Haha! Very apt in the homelab space ! 😂 "Is the internet down again?"
@chrisumali984118 күн бұрын
Thanks for the demo and info. Another great fantastic video Jim. Have a wonderful day
@Jims-Garage18 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@bluesquadron59324 күн бұрын
Well I stopped at the elephant in the room @3:10
@Jims-Garage24 күн бұрын
I can understand that, hence why I felt it was important to mention it.
@bluesquadron59324 күн бұрын
@ very nice and thanks for the transparency.
@PowerUsr124 күн бұрын
and................im done here......
@Glatze60323 күн бұрын
Very interesting, thanks for your work with this video Jim!
@Jims-Garage23 күн бұрын
@@Glatze603 you're welcome
@1111s-y6j22 күн бұрын
But I tried and it did work well and I got positive results after a pen test. Every software collect data. Telemetry is very often used to understand usage patterns.
@gaz197821 күн бұрын
This sounds like an intersting product right up until the throwawy line "they're based in China" Oh well onto the next.
@Jims-Garage19 күн бұрын
BunkerWeb next (albeit checkout my CrowdSec video - it's probably the best option)
@chrisumali984120 күн бұрын
Thanks for the demo and info. Have a great day
@Jims-Garage19 күн бұрын
Thanks, you too!
@davidwestra818124 күн бұрын
Would love a video of more advanced crowdsec/traefik configuration.
@Jims-Garage24 күн бұрын
Noted! I have been meaning to revisit for a while now
@ghangj24 күн бұрын
Same as well. I am building my homelab around these two products Traefik and Crowdsec and getting that data to show on Grafana will be great
@asksearchknock24 күн бұрын
3:10 - it looks interesting but combining Chinese software with something that can read encrypted packets is a bit too much for me. Great review though and thanks for sharing it
@ency9824 күн бұрын
Been looking for a decent WAF for awhile. Sophos is a pain and crowdsec isn't much better. I appreciate the transparency on the origin, i wont be testing this out because of the origin but its nice to see other options coming out that might get support going for other projects.
@Sli3py23 күн бұрын
Very nice indeed! I wonder would this possibly replace traefik+crowdsec+ let's encrypt combo? 🤔
@Jims-Garage23 күн бұрын
@@Sli3py it can, but you'll have to decide if you should
@ghangj24 күн бұрын
*Contemplating on setting up WAF for external services*....Jim's Garage "Should You Switch? Deployment Guide and Initial Thought"............. 3:10 ...glad to know.
@alepouna13 күн бұрын
Looks like a great app, the UI is pretty nice (-light theme), ,bit bummed of the elephant in the room. I wonder if there is anything similar (ui wise) to this
@An78toi13ne22 күн бұрын
Great video as always ! The chinese factor being a problem, Bunkerweb seems to be a good (French) alternative from what I saw. Maybe you could give it a try to do a WAF comparison ?
@Jims-Garage21 күн бұрын
Oui oui, I'll check that out. Thanks
@amrhegazy722123 күн бұрын
kindly compare it to Crowdsec waf
@Jims-Garage21 күн бұрын
I already have a video on crowdsec (both docker and kubernetes) but it might be worth a refresh.
@michaeldziegiel495418 күн бұрын
I have Nginx configured as a reverse proxy for my web applications, and I'm now trying to integrate SafeLine into this setup. I’ve set port 80 to forward to SafeLine, and then configured Nginx to route traffic to SafeLine on port 9443. In theory, this setup should work, but I keep running into a certificate error. Any ideas on what might be causing this?
@crypto-city85915 күн бұрын
Subbed :)
@Jims-Garage15 күн бұрын
@@crypto-city859 thanks 👍
@altimeterlabs24 күн бұрын
May I ask why you always use VMs as opposed to LXCs? A video on the pros / cons would be great!
@Jims-Garage21 күн бұрын
@@altimeterlabs sure, a VM has an isolated kernel (more secure albeit LXC should be sufficient). I also prefer a VM as there's no dependency on the underlying OS (it will run on anything KVM).
@panthonyy20 күн бұрын
@@Jims-Garage I,m with you on this one, I do the exact same. Although, I have a lot of CPU cores and RAM and electricity is dirt cheap where I live. So if those were issues I might've considered LXCs a lot more
@jole23b23 күн бұрын
compare it to firewalla software / firewall
@Jims-Garage19 күн бұрын
Thanks, I'm yet to test firewalla
@eelrepus9 күн бұрын
No Mainland China project....give up for this....
@BenjaminBenStein22 күн бұрын
Chinese, nope thx
@masterroot2421 күн бұрын
Honestly, I tried to move past the Chinese origin. However, seeing that it doesn't even default to IPv6 being on was the final nail in the coffin for me.
@Jims-Garage19 күн бұрын
That's a fair criticism.
@Carrie-f5b19 күн бұрын
If you enable IPv6 on docker, it actually supports.
@masterroot2419 күн бұрын
@@Carrie-f5b I can see that, but the fact that this is being offered as a WAF and it's not defaulting to IPv6 being on suggests that IPv6 is a secondary concern to (legacy) IPv4. In other words: Out of the box, it's only filtering on legacy traffic.
@Carrie-f5b18 күн бұрын
@@masterroot24 Tengine is host network and supports to filter IPv6 traffic by default. But if you mean accessing SafeLine Management Console with IPv6, that is port 9443, you need to enable IPv6 on docker.
@roehlaguila793023 күн бұрын
Please review BunkerWeb.
@Jims-Garage21 күн бұрын
@@roehlaguila7930 I'll have a look
@panthonyy20 күн бұрын
Thanks for the heads up, didn't know about this one, and will definitely check it out :)