You put out videos on things I never would have thought about, but that’s why I love this channel! Always super interesting topics 👍
@josephgomwalk5282 Жыл бұрын
Thank God for KZbin, I was literally curious about this five minutes ago now I know how the engines are attached to the wings. Thanks for this
@alexknoll32653 жыл бұрын
I'd like to also learn about the other attachments like fuel lines, bleed air system, starter, etc.
@PavlosPapageorgiou3 жыл бұрын
The fact that there's an "Engine separation quick reference" is itself remarkable
@jakenolan25723 жыл бұрын
I mean, after American 191 the regulators didn’t want to take the risk of pilots not knowing how to operate an aircraft without an engine.
@billotto6023 жыл бұрын
@@jakenolan2572 it's to make sure that the engine doesn't destroy the wing if something serious goes wrong.
@patrickholl84973 жыл бұрын
different video from the usual ones cause it was very technical and theoretical, but also very interesting cause it had the right length and i didn't get bored like on 45 minutes documentaries or so. Post more videos like that, I'd watch them although I'm not very much into technology but they're interesting and esay to understand :)
@georgemukasabukenya14623 жыл бұрын
Simple flying you're the best ever in aviation content
@SimpleFlyingNews3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! - TB
@Shinycrossbow3 жыл бұрын
Loving every vid!
@KOUKAROS-GR3 жыл бұрын
Next please how the moving parts like fan and turbine stay in their position while spinning!
@Chris_at_Home3 жыл бұрын
They are support by bearings.Some are for support and others are for thrust so they keep the fan for pulling forward out of the engine. I worked at a factory building engines a little over 40 years ago. The engines I assembled were JT-8s and JT-9s.
@azmike19563 жыл бұрын
ath kouk, All engines have one or more thrust surfaces that control position of the rotating group & components. Proper shimming is critical! Without control the rotating parts could contact each other or at least experience diminished performance & seal failure. This is a very basic but hope it helps.
@Chris_at_Home3 жыл бұрын
@@azmike1956 I remember on the JT-8s there was a coupler we installed that locked the low turbine shaft to the low compressor and fan as fan pulled forward and the turbine pulled aft.
@flyingacross4943 жыл бұрын
@@Chris_at_Home how old are you!
@Chris_at_Home3 жыл бұрын
@@flyingacross494 Old enough.
@hurleycapetown84203 жыл бұрын
Not sure I wanted to know about it only having two bolts.
@TheFlightmaster1003 жыл бұрын
Then I'll reassure you. You misunderstood him. He says its attached at two point, fan frame and turbine frame. The aircrafts I have worked on have had 4 bolts at the fan frame, and another 4 at the turbine frame. So all in all, 8 bolts attach the engine to the pylon (atleast on the 737ng and 787)
@znariznotsj65333 жыл бұрын
By bolts! Always thought they were glued... 😆
@IdliAmin_TheLastKingofSambar3 жыл бұрын
Or maybe a couple of binder clips, y’know, if you’re literally in a pinch.
@meowmeowmaxx3 жыл бұрын
@@IdliAmin_TheLastKingofSambar couple of zip ties does jt better than bolts mate
@IdliAmin_TheLastKingofSambar3 жыл бұрын
@@meowmeowmaxx I’m American, so these days, zip ties make me think of scary people trying to kidnap school principals and overthrow the government. But I’m low-maintenance: I’m even fine with twist ties, like the ones that come with garbage bags and loaves of bread. If they’re good enough to keep my Wonder Bread all fresh and carb-y, I’m sure they’re strong enough to secure an engine to a wing! 😆
@fork23096 ай бұрын
nah nah, use hopes and dreams
@alexanderordinary21103 жыл бұрын
"engines are mounted either under the wing or behind the fuselage..." Honda jet: "hold my sake"
@thillaiambalam56613 жыл бұрын
Jet Token
@lohphat3 жыл бұрын
No mention of the HondaJet with engines mounted on top of the wing on pylons? Water landings with underwing engines usually result in the wings being ripped off as the nacells act as water scoops. Being above the wings allows a safer gear-up water landing.
@kenugget95933 жыл бұрын
Engines below the wing makes it easier for access during maintenance. I think also it is safer if the engine should break away in flight if it's underneath than above. Having overwing mounted engines will reduce the lift as well. HondaJet has their engines on the wings and states it reduces cabin noise since the engines aren't mounted to the fuselage, however, the noise is louder than for underwing mounted engines.
@lucbaeten33443 жыл бұрын
A320, Hudson river, Captain Sully : both engines separated, the wings remained intact
@lohphat3 жыл бұрын
@@lucbaeten3344 Wnich is an exception to other water ditching. Most end with the wings tearing off and the fuselage cartwheeling resulting in massive casualties. One success doesn’t make it the rule.
@SarahC2 Жыл бұрын
NOOOO! They're attached further back! They don't stick out the front of the wing like this. I want my timeline back!
@JohnZsAviation3 жыл бұрын
Keep up the great work love the videos
@unnirajagopalakrishnan3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a ton simple flying.. My biggest doubt solved in a couple of minutes.
@SimpleFlyingNews3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! - TB
@NeonSamurai43813 жыл бұрын
I'm interested to know how the engine attachment differs on supersonic aircraft from subsonic aircraft and whether supersonic aircraft can be fuel efficient.
@bigpantsbobnuggets50513 жыл бұрын
This explained to me why an engine mounted so forward of the wing isn't a huge lever bending the wing down.
@joshuahalla.k.a.controlla63333 жыл бұрын
Great video. ☺
@withamarshview14363 жыл бұрын
Only two attachment points? Tell me more about those bolts!
@wikusmeijer3 жыл бұрын
These bolts are called phalanges. There are two of them, a left phalange and a right phalange.
@PavlosPapageorgiou3 жыл бұрын
0:44 ...it exposes the engines
@alancats3 жыл бұрын
The jet engine mounts are vastly underappreciated, from engineering standpoints. When you think about the vast amount of thrust produced by these modern high-bypass turbofans, the engine's thrust force would make it fly off the wing, like a rocket, if it wasn't for a robust attachment to the wing. Needless to say, it's mission-critical for the engine mounts to be exceptionally robust. The tragic example of American Airlines Flight 191, in year 1979, tragically demonstrated what can happen when these engine mounts are damaged, due to negligent maintenance procedures. Thankfully, this was a rare accident that hasn't been duplicated, since.
@donaldstanfield88623 жыл бұрын
That was so sad, and completely preventable. Sad that they thought a shortcut on such a critical component was acceptable.
@SamUnreel3 жыл бұрын
What would be the preferable attachment to a blended body aircraft then?
@TimKunert3 жыл бұрын
Small mistake, at 1:06 you probably meant CRJ Family, because on the ERJ Family the engies are configured in a conventional layout.
@spongebubatz3 жыл бұрын
ERJ is actually the name of the E135 to E145, the other are called E-Jet!
@kunalguleria961710 ай бұрын
Great Video !
@kencarp573 жыл бұрын
This video made me think of the Far Side comic showing a goofy-looking airline passenger looking at two buttons by his seat: Button 1: Wings stay on Button 2: Wings fall off
@alexanderhall42813 жыл бұрын
Engines these days are a marvelous sight why wouldn't you want to see them, especially the GC90s
@guitarplayerforu3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting, great video 👍 One thing though, you forgot to mention aircraft with an engine mounted into the tail like the DC-10/MD-11, L1011 TriStar or Boeing 727 etc...?
@Gabriel.Vargas3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. It's like the removable rear derailleur hanger in a bicycle. It's designed to be strong and stiff enough to get the job done, but it will break first in case of a crash, saving the much more expensive bicycle frame or even the own rear derailleur. This is not for safety reasons like in an airplane, obviously, but for maintenance and durability reasons.
@BetrelomyAlemayehu8 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@janeelliott67724 ай бұрын
Fascinating
@DannoAviation3 жыл бұрын
_DC10 has entered the chat_
@nijenplayz24293 жыл бұрын
I watch all of your videos !
@AluminumOxide3 жыл бұрын
In 1992 (also on this day the video was uploaded), an El Al airlines (flight 1862) cargo Boeing 747 suffered a dual engine pylon bolt failure a few minutes after takeoff. The plane crashed into an apartment complex in Amsterdam, killing 43 people.
@donaldstanfield88623 жыл бұрын
It was a cargo aircraft, wiki says there were 43 deaths plus major and minor injuries. 4 on board 39 on ground
@AluminumOxide3 жыл бұрын
@@donaldstanfield8862 most of the fatalities occurred on the ground in the apartment complex
@AsadAli-px8op3 жыл бұрын
SO INFORMATIVE VIDEO. WORLD WEATHER IZ CHANGING RAPIDLY I DON'T KNOW HOW PILOTS WILL COPE WITH WEATHER
@robertwarn97563 жыл бұрын
DC-10, L-1011, B727, DC-9/B717. Not small. Engines attached to rear fuselage or DC-10 & L-1011, inside rear fuselage. Concorde, in wing.
@get2dachoppa2493 жыл бұрын
Concorde's engine were beneath the wing in nacelles.
@rajr59363 жыл бұрын
I always had this question.....how wings carry Engines weight?
@alancats3 жыл бұрын
The explanation that I've read is that the fuselage is basically built on top of the wings. The wings are exceptionally strong structures. The engines' weight, plus fuel weight (inside the wing) actually benefit the wing's structural integrity during flight, by counter-acting the lift forces that are producing lift, underneath the wing.
@donaldstanfield88623 жыл бұрын
@@alancats The wings are bolted to the main frame, just like everything else...
@Kolan_Koala3 жыл бұрын
They are also put under the wing to allow fuel to the engine via gravity in the event of a fuel pump failure.
@kadabarVIM20 күн бұрын
The GE90 engine weighs more or less 8 tons, and it fascinates me how it's held in place by a few screws and bolts.
@paulloveless41223 жыл бұрын
Interesting stuff
@Neptune9972 ай бұрын
I used to be scared of that engine attachment design. What if those engines fall off in mid flight?
@ericjones77693 жыл бұрын
Nice!!!!
@alexanderhall42813 жыл бұрын
They look much better under the wing.
@peeticek16243 жыл бұрын
So the 4ton jet engine is hanging just on 4bolts?!
@mrBSim13 жыл бұрын
8 Bolts, 4 Nuts and 4 Barrel Nuts
@samarokiam3 жыл бұрын
Interesting
@polishavgeek18493 жыл бұрын
Engines are attached to aircraft by aircraft engineers.
@neunundfuenfzig3 жыл бұрын
1000 IQ
@힐만943 жыл бұрын
You know you're old when the example of tail mounted engines are not Caravelle, B727, DC-9/MD-80, or VC-10 anymore 😅
@letsseeif3 жыл бұрын
Engines on pylons beneath the wings is a pragmatic solution. Sure the Boeing 727, DC9, HS Trident, SUD Caravelle were early success. Successes due to engine out issues and aerodynamic advantage, and passengers in quieter cabins and rear an front entry and rear egress simultaneously. But like most things, it comes down the pragmatic solution. Cheaper is better. Engines beneath wing make sense especially now the aero industry has powerplants that allow 'engine out' safety that didn't exist pre large to massive bypass/turbofan power.
@danielassiak2072 Жыл бұрын
Cool
@nurrizadjatmiko213 жыл бұрын
Interesting 🤔 and because of this interesting video. 29 years ago October 4 1992 is El Al Flight 1862. A 747 200F has crash into a 11-story apartement block at Amsterdam. The cause of this accident that killed 43 people is the result of the faulty fuse-pin on the pylon of Engine 3
@azmike19563 жыл бұрын
Muhammad Nurriza, check out the DC-10 crash on takeoff at Ohare years ago.
@nurrizadjatmiko213 жыл бұрын
@@azmike1956 yes i know that
@foreyfriend1453 жыл бұрын
wasn't it fog, bad weather?
@azmike19563 жыл бұрын
@@foreyfriend145 no, the mounting system failed & released engine #3 which severed electrical & hydraulic lines. Plane did a wingover into the ground. 12 days later all domestic DC-10'S were grounded.
@longbeach76233 жыл бұрын
@@azmike1956 it was actually engine number one.
@saigopal50863 жыл бұрын
Video suggestion: Why is A320 more common than B737 In India 🇮🇳?
@luckywest14673 жыл бұрын
I don’t even know why I’m watching this, we changed an engine last week. Lol
@thenorthstars2210Күн бұрын
You couldn't get me in an airplane for all the money in the world.
@photoshopeditingandphotogr80662 ай бұрын
Only two bolts?? and they are designed to break off. This does not make me feel good. Like severe turbulence... how often do they check these bolts and threads.
@AB-ov1zm3 жыл бұрын
U missed out vibration damage
@bigchris19893 жыл бұрын
It’s for water landing. The bolt setup is to let engine break away during water landing. This video didn’t cover what the title said it would, please stop misleading people for views.
@mfeick8383 жыл бұрын
Aircraft mechanic here: "With high strength bolts into a thrust bearing structure, some hoses and electrical connections" there saved you some time.
@covercompositionandmixes92033 жыл бұрын
Hey Michael, is the Aircraft Mech. job as physically demanding/ as hard as construction jobs?
@jamesbambury3 жыл бұрын
Engine Strut, pylons hold weapons on fighter jets.
@millercool213 жыл бұрын
Flex glue
@gooner723 жыл бұрын
How are the engines attached to the wings.......? Well, hopefully.
@airtesamaviation3 жыл бұрын
U forgot crj 900
@Dominus_Potatus3 жыл бұрын
I need "How to reattach emergency windows?" ASAP!! I accidently open the emergency after people is releasing biochemical weapon aka F.A.R.T
@drhmufti3 жыл бұрын
2 bolts!
@dmacfpv84109 ай бұрын
Pods?? Really??
@MSRTA_Productions3 жыл бұрын
Hmm
@markomare90813 жыл бұрын
Titanium material
@niekdros41473 жыл бұрын
wow im early!
@donaldstanfield88623 жыл бұрын
How early are you!?
@jelisontejada17583 жыл бұрын
This wasn’t the one that won in the poll🥱🥱🥱
@spongebubatz3 жыл бұрын
The poll was about which video the community wanted to see first, not which they want and don’t want. I assume they have all videos produced in advance anyways
@jelisontejada17583 жыл бұрын
@@spongebubatz i know but they haven’t put the winner video
@jelisontejada17583 жыл бұрын
@@spongebubatz oh wait sorry they did 4 days ago I just checked my bad 🙏
@donaldstanfield88623 жыл бұрын
@@jelisontejada1758 Hehee...
@randomdriver3 жыл бұрын
Hahaha. How weak are those swiss maintenance guys! Needing a three man to torque the engine mount bolts. Until now I have been doing it alone with no problems to CFM and CF6 engines.