Sigma 85mm 1.4 ART Review vs Canon 85mm f1.2L II

[@frankluo230]

Canon 85F1.2L is a special lens in the entire EF lens history, along with 200f1.8L and EF 50F1L. Hall of fame if you like to call it. Other lenses are great but not legendary like them.

[@juliatrotti]

I agree, it's not perfect but there's something very special about it!

[@sergiusblessed]

I wiil work hard and eat less but will buy this lens - Sigma 85/1.4 ART :)

[@tomkro9704]

Сергей Городецкий and did you get it ?

[@isabostan]

@@tomkro9704 maybe he worked less and ate much

[@at4095]

@@isabostan Good one :D

[@PhotoBob]

Sigma has been killing it the last few years. I’ve been shooting their primes for wedding, portrait, and family shoots. The results are fantastic. The only down side is many of them are BIG!! Great video

[@abhishek_kadam]

Is there any focusing issues??

[@tomkro9704]

abhishek kadam not on mirrorless

[@pogolas]

Not the only. Auto focus accuracy on DSLRs, is the real problem.

[@aingzuu2110]

Autofocus is absolutely trash

[@Peter-qg4nh]

What would you choose ? sigma 105mm 1.4 or the 85mm?

[@juliosanchez6677]

I love the focus accuracy, color redemption and unique look of the Canon 85 1.2LII

[@stanleycampos3400]

Does the sigma 85mm fits on the canon 90D?

[@sergeyesin1099]

Thanks for the review. Sure you have to compare Sigma with the latest Canon 85 1.4.

[@patrikvargovcak8788]

I was deciding between Canon 85 1.4 and Sigma 85 1.4 for a long time and I am really happy with Canon. Both lenses are perfect but you know sigma may have trouble with focusing in some cases what was the main reason I choosed Canon :)

[@juliatrotti]

Glad you liked it :) I'll do that next!

[@mhaqqi]

@@patrikvargovcak8788 I heard they doesnt have trouble focusing with mirrorles sony camera's such as a7 iii is that true?

[@mccon2ej]

Have you tried the Sigma ART 50mm 1.4? I keep hearing it’s the “best” 50mm SLR lens of all time....I wonder how it compares to the 1.2 L

[@doyshoots6259]

I think the Sigma beat canon in lots of ways. thank you Julia for that video👏🏼 👏🏼

[@ArcanePath360]

Good comparison and thoughts on what is right for what kind of photography you do. I like the 1.2 look as well and pin sharpness isn't always a good look. However at least with the Sigma you can blur in post if it suits. You can't sharpen a blurred image in the 1.2 if you want it to be a little sharpened when cropping in.

[@soulrock8412]

Nice comparison. But u talked about using it for wedding, how about testing it in low light shooting? Mix lighting? Shooting wid flash ? And moving subjects? Tnx.

[@juliatrotti]

I wanted to focus this review on using it for outdoor portrait photography, maybe next time I can do a low light test :)

[@ThatGuyInVegas]

Myself I sold my Canon 85mm 1.2 because it's so slow to focus, yes beautiful, but it's so slow. I was going to run with Canon's 85mm 1.4 but my camera shop showed me that the Sigma 85mm 1.4 is sharper and just as fast. Landed on the Sigma 85mm 1.4, very happy.

[@milestrevelyan]

I think you need to do a focus micro adjustment of both lenses for the 5dmk4. You can download a focus chart from the web.

[@jenniferclaudio8937]

May I ask what us a focus micro adjustment?

[@milestrevelyan]

@@jenniferclaudio8937 it is a procedure that allows a user to correct for small errors of front- or back-focusing. With lenses having wide apertures less than f2.8 such as f1.2 and f1.4 its very important. Micro focus adjust is a feature on high Canon dslrs such aa the 5dmk4.

[@seanbond8075]

Julia, I think a better comparison would be the Canon 85 1.4L with the Sigma, as you are comparing better apples. Here would be my issue with the Sigma. It just appears that the lens barrel from the mount to the base of the focus ring is very long and when you tack on the Canon EF to RF Adapter it makes it even longer it seems. For me I would opt for the Canon 1.4 since it also has IS, where the Sigma does not. Cheers!

[@josephpeppard561]

Hi Julia, thanks so much for the excellent review of the Sigma 85mm f/1.4 Art lens. Another lens you might want to compare and review is the new Canon 85mm f/1.4 IS lens. I recently purchased this lens for my portrait photography and I love the results. It delivers beautiful color rendition and bokeh with superb resolution and sharpness. As always your images are lovely with beautiful editing. Take care and happy shooting.

[@juliatrotti]

Glad you liked it! I definitely want to test out the new Canon 85 soon, looks like a beautiful lens :D

[@josephpeppard561]

Hi Julia, the Canon 85mm f/1.4 IS lens is quite heavy but the IS works quite well for portraits. I think you will love the Canon lens as much as the Sigma 85mm lens. Take care and happy shooting.

[@hey.steven]

Joseph Peppard hi Joseph. How does the canon 85mm 1.4 do with sun flares compared to the 85mm 1.2?

[@josephpeppard561]

Hi Steven, sorry for the late reply as I've been ill. I did not use the lens to test sun flare as I don't typically use flare for my portrait projects. However I can say the lens excels in resolution, color rendition and bokeh quality. The lens is on the heavy side but not really a problem for a portrait shoot. I feel the Canon lens will typically hold it's value as compared to the Sigma 85mm f/1.4.

[@basantshrestha]

Hi there, Would you guide me, I am bit confused Shall I buy this 85mm sigma art or canon 70-200mm f2.8 III Thanks

[@stevenmeansphotography3861]

Question 1 should I trade my canon 24-70 2.8 version 1 for the sigma 85mm…. Question 2 does this lens miss focus on canon

[@xpy1]

Would you recommend the sigma 85 for portraits and full body fashion

[@filomenoybanez5227]

had focus problems with my Sigma 85 Art..had do the internal compensation focus.. but still missing some shots

[@K9malinois_dog_love]

I was thinking about the sigma but I ended up buying the Rikinon 85mm 1.2 manual lens image quality it’s more like the canon 85 mm 1.2 which is what I’m after but also in a lower budget.

[@ejphoto]

I love my Canon 85 1.2 L II

[@allanapollon4304]

thats about $2500 for a lense but the quality is good but I feel like the sigma can do a smooth job as well but Canon lenses are ridiculously expensive.

[@jadejade2851]

5:11 comparison start

[@Skoek1]

It would have been interesting to know what aperture you were using. I have just bought the Sigma for my Canon 5div and the autofocus is quite off. Focusing on the closest eye in all cases it was out of focus and the further eye was in focus. I guess that is where calibration come in, but I was told that straight out the box it should be calibrated and would have to be calibrated in a few months. So, quite disappointing.

[@seoulman2u]

Did you have to calibrate or was it already pre-calibrated when you rented it? Most are saying you have to calibrate the lens using the adapter for tack sharp images. Did you you buy one and how was it out of the box?

[@sinthailim4848]

It's personal but I prefer the colour, tone and luminance of the Canon lens. I would also say the Canon is 'cleaner' rather than vice-versa.

[@JeffCreates]

Both look like great lenses to me. The Sigma would be my preference if i was comparing them directly, but i'd be very happy with either. Interesting to see such a close comparison (especially as i've been looking at getting a Sigma - although not this one).

[@pepe2618]

Thanks for the review. I´ve just bought the Sigma few days ago and can´t wait for a portrait photoshoot!

[@bohdanstadnyk9578]

How to shot photos with the most contrast it could be and get optimal histogram? Is it only lens job (high quality glass etc) or some technique can help us as photographers?

[@kimsonpro]

You want to get it right on camera?tough job. The right answer should be "It depends". There's no same environment as other, reading the scene is a must

[@bohdanstadnyk9578]

@@kimsonpro Thanks. Yes, on camera. So, should I try to reach more upper and centered histogram? As I understood the height is more to contrast. Is it correct?

[@kimsonpro]

@@bohdanstadnyk9578 the height shows how strong the gamma zone is, the width shows which zones are in the frame.

[@kimsonpro]

If you're looking for more contrast, get the height from both ends of the histogram to strike top

[@bohdanstadnyk9578]

@@kimsonpro Thank you..=)

[@alexmorgan3435]

Lens hoods to reduce flair. A more applicable comparison would be with the new Canon 85mm F1.4 IS.

[@juliatrotti]

I'll be doing some videos with the 1.4 next!

[@alexmorgan3435]

Julia Trotti Shall look forward to it!

[@basantshrestha]

I have canon 6d mark ii , looking for sharp lens, I allready own canon 50mm 1.4 and Tamron 24-70mm f2.8, Looking to buy one more. Please advise me, heard lot about 85mm sigma art.?!!

[@hey.steven]

That’s interesting how you mentioned the canon 85 having a more vintage look cause you also mentioned the same thing about the 35mm 1.4 Mark I lens compared to the Mark II. I guess you’ll find out for sure when you use the new 85 1.4! Do you think the canon 5d2 has also has a more vintage look compared to the 5d4 since it’s an older camera? Time to whip that baby out again! I have the 35 and 50 lens and am very happy with them but now I’m tempted to get the 85! I just hate how you have to stand so far away even just to get a 3/4 shot!

[@juliatrotti]

Ooh boy I haven't touched my 5d 2 in years!! Would be so weird to take it out again and I think I will do that today for fun and see how the photos turn out haha I'll take some shots of my kitty! And I agree, the 85 produces beautiful photos but I always feel so disconnected while shooting because I'm so far away

[@hey.steven]

leicanoct canon actually did update the 85 with IS. It is the 85 1.4 and I think it came out a year or two ago.

[@hey.steven]

Julia Trotti YES more evie love please!!

[@musicvideos1663]

Would you recommend sigma 35mm 1.4 or sigma 85mm 1.4 (using in a Nikon camera) I do portrait photography

[@khoifoto]

I noticed my sigma 85 art sometimes suffers from front focus at certain distance, especially on 5dmark3. Then I switched to sony using the mc11 and the front focus is gone.

[@tomvartanian377]

I've shot the Canon 85 f/1.2, 85 f/1.4 IS as well as the Sigma f/1.4. I like the Canon 85 f/1.4 IS the best, followed by the Sigma, and finally the Canon 85 1.2.

[@brendantaylor2623]

I'm about to buy one of the Canons. Can you elaborate a little? What made you like the 1.4 the most? Thanks!

[@Motor_Metrics]

I have bought sigma 85mm f1.4 for canon but i dont know which camera body i should go for?

[@thomasgunn4146]

Great video! The only thing I'm a little confused about however is why you didn't use the Sigma mc-11 for use on the Sony? You are using a Sigma lens, so why use the metabones instead of using Sigma's native adapter that is designed to be used with their lenses? Was it because you already owned the metabones already prior to getting the sigma lens? If it works well then it doesn't matter, but I've heard many reports of the metabones working better with native Canon glass but not working as smoothly as the mc-11 when mounting sigma lenses.

[@sheikhyerbouti5567]

Hi Julia you inspired me to shift from zooms to PRIMES! Now i owned Canon 85mm f1.4 L IS, 35mm f1.4 II L and 50 f1.2 L

[@juliatrotti]

Aw yay! Primes are so fun :D

[@elenapopa2574]

Thank you so much for this review Julia! Looking at buying an 85mm myself this was super helpful. I think I'll have to save up and go for the Canon in the end, as the Sigma lenses seem to all have this back-focusing issue on full-length portraits, which is such a shame because otherwise they're such lovely lenses. I have the 24, 35 and 50mm Sigma Art lenses (Canon mount) and I can only put my money on the 35. The other two seem to miss focus every single time I shoot full-length portraits which is so frustrating, especially when you're trying to shoot a wedding. So yes, thanks very much for this!

[@juliatrotti]

So glad you found it helpful! I know, I was really bummed about it not focusing on the full body shots. I use the 85mm usually for fuller length portraits at weddings and for e-commerce, so focusing at full body is a must for me. It's such a shame because closeup its TACK sharp! I'm going to make a video about micro adjusting Sigma lenses to see if it actually helps the front/back focusing issues soon :)

[@adrianbuckley8922]

Have you had these lenses optimised? Should resolve your problems

[@4321jimjam1]

Do you only work with prime lenses? If you were to do travel or landscaping photos? I get prime for photo shoots as they are sharper

[@juliatrotti]

Yeah I pretty much always use primes, for portraits, weddings, travel, landscapes, everything haha. The only time I use zooms really is when I'm borrowing them off brands to be able to film some videos about!

[@4321jimjam1]

Julia Trotti what lenses would you recommend for landscape work and then like street photography and portraits? I’m a beginner and I don’t know whether to invest in a decent 24-105 f4 or two prime lenses with better f like f1.4/1.8

[@peterbetts9347]

Julia ..I just love your informative Videos ..Learning a LOT

[@defyingtheodds1987]

Is there a video of your editing process ?

[@ERoossien]

But what's the price difference between them? Surely the F1.2 will be very pricey to pick up?

[@CrazyMalawian]

Sony G-Master 85 vs. Canon 85L II vs. Sigma 85 Art?

[@juliatrotti]

That would be a fun next video!

[@arpitwankhede6062]

And i wanted to know how well can canon 85 1.2 can perform on sony a7iii as im willing to purchase either 85 1.2 or 70-200 but i do portrait so 1.2 or 1.4 is what im looking for and sony g master is equally priced to canon and canon 1.2 if it works on sony then surely ill buy it over g master cause speed isnt what im looking for

[@mochamocha1040]

Julia, it would be very interesting if you used the 135mm L lens that you own and pair it up with the 85mm and what your thoughts are in terms of working distance and results.

[@juliatrotti]

Yes I would absolutely love to do this!

[@gametubenepal1396]

Hii, is it worthy to buy used 85mm 1.4 DG HSM lens for 555$ usd? Please reply

[@jorjevermoudes8944]

hey i can use a cheap manual adapter N-G-NEX SIGMA 85MM MY SONY A7III

[@LukeKwan78]

Julie do u have the Sony 85 gmaster? Triple comparison!!!

[@juliatrotti]

Unfortunately I couldn't find anywhere in Sydney to hire it, but as soon as I can get my hands on it it would be so fun to do a triple comparison!! haha

[@jindu881011]

@@juliatrotti don't know if you know this guy @悉尼顾俊, he has almost every single sony and canon lense and he's in Sydney

[@borlach321]

Could I use this on my Nikon D7200?

[@Ajay-ws8it]

Perfect for candid🤜

[@filmmaker8444]

about going closer, I think both cameras you used were full frames but the difference is that with the sigma you used a converter which cropped some of the frames of your camera. having said that if you were to use the same converter on a canon you would have got the same results. there is a camera difference too which I think is good to have such matter in a comparison. you see Sony is a mirror-less camera plus new edition. to my opinion if you could compare EOS-R to Sony alpha A7iii that comparison would have made more sense, however I loved the video and please make more..

[@marclabro]

hello Julia, nice review and beautiful pictures. If i understand well, you have some problems of focus on different sigma lens at F/1.4. correct ? so, how do you fix it ? would you recommend it for my d750 instead of my nikon 70-200 2.8 vr which could provide same depth of field i think than an 85mm F/1.4 or F/1.8 (430 euros nikon).

[@Investwithgourav]

Hey Julia plz suggest a beginner DSLR with lens for portrait photography I love your portrait photography

[@oksanasoko]

So clarity depends of lenses? I used 50mm canon 1.8, and photo is not so clear and not so sharped :)

[@juliatrotti]

Yep a lens can affect a few image quality things such as sharpness, colour rendition, etc

[@TinkeringNerd]

I’ve had somewhat of a disappointing experience with sigma 18-35 1.8 on my 60D. Focus, focus, focus.. I was getting maybe 20% of pictures in decent focus. At some point, I acquired the lens dock to adjust its parameters. Well, it forced me to update the firmware of the lens, after which, the lens refused to focus while in manual mode on the camera. It became next to useless, really..

[@TheGirlSkateBoardCo]

😂😂😂

[@afrank3029]

Wow the Sigma looks really good !

[@rondetten9252]

First let me say I love you! If I were 20 years younger, well not that it would make a difference. Just wanted to ask why you never use the viewfinder, is that a mirrorless thing?

[@zsozsousa1]

did you fine-tuned the lens?

[@shanenebria5822]

Hi pretty Julia. I hope you will make a video on how to set your camera to get that dark background without having editing your photo.. thank you

[@jaimeduncan6167]

Great review, I was full dejavú until she mention that she release the behind the scenes already 😊

[@MrSunamo]

Good comparison Julia. Since you had mentioned the focusing issues, were you using the Eye AF on the Sony body?

[@juliatrotti]

I didn't have any issues with focus on the Sony, and yep eye AF worked really well! I only had issues with focusing when taking full body shots on the Canon, maybe because of front/back-focusing issues, or maybe because it was a busy location with all the leaves in the background. But that's the only time that AF was struggling :)

[@syednadeali5834]

Your photography is very good

[@nicolewilson3886]

Would really love to see you compare canon 1.2 vs the newer 1.4 with IS/faster Autofocus!!!

[@charlesazevedo4849]

Just think that you should have used the canon version of the sigma in this review so in my opinion this was not a fair, reliable comparison. Another option would be to use.the canon 85mm on the Sony with the adaptor. Lets not forget that the Sony focusing system benefits tremendously any lens when it comes to the sharpness bit since the AF is different, no mirror, no separate AF module, everything done in the sensor and you have ore accuracy. It would be nice to see a review of these two now with the canon 85 in the Sony with an adaptor.

[@circassian3771]

Great video, thank you!

[@TheLinesEnd]

best portrait lens i've ever owned.

[@YaStarz]

Your shots are so beautiful

[@syednadeali5834]

I like your photos

[@samuelserubiri9390]

Great comparison

[@tenorbanjoguy]

Both lenses definately shine in their own way. Some of the Sigma images were a bit sterile, while some of the Canon were a bit vague, but all images displayed were lovey!

[@carloscarlitos4010]

Thank you. This is you at your best. Loved the video.

[@juliatrotti]

Aw thank you! I love talking about lenses haha

[@phnxbr]

Belated view but thank you anyway ) Having had both Canon and Sony, now I admit that Sigma is amazing

[@v-tube2265]

Love your work !

[@baileywooten2069]

can you do a comparison with sigma art 35mm 1.4 versus canon 35mm 1.4?

[@juliatrotti]

Yep, it's up next on my list!

[@PouMpleksame]

I like your videos very much. I would like to see a video about crop frame cameras and lenses.

[@ChemaGD]

If you try the 105 mm you will love it!

[@VonDerLocke]

So happy that I found you!

[@eagamerzz]

Hey julia u never use flash (studio or other) ?

[@juliatrotti]

I used to do studio photography but I just prefer being outdoors and using natural light. I might get into a studio again for a video sometime soon though :)

[@eagamerzz]

@@juliatrotti allright u are lucky for natural light. In France the weather at the moment its raining and cloudy. Really nice channel u have. Have fun and thanks for everythings. Biz

[@richardpcrowe]

I opted for the Sony 85mm f/1.8 for my A6500 because of size, weight and OF COURSE PRICE!

[@Francisfphoto_]

Did you finally tested the Sigma 85mm f1.4 ART against the Canon EF 85mm f1.4 L IS?

[@lexyshannon5474]

Julia! You’re amazing! You have inspired me and you have taught me SOOOO MUCH! I’m about to get my canon 5d mark iv!! I would love to talk to you more and get tips on how to always get settings right and using natural light right every time!!!!

[@juliatrotti]

That makes me so happy to hear, thank you! :D

[@skiifree1]

best review so far. I think because of the price sigma is a lot better. But i do prefer canon 85. But consider the price of the canon 85 i rather buy sigma. 100%. :)

[@ivicanikolic034]

try MC-11 adapter, it works even better with sigma. Same as it was a native lens

[@juliatrotti]

The Metabones adaptor felt like native glass on Sony as well!

[@ivicanikolic034]

@@juliatrotti it feels until you try mc-11 with sigma lenses... :D I had metabones mk5, used with canon lenses...it was not like native... then i went to mc-11 and sigma lenses, and it is WOW...

[@willoughby5150]

Hi Julia, thanks for the review and I really love your channel. You mention the lens was out of focus slightly for the full body shots. I own the sigma 35mm sigma 1.4 art lens and out of the box I found I had the same problem. I over came this by calibration with the sigma dock which really worked and the lens is now amazing. It’s a shame but I think all the sigma art lens need that little tweak to uncover there full potential.

[@tara_nguyen]

I agreed. I'm saving to buy this lens but worry about tampering with the technology.

[@willoughby5150]

Tara Nguyen I was to Tara but it was very easy to do and really worked

[@juliatrotti]

Yeah I agree, I have the Sigma 24mm and I have lots of problems with back focusing. I was pleasantly surprised that the Sigma 85 managed to get tack sharp photos the majority of the time though with the exception of the full body shots! I have micro adjusted my 24 but honestly haven't shot with it since then as I find it's unreliable so I just don't reach for it. I'll have to take it out for a spin soon to see if the micro adjusting worked!

[@ishowspeedaf9986]

Why I not mske any video on a6400

[@utubekiidder]

This was amazing, great job

[@dccd673]

Glad to have found this video as I’m considering getting an 85mm for my Canon 5Dm4. I think at this point I’ll choose the cheaper one 😂

[@nikdepoez2092]

i just found your channel, and it's amazing😍❤️

[@eagamerzz]

You right :?)...

[@nikdepoez2092]

job ony ? wdym

[@eagamerzz]

@@nikdepoez2092 dont understand

[@nikdepoez2092]

job ony bye

[@taimoorkhanvlogs]

Julia I love your background setup ! Specially the lightning 😍😍 I wanna see the behind scene video of your setup plz ❤️

[@picturef8]

The Sigma is clinically good but lacks character and tonal value in its photos , I've got one myself . As for Autofocus, when focusing further then 5 meters away the hit rate drastically drops unless you focus centre frame. This is for me the biggest flaw. Shot in Nikon d810

[@jamesjackson4264]

pieter van der walt would love to hear your reply. I have just upgraded from the d600 to the D800E. I have the sigma 35 art and like you said up close it is nice but the 35 is made to shot close. Further I miss focus more than I would like. Right now I own the 85 1.4d but feel I am lacking with the more MPs. Would you recommend the sigma 85? I know you say it misses a lot from further back. I don’t want to drop the cash and have this be an issue because I usually buy second hand.

[@picturef8]

@@jamesjackson4264 if you fine tune the lens with the tap in console then its " ok " . If your doing head and shoulder shots then your hit rate will be high . But full body shots at f2.8 and wider you will have a 50 - 70 % hit rate, and that's by using the centre AF point . Far outer focus points your looking at a 2 out 10 hit rate at f1.4 for full body shots .

[@jamesjackson4264]

pieter van der walt dang that feels low. Thanks for the insight.

[@picturef8]

@@jamesjackson4264 I dont think it necessary all the lenses fault but rather the limitations of the older d8xx AF system . I've heard more positive results with mirrorless system and d850

[@escuelavaldez]

Por qué el titulo en español si el idioma del video es otro?

[@juliatrotti]

The title is in english.. even though there is only one proper word - "review" haha, the rest of the title is just the lens' names :)

[@GilbertTV]

tough choice.... i'll stick with my £600 GBP Sony 85mm F1.8 ...which is a fantastic lens for the money... would love to try the Canon lens though

[@on-the-spot9467]

I like your model. And the Sigma 85mm as well.

[@AramSabah]

Nice work!

[@mukmin01]

Didnt know there is a girl reviewer for cameras and gears. Subbed immediately

[@LieslHuddleston]

Great video Julia! I’m still confused about which one I’d prefer 😄 I rented the Canon 85mm 1.2 once and absolutely loved it. Saving to buy one, the cheaper Sigma is tempting, but I’m after it for up close nature photography and I love the very creamy bokeh from the Canon 85mm @ 1.2 Ahhh, what to do... what to do 😂

[@LieslHuddleston]

Oh, I dropped my Sigma 35mm 1.4 the other day from about 4 feet onto a hard surface, smashing my filter... but thankfully nothing bad happened to the lens... impressed with Sigma!

[@PavelR2]

Buy Canon 1.4 - better AF (especially for video and future bodies), IS, better resolution than 1.2II or wait for R 85/1.2 ;-)

[@alexmorgan3435]

Liesl Huddleston canon 100mm f2.8 L macro

[@LieslHuddleston]

Alex Morgan, I have that lens, it’s great, my KZbin channel has several videos about my pictures with that lens :) I rented the 85mm f/1.2 and used it for some nature photography and portraits and have been in love with it ever since, just trying to scrape the money together to get one 😂 tho the Sigma May win out for price.

[@juliatrotti]

Oh damn!! So good that it didn't break, I've never dropped one of my Canon lenses before, so I wonder how it would hold up lol next video - dropping my lenses! But yeah I agree it's a tough decision between the two, they are both beautiful lenses 😫

[@peterpreisdinslaken1510]

Klasse gemacht gefällt mir außerordentlich gut LG.Pidi

[@BochuJay]

I wish they're going to make canon adaptors for the Nikon Z cameras 😭

[@jarrellelee]

I have a fringer adapter that allows me to use canon glass on my Nikon z6ii!

[@flclarkinc]

Have you shot the Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS USM? Curious to hear how you feel it performs in terms of portraits to the 1.2.

[@juliatrotti]

I haven't used that lens yet, but I definitely want to try it out this year and I'll make a video about it when I do!

[@julienvasquezphotographyll8900]

Your amazing! Great informative videos as well🤓

[@cy0ng]

Keep the reviews coming Julia!

[@pyroBlastM]

Hi Julia, I. have some question that I am trying to find and answer to but it is very difficult. Hope you can clarify: We all know that the sigma lenses have a bit of bad fame for their focusing system. Some people say that don't experience any problems and others say they do. Now read that live view when used the people that experience the problem they don't see that problem. (assuming for DSLR) 1) Have you tried a sigma lens that had this problem? 2) Have you seen that problem in live view? 3) Have you tried to use that same lens in a mirrorless camera with adaptor? To double check if the problem still there? 4) Do you know why sigma have this problem on DSLR? 5) Do you know if this problem still persists nowadays? 6) Do native sigma lenses for mirrorless camera have this problem? TiA a lot.

[@juliatrotti]

I think the answer to this is difficult because not all lenses have this issue, some are perfectly fine straight out of the box, some need to be adjusted with the dock and they're fixed and some need adjusting and it will still back focus as I have experienced with my 24mm :( I haven't tried using these in live view, I find that shooting that way on the 5D4 is very slow and the focus point is too big so it wouldn't be accurate on the model's eye, so unfortunately I don't have any answers there for you! Lenses do not back focus on mirrorless bodies, so you wouldn't have any issues like this on the EOS R or A7III, etc. It's also not just Sigma - any lens has the ability to back focus. And why this happens on DSLRs and not on mirrorless: Mirrorless cameras use phase and contrast AF on the sensor unlike DSLRs which reflect light through the mirror to a separate AF sensor, so back/front focusing issues don't exist in mirrorless. I hope that answers some of your questions!

[@pyroBlastM]

@@juliatrotti yes indeed. For example, have you tried your 24mm on any mirrorless that you have got and you saw that that problem was not there anymore?

[@pyroBlastM]

@@juliatrotti Thanks. Got it. Another question please. Did you have any lenses that had to be AFMA to extremes that worked very well on your Sony adapted (obviously not adjusted)? I know that mirrorless don't have the mirror but would like to know from experience and something that you have noticed/expreienced. TiA