SHAYKH'S BOLD STATEMENT BEFORE ARREST - "Tip of the iceberg of what is coming..."

Dr. Muhammed Musa Shareef made a bold and controversial statement regarding what's coming after the Arab spring based on his analysis of history and the situation of the Muslims today. He was soon arrested along with other Islamic preachers, we cannot verify if this statement led to the cause of his arrest or not, but this statement of his was considered as highly controversial.
As Muslims, our accounts can get taken down or suspended anytime,
So Do Follow us on different platforms:
TIKTOK: www.tiktok.com...
FB: www.facebook.c...
Telegram: t.me/CrescentFeed
For contacting admin : CfeedAdmin (Telegram)
JazakumAllah khair
#islamic #muslimscholars #arrested

[@farrenhart9423]

May Allah reward him for his suffering. He was always a great imam. الله ينصرك يا شيخ

[@mmsia7775]

May Allah keep him safe for leading Ummah in future

[@femunu]

may Allah hasten his release

[@alima.6776]

As-salamu Alaikum… ‎السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته who’s watching this in 2024 😮😢

[@shaikmohammedmansoor]

وعليكم سلام ورحمة الله و بر كاته Me ✋

[@rafaypirzada5061]

Its true.

[@aticqhalim3949]

🕋🏁🏁

[@Takfirienrager]

And what was the result of the Arab uprisings apart from death and destruction. And where are the rest who were calling for it? Why are they silent now?

[@user-xn8sv9dh2p]

If our scales are just death or destruction. We could claim the same for Uhud, and Mutah, ukhdud etc. We need to stop parroting scholars of the govts without actually thinking abt the reality of our ummah.. Nobody disagrees that we are ruled by tyrants, and barely any country rules by islamic law, even rabi al madhkhali says that abt the rulers, but do we call for rebellion while not having means is another thing, and if a rebellion naturally happened and bloodshed already started, then do we still call by to follow the tyrants and stand hand to hand with the tyrants in fear of bloodshed? and why must we categorise arab spring as one issue either false or good?. We need to judge fairly and see where is the benefit of the ummah. Perhaps not every country needs a spring, perhaps some may, scholars who are with the ummah and not with the govts should be independently able to judge that... actually arab spring brought in muslim brotherhood rule in egypt, but it was the secular spring that brought back sisi and got back to kill morsi and thousnds of ppl in the streets...so shouldn't we blame the anti arab spring guys too who were persistent in trying to fail the arab springs to protect their own chairs and were ready to fund killing thousands of ppl? who funded sisi and who still supports him? If our scales are just death and worldly results, then what was the result for the people of ukhdud apart from death or shahada or life you call it bloodshed? sometimes things reach to a level, for eg in syria, kufr is done openly in speech nearly daily...and bloodshed has happened are you suggesting ppl should obey the ruler that has empowered the nusayria and made kufr a general speech in the country ? 2ndly They are not silent, most of them are in jail, for eg this shaikh is in jail..and the ones outside are either threaetened of jail or silenced by some other threats, its as simple as that. If you want to try that, speak up against bashar assads nusayri rule that how he has butchered 100s of thousands of muslims, try doing that in UAE in a masjid publicly and see how you shall perhaps be silenced too 3rdly, the video talks abt what comes after the arab spring and is talking abt the reality of the ummah and is not a fatwa generally about arab spring , yes or no etc

[@user-xn8sv9dh2p]

They are not silent, most of them are in jail, for eg this shaikh is in jail..and the ones outside are either threaetened of jail or silenced by some other threats, its as simple as that. If you want to try that, speak up against bashar assads nusayri rule that how he has butchered 100s of thousands of muslims, try doing that in UAE in a masjid publicly and see how you shall perhaps be silenced too

[@Takfirienrager]

@@user-xn8sv9dh2p more Muslims died and suffered after the rebellion than before it. The end did not just justify the means. And the means did not justify the end. The Muslim brotherhood are innovators, every innovation is misguidance and evey misguidance is in the fire. Why would Allah help people who go against the sunnah? We must learn from our mistakes and turn to Qur'an and Sunnah, then Allah will help us.

[@user-xn8sv9dh2p]

@@Takfirienrager It succeeded in Libya, Egypt and Tunis, until the other so called Muslim govts who got scared of their own thrones started causing conflicts and bloodshed so that ppl would say "see what did we benefit from the arab spring " the way you did here. This kind of thinking is perhaps what the tyrants want to achieve when they started the funding the killings, after the arab spring was an actual success. Therefore, if you consider it a battle of the ummah vs the tyrants, yes initially the ummah was winning and making positive changes, but then the tyrants who dont fear Allah started causing havoc in expnese of the ummah to protect their own chairs..So yea ppl died, like in any other battle of the ummah in the past. This is life and it is a continous test. But our scales are not the death, but rather, our scales go by the Quran and sunnah, who did we side with, the oppressors or the ones who wanted the Quran and Sunnah to rule over us. what did you do to help the deen etc, if your against the arab spring and against the tyrants you can disagree about the timing of the arab spring, etc, but you dont need to criticise the ones who sacrificed their lives in hope of a brighter future for the ummah, and to stand against unislamic rule... because at the end there is no one particular scholarly body of the ummah who gives a binding fatwa and decides when we can make a rebellion as per our capaability, or whenever are we ready or not. It could be a matter of ijtihad and could be a matter different to different countries etc about you rashly applying the concept that why would Allah help innovators , like "Muslim brotherhood, and if Allah is with you none can defeat you" etc, in that case, when sisi did khuruj and won over morsi through force, was sisi on ahlul sunnah and did he deserve victory due to his pure salafi manhaj? We need to understand that Allah is the one who controls the results, whether victory or loss, whether trial in form of dunyawi loss or trial in form of dunyawi win, importantly we cant keep thinking just because we consider ourselves ahlul sunnah, we must always win ! in that case the sahaba and the salaf would never loose a battle. So dont be rash in applying these concepts "he was a bid3ati and hence he was defeated" or "if he was salafi he would never be defeated in a battle etc"

[@Takfirienrager]

@@user-xn8sv9dh2p How is that success, it failed, if Allah is with you no one can defeat you. My brother, look at what the scholars have said for 1300 years after the first fitna, you will see it opposite of your view of Qur'an and Sunnah.