SIGN or SWERVE? The Biggest Transfer Decisions This Summer | Sunday Vibes

► SPONSOR THIS VIDEO: [e-mail]
This week Joe, Pat & Zac are back in the pub! They are decided whether they would sign or avoid some of the biggest rumours of the summer. Including: Darwin Nunez to Liverpool, Frenkie De Jong to United, Jules Kounde to Chelsea, Robert Lewandowski to Barcelona, Kalvin Phillips to Liverpool, Bastoni to Tottenham Hotspur, Gabriel Jesus to Arsenal and loads more!
► SUBSCRIBE to FOOTBALL DAILY: bit.ly/fdsubscribe
► SUBSCRIBE to EURO FOOTBALL DAILY: bit.ly/37igEnb
► SUBSCRIBE to FOOTBALL DAILY PODCASTS: bit.ly/3moyeMO
► JOIN THE FAN RUN FD FAMILY DISCORD: / discord
► SIGN UP FOR A FREE SMARTERSCOUT MEMBERSHIP HERE: smarterscout.com/
This is Football Daily - the home of Premier League fan analysis on KZbin. On this channel you'll find Sunday Vibes, Top 10s, Explained, Transfer Talk, Unfiltered, Winners&Losers and much more. If you love football as much as us then don't forget to subscribe!

[@matthewharrison4115]

Pat comparing pogba’s situation to Joe’s hangover meal is so good!

[@lcweng99]

Sounded like a dad explaining something to a 5 yr old child XD

[@lps2013]

@@lcweng99 Don't let 5 year olds get a hangover

[@lilzak96]

I was just about to comment this and saw yours 👍🏽

[@joshdavo1068]

Goated

[@jordannaas5217]

That shook my brain like some Freud shit 🧐

[@SmHitman]

Never let pat not be there in Sunday Vibes. Sunday Vibes is incomplete without him

[@JKnight23]

Ward completed the Jota, Konate, Diaz and Carvalho deals so this isn’t his first move for LFC

[@rafadinhoforlahm]

I believe Konate and Jota were still overseen by Michael Edwards though. But you’re right, Ward basically arranged everything with the past few deals.

[@nikolasavic1525]

Jota hahahah

[@keysersozejr.7925]

Can we get a Sunday vibe w the full cast at the end of the season(or at least once per season)

[@tomsimmonds6258]

This is a great idea

[@Miooni]

Amazing idea

[@wpb2354]

make it 2 hours long also

[@randomrussianguy603]

how many would that be? 10?

[@joshdavo1068]

@@randomrussianguy603 more than 10 like

[@PatJDelaney]

Nunez is £64m initial fee, add-ons of £12.8m on appearances and £8.5m on team success. When you break it down like that it seems like a perfectly reasonable deal

[@arranrobertson664]

And it’s 6 years. Plus I’m guessing his wages won’t be ridiculous.

[@jonnyvelocity]

@@arranrobertson664 Wakes are 98,000 a week

[@Lee-ye3ev]

No it doesn't. He hasn't done anything to warrant being worth £80 million.

[@PatJDelaney]

@@Lee-ye3ev Without Nuñez performing Liverpool won't hit those team success add-ons, so he's worth the initial gamble and if he performs to that higher level then he'll be worth the add-ons to make it £80m

[@50tyson39]

We need a good prediction and Chris Hamill is not here. 😓

[@danx_3535]

the fact that this Liverpool club is dropping €100M on Nunez is scary given how well the club is run. I feel like klopp wants to evolve the attack with firmino dropping even deeper instead of replacing hendo with a like for like, and then returning to his 4231 like he had at Dortmund with a goal scoring out and out 9

[@DeviantDevdog]

My thoughts exactly. We came up short in the 3 x finals we played this year as well, 0 goals in those games so I think there will be a system change coming.

[@danx_3535]

@@DeviantDevdog Exactly, klopps no idiot, he knows an evolution will breathe new life into this team. I do feel like Nunez is very similar to mane stylistically when mane plays through the middle too

[@Eltuong]

Pair fab in mid with someone else and play Bobby or Elliot in the number 10. Low blocks really kill us last season especially on the off chance when the opposition actually manage a lucky counter attack

[@evannorris9885]

Pat always makes these vids so much better

[@joshbramley7242]

Yh his sarcasm and bluntness is hilarious

[@yourdadhasadogfilter2505]

@@joshbramley7242 His "I'm done with it all" vibe is a nice balance to Zak's puppy like demeanour

[@juniorkhomari1850]

Zac is absolutely enormous. God he's a giant. Great show as always though. Also, can yall suggest new topics for Joe's we need to talk? Getting a lil tired of the ranking videos😂

[@naam697]

!!!!!

[@jonytm999]

I can't unsee it now lol. Are Joe and Pat just small or is he really that huge

[@skiddy529]

man's gone gym as well

[@yourdadhasadogfilter2505]

@@skiddy529 Glowed up a couple years ago. Fair play to him

[@mzamogagaimzeeza9055]

Wtf why have i never noticed😂😂😂

[@AngoGoblogian]

Pat’s last point about Scamacca’s technical ability and numbers is interesting especially in contrast to Kalasjdzic’s. I haven’t watched a ton of Sassuolo’s nor Stuttgart’s matches, but according to FBRef, Kalajdzic’s numbers paint a very different profile, and highlights don’t really seem the same either. Similar physical specimens, both aerial scoring threats, get into good attacking positions on counters and set pieces, but Scamacca’s numbers reflect much more of a scoring threat, while Kalajdzic is more of a facilitator. Scamacca far ahead in total shots, SoT, NPG, and Kalajdzic better in shot creating actions, xA, and npxG+xA. That said, IMO Scamacca‘s highlights show a lot of technical promise. Good aerial and ground control, some creative flair, and significantly better passing stats than Tammy Abraham; who’d cost a similar fee. Plus he’s able / willing to drop deep. To receive and bring play forward. Looks faster than Kalajdzic too. Comparing fees Kalajdzic might seem cheaper-for-similar option, but Scamacca is ~1.5 years younger AND has a better goal scoring record + almost double the top league experience, AND has more penalty + free kick ability. If Arsenal is to continue building a title competitive side, more money on proven-quality starters and depth players is necessary. IMO, Scamacca at his larger fee is more worth it than Kalajdzic at his. Ofc, I’d prefer they threw as much money as necessary at Nkunku or a middle-Scamacca price option of Schick to go with Jesus as possible, but those seem exponentially less likely. If we can only secure one striker, Jesus. If two are possible (with enough budget for Tielemens), Jesus and Scamacca. But Jesus and Tielemens should remain top priorities.

[@seblpjpihl6838]

Love the fact that the english media believe that Barcelona aren’t trying to figure out the financial mess. It’s really does my head in how stupid the general view on Barcelona is. 5 quick statements: 1. Barcelona generate more money than ANY premier league club (except for Man U) 2. The money Barcelona earn cannot be spend because of the huge dept of 500 million euros 3. La liga is the only reason Barcelona isn’t able to sing or register players. La liga has the most strict financial rules of any of the top 5 leagues (wich is bullshit) and has put Barcelona under a 1:3 rule, that states Barcelona can only spend 33% of the income they on player sales (100 million for frenkie would give us 33 million to spend) This rule will only be removed when Barcelona has paid their 500 million dept 4. The club is working tirelessly to fix this and trying to find some economic levers to pay the 500 million in dept…the club decided to sell 49% of Barcelona merchandise for 250 million euro and 15% of Barcelona’s tv rights for 250 million euros 5. These levers will be activated as soon as the socies vote for them to be activated. When that happens Barcelona in theory would be operating as a “normal” football club again Plz British media, stop being so delusional and self-centred

[@chrisfraser5088]

Fantastic explanation, Friend! I don’t understand why so many people are ignorant regarding Barca’s situation. All this information is readily available, you just have to look it up, yeah? Anyway, thanks for putting it so concisely!

[@seblpjpihl6838]

@@chrisfraser5088 thank u so much:)

[@YassineNtifi]

typical english media with the "Barca are Broke"

[@generalaladeen1159]

Yes,I was absolutely triggered by the way they talk about Barca.We are no longer in the Bartomeu era.

[@rafadinhoforlahm]

I just want to say, although I’ve never been a fan of Zac, he was very decent in the Núñez segment and shows how much he’s developed as a member on these discourse shows. He’s absolutely right on how Nuñez doesn’t need to hit the ground running like say, Lukaku had to. Chelsea bought Lukaku because we all saw there was a distinct lack of goals in the team and too much responsibility was being placed on the wingbacks to score. For Núñez he doesn’t need to bear all our goal scoring needs because we’re already really good at scoring, at most he just needs to match Mane’s tally. And the off the ball attributes he’ll bring like occupying defenders on the box and providing more space for Diaz and Salah to score will be pivotal. Also I don’t think a midfielder and attacker are as binary as Joe and Pat make it out to be- I’m sure we prioritized Tchouameni but after being priced out we figured it’d be better to secure Núñez first and then focus on the midfielder once more movement starts across Europe. Perhaps if LFC waited to get a midfielder in before Núñez we would’ve missed out on him, so it’s better to seal it early.

[@gavbailey4363]

Julian Ward’s first transfer was Diaz. He’s been working alongside, Michael Edwards for the past 12 months & was put in charge of getting Diaz to Liverpool as the original transfer for him was lined up for this summer.

[@franzreyes846]

I'm pretty sure Pat said first MAJOR transfer. Diaz was unexpectedly absolutely phenomenal as soon as he arrived but let's be honest, he was meant to be a squad option. But putting Nunez will be the first big fee player by Ward so the point stands

[@ashlfc4eva]

Only 4minutes in but he mentions nkunku as perhaps being a safer bet than Nunez, Nkunku is 2 years older and this is the first season he’s scored more than 6 league goals 😅 klopp saw him up close and personal and liked what he saw. Luis Suarez scored 15 league goals in 44 games. A slow start but look how he turned out. Let’s give Darwin time to grow. We bought him for now but also for the potential he has. He scored 6 champs league goals and they was against big clubs. So he definitely has something about him

[@ginge9675]

Klopp is evolving the front 3, the false 9 role seems to be ending in Liverpool nd city, plus the price is the going price for strikers now

[@thesoocerkidforlife3834]

Botman does not want to go to Newcastle but lille want to ship him to Newcastle because they offered 55 million compared to Milan’s 30 million.

[@NLGNATHAN]

Have these even watched nunez? He's played in the left and can play in the channels to rotate. Mentioning that Liverpool are basically going for nunez because they didn't get touchameni is incorrect, its because minamino and mane are leaving and origi has left.

[@philiptaylor2950]

Totally agree - and then to praise Real Madrid for strengthening other area of the squad (getting Touchameni when they missed Mbappe) was confusing when Liverpool are critised for looking to a forward when they miss out on a midfielder.

[@GaryGernon]

They also question whether he could play against premier league defenses 🤔. He played against Liverpool twice in the champions league last season and scored in both games. Even van Djik has since said that he was a handful.

[@safwaanali5727]

He’s 8 years younger then Mane and is going to be on half the wages iswell it makes sense to me especially when there’s a player out there who has that quality you can’t just force a move for a midfielder because we missed out on touchameni, one thing about Klopp is he never forces it and is always patient if he needs to wait a window for the player that he wants to become available i.e a bellingham he would rather do that then panic buy a player who won’t improve that position

[@tomspreadbury2915]

They always get their calls on Liverpool wrong anyway, a simple fix would be hiring a Liverpool fan to sort them out and give them a reality check on Liverpool - if they're saying swerve, we know this signing is going to absolutely bang. Also who are they to say that Liverpool aren't looking at midfielders too?

[@MrPorto4ever]

@@philiptaylor2950 @Gary Gernon @Safwaan Ali Yeah but the values are not the same. Also I would add that nunez has only had 1 good season in Portugal. Paying something close to 100 million for a player like that is a big risk imo and not at all how Liverpool usually do business this past years. Tchouameni to Real makes more sense to me. The fee is lower and they need to renew that midfiled, Modric and kroos are great but they won't last forever and I am sure they still have enough money avaiable to make 1/2 big signings to cover the holes they have in their 11 (right winger and left back/centralback). That being said I do think Nunez seems a good player and would fit really well in the liverpool tactic plus Luis Diaz only had half of a great season and did great for Liverpool. I just think that the fee numbers don't add up. Usually liverpool spend those kind of millions in players that you know will be one of the best in the world (Van dick and Allison) and I don't think nunez is the same level as them, atleast is seems to early to know that he is.

[@kristofferkoldenborg180]

Your take on Barca’s winger situation tells me that haven’t watched Barca play since Xavi took over. Yes Barca do have many wide options, but out of all the ones who staying none of them are creative and none them are right wingers. Ansu plays of the left and he’s more of a finisher then a creater (and Xavi sees him as a striker) Ferran Torres plays of the left, and all his creation comes from well timed runs. Auba is a striker and doesn’t create at all Memphis does create, but he plays through the center and occasionally off the left. Gavi is a midfielder, not a winger and when he was used on the wing, he was used of the left wing The only wide creation Barca had since xavi took over was dembele, alba and adama. And two of those options are leaving. It has been reported in Barca media that if they don’t sign a right winger this summer, then Abde will the starting option at right winger next season, which isn’t good enough if you want to compete for titles. I will admit that the raphinha signing seems unrealistic since leeds stayed up. Your take would make sense if Dembele was staying but he isn’t so Barca differently need a right winger. It probably end up being Di Maria.

[@kristofferkoldenborg180]

@Ernesto Zavala I wanted to comment on that as well, but felt I had written enough. Also in January when Barca signed Auba they said they didn’t understand the move because they believed he was finished, and now they saying “why are Barca trying to sign lewandowski” their opinions on Barca never line up. They are such prem merchants.

[@gurucartel3422]

Such cliche nonsense. They need another striker, Mane wants to go, Firmino will leave and Mo may or may not go in 1 year. If they sign him now, he has time to settle, he is not expected to hit the ground running. Which is how we like to do things. He is 100 mil because he has a sell on value. 5 years time, he's 27 and can sell him for full value. Plus they will get 50 mil for Minamino and Mane. Liverpool need a midfielder, but not a replacement for Hendo, you can see there is a plan for Elliott and Cavarlho, Jones too. They want Bellingham, he's not moving this year. It makes sense to wait till next year. They will buy a defensive midfielder... Sangare is being touted. He makes for a good backup for Fabinho. The Liverpool midfield has experience and 3 really exciting youngsters, Elliot, Jones and Cavarlho. It's exciting.

[@dansegelov305]

I see the Nunez signing as Klopp expanding his 'systems' repertoire. Nunez could operate within the 433, but also as a sole striker in a 4231 when needed.

[@Josh-sn8ve]

Crazy how many people don’t know the difference between £100 and €100

[@marko9463]

I do but im confused how much is nunez in euros and how much was vvd in euros?

[@Josh-sn8ve]

@@marko9463 nunez €100m = £85m vvd €87m = £75m

[@tebeclipz]

Pat is back!!!

[@Ryan-C]

Is nkunku really that much more of a safer bet that nunez? You could say there's been far more transfers from the Portuguese league that have transferred successfully to prem football than bundesliga players in recent years. Although I do think nkunkus style suits Liverpool more.

[@nikz200]

If the deal collapses will they keep the same negative energy they have for Liverpool and nunez? Or will they track back on their points?

[@jaisriram295]

What negative energy...they just think he's overpriced...which he is

[@liverpooljesus8782]

What you on about no negative energy !!

[@rashikrai7655]

I think West Ham £100m upfront for Rice but with Nunez, LFC is giving a €100m package which is £85m. £64m upfront and £21m as add-ons.

[@emmanuelagada7780]

Barca are losing Dembele a RW and Zac is talking about not needing one because we have Depay, Fati, Auba all who prefer playing on the left. Pat even mentioned Gavi and Ferran Torres both are not elite wingers in the slightest.

[@wisdomlindo7125]

Bro they don’t have any ball knowledge when it comes to Barca .

[@Alex_A17.]

i think you guys should actually look into the barca finacial situation if you are going to keep talking about them.500m must be generated to get back to the 1:1 rule that normal clubs are on which if the socios votes agree on would be settled plus some with these economic levers. every club is in debt were not in financle ruin were just restricted by laligas rules

[@cyrobeam876]

Literally. Are all premier league fans this ignorant?

[@hopperoonsterrino3448]

coverage on them is so lazy. every rumour is just ''but barca are broke''. they have no clue what they're talking about

[@Alex_A17.]

@@hopperoonsterrino3448 completely agree and it’s getting old at this point

[@Er1n04]

Thank you somome actually laying the facts about Barca and not just "what are they thinking? Their broke". As a comment here said it's lazy coverage. Also Joe doesn't seem to understand the concept of having squad depth to compete, hes acting as if signing 28+ year old players is a crime and that Barca are meant to have a full starting XI of Under 20's playes

[@RobbieDoneify]

Wait hold on you criticised Liverpool switching from trying to sign a midfielder to a striker but when Real Madrid switched bases you complimented it?

[@ISyKoZzxI]

Fantastic content. Look forward to it every week! Big up the FD boys

[@craigbuckland6584]

Nunez a 100m euro,s including bonuses. Not a £100m

[@TheFunkystewie]

Shh

[@evanclp514]

i think Nunez for 70-80 million would be fine. if they can talk Benfica down to like 70 million + 15-20 million in add-ons that would be a good deal. he has the potential to be a star. he's big, fast, a good dribbler, and a good passer. and it seems like his finishing improved this past season. i think Liverpool should get the deal done if they can sign him and still have money to potentially add a solid midfielder as well.

[@shawnt8850]

I think Chelsea should look at Gouiri, Jesus, Dembouz for attackers. Sangare, Palacios, Camara (Salzburg), Fofana (Monaco) in midfield. Obviously Kounde is heavily linked. We should take a punt with Koulibaly and try ease in Colwill. Some other defenders as well depending on how things go

[@mjb2697]

Chelsea should look into Lewandowski as a striker for sure.

[@cadillacsun618]

Lads, the window is not closed yet. Midfield enforcement will still come in for Liverpool & City will further strengthen. The top 2 might just run away and do their own thing again next season

[@icsgg3607]

I just dont understand why people think that we wont sign midfielder also :D Liverpool just rushed Nunez so that United dont get him and so Mane can leave after this is done, Liverpool have a lot of time to get the right midfielder in.

[@nikolasavic1525]

Doesnt mean nunez is worth nowhere near 100mil

[@icsgg3607]

@@nikolasavic1525 Bro there is a thing called inflation which is spreading with scarry temps right now. Also there are very few good options for strikers this summer so this is also a thing that increases the price.

[@domarmstrong444]

@@nikolasavic1525 euros

[@nickmate4482]

@@nikolasavic1525 £64mil

[@sertero0962]

Although Henderson and Thiago are aging, they still have the quality. Klopp have tried to mold Curtis Jones and Harvey Elliott into that midfield for the last few seasons. No reason to see why he would not continue that trend next season. With Jones, Elliott, Keita, Milner, Carvalho, maybe even Firmino as backup for a midfield 3 we would have enough cover imo.

[@durodoluwaajidagba5017]

Well liverpool losing origi and firmino not being the same player he used to be kind of makes the forward line more of a priority than the midfield since they have curtis jones and elliots that are bedding in well in midfield already

[@ravd883]

Funny how people criticize Klopp and LFC. Just look at their recruitment. No signing is guaranteed, so will just have to wait and see. Also, is it possible for this lot to be accurate with their facts; €80 million (approx £68 million) plus add ons. However, I do think we need to strengthen our midfield though.

[@SonnyK248]

The thing about the fee for Nunez, and I know I'm not alone here as a Liverpool fan. I don't care how big it is. Mainly because FSG aren't a club that give the manager a set transfer budget every year and let the manager go wild with it. For the most part Klopp has brought in a lot of money through sales since he got the job. The wage bill at the club is not astronomically high and we do well in Europe so the financial situation of the club is very secure. What I'm saying is if we don't sign Nunez for 100 mill then it's not like Klopp will still have 100 mill to spend. So it's not like for instance he has a 100 mill transfer budget and he's blowing it on one player. I just look at it like the board are finally putting a bit of cash back into the club and we get a new striker and he's really good and I could care less about the fee. Also if we gave Mane a 300k per week four year deal that's a lot of money on the books. We're talking over sixty million right there. Nunez will probably get half that, so that's a 30 million saving along with a potential 40 million fee for Mane. So then you're paying around 30 mill for a 22 year old replacement who's only going to get better while Mane declines.

[@obifinest521]

Sadly only those with common sense would comprehend your comment. But then again most of football fans are lacking it…..

[@Chuy1128]

What an awesome analogy with the hangover breakfast lmao

[@danielmcdivitt3467]

Hay guys thoughts on richarlison going to spurs? 51mil I'm scratching my head at it I'm a toffee but I'm resign to losing him now just see spurs as an odd destination..

[@moomountain]

The take on Liverpool and Nunez is terrible. They probably wouldn’t be going for him if mane was staying. Mane stays,sees out his contract, leaves next year, Liverpool spend 40million as usual on his replacement who’s a raving success and everyone says Liverpool have done it again. Well their basically bringing that forward and saying Jurgen by the way where going to get 30mil for mane so if you want to buy someone who’s 70 mil go ahead. Also have you not watched Liverpool in transfers over the last years, I know 100mil sounds good for the press but it’s euros and they will prob able pay 60 and then add ons which are based on success, which will be worth it if he’s successful. Your basically looking at a 40mil transfer which is the bracket they usually shop in. If mane stayed and they still bought Nunez at that price then some of your points might be valid but to be honest when do they get transfers wrong Klopp knows what he is doing.

[@chrismullan2125]

Not sure why everyone is saying Liverpool should buy a midfielder instead of Nunez? All the talk from Journos out of Liverpool is that there will also be a midfielder signed on top of Nunez. It's not one or the other, Liverpool have the finances to do it and it's the first summer since Klopp signed his new contract so it makes sense this would be a big summer.

[@jackmonaghan834]

AWFUL takes on the Nunez deal. Firstly, Mané, Minamino and Origi are leaving, how can you say we don’t need a forward? Next, comparing him to Lukaku and saying pressure will hinder him, classic Chelsea bias by Zac, Lukaku isn’t performing because he’s a lazy, egotistical bastard, not because of his price tag, Liverpool don’t sign players with attitude problems Finally, why is Nunez being called an £100mil deal, it’s only £100mil in pounds even if you including add ons and six years of wages, if we’re going down that route then Lukaku is £51mil + £40mil in agent fees + at least £10mil in adding + £100 mil in wages over 5 years so around £200mil in total

[@raphaelnasser7084]

I like the way they just refer to Richarlison as a 'dog'😂

[@buggylfc]

Why is it so hard for people to understand Núñez isn’t costing 100m pounds

[@godalbinothe]

Joe does not watch Sangare lol he’s not immobile at all. He’s probably more mobile than the best PL DM this year Rodri

[@godalbinothe]

and I’m a City fan

[@jakebyronjones]

My left field shout for a young English squad player for City's midfield to add to their home grown quota would be for them to go back to Villa for Jacob Ramsey. He is hugely underrated and has such a high ceiling. Pep could easily and quickly mold him into the sort of versatile player who plays his own style! Would be better than spending 60 million quid on Kalvin Phillips and he has his friend and former mentor/captain Jack Grealish there already as well! I think he could be developed into a player who can play as a mix of all four of 6, 8, 10 & covering full backs because he is still so young to be a blank canvass for Pep! Still growing physically as well! I think Villa would sell him for circa 35m-45m, if not less. Then they would use that money to get one of Gerrard's other targets as he clearly wants to bring in his own players more than he wants to keep any of the decent players he has inherited!

[@samuelloification2749]

What are you smoking that villa would sell Ramsey cheap? No chance. He's just signed a new deal and Gerrard loves him. No way Villa would even entertain offers but even if they did you would be looking at 60 million plus

[@cretz2471]

A uruguayan to Liverpool has worked before 😆😆 and this one hopefully does not bite

[@tomspreadbury2915]

Nunez is moving for £68m with potentially £20m in add-ons over the next 5 years. Where's this £100m coming from? The above fee in total is equivalent to 98m euros.

[@krish4246]

Those add one are pretty achievable if u ask benfica Which means it’s close to £100 mill

[@tomspreadbury2915]

@@krish4246 Not at amortised cost it's not. Also in GBP it's a maximum of £84m as it has been confirmed today the initial fee is actually £64m Stop misrepresenting currency. £1 is not the same as €1

[@alexanderverheij8289]

9:30 how have I not even thought of this, Frenkie de jong at Liverpool would be a force of nature and opposition teams could only shiver and hope for the best.

[@MortalDeathGaming]

De Jong's Pressures, tackles and interceptions numbers aren't good enough for Liverpool, that was the reason they were going for Tchouemeni. It's more likely they would go for low profile players like a Caqueret from Lyon or Bennacer from Milan

[@duffdabsduffdies]

For a long term project to replace Henderson? Sure

[@coolz2334]

Please fix the audio Lads , I always have to max the speakers watching FD, Except wntt cuz joes mike is good

[@craigkeogh00]

Pat saying its strange Liverpool are signing a forward after missing out on a midfielder then 10 minutes later saying he loves how Madrid have missed out on mbappe so moved those funds to sign a player in a different position is a bit weird no ?

[@pkstyll7920]

Different teams with different contexts

[@piperzl1997]

@@pkstyll7920 yeah Liverpool are losing a world class forward they need to replace and RM aren’t is the context.

[@j6372]

yesssirrrrrr, welcome back pat!

[@QazwerDave]

64 + 20 mill for Nunez. Not 100 mill

[@raphaelnasser7084]

never thought I'd hear pat say the word 'geeza'😂

[@jeredkelly1193]

It’s 100m euros (£84m) and that’s with £20 add ons. The transfer committee at Liverpool haven’t got many wrong.

[@Drizzle8481]

They already got carvalhjo in January and have Elliott returning in the mid Also it's not £100m, it's €75m with €100 reachable with add ons.

[@maskedriderkiva1]

Hope Pat gets his voice back. Great episode once again

[@chumlanodi2426]

L

[@nicolaischweizer3708]

I don’t know what kind of Serie A you watched but Vlahovic is actually pretty good at Juventus.

[@BoothyTheGamer12]

Hangover Daily

[@nyoremeokere]

Mane goes and you swerve Nunez who then takes his place? when man city has strengthened. To keep up with Man City Nunez is a sign everyday of the week. Liverpool still has at least £50 million to get another midfielder. Not that after Nunez no more signing.

[@r.i.psteez929]

At this rate, Newcastle will win a UCL before PSG. They’ll show them that you need to spend your money on a coherent team and not Superstars. They should’ve let Mbappe go, sold Neymar and kept Messi. Get Sterling and a good striker or move Messi to CAM and get a whole new frontline with 2 workhorses behind Messi cause the frontline would press as well.

[@franzreyes846]

What good would letting Mbappe go bring to the club? He's got a decade of being arguably the best in the world ahead of him. I agree with selling Neymar, I think his window as one of the top 5-10 players in the world has closed and they should just get something back for him. They need better CBs and DMs, they're sorted with that along with signing Zidane.

[@scottydc91]

Who says after us getting Nunez we won't get a midfielder haha

[@peterspaulding5584]

Why do they think Liverpool need a midfield player other than that there was rumors of Bellingham? Liverpool signed Carvalho, they have, Thiago, Fabinho, Hendo, Harvey, Jones, Ox, Keita... and others??? Liv are losing three strikers this summer!

[@tdyerwestfield]

Darwin Nunez fee confirmed by The Athletic and Paul Joyce at The Times as £64m, not €100m.

[@ramiruokamo9751]

Phones speaker volume max level and still hardly hear audio. Is just me and my phone? Even though great video cheers fd!

[@irishred8850]

Can't wait for Darwin to score 35 league goals next season

[@xil3w1sxi33]

I think people are massively overestimating how much money Nunez is costing Liverpool, he’s joining for 100 mil Euros which is 85mil pounds and only 65 of that is upfront plus he’s on less than 100k a week ( less than half of what mane would be on if they gave him a new deal ) overall Haaland for example will cost city more money than Nunez will cost Liverpool because of the massive wages he’ll be on

[@mzamogagaimzeeza9055]

Madrid probably needs a RB more than LB because Mendy injury record is quite similar to Carvajal but we have Alaba a bit more freed up because of Rudiger, Miguel G is decent aswell

[@jamesnguyen17]

About the Barca situation, the Lewan rumours starts after Leeds seems to be able to survive this season. This means their budgets are around 25-30 mil. If they sell Frankie for 60 up front, it will enable them to register new players, and maybe add 10-15 more to the transfer budget. Hence, it will be either Raphinha or Lewan, not both. Edit: let's face it, Ferran Torres has not performed well in the last 10 games of the season, Dest is dull, Depay does not suit Xavi's ideal wingers, same for Auba, and Gavi last time playing in wings for Xavi were not as effective as his usual CM role. So the real choice for the wings are Fati, Pedri and Dembele. If Dembele leaves, it make senses to buy Raphinha

[@hopperoonsterrino3448]

60mil for frenkie hahahhaha

[@jamesnguyen17]

@@hopperoonsterrino3448 Sadly it is. The board seems to demand 60 up front and 25 add-ons. Suck for us as a fan

[@hopperoonsterrino3448]

@@jamesnguyen17 frenkie is worth 100m minimum

[@jamesnguyen17]

@@hopperoonsterrino3448 In normal time, yes. But with Barca current financial situation, the board are really tempted at 85. Xavi also does not want to sell, so it's up to the board now.

[@bomboclaat1509]

I dunno what My man in the middle is waffling about we need a solid striker, why would we have Diaz and jota, buy our first tall and strong striker, to play him in a position that we have players already

[@mtb0169]

Pat’s bit on Pogba was so well said

[@jrb614]

I think Pau Torres would be good at Spurs just because of Conte he'll push him so much

[@franzreyes846]

Problem is that whenever you have Conte, you can't just assume he'll be part of the plan for the long term because he's never stayed for too long so you have to consider whether the player fits in the squad even w/o Conte.

[@BFMVPeter]

Just an FYI, the deal for Nunez is £64 million guaranteed. Then its £21 milliom in addons based on team success and individual performances.

[@Plaa84]

Wow what are you chatting ref LFC?? We need to keep with city and have been crying out for a goal scoring forward, and on the need a midfielder more lfc are in for midfielders as well, first and last time listener so much crap talked

[@sm0359]

Ending was class Pat😂😂😂😂

[@Football_Super_Fans]

did we now what we were gonna get when e got van dijk ? even then everyone was blaming liverpool for that transfer

[@warrenmcgregor8434]

I disagree with the initial Nuñez analysis. It's not 100mill, firstly, as it may rise to that. That financial apex will only be reached if he and the team actually achieve excellent results, with Liverpool, subsequently, receiving the financial reward garnered by team success. In addition, Klopp and his team select their first team based on performance in training and games. Nuñez will play initially only if he is ready to do so. Likely, he will not be thrust in from the start, and thus does not have the pressure of, e.g. the Lukaku transfer. Lukaku was signed to be the final jigsaw piece; Nuñez not. He will have time to bed in, and he is in the perfect environment for that.

[@callvms5362]

Singing Nunez over Nkunku will be such a disaster

[@redgoals5701]

Nunez is being negotiated for around 60 mil not 100.

[@vidurarora8376]

Joe's t-shirt made me realise that Cantona looks like Ted Bundy

[@JB-px6ql]

Liverpool bringing in a player that is more of an out and out striker is not out of the ordinary, they played with Firmino who doesn't interchange on the left or the right and that system worked well for them

[@usmanrulezzz]

Guys the audio quality not so good. Please improve but great content otherwise as always.

[@g.n.b9197]

Nunez isn't a £100mil player, it's 85 with add-ons, people are mistaking his Euro's price for pounds. Plus he's a much needed 9, it's taken LFC too long to get a competent 9 for receiving the beautiful crosses that come from every angle

[@muhammadizmadi2702]

Its 100mil euros equivalent to 85 mil pound and they are only playing close to 65mil euro upfront. Check the fact mate

[@charliecooper1646]

That hangover pogba analogy was intelligent poetry

[@Rick1Nz]

pogba would suit liverpool

[@tusharamanshrivastava65a73]

Love the discussion on curry!!

[@carterB14C]

Just got out of bed and seen Zac’s in the ep what a way to start the day

[@1903JPG]

6:45

[@thefmsrinder6324]

Spurs have to spend that 150 million before the end of the season or the owners won’t see an increase in ownership stakes.

[@Tom-lr1if]

Nunez isn't going for 100 million, he's going for 61 million plus potentially 20 million in add ons according to Fabrizio Romano. That's worth a shot for me

[@Lee-ye3ev]

Still overpriced for a one season wonder. Liverpool fans are the gift that keeps on giving. They slate United for spending 80 million on Maguire, slate City for spending 100 million on Grealish, but then try and justify Liverpool spending 80 million on a one season wonder in a farmers league. Literally couldn't make it up.

[@Tom-lr1if]

@@Lee-ye3ev I'm happy to explain it for you. Liverpool don't have as much money as clubs like Man Utd or Man City. We have to sell players in order to sign them. Over the last decade, Man Utd have spent 1,5 billion euro, Man City have spent 1,7 billion, and Liverpool 1,1 billion. That's 400 million and 600 million less. But where the big difference is is player sales. City have sold players for 700 million, and Utd only 470 million. That leaves their net transfer spend at Utd: 1,1 billion, and City: 1 billion. Liverpool in the same time have sold players for 800 million and have a net transfer spend of 347 million. That's roughly equivalent to Newcastle and West Ham, and almost a hundred million less than Everton. Let's get that straight, both City and United have essentially net spent more than two and half times the amount that Liverpool have. That's a huge difference, whichever side you stand on. When United or City buy players, they just buy them. They don't need to worry about the finances. They are covered from insanely rich owners. When Liverpool sign someone, they have to cover it with the sales of other players, as we will do with the sales of Mane, Minamino, and likely Oxlade-Chamberlain as well. This is where the frustration comes from with Liverpool supporters. That's why there is a significant difference in United buying someone for 80 million or City for 100 million, and Liverpool doing the same. Liverpool cover the cost with other players, United and City simply send over a receipt to their owners.

[@Lee-ye3ev]

@@Tom-lr1if Regardless, there's no justifying paying 80 million for a guy who's had one good season in a farmers league

[@Tom-lr1if]

@@Lee-ye3ev my man, it's hardly a farmers league. The last five years saw three different winners and it hasn't had a repeat winner in 6 years. This last year it went up in the coefficient ranking to 5th place. But yeah I agree, it was a big fee. Not the 100 million euro fee everyone was reporting, and we don't know what the 20 million in bonuses applies to, but regardless it was a large fee for a relatively unproven player. I do, however, trust Liverpools scouting and analyst teams and if they felt that price could be justified, I back them on that. Same thing was said about Salah and van Dijk, and they turned out alright. We'll just have to wait and see

[@Lee-ye3ev]

@@Tom-lr1if The Portuguese league is definitely a farmers league mate.

[@newtonjr.madzika1439]

All the wingers you mentioned are the same profile, none of them are creative they're there to score. You need a creative winger which they'll lose in dembele and replace in raphinha. How does that not make sense??

[@SockPuppet80]

Keita is not a great example of a failed LFC signing if you're going to shrug and say "OK at least he didn't cost a stupid amount of money!" Naby Keita cost over £50 million *five years ago*, one of their most expensive signings to date. If Nunez flops and doesn't trigger bonuses, he'll have cost £65 million - entirely within Keita's range, considering price inflation since 2017.

[@karnpandharipande]

Thx for the Indian Cuisine shoutout at the end👍

[@Hursty-gy8el]

If Spurs are so set on a left footed CB, is Nathan Ake not an option? IMO starts for the majority of Premier League teams, fairly certain he worked with Conte previously at Chelsea? Along with the fact that City have apparently told him he would be allowed to leave.

[@conor0008]

Sangare is hardly being linked to United. I am nearly 100% sure we will not get him.

[@lukapavlovic2754]

Out of the 3 guys presenting Football Dailys biggest video, 1 is still drunk from a night out and another has lost his voice and has an eye infection. This, this is why football daily will always be better than Sky Sports.

[@subarusam34]

Sangaree Enzo Fernandez and De Jong with the return of Garner and keeping McFred is enough squad depth at United for next season then look at a cheap prolific striker like Scammaca or Kalajdzic as well as either a CB or RB

[@rory4605]

This is totally un-related to football, but Patrick saying he has an eye infection is somewhat reassuring to me, I have one too, think it's a particularly bad hay fever this year.

[@TheMasterCylinder]

I'm sorry, but the whole panel should have gone "sign" for one reason: Klopp wants him! Over the last few years, how many times has LFC got it wrong with a player? And with the oil clubs like Man City and now Newcastle poised to buy up on sight, there is a new arms race in the League. I'm surprised the panel didn't mention that LFC is trying to pry Jude Bellingham out of Dortmund. Anyway, I'm glad to see the boys all back together.