We need to pass a law making parliamentarians to sit for exams on basic electoral laws prior to every general elections so that we can hold them accountable if they go against the laws
@williamagyei221416 сағат бұрын
Taken photographs and sharing food should be a crime in the country during election.
@winimea.azumah491212 сағат бұрын
If we all start taking pictures of our ballot, do you know what chaos that will create in this country. Hmmmm, what is Sampson saying? So, now it is okay taking pictures of our ballot. Will Sampson go defend those listening to him all over the country telling them that they can take pictures of their ballot!!!
@kwabenasakyi259811 сағат бұрын
This debate is needless
@percylaryea56573 сағат бұрын
In the USA there signs posted at the polling centers that indicates phones should be turned off.
@pm_kay11 сағат бұрын
The concept of Law annoys more every passing day!!!!!🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
@KwameBoateng-kv3gw17 сағат бұрын
Law without understanding
@NanaesarOnJoy18 сағат бұрын
That law is clearly USELESS. LET THE PERSON OUT
@salifuawudu-ns9hi13 сағат бұрын
SAMSON YOU ARE NOT GIVING A CORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THE LAW, IN ANY WAY IF THE LAW IS PROTECTING THE SECRECY OF THE VOTER AND THE VOTER GO AGAINST THAT, THE VOTER IS LIABLE FOR PROSECUTION.
@iddrisga138613 сағат бұрын
Kpebu is right ,his arguments sound logical than Samson...
@anthonyatitso485715 сағат бұрын
You can express your concern and that does not prove you have really done that but a situation where u show it has been done
@dominicadjei99514 сағат бұрын
is Sampson trying to tell us that where a person decides to take his own life by killing himself, that person commits no crime because he or she has decided to take his on life?
@mywifecantcook297416 сағат бұрын
Your life is protected by the constitution, right to life,... but it's also expected of you to uphold that protection by protecting and preserving your own life, violating it by attempting suicide is a major crime. Same will apply here.
@pm_kay11 сағат бұрын
Exactly my thoughts!!!!
@francisdonkor573812 сағат бұрын
I disagree with Sampson, because when a voter writes his name on the ballot, that ballot is rejected. And this is what the says.
@AshantiJuliusCeasar18 сағат бұрын
Samson is not speaking law.
@mariasedashsedash308815 сағат бұрын
He is only trying to defend the behaviour of those who took photos of their votes
@justiceyevugah841115 сағат бұрын
Whaaat??? Should this even be a question? ? It should be about how swiftly the task force is able to deal with such people. Why is it a secret ballot. ?
@mywifecantcook297416 сағат бұрын
You see, you can liken this law to the law that criminalises attempted suicide..... the law is trying to protect you, it's still your life but you cannot voilate it by taking your own life. It's protecting your right to secret balloting, though it's your choice, you still cannot voilate it. Samson is wrong with this one
@TrendWithGrace9 сағат бұрын
But Sampson why should an official be ask to protect secrecy of an individual but then a voter can do so if he wills ? It doesn’t make sense at all
@IsaacPrinceGlorier9 сағат бұрын
If bribery involves two people; the giver and the recipient, why was Kingsley Nyarko (I can't address him as honourable because he didn't behave honourably in this matter) left to go free and that poor EC temporary staff layed off?
@KwameBoateng-kv3gw17 сағат бұрын
This law is totally baseless
@iddrisga138613 сағат бұрын
Sure Samson is N9T speaking law...
@samuelerzah-vt5ux14 сағат бұрын
The law said that on that day, you should not take a picture or show it. (That day)
@IsaacPrinceGlorier10 сағат бұрын
Samuel Lardy, please go back to the constitution. Subsection 3 generalises the subjects by saying, "A person shall not..." This includes the voter. Subsection 1 mentions specific officers to whom the provision concerns.
@derrickafianu422011 сағат бұрын
You can declare your vote but you can't showcase the ballot paper features on which a voter used until the ballot are accounted for by Election official.
@osricjohnson323516 сағат бұрын
I am afraid Martin is right. If the law was intended for election officers only it should have said so as it does in other cases. Anyone include everybody except clearly exempted.
@RichardAryee-h4s22 минут бұрын
Saying I voted for a candidate is different from showing a real proof of if. because you can say something and do else, let think about what we mostly refer to as the spirit of the law.
@bendzukey631915 сағат бұрын
IN GHANA IT SHOULD NOT APPLY BECAUSE THERE'S NO TRUST IN THE SYSTEM SO THE VOTER NEEDS TO KEEP HIS EVIDENCE
@kofihermanagboh15310 сағат бұрын
I don't agree with Samson.
@mrw176216 сағат бұрын
these hosts keep on repeating the same. Use your common sense small.
@emmanueladjei932713 сағат бұрын
Why Samson Lady sometimes ask a silly question as if he is not a lawyer?. What I know as a novice of the law is that a voter must not disclose his or her ballot to the public that is why a provision is made for a voter to vote in an enclosed ballot cabin.
@KekeliBuckner16 сағат бұрын
So you people are more concerned about a picture than people sharing food to voters in a queue. Smh
@richill39638 сағат бұрын
I feel that what makes it a secret happens only the boot because that is where the truth can be seen and identified. In other words I can tell the whole world that I voted for candidate A or B meanwhile truthfully the candidate I voted for can only be told about with what happened secretly in the boot! I think anything that happens outside or after the boot can't be said to be secret or true because it cannot be verified... My opinion...
@niinii507016 сағат бұрын
What country do they take pictures of votes, Ghana is becoming something on this planet Earth. Villagers will not discuss this but we will have so called interletuals to discuss this on radio because the same people want to bend the law
@Cynthia-mx8cm15 сағат бұрын
Who is this Martin guy ? His personal view is not the law .
@ghanasoukous34815 сағат бұрын
ballot selfie or picture taking is a form core political speech and a ban or prosecution may stifle free speech and expression. You cannot ban an act meant to ocombat an unsubstantiated and hypothetical danger of vote buying. The state must establish that ballot picture taking is because a vote has been sold or bought.
@IsaacPrinceGlorier10 сағат бұрын
Martin Kpebu, you just read that a person shall not, at any point in time, disclose his or her vote. You are equally at fault for saying that you once voted for the NPP, though it happened long after the declaration of the results.
@isaacdarban674515 сағат бұрын
Martin doesn’t speak law, always using emotions
@mariasedashsedash308815 сағат бұрын
Then we should all start taking pictures of our votes if this is how you joy fm are seeking to do. Why do you want to turn the Country into a banana republic instead of you condemning this nonsense