SHEIKH ASRAR RASHID/HASSAN VS SHEIKH NOORUDDIN RASHID|NEUTRAL/CRITICAL ANALYSIS - SPREADINGTRUTHHOOD

In today's video, we sat down to critically analyse the whole situation or debate that took place between sheikh asrar rashid, hassan and sheikh about some of bayazid bustami's statements in tadhkiratul awliyah.
This video will take you through from how it started and where it led as well as looking exactly what was said in the meeting and my reaction to it.
I also reveal and expose to you additional information about tadhkiratul awliyah and more statements that are attributed to bayazid in tadhkiratul awliyah.
This will be a very interesting video with a surprise for you all towards the end so please sit back and watch this video with an open mind.
Jazakamullahu khairan
#sheikhasrarrashid #islamanswers #nooruddinrashid #bayazidbastami #tazkir_tul_aulia #sufism #fypシ゚viral #ahmedrazakhan #barelvi #fatawarizvia #muftishahidali

[@SiraateHidayat]

Mashallah Great Video very Informative Allah apko Ajar e Azeem At a Karay

[@navoxford8406]

Aqeedah Asrariyah (Barelvi Creed) 1, Awliyah have license to insult Allah most high and his Messenger ﷺ 2, Insulting the Prophet ﷺ is a Karamah 3, Revelation did not end with the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ

[@H_G2013]

Good analysis actually thank you Asrar has a habit of throwing red herrings into the debate in order to avoid the main point at hand He ambushed Shahid Ali at a wedding lol too

[@navoxford8406]

Asrar is dangerous

[@navnavo1414]

kzbin.infoSIsVp_P8pb0?feature=shared

[@SpreadingTruthHood]

@@navnavo1414 kzbin.info/www/bejne/raSknp95mtKBqKMsi=mpcYjqneHetP7w18

[@truth-z7x]

Asrar and the Barelvis want to praise insults against the Prophet peace be upon him so much they invented nee Aqidah They say Allah Tala speaks from the mouth of a Pir.

[@TrueSunni]

Shabash Asrar fans you have sided with Kufr and blasphemy against defending the Prophet peace be upon him Sh Nurudin is telling you to stop praising insults against the Prophet peace be upon him and you lot are insulting him too. Shabash You lot must have a great teacher. Enemies of the Prophet peace be upon.

[@TrueSunni]

Brelvis getting exposed everywhere They lied about defending the Prophet peace be upon him

[@mrorn8199]

Berolvis should be called Ahlul bidah wal halwa al jelabi jamat.lol

[@H_G2013]

Anyone have link to Hasans channel as I can't seem to find it

[@RAGSTAluvsDA90z]

It's under 18 bro

[@H_G2013]

@RAGSTAluvsDA90z what you mean

[@BakhtawarAlee-b9t]

Though Asrar's student Hassan didn't defend the statements - Rather he said what Ibn Hajar ,Dhahabi etc have said Bayazeed R.A has not been declared Kaafir by any ancestor scholar not even by Shykh ul Islam Ibn Taimiyah - but Asrar & Co. Are zanadiqa no doubt.

[@SpreadingTruthHood]

Whether bayazid said it or not, the fatwah isnt upon him, are you telling me that a person in "special" state will insult the prophet salallahu alaihi wa al e wasalam, no but in fact the one who is either mad or the one who is possessed by shaitan, bayazid in this case is innocent and I wouldn't defend him and say he was in a "spiritual" state.

[@H_G2013]

They like to say Hasan is a child, why is he making videos hahahaa Also, Asrar told Hasan to go forward in the first place hahaha and he stayed behind front lines

[@navoxford8406]

Asrar is walking contradiction

[@TrueSunni]

Announcement: Asrar Rashid says it is fine to promote disgusting statements of Kufr without condemning them. Updated Brelvi Aqida!

[@mohammedbashir1281]

Spiritual state is when, what does the Quran say in this matter, about Allah becomes the hands etc of the person who gets to that level, this needs explaining

[@SpreadingTruthHood]

@@mohammedbashir1281 the quran doesn't say anything about becoming the hand of anyone

[@IrnBrummmmmmm0]

Hamdu LILLA not LILLAW Lillaw will be pronounced when there is a fatha or damma before the ل

[@SpreadingTruthHood]

Jazakamullahu khairan for correcting me dear brother

[@imranahmed786]

I first thought this would actually be a neutral account but in fact is not. The fact that you refer to Shaykh Ahmad Raza Khan without using the title shaykh throughout your comments, despite him being regarded highly amongst millions of Sunnis in Southeast asia, accusing him of defending Blasphemy also, several times. This already shows your bias, and your hatred towards Sunni Barelvis. It appears sectarian driven. Instead, we should be reconciling between the 2 Sunni shaykhs. Instead we should request brothers to stop treating this as a UFC match, and contribute towards unity. Your video, im sorry, adds to disunity, and is totally one sided.

[@SpreadingTruthHood]

@@imranahmed786 asalamualaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh, jazakallah khair for your comment. If i made the claim that imam ahmed raza khan barelvi defended a blasphemous statement, its abit obvious that i didn't take that out of my back pocket but in fact i provided the screenshot from his book "fatwa ridhwiyya" now its your job to either accept him or condemn him. Another point id like to bring to your attention is regarding your point that this appears sectarian driven id like to give you an insight on what imam ahmed raza khan barelvi use to say about those groups other than his 1. Deobandi, wahabi's, qadiyanis are kafirs and murtads (wajib ul qatal) anyone who doubts their kufriyat is also a kafir 2. The masjid of the wahabis is not a masjid, their adhaan isnt adhaan and their namaz isnt namaz. 3. The meat slaughtered by wahabis and deobandis is haraam but its okay to eat that meat which is slaughtered by the jews as long as you read bismillah over it. Now brother i am really confused here, why did he make these statements, apart from the millions who follow imam ahmed raza khan barelvi, there are millions of those who follow the deoband, and also those who claim to be ahlul hadith, imam ahmed raza khan has made open takfeer upon them so now I'm thinking was imam ahmed raza khan barelvi the real sectarian driven? Please share your thoughts.

[@imranahmed786]

@SpreadingTruthHood wa alaikum as salams. Thank you for a respectful engagaement. May Allah SWT bless you. ok brother, at least you have honestly accepted that your video is predominantly against the Barelvi Sunnis and that you have reservations against their stances when it comes to the groups they deem as ahlul bidah I do know of the takfeer that has been pronounced on the 4 elders of Deobandis. There is no takfeer on the whole jamaat of deobandis. Similarly, there is no takfeer on the jamaat of Wahabis. If you have reas otherwise, please make a video or provide a link of your video already done that discusses these fataawas. I can give you a response, but as only a student of knowledge, I will abstain as I would not want to fall in the mistake Br Hassan fell into. I will however emphasise, that you have chosen the path to demonise a large portion of Sunnis, this is NOT what ustad Nur ud Din is doing, and it is not his methology. If brothers who are knowledgeable would like to make a radd on your claims, they should provide a response. I will abstain to avoid disunity amongst sunnis. I see sh Nur ud Din as a staunch Sunni, and Barelvis as staunch sunnis. And will only contribute to unite our ulema. Jazakallahu khairan

[@SpreadingTruthHood]

@imranahmed786 @imranahmed786 asalamualaikum once again and jazakallah for your respectful response. No.1 the video i have made isnt for the large potion of barelvis, it was only for the sake of the defence for which i provided a screenshot of fatawa ridhwiyya that if u consider it kufr at last then what would be your verdict about anyone who justifies it or defends it. No.2 imam ahmed raza khan as you said that he only considered the deoband scholars as kafirs and not the whole jamaat, then the question arises that when he said "iss main jo shakk kare ga, woh bhi kafir" that whoever doubts in them being kafir is also kafir, what does these word's exactly mean because the whole jamaat considers them to be muslims, not just muslims but better muslims than us. No.3 when imam ahmed raza khan said that the slaughtered meat of the wahabis and deobandis is haraam but the meat slaughtered by the jews are okay as long as you read bismillah upon it, did he also mean just the scholars themselves or also the followers of the scholars? No.4 when imam ahmed raza khan said that masjids of the wahabis is not masjids, their namaz isnt namaz and their adhaan isnt adhaan, was he again referring to the scholars or the whole jamaat? I mean its quite clear, that apart from the book husaam ul haramayn where imam ahmed raza khan made takfir upon the elders of the deoband scholars, in his other fatawahs, malfuzats and others he made it very very clear that the peoole who doubt their kufr is also kafir then to ask the question that did he refer to the whole jamaat as kafir is not even a question anymore One last point, imam ahmed raza khan barelvi didn't just mention the wahabis and deobandis in his takfeer but added the qadiyanis and said "even if they recite allahs name a thousand times it will still be haraam" I await your response dear brother

[@imranahmed786]

@SpreadingTruthHood wa alaikum as salams. As far as Deobandis being Kuffaar as a jamaat, I understand his statement that whomever knowingly what has been allegedly written by the 4 elders defends them as they have written (not making Taweel, which is what Deobandis mostly have done) would be deemed a kafir. I don't know of any Deobandi worth the name who has ever defended the statement as it is, instead they have tried to elaborate what they may have actually meant, which was also accepted by Pir Justice Karam Shah Azhari RA, and Sh Nuh Ha Meem. I have not read a takfeer on Wahabis nor Deobandiyya outrightly. As far as other statements are concerned they could be opposed as ikhtilaafi matters, its up to the scholars to guide the masses to accept them or ignore them. The points you have mentioned, if you have a video made on them, kindly provide a link, and I can request a learned student or a scholar to provide a response. As far as Wahhabis and Deobandis are concerned, their takfeer of Jumhur Muslims is well known. And they have been at it long before Sh Ahmad Raza RA. To whitewash them as innocent whilst throwing the same blame on Barelvis is unfair. Wahhabis especially, whom have gone as far as declaring barelvis mushrikeen, quburiya which I'm sure you are aware. Deobandis also have fatwas where they have declared niyaz food haram yet make it permissible to eat prasad as its vegetarian, and this point is often brought up in debates between the 2 groups. My point is, both groups could be blamed for similar things. What do we as sunnis do? Cause further division by dividing the divided sunnis? Or avoid controversial matters that don't concern British Muslims unaware of such divisions. For me, Sh Nur Ud Din is a beautiful scholar, I have learnt alot from them. And Sh Asrar Rashid is equally a brilliant scholar. And I would very much like to see the scholars in unity. Jazakallahu khairan for your thoughts

[@SpreadingTruthHood]

@@imranahmed786 asalamualaikum, i see where you are coming from but can the same excuse be used for the qadiyanis who are not as familiar but follow their scholars anyway? I agree both barelvi ulemah and deobandi ulemah and wahabi ulema have made takfirs upon eachother for whatever reasons, may it be for shirk or niyaz or whatever but since the topic is asrar rashid and hassan so therefore it turns in to a barelvi issue as many blind follow asrar rashid unfortunately and asrar rashid himself is a barelvi Coming to what we should do to unite is first of all give three talaqs to the ulemahs who have made takfir on each other and follow what the quran and sunnah states but before we need to have the heart to question our ulemah openly and ask them what their verdict is on such ulemah who have made takfeer. Hope that answers

[@prophetic.wisdoms]

I don't think he was defending the statement. He was defending hazrat bayazid bustami RA.

[@SpreadingTruthHood]

@@prophetic.wisdoms you can't have your cake and eat it at the same time, he was reading from the BOOK and defending him

[@prophetic.wisdoms]

@SpreadingTruthHood yes because we don't consider hazrat bayazid RA to be a kafir. he said those statements we don't consider him to be a disbeliever.

[@SpreadingTruthHood]

@@prophetic.wisdoms do u believe he said those statements, did allah talk through him?

[@navoxford8406]

These crazy Sufis put Bayazid before the Prophet peace be upon him They are lost

[@torjet5640]

​@SpreadingTruthHood 😂😂 are you serious ? The kid was reading out a passage that deobandi noorudin hid and did not mention in his original video. As for being angry maybe if noorudin didn't do takfir of a kid it may have Ben different. Just watching 6 mins of video shows you are not neutral but biased in defence of the deobandi noorudin. Now it's no one else's fault noorudin can't grasp basics of ilm ud din. P.s... spiritual state is from the original passage (Haal).. he was refuting noorudin lying and not giving full statement as Bayazid Bastami himself said this statement is kufar (noorudin hid this). Now compared all of noorudins work against Ahle sunnah and the kufr statements of the deobandi elders who with a sane and complete mind made statements such as "it is better to think of a donkey then Rasul Allah ﷺ " and statements like "even animals and mad men have the same knowledge as Rasul Allah ﷺ " amongst many filthy comments that are defended by deobandis till this day and are still found in their works. ?

[@H_G2013]

Asrar has a habit of dodging and diverting and distracting in order to run away

[@airxeditz]

Sufism is a different religion 😂

[@TrueSunni]

Aqeedah Asrariyah (Barelvi Creed) 1, Awliyah have license to insult Allah most high and his Messenger ﷺ 2, Insulting the Prophet ﷺ is a Karamah 3, Revelation did not end with the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ