Shape Analysis (Lecture 19): Optimal transport

[@AllemandInstable]

now we need all the hours he said he could talk about it at the beginning of the video

[@4mb127]

This is really well made. Really appreciate the connections to the physical world and not just putting on a bunch of slides with equations.

[@nithinparepally5865]

This is such a great video for an introduction to optimal mass transport! I love the snow analogy you gave! Helped me a lot to visualize what is going on.

[@awaisnizamani2612]

It was an amazing video, I am trying to understand the uses of optimal transport for video alignment. Thanks for sharing such diverse knowledge about OT.

[@wongrufus]

56:23 The sum of elements of p is 1 because we're still assuming p and q are probability distribution functions?

[@stevewolligandt]

Hi Justin. Nice video. I wonder how this was produced. Did you write on a glass board and afterwards mirror the video content?

[@kirekadan]

Awsome. Could indicate some easy materials to undestand optimal transport?

[@littlestamp9061]

Very good explaination, thank you!

[@littlestamp9061]

Very curious about the Gromve-Wasserstein and matrix vectorization field problem, hoping anyone else also interested in these problems could contact me.

[@gabrieljardimpereirapinto6675]

This is great! Thanks!

[@alfcnz]

1:37 You need to use charts that share the same axes, otherwise it's *really hard* to tell which are taller. Also, axes are not labelled. Negative 3 metres? Feet? The graphics is highly confusing.

[@justinmsolomon]

Not gonna lie, these seem like vanishingly small issues relative to the many mistakes in this extremely informal 30 hour course. But I appreciate the feedback! Hope all is well.

[@canny891]

thanks for the upload!

[@alfcnz]

11:16 using the same letter p for two different things *does not make sense.*

[@Rjsipad]

chill man its a casual introduction not "Topics in Optimal Transport: Old and New" 😭

[@alfcnz]

24:51 back to µ and ν… and ℓ.