Ugreen NASync Private Cloud Storage Solution - up to 35% OFF: bit.ly/4442TFR
@ReySChasey8 ай бұрын
NASync these nuts.
@blakegirouxphotography9 ай бұрын
One thing I've learned from photography it's not the camera or its movement that creates a cinematic or great shot, it's mood and the viewer's immersion in the image. If you can make a connection for the viewer then the shot will always be strong
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Very true! 🙌
@jeydison8 ай бұрын
But this is a video
@blakegirouxphotography8 ай бұрын
@jeydison video and photography are here to do the same thing. Make a connection, and get a story across. Whether it's one frame or many frames it's all the same in that sense
@Natureboy-w1e5 ай бұрын
😂
@AlFirous4 ай бұрын
@@jeydisonCinematographer also called Director of Photography
@bogey2phoenix9 ай бұрын
I was educated not to move the camera when unnecessary, my professor always told me "every camera movement should be justified to follow an action or something that actually requires a camera movement". Following this rule since.
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
That is definitely a good rule to live by! 👍
@undergroundsprinkles8 ай бұрын
Don't always follow these guidelines... watch "Killing them softly" it had lots of amazing shots and some brilliant ones that didn't require movement... the placement was everything and the most important thing of all... originality without being silly. The cabinet panover shot is one of those amazing shots. You'll know it when you see it.
@robertdouble5594 ай бұрын
@undergroundsprinkles still one of Fraser's best movies.
@myxp-113 ай бұрын
I was going to write exactly the same thing :-) I'm old school. Every movement of the camera says something to the viewer. What do today's "cool" shots say when the camera keeps emerging from behind something?
@MichaelKachalin9 ай бұрын
0:56 Static Shot 2:40 Overhead Shot 5:38 High Angle Shot 6:46 Panning 7:18 Fast Pan 8:02 Tilt Shot 10:12 Rotating
@nomadikmind39798 ай бұрын
YES. People always tell me, that shot went too long, it got boring, it made me feel weird. And it only solidifies my desire for shots to be more static and long, as in like 10-15 seconds vs the 5 seconds people want.
@SightseeingStan8 ай бұрын
As long as the shot does what you want it to do, it can be as static and as long as it needs to be!
@mickeybardot9978 ай бұрын
Sometimes people aren’t wrong
@nomadikmind39798 ай бұрын
@@mickeybardot997 when they are wanting 2.5 second shots constantly, they are
@cineMADvocate6 ай бұрын
@@nomadikmind3979 ahhhh now it is 2.5 seconds. Sorry we got confused since you said "vs the 5 seconds people want." But just throwing it out there: shots like anything else in art are subjective. You just saying that 10-15 seconds is right and "2.5 second shots" are wrong actually doesn't make you any more correct than the ones giving feedback...in fact as THE AUDIENCE, their feedback is more correct since they are who content is made for. Only pretentious douchebags say people are wrong for giving you feedback on how the content you made FOR THEM (the audience) felt.
@nomadikmind39796 ай бұрын
@@cineMADvocate i feel like youre interpreting this whole conversation to be a lot more literal than it is.......
@franklinmariaa12 күн бұрын
A lot of value in just 1 video. Thanks man. 🤜🤛
@ItsBriezzy3 ай бұрын
Love the explanation of Top Down shots. Chef's kiss.
@SightseeingStan3 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@Dizzy12345679 ай бұрын
Mi first little project "Oppenheimer - The Vinyl" after years and years of doing absolutely nothing with a camera is basically all stationary shots. Made it just for fun and enjoyed making every bit of it. So yes, I think you don't need a million cranes, gimbals to make something meaningful. Just recently went to see a movie "The Zone of Interest" and it was basically 95% of static shots. It is possible and it can create a certain type of feeling. I highly recommend that movie by the way.. but not everyone will fully get it I think.
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
As much as I love using a gimbal, setting up a nice static shot is just so pleasing. I haven't seen that film though, thanks for the recommendation 👍
@scottathomson9 ай бұрын
If you search you'll find a great BTS on The Zone of Interest, no lighting used, yes the cameras were fixed but all hidden so the actors could move freely around the house, no crew in the house during filming all cameras monitored remotely. Often 3-4 cameras in each room with up to 12 used for a scene where the actors moved around the house, very well done and very effective, no wonder it won an Oscar.
@j.d.57093 ай бұрын
Really great info. Great explanation and great examples. Thanks.
@SightseeingStan3 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks a lot
@davidgrubba9 ай бұрын
Congratulations on the video. I was wondering how you managed to play the intro songs loud, without disturbing your voice. Have you changed the EQ frequencies?
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it! Yes exactly, bring down certain frequencies 👍
@calwater3 ай бұрын
Similar to the rotating shot in your last example, I have used a tripod for a quick dolly-type pull back shot when shooting food - starting on one item of food and pulling back and slightly rising to reveal another item. I would practice the move several times perfecting the framing and movement, and use my foot to help the move come to a soft, controlled stop. It looked quite impressive, and I've never told anyone how I accomplished a high-quality move so quickly and cheaply...until now.
@SightseeingStan3 ай бұрын
Nice one! Thanks for sharing 👍
@directorserge8 ай бұрын
Amazing tips! Will definitely use them as a film director. Thank you.
@SightseeingStan8 ай бұрын
Awesome! Thank you!
@JayneNicoletti5 ай бұрын
This came up in suggested. Totally helping me in my new “moving” story telling videos. Simple tips but GOOD. Thank you.
@SightseeingStan5 ай бұрын
Thank you! Glad to hear it! 🙏
@TonyC01018 ай бұрын
Great video...and yep! I love static shots in movies because it allows me to become immersed into the vignette around the subject, such as: the environment they're in, or the people around them, they way that objects in the room are arranged, and especially the lighting setup.
@SightseeingStan8 ай бұрын
Thanks! And well said, couldn't agree more 👍
@cineMADvocate6 ай бұрын
As a filmmaker I can tell you that if you are paying attention to all that shit, then the story must really suck.
@TonyC01016 ай бұрын
@@cineMADvocate OR, you've seen the film numerous times and are now looking for things that you may have missed.
@calebe167 ай бұрын
this was a refreshing and very interesting video. Really cool to focus on techniques and not several expensive gadgets. It really inspires to try new things.
@SightseeingStan7 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! ✌️
@TCMejia5 ай бұрын
Thank You So Much For Doing This Vídeo! Because Right Now All I Have Is My Tripod And My Camera. Thank you For Showing The Actual Camera BTS On How You Positioned The Camera To Get Each Look. I’m A Visual Person and That Helped Tons Ive Been Researching On How To Bring My Vídeos To Life.
@SightseeingStan5 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it ✌️
@frederickgreissing99136 ай бұрын
Very nice video! I would add that adding a jib for static shots can be a very powerful tool especially with a remote control head to explore great angles and compositions.
@SightseeingStan6 ай бұрын
Glad to hear you like it! Cool idea with the jib 👍
@CrosscutFilmsSask8 ай бұрын
“Cinema is a matter of what's in the frame and what's out." -Martin Scorsese I always keep that top of mind when shooting
@MelHyde3 ай бұрын
This is so true! With all the great new tech it's hard sometimes to realize that a simple shot can be if not more powerful that a moving shot
@SightseeingStan2 ай бұрын
Yea man, agreed! ✌️
@TonyRush216 ай бұрын
Very informative video. Very creative techniques from just a tripod. Shows how much we don't have to break our backs to get high cost until we comfortably afford, especially if one isn't shooting high-cost videos. I like & subscribed. It was definitely worth it. Kep producing.
@SightseeingStan6 ай бұрын
Happy to hear you liked the video Tony! Thanks for subscribing ✌️
@RamPrism7 ай бұрын
love it. I use a lot of these things instinctively in videos but this structured explanation really gives a sense of clarity to it all.
@iancraig9 ай бұрын
I find the perpetual motion that many KZbinrs use very distracting. Some guys actually seem to push the idea of moving the camera for every shot in order to create motion. Watching on a large TV makes it more obvious, so I experimented by making a short film of a trip twice. Once handheld with moving shots and the same locked off. The wife preferred the locked off version because it was easier to watch. In the end, I mixed a few moving shots into the static in slower sections and that gave a reasonable compromise.
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Yep, I think good balance is important. There is no right or wrong, it just has to make sense and not distract from the story or what is going on in the frame 👍
@Higlorynwaneri3 ай бұрын
Love how you explained it… it seems interesting when I realized you shot Joker
@SightseeingStan3 ай бұрын
Glad to hear you liked the video 🙏
@mikelrv8503 ай бұрын
What a video !!! Love it !!! 😮
@SightseeingStan3 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it! 🙌
@Opensourcetrio9 ай бұрын
Nice one, thanks!
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@jmshrrsn9 ай бұрын
Good video and some useful tips and ideas. Thank you! My rule of thumb for camera moves is simple. If you can’t do it with your head then don’t do with your camera (unless you want to be arty). Use a slow zoom only when you want to draw the viewer into something secret or emotive. Like when someone tells you “hey, come closer, I’ve got something to tell you”. Cameras that move continuously around a subject (especially in interview situations) are plain odd. Would you walk around someone talking to you in real life like that? Perhaps if you were eyeing them up or trying to get the measure of them. If that’s the mood you want to pull off then fine but I really don’t like these moves just because a crew can hire some track and dolly the camera from left to right or in a semi circle. The worst thing a filmmaker can do is move the camera unnecessarily - that’s when you end up distracting the audience and ruining a good story. If the audience becomes aware of your camera moves then in my book it’s gone wrong!
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Good points here man! Totally agree! Camera movement should make sense (in most cases)! There's always exceptions to the rules though but it's a good general rule!
@hakimchekroun48995 ай бұрын
Hi great video I’m new to filmmaking and I’ve learned a lot from your channel I have a small question : how do you find movies references for each technique, do you find them one by one or there is a tool or website that helps thanks in advance
@SightseeingStan5 ай бұрын
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed the video. There are a number of websites to find movie stills like Frameset, Film Vibes, Shotdeck, etc
@braxtonwoullard11888 ай бұрын
If it’s the composition, set design and lighting is strong and working with the story then the static shot can most definitely work.
@Genolexis6 ай бұрын
Amazing video, thank you.
@SightseeingStan6 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@carlosalfredofloresvideofotogr4 ай бұрын
I loved this video. Great!!
@SightseeingStan4 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@Tesmond2564 ай бұрын
Nice to see a clip of my friend Joey in a fight scene. While we were all out trying to shoot martial arts movies in the neighbourhood he went out and got real roles like in the Bourne Ultimatum 👍
@MLM_EC2 күн бұрын
Exactly.You have the same vision as mine. good video.
@shrymq90876 ай бұрын
The content of the video is anchored in the depths of my brain and I hope it helps my creativity. I say: many people should simply dare not to stick to established rules or short-lived trends. Just do it. Just try to put your own creativity and imagination before everything else ...
@SightseeingStan6 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot! Glad you liked the video 👍
@AstroBlissMalayalam5 ай бұрын
simply great1
@SightseeingStan5 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@tymakas3 ай бұрын
good advice, ty
@SightseeingStan3 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@AJ-on-youtube5 ай бұрын
Also important to mention is that if you're shooting in 24p, or (to a SLIGHTLY lesser extent) 30p, you will have to pan your camera more slowly or it will become juddery (and probably also blurred if you're using the 180º shutter rule), especially if you're not using a wide-angle lens. 60p and 30i are more forgiving, and will allow you to pan a little bit faster without these problems. However, even if you're shooting in 60p or 30i, if your shutter speed it set to 1/60 second (or set to "off") you'll still have to be a little careful not to move it too fast or it can blur just a bit, but (if your exposure and lighting will allow it) you can turn up the shutter speed a little bit and get less motion blur without having to worry about it becoming choppy like 24p and 30p will at high shutter speeds.
@AJ-on-youtube5 ай бұрын
Also, you can't just shoot your faster pans in a high frame rate and then convert the footage down to 24p or 30p because it will still judder from having 50%-60% fewer frames (unless you're playing it back in slow motion).
@flybmxlex3 ай бұрын
shooting a bit wide and then digitally reframing a bit can help keep framing
@cinegallo4 ай бұрын
can you tell me how you were wirelessly transmitting the image to the monitor in the directors hand during the overhead example? thnx
@SightseeingStan4 ай бұрын
We were using the Hollyland Mars M1 monitors, they wirelessly connect or can connect to your smartphone
@studiosoul9 ай бұрын
Very informative and engaging. Thanks for sharing!
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@jKHAHN215PA8 ай бұрын
This was really good in certain areas ..thnx
@SightseeingStan8 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it
@MisterBudBrown9 ай бұрын
Super. I learned so much. Thank you.
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Great to hear! Thanks for watching 🙏
@StellaAay9 ай бұрын
POV - You’re learning and it’s super satisfying to watch!
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it 🙌
@BenjaminJaksch9 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for this. Learned a lot in a short time.
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@lumisho9 ай бұрын
First time watching your channel. Great video.
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot for stopping by! Glad to hear you enjoyed the video 👍
@filmworkscl4 ай бұрын
Great video....thanks for the tips
@SightseeingStan4 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@viceroy77929 ай бұрын
Wow! Eye opening. Really interesting. Thanks!
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@OrtwinSchneider9 ай бұрын
Danke für die tollen Informationen und Erklärungen. Solche Details Analysen helfen sehr bei eigenen Projekten.
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Freut mich! Vielen Dank 🙌
@go4acro5 ай бұрын
nice work, thanks man.
@SightseeingStan5 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@Bill-k7x3 ай бұрын
Great stuff. Hope your project sells! Reading Mamet. Mamet says the uninflected shots put side by side is the strongest. What happens next=drama. The camera needs to get out of the way. So tripod shots work great for that style. Example: shot of birds flying out of a tree, shot of lion walking=idea: approaching danger. Implication is always strongest. Because the audience does the work. Who's got money for cranes?
@SightseeingStan3 ай бұрын
Appreciate it! Glad you liked the video! And yes, cranes... eeesshh💰💰
@Emilioh8885 ай бұрын
True but really depends on the subject. If you’re shooting a static object or an event, movement helps because you’re showing many angles of the product at the same time( with a gimbal for example). For event, it helps a lot, it creates energy and dynamism to describe the event.
@Adnan_Khan__1115 ай бұрын
Thanks for this teaching.
@SightseeingStan5 ай бұрын
Glad you found it helpful man! 🙌
@supawooky8 ай бұрын
3:52 use a tilted mirror for a more comfortable position for your actor and the camera operator. Bonus: it can simulate the camera being higher than the ceiling.
@IEBIGCAT9 ай бұрын
Awesome a very helpful video, well spoken with great video samples….thank you……….please please keep up the good work
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful! Thanks a lot 👍
@bondgabebond49079 ай бұрын
Love to see all the techniques directors use in movie making. With today's tiny cameras, like the ZV-E10, one doesn't need much in the way of equipment to make a video. I cheap gimble and tripod can do. Love to see a remake, just for fun, of the 1960s movie Grand Prix using small ZV cameras from Sony. I want to see what today's kids can do.
@emmanuelnzomiwu3 ай бұрын
This was helpful
@SightseeingStan3 ай бұрын
Great to hear! 🙌
@RavinderSingh-ft5dw5 ай бұрын
Superb
@SightseeingStan5 ай бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@BoReynolds9 ай бұрын
I know I'm a Rookie but WHY NOT auto focus when moving the camera in the scene where crazy is moving up from lying down on the bed. Wouldn't that be far better than having a focus puller while you're lifting the tripod? Just curious. AWESOME tutorial man! LOVE the channel. Bo
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Yes of course that would have done the job perfectly fine! But I was using a vintage lens and that does not have autofocus. Glad you liked the video Bo, thanks for watching! 🙌
@BoReynolds9 ай бұрын
@@SightseeingStan Ah yes, makes sense
@dalmatdevelopment78218 ай бұрын
Great info, thanks!
@SightseeingStan8 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful! Thanks for watching ✌️
@amanthecoach8 ай бұрын
I discovered you just now, Thank God for making you.
@dwaynefoong7 ай бұрын
that's a nice silver mir-1b 🤩
@SightseeingStan7 ай бұрын
I actually sold it again, but why?! 🥴
@subros.9 ай бұрын
9:50 or a camera with good resolution and then crop and refine the movement in post 😀
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Mmm maybe in some cases yes. But wou'd have to shoot everything with a lot more space around the character because otherwise they will still break frame if the camera doesn't move fast enough.
@subros.9 ай бұрын
@@SightseeingStan yup, exactly. I think i heard Fincher talking about doing that in an interview or RED promo video
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
@@subros. Ahh really!? Would be interesting to see/hear that! I also heard he's a perfectionist and will do tons of takes until he gets it just right!
@neulandlotse7 ай бұрын
Thanks for reminding this important facts.
@F-Andre9 ай бұрын
im making my first shortfilm and most of the shots are stationary, cause its a one man project. the rest are stills (to show the empty scenario, panning and two tilt shots to show the direction from which my Actor maybe comes (its a sort of sci fi film)
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Nice! Yea I think solo projects are a great way to learn because you just have to simplify certain things
@Eliasu11509 ай бұрын
Great composition = Cinematic
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
100% true 💥
@lifehacks32778 ай бұрын
Thank you
@SightseeingStan8 ай бұрын
Welcome!
@ZDepth_VFX4 ай бұрын
Good video
@SightseeingStan4 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed
@solarkantari5d6 ай бұрын
Great video!
@SightseeingStan6 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@KDiaomo6 ай бұрын
this was really goooodd. have you ever heard of a two piece combo from Popeyes?!?! LOL I would def watch an episode two.
@dafne-wy3ht6 ай бұрын
You used Wild Tales, my favourite movie
@MezeiEugen3 ай бұрын
3:27 What lens is that?
@SightseeingStan3 ай бұрын
Helios 44
@MezeiEugen3 ай бұрын
@@SightseeingStan I did knew it is a soviet lens, but thought it is the Mir-1.
@SightseeingStan3 ай бұрын
@@MezeiEugen Oh okay, maybe the time code is wrong, because I also used a MIR-1 in this project!
@diariodeunavividora7 ай бұрын
Interesting, thanks!
@SightseeingStan7 ай бұрын
Nice to hear you liked it! 🙏
@joekaprod9 ай бұрын
Great! I love that you had many different sources of examples for each shot.
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Happy to hear you liked the video 👍
@TheAardvark573 ай бұрын
Anybody know what the film at 2:26 is? It's two people in a restaurant. Don't recognize either actor.
@SightseeingStan3 ай бұрын
Wild Tales or Relatos Salvajes
@NostalgiNorden9 ай бұрын
The camera actually moves in that shot from Dunkirk tough.
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Do you mean the shake when the bombs drop? I would still say this counts as a locked off shot 😉
@ImJustRob.8 ай бұрын
Yeah, I'd say more of an effect rather than a move.
@MLM_EC2 күн бұрын
correct . I like static shots
@apsaravideo7 ай бұрын
😯Wow this is good. The techniques covered more than the entire 4-year of Cinematograpahy schooling !!!
@SightseeingStan7 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot! Appreciate it 👋
@cineMADvocate6 ай бұрын
Wow yo u either went to a SHIT cinematography school or you mastered in hyperbole. So basically you are saying in FOUR YEARS they didn't teach you to tilt or pan the camera or use a high angle to show a wide shot? Like I said: sounds like a shit school.
@CalmRelaxedPeace9 ай бұрын
3:33 what kind of tripod is this?
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Smallrig Freeblazer AD-100
@LeyAkino9 ай бұрын
this is also effective if you have a great actor to begin with
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Yes of course great talent helps!
@InnerPeaceSounds9 ай бұрын
It is a must no matter what technique you use.
@luispaulovi6 ай бұрын
Very similar content we have seen at studio binder, but 4 years ago.
@SailingOfka8 ай бұрын
Thanks
@NicoleSeelig8 ай бұрын
90% of my short film is locked off shots, because the characters are stuck in a bad situation. Sometimes, stillness in itself can convey a mood.
@SightseeingStan8 ай бұрын
Yes 100% agree! 👍
@nikitamasojidkova8 ай бұрын
It s all about feeling
@HAVEN-hr1ob9 ай бұрын
This is familiar with the StudioBinder.
@methodstudio82089 ай бұрын
great
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Thanks! 🙌
@ded-_-pihto9 ай бұрын
What is really noticeable in your film is the unmotivated lighting
@chrisogrady287 ай бұрын
A harsh read only the lighting nerds will understand haha
@BajangPetualang9 ай бұрын
Ini yg ku mau di pelajari
@AnandaGarden6 ай бұрын
Thank you. The problem I see with the "handheld look" is that it's so seldom done well. Mostly, it upstages the actors, it's tiring for the viewer, and it demonstrates the camera person's ego-activated desire to be, very unnecessarily, part of the action. Poor handheld camerawork has ruined entire films and series, most notably (?) the Belgian version of "Professor T" which needs to be Warp Stabilized (read the Amazon 1-star comments). Too often, camera shake is used stupidly in the belief that it will GENERATE excitement, fear, nervousness, a feeling of hectic action, et al., instead of trusting the actors, who nearly always do it better. I've watched handheld scenes that were very well done - like the best running shoes, you forget that the camera is there. In those scenes, it was appropriate and served the viewer - it made the scenes better, not worse as amateurish handheld work does.
@FilmSpook8 ай бұрын
Instant subscriber!!! 😅 Many Thanks, my Good Brother.
@SightseeingStan8 ай бұрын
Thanks for subbing! 🙌
@LaSedNoEsNada9 ай бұрын
WILD TALES 🇦🇷🇦🇷
@nutssense74999 ай бұрын
hi Sightseeing Stan , i would like to do video editing for your content , looking forward to hear from you soon
@georgeguilfoyle68473 ай бұрын
Reth Sogan
@NostalgiNorden9 ай бұрын
Roy Andersson approves.
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
😁
@CellarDoor19703 ай бұрын
2:00 it’s called sub-framing
@TheMissingxtension9 ай бұрын
Isn't it someone's job "focus puller"? You did it the Hollywood way
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
Yes you are correct. Usually that person is wirelessly connected to the camera and isn't in such an awkward position though 😅
@LeadsTheFallen8 ай бұрын
Let the action move, not the camera
@SightseeingStan8 ай бұрын
I think Casey Neistat once said something similar!
@petermgruhn9 ай бұрын
3:15 - Same calculator.
@The_Idea_of_Dream_Vision9 ай бұрын
Doesn't you. Camera have auto focus? Last shot xould be taken care of with autofocus
@SightseeingStan9 ай бұрын
I was shooting on a vintage lens, that doesn't have autofocus.
@elingrome58538 ай бұрын
yep... Ive seen so many movies ruined by endlessly moving the camera.
@Ultralined2 ай бұрын
You probably get this a lot but Seth Rogen.. is that you?