next 10 spins will be

[@pelvist]

The casinos have a way to prevent people using this method. They put a miin and max bet amount on the table so when you lose 6 times in a row you cant cover your bets any higher and thus cant win back what you lost.

[@arunmeena2224]

Go for alternate colours ,toss a coin and decide the colour each time

[@DrAnandYadav-ig6ol]

50% profit me mere sath work kroge

[@Dragon-jd1ks]

This is a great video on chasing your losses.

[@ShaneHuang88]

Glad you think so!

[@AbelAbelllllll]

As a daily roullete player i can tell you martingale its the worst strategy ever. I used to pay 2 dozin or 2 column which is 66% winrate and when i lose i used to triple my bed, every 2-3 hours there was a 10 more lose streak. There is no way to beat this shit magnet, i used to play 35 numbers out of 37 and i played 3 spins like that and lost all 3 spins, i didnt had coins on 26, and 18, what do you think? the next 3 rounds it came 26,26,18 . This roullete its just a scam. You can play anything, anytime it will go exactly on the number you didn't bet

[@stevec9095]

If it doesn't work then why am I so good at it. Yes I'm not undefeated but I'm very tough to beat in roulette. I have a large bankroll and only win 5% or less as my goal. I'm not greedy, drunk or stupid when I play, I take it very seriously.

[@Dutchenter]

lmfao you take gambling seriously? get some help bro beforre you bankrupt. i knwo what you thinking, all addicts think like that, on day you get the 12-16 streak colour and yiu fucked

[@kj4673]

Do you apply a similar strategy as in the video?

[@RandyMass]

I started with $100 and went WAY lower than his prescribed 1/15 bet, and went with .25$ bets. It takes way longer but you can double 8 times before going bankrupt. 9 if your bankroll gets to 200, and 10 if your bank roll gets to 300.

[@blackzeke8706]

Some casinos have minimum bets for the even chance bets it’s usually high like $25 minimum however to place a bet on a number the minimum is $5.

[@dattebayogyatt69]

bruh ur at some high stake casinos lmao i’ve never seen the min over 15

[@260Xander]

I've definitely seen up to $25, but the most common is definitely $5

[@shxttywebster]

You can find $3 min in Vegas… where are you playing?😂

[@260Xander]

@@shxttywebster I'm in Australia but I've been to a few different casinos. Too low a min buy and the casino makes too little money

[@KatScratch1]

There are no even chance bets

[@jeffreycarandang140]

This strategy is good for thise who has a discipline. If you win once you must literally stop and go.home. 10$ a day is good. X30 days is 300. Not bad.

[@JaMiE-01]

With the martingale system you could end up broke with in minutes I'd just go for the most recent numbers on quarter's the amount of time I've seen double numbers is crazy also when your down to your last bet I'd always bet green I've never been less happy to see a 0 when I've bet on red or black

[@Dutchenter]

dam bro got u, started gamling yesterday. put 50 euro in my account, started dubbling 10 pennys. after 5 wins in a row (always red) i moved to black and doubled 1 euro, made my 50 to 215 euro in 2-3 hours after 3 hours i had a 11 in a row black streak wtf, lose it all and now im sad. i rlly RLLY never knew how ppl get addicted to gambling for years, now i know and i dont start again

[@Haha-nv5gm]

with you on that one 100% haha I just bet recent numbers and go for the quarter of the wheel that’s near the 0.

[@willcover6142]

It doesnt work. It's math and stats and there is NO system to beat roulette, caps etc.

[@JaMiE-01]

@@willcover6142 roulette is luck and down to the rigged magnetic roulette tables

[@willcover6142]

@@JaMiE-01 lol. I guess u didn't read my posts. I'm the one who said it is impossible to beat. It isn't rigged. The numbers only allow a less than 50 pervebt win ratio. You don't have to rig anything. It's set to have the house win. Why do you think vegas can run 24 by 7 by 365

[@Monkeymahenmiester]

Important factor u missed are the minimum and maximum bets which make this method obsolete

[@AParallelReality]

Martingale worked great until I hit 12 loses in a row which isn’t that uncommon

[@Michael_Humphries]

IK This method is just an illusion no matter how you play the edge is always the same.

[@Michael_Humphries]

IK This method is just an illusion no matter how you play the edge is always the same.

[@MA-qu3hi]

The odds of that are by definition low. But yes it’s possible, that’s when you come to terms that you are gambling!

[@thetruth1972]

What you forgot to add is that when you do loose 4 times it’s $150 so all the other times you won previously has to be subtracted from your total winnings and this would actually leave you with a net loss over a period of time.

[@blackjackhammer21]

Martingale will make you lose your bankroll faster. You are not accounting for the fact there are losses due to a choppy roulette. Also, most players forget to put a bet on zero as a back up.

[@mrautomation]

Perfect method to blow up your whole balance to chase a 10 bucks win. But I agree if you apply margindale with a hit and run method you can win 10 bucks, but potentially you need to bet 1000 at some point to get that tenner back ;-) Margindale is chasing losses technique, and it will always fail in the long term. Risk/reward is out of balance.

[@petedavidson2959]

I believe the Casino always Wins tbh😂

[@kittyhayse9516]

People are more obsessed with fast money so they end up losing it all.

[@petedavidson2959]

@@kittyhayse9516 it's called 'Choice'

[@petedavidson2959]

@Charles Vaughan 🤣🤣🤣

[@petedavidson2959]

@Charles Vaughan lol I'm not against you... I understand perfectly fine 😃, I'm an Entrepreneur.

[@kelvinjones3901]

@Charles Vaughan Everybody loves the luxury lifestyle but many don't want to take the risk to invest or work for it.

[@PaulRoos-p3o]

if i take 2nd and 3rd dozen and cover 0/00/2 on an American wheel i have 27 slots to land in and dealer only has 11 would that be + ev ? or on european wheel same thing take 2nd /3rd dozen and cover 0/2 i still have 27 -11 slots.

[@QsPracticalNonsense]

I don't think I've seen roulette table without 00 in any casino I've ever been in. Because of this, all the math is wrong...

[@moe_lester9801]

I think you get different type of roulettes. Cause I just heard there is one with 00

[@QsPracticalNonsense]

@@moe_lester9801 Single 0 roulette is referred to as "English" roulette whereas 0 and 00 roulette is referring to "American" roulette. But even outside of the US I have yet to find a single 0 table anywhere from Mexico to France to Australia. It's a nice video but it really isn't representing the common type of table

[@moe_lester9801]

@@QsPracticalNonsense ohhh I'm sorry. It was my first day standing at a roulette table, here in South Africa so far I only saw the normal 0

[@liberalstudiesmaterials899]

May I ask what is the best gambing strategy for any games please?

[@bankgrowbets]

Great video! Do you accept partnerships with betting companies?

[@chavale2]

why not? Write to me BJ

[@Irishman8787]

Cool video thanks 👍 ill try it

[@infaskjeeshorts5729]

Seen it hit 0 TWO times in a row & Black 13 times as well

[@axelpalacios9232]

Would you say this works on mystery card roulette ????

[@brandonwidmayer4722]

If anyone is a card counting this would be a good strategy to incorporate on a game the casinos know isn't an advantage players edge game, using this strategy to minimize losses taking heat off of you and potentially getting reward points as well for amount wagered even tho the losses are theoretically contained over the long term. just an idea tho

[@einhalbesbrot]

Good thinking

[@brokie99]

My only goal rn is to make 220 bucks and signup for your course, halfway there.😙. Great Video

[@donnieaplin7054]

So why not sit on the side line for let’s say 6 consecutive color rolls (red for example) then start the system where now your first roll would start at the 93 percent at the 5th power and you would only bust after 9 consecutive rolls….takes some patience but increase your win probability

[@Gregtaylormusic]

Each new spin has the same chance of being either red or black. The outcomes that came before have no relation to the next spin. Look at ‘the gamblers fallacy’

[@donnieaplin7054]

Agreed but when you wait to bet say 6 rolls as I suggested you are not betting on a single roll but instead betting on a combination of rolls simple math suggest that the odds of rolling 10 consecutive colors (red or black) account for a 0 and 00 in the mix is 1,346 to 1 ….I agree that the previous roll will not effect the next roll however you have too calculate your math on several consecutive rolls and the probability in which it brings

[@ClosingSoon5]

@@donnieaplin7054 that would only be taken into consideration if u were betting on the other 5 theoretical spins and wanted the same color each time. Only betting once after a streak is still netting u 50/50 odds

[@joeyteixeira602]

@@ClosingSoon5 this doesn’t make any sense. Whether he was betting on the first 5 consecutive colors or not, they still happened in a row, increasing his chances of winning out of 10 rolls quite a bit. Hence why it’s very rare to see 10 blacks in a row.

[@adolforodolfo6929]

Doesn't increase your win probability at all - makes no difference to what it was before. There is no such thing as a winning roulette strategy.

[@pilly1000]

Just allocate a bigger budget or smaller minimum bets, then increase $5-10 with each additinal loss + doubling. I once lost 13 times in a row and wiped myself out, now I make sure I have sufficient funds to cover this anomoly, just to be sure. Haven't wiped out yet. I'm betting 15-20 extra every hand, with a 30-35k budget it is optimal. Depending on the table or platform you should make 45-60 per minute.

[@bringtheseo]

My stepfather used this strategy back in the 80s successfully. However the Casinos would often send someone out to distract you and break your concentration in order to force a mistake or miscount.

[@bassbird]

your stepfather is lying to you. The math does not work

[@LourdesTrepagnier]

Офигительные завозы получаются, хоть самому пробуй)👓

[@JayDavidson46]

I’ve seen it hit green a lot actually like I put £10 on red and it went on green

[@andrewpritting6665]

Pain

[@Michael_Humphries]

Lmao to avoid this I always bet on green xD, just so I cant get shafted even tho overall it is probably worse for my profits.

[@aaju3192]

Every casino use magnet on roulette. How do you beat that?

[@valor7694]

Bro thanks alot. this video helped me make a lot of money today in the casino

[@roulettemaster5826]

Anyone who is involved in roulette and really wants to make money I want to send me only the last three numbers of a live table and I will tell you what you have to play to win most of the time.

[@user-jr9tf1iq8e]

@@roulettemaster5826 Wow. How do you read that? What strategy/strategies do you use?

[@DavidRedfearn]

All your great work undone in this video.

[@michaelangelocostello2599]

This is my method and I leave the casino 9/10 times as a winner. It takes money to make money.

[@defaultusername1145]

You are not profiting with this strategy if you are only winning 9/10 times considering you are only winning a small amount but when you are losing you are losing much more you would need at least a 94% win rate probably a 95% win rate not a 90% win rate

[@keeptrying59]

Good job. You must have a plan before playing such as how many steps will you go as your stop loss. Nice to see someone is profitable with this strategy. Thanks

[@jokojoko9530]

Does this work for rng roulette or just live wheels?

[@pappaflammyboi5799]

Roulette has a negative expected value of -1/19. You'll eventually lose unless you know physically where the ball will fall. It must be measured deterministically.

[@sagarpokharel70]

One of my friend did this on a 3:1 number set selection and got burnt to the T

[@mosesnoble5236]

You forgot to take into account that it’s 50% every time, so It could hit Red 20 times in a row

[@dojoparsnip9905]

it is NEVER 50%. he showed that.

[@mosesnoble5236]

@@dojoparsnip9905 you are right it’s actually 47.4% in American roulette and 48.6% for european roulette.

[@dojoparsnip9905]

@@mosesnoble5236 yeah. And the casino near me has the 00. I tried this strategy with $630 and made $10 in about 30 mins. that was scary.

[@Entropy106]

Yea but the chances of hitting the same color 10-20 times in a row are slim

[@user-qi7rv1xz3g]

Play late at night when the croupiers are tired. Watch the wheel and the way they spin. Play a section of 5 or so numbers in the same section where the ball last dropped and you should do okay......or not.

[@321thach]

The ball is magnetized they control where to land. I’ve seen it multiples time where ball stuck on the metal part between the number it didn’t fall

[@alleykat5188]

some guys from russia caught them doing this,

[@madafaka8921]

just tried this and it works

[@angravante]

With a martingale strategy you must win 99.91% in order to make a profit in the long run, hitting the table limit. With your martingale ,you lose 7 in a row and you are down $127.

[@googlino3866]

Anyone who is involved in roulette and really wants to make money I want to send me only the last three numbers of a live table and I will tell you what you have to play to win most of the time.

[@AshishKumar-xs1ik]

@@googlino3866 how brother

[@AmorDeiLove16]

I tried that Martingale and betting on RED 8x and it’s result All Black for 8 consecutive draws. I was 6:34 playing on the machine and not on the real person. It didn’t work for me. So sad 😭

[@jerrycarnes9487]

I play with $1 bets doubling down. Starting with 10 you miss 4 potential spins. It's slower but safer. Can make about $60 an hour doing it this way.

[@johnsonbenson5779]

REACH HER ON TELEGRM.

[@johnsonbenson5779]

@KATHIMORGAN is her user name for help

[@lahcenmetal5553]

The best way to win in roullette is do not play it at all 🤓

[@sachinms2772]

what if we put the money directly on 35 numbers

[@ceversole1]

Please don't do this. You will end up losing all your money in the end.

[@loorobert6430]

Yup this is not the best strategy. You take a large amount of bankroll to win pittance. On a bad day you can lose all by doubling up too early.

[@coreveinternational7666]

In a casino, the expected value is negative, due to the house's edge. Additionally, as the likelihood of a string of consecutive losses is higher than common intuition suggests, martingale strategies can bankrupt a gambler quickly.

[@Dissentasylum]

You also forget to factor in the wheel trend. It tilts the odds in any given senario. If it is %48 red, %48 black. Never bet black or red. If its skewed %53 black %42 percent red. Yes bet black and use a better progression. You have the edge over the casino at that point

[@sookmajoaby]

Or bet what ever last colour is

[@Fyz-qz3bv]

Realistically the trend don’t matter, every spin as a completely new event and previous spins have 0 effect, but I always tend to follow trends

[@Dissentasylum]

Seems like it's situation depending. What's working can stop at any given moment. The greatest system can fail and less likely one can accell. Play like a pro works better than most. But it has the martingale land mone attached

[@talalasad538]

The greatest thing to casinos is people not understanding the Gamblers Fallacy

[@metalmat3651]

Unless the the wheel is not operating correctly or there is cheating involved the “wheel trend” is useless. The odds are always fixed with what you pick each spin. The wheel could’ve hit red 10 times in a row previously and the chances of it hitting red again the next spin are still the same.

[@a.k.8531]

I used it 15 years ago first day high profit second day after 8 hours playing 19 red in a row...

[@Ecstatic_Grasshopper]

You can protect yourself a little bit. By betting red and low, might hit both or if you only hit one then you break even

[@hendraprasetyo5799]

My losing strike record is 10 times. I was betting with small $ amount on roulette . 0.2 Lose 0.4 Lose 0.8 Lose 2 Lose (i bet 2 instead of 1.6) 4 Lose 8 Lose 16 Lose 32 Lose 64 Lose 128 Lose 256 Won That was insane experience, i really don't wanna feel that anymore. But in gamble, theres always a chance it gonna happen. Betting using martiangle is you are using the entire balance, even you think it very small. If you have $1M, you can survive for 20 Rounds for only $1 Bet. But have you heard someone losing 20 strikes? I have.

[@pavelsarkar9337]

Ive hit reds 11 times in a row doing this! Play slow think about the overall probably of the colour(currently) that is farthest from the actual probability.

[@PaulRoos-p3o]

i'm confused about something and no one has been able to help me out, my understanding is in the game of baccarat it makes no difference whether you know what the next card is or not, it's just luck whather the card helps you , because even if you knew what the next card is you can't say to take it or not , it will simply be given to you (or the bank/dealer) regardless. HOW is it an adavantage to know what the next card is !??

[@wrainmaker6283]

As an American roulette player, I generally average anywhere from $70-100 an hour (nothing set in stone, it’s fully dependent upon how often my numbers hit). I usually stick to the dozens or columns, bet the minimum required for the 1st 2 spins, then increase just enough that a win will cover previous losses and make a profit. Say it hasn’t hit the 1st dozen (1-12) for 5 spins in a row, I bet on 1st 12 and let it ride until it hits. Considering roulette is widely known as a “rich man’s game” you can do this relatively cheap and get a good 10-11 spins in (plus the previous 5 losses on that spot). Odds are well over 99% and you don’t have to double every spin because it pays 3:1 as opposed to 2:1 like the black/red odd/even. All that being said, I would KILL to be able to play on a single zero table!

[@roulettemaster5826]

Anyone who is involved in roulette and really wants to make money I want to send me only the last three numbers of a live table and I will tell you what you have to play to win most of the time.

[@aggelost3103]

@Wrain Maker Easy to play on a European wheel online. Also odds never change you should know that.

[@aggelost3103]

@@roulettemaster5826 Hmmm something magical i guess...

[@wrainmaker6283]

Sorry, probability is over 99%. Not odds.

[@aggelost3103]

@@wrainmaker6283 Sure but we cannot beat the game with probability unfortunately. The reason is every spin is independent from the previous. If it was not, it would be too easy to win and casinos would never offer it as a game.

[@user-qi7rv1xz3g]

If I remember rightly, the Monte Carlo Casino hit 29 blacks in a row back in the 1930's. Enormous fortunes were lost that night.