No video

Simplify this Radical Expression | Step-by-Step Explanation

  Рет қаралды 249,886

PreMath

PreMath

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 156
@mshanmukhavalli4567
@mshanmukhavalli4567 3 жыл бұрын
Nice video.very helpful for me
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that! You are awesome Shan👍 Please keep sharing premath channel with your family and friends. Take care dear and all the best😃 Love and prayers from the USA! 😃
@ramtirthparashar5988
@ramtirthparashar5988 3 жыл бұрын
Pl. solve more and more problems. Thank you.
@ramtirthparashar5988
@ramtirthparashar5988 3 жыл бұрын
Nice problem.pl. send more difficult problems with solutions.
@shivanandankolekar9244
@shivanandankolekar9244 2 жыл бұрын
*it I don't want it
@gmutubeacct
@gmutubeacct 3 жыл бұрын
Can be solved in 3 steps by multiplying numerator and denominator by ((sqrt(3) + sqrt(5) + sqrt(7)) - sqrt(5)) Treat the denominator as ((sqrt(3) + sqrt(5) + sqrt(7)) + sqrt(5))
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ram for the feedback. You are awesome 👍 Take care dear and stay blessed😃
@pranavk.p.6333
@pranavk.p.6333 3 жыл бұрын
@@PreMath you should reload the same otherwise people would get confused watching this video.
@SDon-wn8xb
@SDon-wn8xb 3 жыл бұрын
@Ram Narayan Can you illustrate fully your suggested method, for it seems to me your method may be more involved than that illustrated here, no?
@hyperloid2143
@hyperloid2143 2 жыл бұрын
Illustrate please
@teambellavsteamalice
@teambellavsteamalice 2 жыл бұрын
Lets see if √3, √5 and √7 are a, b and c you get this: n = (ab+bc+ac) + 5 d = (a+b+c) + a Then you'd multiply both by a+c, which can be written as (a+b+c) - a, note (a+b+c)^2 = 2*(ab+bc+ac ) + 15 (the sum of squares 3+5+7) so the denominator becomes this square minus a^2 (which is 5). That makes it equal to twice the numerator! In the numerator only remains the added factor (a+b+c) - b which is of course a+c so you quickly get the answer (√3+√7)/2 Well done!
@phoenixslender6541
@phoenixslender6541 2 жыл бұрын
Incredible solution! Thank you for uploading amazing video everyday!
@HassanLakiss
@HassanLakiss 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for an interesting problem and you very good explanation of how to get to the answer. I would respectfully say that it could also be done by rationalization of the denominator once it has been grouped as you did in your first line. Thank you
@billmorrigan386
@billmorrigan386 2 жыл бұрын
Very nice problem! After factoring the numerator I immediately saw the structure of ab/(a+b); so naturally, I went 2ab = (a+b)^2 - (a^2 + b^2) but it looked like a circular dead end. So I also flipped the whole fraction to (a+b)/ab = 1/a + 1/b and momentarily stumbled upon the exact same solution: 1/(√5+√7) + 1/(√3+√5) = (√7-√5)/2 + (√5-√3)/2 = (√7-√3)/2. Flipping it back gives 2/(√7-√3) = (√7+√3)/2. That's a beautiful problem. I didn't expect that flipping the fraction would work. I was actually surprised to find it out. Although this problem is extremely simple and I stumbled upon the solution in a few minutes, I really like it. A huge like to this video too!
@fmstudio085
@fmstudio085 2 жыл бұрын
You're genius, many thanks 👍🏻 I already suggested this perfect channel to all my friends which intended to obtain good math skills
@imonkalyanbarua
@imonkalyanbarua Жыл бұрын
So smooth! Very nice! 😇👏👏👏
@sangpham2931
@sangpham2931 Жыл бұрын
Tuyệt Tuyệt vời, giải rất hay (tốt )rễ hiểu, xin cảm ơn chương trình đã cho ra nhiều đề (bài toán )rất khó nhưng giảng viên giải rất hay, rễ hiểu ,một lần nữa xin cảm ơn
@JLvatron
@JLvatron 3 жыл бұрын
amazing! I almost got it, I just gave up too early but I was on the right track.
@pratimadevi2214
@pratimadevi2214 2 жыл бұрын
Me tooooo
@Rudxain
@Rudxain 2 жыл бұрын
I only went as far as doing the prime factorization lol
@adityakumarsingh8012
@adityakumarsingh8012 3 жыл бұрын
easiest method can be by multiplying numerator and denominator by 2 then making (root(5)+root(7)+root(3))^2 - (root(5))^2 at numerator and applying diffrence of squares formula
@duongduong2939
@duongduong2939 2 жыл бұрын
R u sure 😂😂😂
@rafaelivan1830
@rafaelivan1830 3 жыл бұрын
this has become a new fave channel for me :D its fun trying to solve the problem you shared and its mindblowing to see how you solved those !
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome, thank you Rafael! Glad to hear that! You are awesome👍 Please keep sharing premath channel with your family and friends. Take care dear and all the best😃 Love and prayers from the USA! 😃
@Thathugheschap
@Thathugheschap 3 жыл бұрын
Love these for keeping my brain working. Thanks 👍
@Leonex52
@Leonex52 2 жыл бұрын
If one knows about field theory then the solution can be quite simple. Note that this is a element belongs to the field Q(sqrt(3),sqrt(5),sqrt(7)) , and the elements of the field can take the form of a*sqrt(3)+b*sqrt(5)+c*sqrt(7). Then solve for a, b and c.
@soloduhaelena3412
@soloduhaelena3412 2 жыл бұрын
Thаnk you for your interesting and sometimes unexpected explanation . It's a pleasure to follow you step by step.
@Ramkabharosa
@Ramkabharosa 3 жыл бұрын
Suppose (√15 + √21 + √35 + 5)/(√3 + 2√5 + √7) = (a√3 + b√5 + c√7). Then (√3.√5 + √3.√7+ √5.√7 + 5) = (√3 + 2√5 + √7).(a√3 + b√5 + c√7). By equating the coefficients of √3.√5, √3.√7, and √5.√7; we get 2a + b = 1, a + c = 1, and b + 2c = 1. So b = 1 - 2a and b = 1 - 2c. Hence 1 - 2a = 1 - 2c and so a=c. Thus a+a =1 & hence a = 1/2. So b = 1 - 2a = 0 and c = a = 1/2. In the end, we will finally get (√15+√21+√35 +5)/(√3 + 2√5 + √7) = (a√3+b√5 +c√7) = (√3+√7)/2. .
@velimir_ikalovic
@velimir_ikalovic 3 жыл бұрын
great video, but to slow for my taste, I had to skip over some obvious things that were repeating. That makes it perfect for everyone who is not fluent in math, but want to learn more. good job overal.
@thinkingaboutreligion2645
@thinkingaboutreligion2645 3 жыл бұрын
14 minutes of algebra with just one single x. In one tiny corner of the video. That's impressive in itself, but it was a great watch too.
@mustafizrahman2822
@mustafizrahman2822 3 жыл бұрын
Your solving position is LEGEND LEVEL!(SERIOUSLY). I have about to solve it like your process but failed. Thanks for your nice explanation.
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome Rahman dear! Please keep sharing premath channel with your family and friends. Take care dear and all the best😃 Love and prayers from the USA! 😃
@cookaburra
@cookaburra 2 жыл бұрын
If you assume that the numerator has the denominator as a factor and see how that goes, you can write: Numerator = (sqrt(3) + sqrt(7) + 2*sqrt(5)) * (a*sqrt(3) + b*sqrt(7) + c*sqrt(5)) Then multiple out and see that: a + b = 1 c + 2b = 1 c + 2a = 1 3a + 7b + 10c = 5 Solution then follows as: a = b = 1/2 c = 0 so the simplified expression is: (sqrt(3) + sqrt(7))/2
@RKJha-wm3us
@RKJha-wm3us 3 жыл бұрын
Very helpful video 👏👍🙏
@shrikrishnagokhale3557
@shrikrishnagokhale3557 2 жыл бұрын
I like the Q's and A's both.
@mathsplus01
@mathsplus01 Жыл бұрын
Congratulation of 300k subscribers. Amazing
@durgatoshpandey5250
@durgatoshpandey5250 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I reached upto the reciprocal (1/x) part myself. But learnt from you the trick of multiplying numerator and denominator with the conjugate to rationalise the denominator.
@stumbling
@stumbling 2 жыл бұрын
I noticed that if you set x = √5 then factoring you get ( x√3 + x√7 + √21 + x² ) / ( √3 + 2x + √7) Then setting numerator to a function, f(x) = x² + x√3 + x√7 + √21 The denominator is in fact the first derivative of the function, f'(x) = 2x + √3 + √7 I am not sure if this can be used to solve the problem but was an interesting observation.
@ayushshukla4205
@ayushshukla4205 3 жыл бұрын
Very nice.
@bobsinger8637
@bobsinger8637 3 жыл бұрын
Ja this is a cool problem but I think all you can say about the series of terms that this is equivalent to is that the sum of these terms when you examine the positive valuses you see that they grow a little bit and will aproach the highest numerical value that you can easily see using arithmetic however because of the presence of prime numbers the function approaches the sum of their roots but it doesn’t get there so their limit is equal to their sum. The numerator grows faster than the denominator so the expression itself will aproach infinity very slowly and probably not converge to a specific value. It’s hard to say this fir sure because of how many numbers would have to be looked at along this curve, but I think because of the the numerators accelerated growth it has to be a growth function and also a decay function because of negative integer values that are twins present beneath the radical symbols in both numerator and denominator. I really like that you’re showing the starting point for this with the factor method to take out the unseen primes beneath the radical signed in this expression. Again this problem is really great. Thank you very much.
@md8744
@md8744 2 жыл бұрын
Learning more to teach my kids at 7th and 8th grade. It is helpful
@Potencyfunction
@Potencyfunction 2 жыл бұрын
In the 7th grade? Lol mines are learning in the first grade this LOL
@matthewleitch1
@matthewleitch1 3 жыл бұрын
This is an interesting video but strangely frustrating. I could not see any reason to think each move was getting us closer to an answer until about 8 minutes had passed. What was it about the expression that suggested this method would work, if anything?
@andywright8803
@andywright8803 3 жыл бұрын
Factorising tends to be a good thing in general
@matthewleitch1
@matthewleitch1 3 жыл бұрын
@@andywright8803 Yes, that's a start. Though in other situations with surds factorisation is not the first move.
@monikamalinovka9514
@monikamalinovka9514 3 жыл бұрын
Back then they don't teach us about make a whole number in square root. So 5 =(√5)(√5). That blow my mind!
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
You are awesome Monika 👍 Take care dear and stay blessed😃
@13kefka
@13kefka 3 жыл бұрын
That IS the definition of square root : the number that you multiply by itself to get the number
@girolamocapita3321
@girolamocapita3321 2 жыл бұрын
Very nice
@ghmaxiron2639
@ghmaxiron2639 3 жыл бұрын
Nice and interesting video Thank you
@aashsyed1277
@aashsyed1277 3 жыл бұрын
VERY NICE VIDEO DEAR. THANK YOU. LOT'S OF LOVE FROM FAR AWAY
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
So nice of you Aaash dear. You are the best Thanks dear for the feedback. You are awesome 👍 Take care dear and stay blessed😃
@victorchoripapa2232
@victorchoripapa2232 3 жыл бұрын
Nice solution. Great video. Thanks!
@alittax
@alittax 2 жыл бұрын
Beautiful, thank you!
@242math
@242math 3 жыл бұрын
got it, thanks for the challenge bro
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that! You are awesome 242👍 Take care dear and all the best😃 Love and prayers from the USA! 😃
@cenderelaabenezer7489
@cenderelaabenezer7489 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome Abenezer! You are awesome 👍 Please keep sharing premath channel with your family and friends. Take care dear and all the best😃 Love and prayers from the USA! 😃
@lancege8596
@lancege8596 3 жыл бұрын
Very helpful for grade 7 students
@jesusantoniocarhuashuerta4662
@jesusantoniocarhuashuerta4662 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Jesus dear for the feedback. You are awesome 👍 Take care dear and stay blessed😃
@SrisailamNavuluri
@SrisailamNavuluri 3 жыл бұрын
I am learning something from you.
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent dear Glad to hear that! You are awesome 👍 Take care dear and all the best😃 Love and prayers from the USA! 😃
@abdellahaitouahmane1593
@abdellahaitouahmane1593 3 жыл бұрын
very nice sir ( from morrocco)
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks dear Thanks Abdellah for the feedback. You are awesome 👍 Take care dear and stay blessed😃 Love and prayers from the USA! 😃
@erwinracoma1935
@erwinracoma1935 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@vaghelabhikhusing6553
@vaghelabhikhusing6553 2 жыл бұрын
Good sir
@andrewrao634
@andrewrao634 2 жыл бұрын
Impressive, but too complicated. Based on the radicals in the numerator, it's clear that we need to multiply the denominator by some of its own radicals: d*rt3 = 3 +2*rt15 + rt21 d*rt5 = 10 + rt15 + rt35 d*rt7 = 7 + rt21 + 2*rt35 It's then obvious that d*(rt3 + rt7) = 2n, so n/d = (rt3 + rt7)/2
@teambellavsteamalice
@teambellavsteamalice 2 жыл бұрын
Wow, nice trick! I tried something similar, but that didn't work.
@sianneang6893
@sianneang6893 3 жыл бұрын
thank you.it's very helpful.
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that Thanks Ang for the feedback. You are awesome 👍 Take care dear and stay blessed😃 Love and prayers from the USA! 😃
@nicogehren6566
@nicogehren6566 3 жыл бұрын
nice soution sir thanks
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Welcome Nico So nice of you dear! You are awesome 👍 I'm glad you liked it! Take care dear and stay blessed😃
@janvigoel5767
@janvigoel5767 2 жыл бұрын
I also solve easily bcz i hve done in my school time
@MarieAnne.
@MarieAnne. 3 жыл бұрын
That seems a lot simpler than what I did. I did manage to factor numerator, but couldn't with denominator, of course. But it didn't occur to me to split up denominator. Instead I tried to rationalize part of denominator in first step, then rationalize all of the denominator in second step: 1st step: (√15+√35+√21+5) / (√3+2√5+√7) = [(√15+√35+√21+5)(√3+2√5-√7)] / [(√3+2√5+√7)(√3+2√5-√7)] = (8√3+6√5+8√7+2√105) / (16+4√15) = (4√3+3√5+4√7+√105) / [2(4+√15)] 2nd step: = [(4√3+3√5+4√7+√105)(4-√15)] / [2(4+√15)(4-√15)] = (√3+√7)/2 I left out the intermediate calculations, but I believe your method is less prone to errors because you're dealing with very simple fractions.
@mathematicsolympiadchannel5345
@mathematicsolympiadchannel5345 3 жыл бұрын
Pls do olympiad math
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Sure dear. I'm working on that. Take care dear and all the best😃 Love and prayers from the USA! 😃
@pareshmehta4670
@pareshmehta4670 3 жыл бұрын
Nice
@naucifacio
@naucifacio 2 жыл бұрын
I think this is a little bit faster: a:=sqrt(3)+sqrt (5)+sqrt(7) Then our expression becomes: (a^2-5)/(2*(a+sqrt(5)) Simplifying (a-sqrt(5))/2 Substitute a (sqrt(3)+sqrt(7))/2
@theophonchana5025
@theophonchana5025 3 жыл бұрын
x = 2 ÷ (square root of 7 - square root of 3)
@julieng.4375
@julieng.4375 3 жыл бұрын
It's incredible
@skyrimguard3501
@skyrimguard3501 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much
@manasbhattacharyya4359
@manasbhattacharyya4359 3 жыл бұрын
It can be solve by plane division method
@michaelaseraphine124
@michaelaseraphine124 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@teodoromaranan1415
@teodoromaranan1415 2 жыл бұрын
very interesting, but very difficult.
@tudanluo
@tudanluo 3 жыл бұрын
Let numerator = [sqrt(3)+2*sqrt(5)+sqrt(7)] * [p*sqrt(3)+q*sqrt(5)+r*sqrt(7)], then p=r=0.5, q=0.
@jpolowin0
@jpolowin0 3 жыл бұрын
That was my approach also.
@lavoiedereussite922
@lavoiedereussite922 2 жыл бұрын
good
@user-mi1lg2ih1b
@user-mi1lg2ih1b 3 жыл бұрын
Great
@Zorlig
@Zorlig 3 жыл бұрын
Couldn't you have just done long division?
@mokshithreddy1634
@mokshithreddy1634 3 жыл бұрын
HATSUP TO YOUR DEDICATION BUT ONE THING FROM ME......... By the methods approximation and calculus can we solve.???‽¿‽ I solve it by approximation..... I got same answer but please solve it calculus
@marciec6862
@marciec6862 2 жыл бұрын
👍🏻
@minka866
@minka866 2 жыл бұрын
I couldn't understand the erasing signal.
@Skandalos
@Skandalos 3 жыл бұрын
LOL I solved it exactly the same way including the substitution. What are the odds ...
@HungNguyen-rj3ek
@HungNguyen-rj3ek 3 жыл бұрын
Why made it that complicated? We have: question = (sqrt(3)+sqrt(5))*(sqrt(5)+sqrt(7))/((sqrt(3)+sqrt(5))+(sqrt(5)+sqrt(7)) Then we multiply both with (sqrt(5)-sqrt(3))*(sqrt(7)-sqrt(3)), simplify then we have the solution
@philipwebb8297
@philipwebb8297 3 жыл бұрын
Genius.
@voltape
@voltape 3 жыл бұрын
jodidazo el problem!
@user-ed8zf5zv5j
@user-ed8zf5zv5j 2 жыл бұрын
I FUCKiNG LOVE MATHS!!!
@kaderdiaw2604
@kaderdiaw2604 2 жыл бұрын
🥰
@Ensign_Cthulhu
@Ensign_Cthulhu 2 жыл бұрын
7:23 I would have flipped the order and called it sqrt(7) + sqrt (5). It works out the same, but you don't have to deal with negatives.
@Teamstudy4595
@Teamstudy4595 3 жыл бұрын
Under root7+under root3/2
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent Jayant You are awesome 👍 Take care dear and stay blessed😃
@dinaris84
@dinaris84 3 жыл бұрын
speed Х2
@langucarl4212
@langucarl4212 2 жыл бұрын
Why putting a pretence? Why you can write a answers without any brackets
@ranveeryadav176
@ranveeryadav176 3 жыл бұрын
Wow I can't explain how same we think
@poseidon.M
@poseidon.M 3 жыл бұрын
💖
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
So nice of you dear! You are awesome 👍 I'm glad you liked it! Please keep sharing premath channel with your family and friends. Take care dear and stay blessed😃
@YusufKhan-od4ku
@YusufKhan-od4ku 2 жыл бұрын
I can solve it in more easy way Make a+b+c to the whole square in the numerator
@theophonchana5025
@theophonchana5025 3 жыл бұрын
x = (Square root of 3 + square root of 7) ÷ 2
@theophonchana5025
@theophonchana5025 3 жыл бұрын
5 - 7 = [Can't substract] (because 5 is too small to substract by 7)
@123_gooo6
@123_gooo6 3 жыл бұрын
Lol... What? 😃
@osamaabdurrahim9146
@osamaabdurrahim9146 3 жыл бұрын
-2
@junkgum
@junkgum 3 жыл бұрын
You owe 7 dollars and only have 5 so you lose 2 dollars from your credit card.
@theophonchana5025
@theophonchana5025 3 жыл бұрын
2 × square root of 5
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
Great
@Michael-wc8xl
@Michael-wc8xl 3 жыл бұрын
42
@hernando-d
@hernando-d 3 жыл бұрын
👍
@doghousedon1
@doghousedon1 3 жыл бұрын
Easy Pease, 42
@skeetorretard
@skeetorretard 3 жыл бұрын
at this point in our level of technology whats the use in simplifying.
@Propane_Acccessories
@Propane_Acccessories 2 жыл бұрын
There's a few reasons, but I'll say just one. When you are creating code, you want to simplify it as much as possible so that it runs faster and it is concise. If you make an error on your code, it can be hard to find it if you have a bunch of unsimplified algebraic expressions.
@santoshKumar.7ts
@santoshKumar.7ts 3 жыл бұрын
sir how can you write ✓15=✓3✓5.. ✓3✓5 is written for only 15 as you written for 5 √5√ 5
@madihagul5702
@madihagul5702 3 жыл бұрын
Never Do Math without tell how will work in practical Life?
@mintusaren895
@mintusaren895 2 жыл бұрын
Primary.
@umedsingh9304
@umedsingh9304 3 жыл бұрын
Very easy question
@teambellavsteamalice
@teambellavsteamalice 2 жыл бұрын
The number of steps is a bit annoying, you should really reduce the number of unnecessary ones! At 3:05 you have six rows. Unless your viewers are a mix of math lovers and toddlers you really only show line 3 (√15 +... = √3√5+...) and line six. You just need to encircle √3 in term 1 and 3 and √5 in term 3 and 4. You immediately see both are multiplied by the same pair. In the second part you can also make life simpler by keeping it shorter: always write the higher root first, so √7+√3. when multiplying with √7-√5 you get 7-5=2 and keep all terms positive later on do explain ab/(a+b) = 1/[1/a+1/b] but immediately write it as 1/[ 1/(√7+√5) + 1/(√5+√3) ] explain (a+b)(a-b) =(a^2-b^2) only once So like you did you can now show 1/(√7+√5) = (√7-√5)/2 and 1/(√5+√3) = (√5-√3)/2 adding you can easily see both are divided by 2 and the √5 drop out, so simply as 1 / [ (√7-√3)/2 ] in one step. you might move the two on top right away. finish again applying the trick of multiplying with (√7+√3)/(√7+√3) getting 7-3=4 in the denominator and divide out the 2 for the answer.
@lechat165
@lechat165 3 жыл бұрын
too complicated. I solved this in mind by making sqrt(3*5)+sqrt(5*7)+sqrt(3*7)+5 = 1/2 * ( (sqrt(3)+sqrt(5)+sqrt(7))^2 - sqrt(5)^2 ). Then I used formula for difference of squares, and (sqrt(3)+2*sqrt(5)+sqrt(7)) expression just cancelled with the denominator. Done.
@antikertech157
@antikertech157 3 жыл бұрын
Nice solution. I did also something like that very very similar, although just a bit indirect.
@shiva2usa
@shiva2usa 2 жыл бұрын
Too lengthy to explain well known facts. (A-B)(A+B) is A^2-B2 and this doesn't need to be invented.
@shadmanhasan4205
@shadmanhasan4205 Жыл бұрын
Real answer = 2.19
@thomasklugh4345
@thomasklugh4345 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but can you do all that backwards... 🙄 Seriously, I've often wondered what a word problem would look like for such a set-up as this.
@davidchiles5331
@davidchiles5331 3 жыл бұрын
Please just leave us alone.
@theophonchana5025
@theophonchana5025 3 жыл бұрын
3 - 5 = [Can't substract ]
@jcfos6294
@jcfos6294 2 жыл бұрын
Pas trivial du tout. Aucun intérêt en mathématiques. Jamais au programme de la licence ni du Master en France. C'est nul.
@arpansit3155
@arpansit3155 3 жыл бұрын
first
@PreMath
@PreMath 3 жыл бұрын
You are awesome Arpan👍 Please keep sharing premath channel with your family and friends. Take care dear and all the best😃 Love and prayers from the USA! 😃
@jaykumarjoshi5173
@jaykumarjoshi5173 2 жыл бұрын
I do not understand any thing what you tought I think I have spoil my time I feel sorry for this video
@theophonchana5025
@theophonchana5025 3 жыл бұрын
Square root of 15 Square root of 35 Square root of 21 Square root of 3 Square root of 5 Square root of 7
@mouloudimedlarbi2443
@mouloudimedlarbi2443 3 жыл бұрын
🇲🇦🍉
@gordonhall3331
@gordonhall3331 2 жыл бұрын
worked it out in three minutes in head this is pathetic
Simplify the Cube Root Radical Expression. MOST will NOT Get RIGHT!
18:13
WHO CAN RUN FASTER?
00:23
Zhong
Рет қаралды 46 МЛН
女孩妒忌小丑女? #小丑#shorts
00:34
好人小丑
Рет қаралды 84 МЛН
Gli occhiali da sole non mi hanno coperto! 😎
00:13
Senza Limiti
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН
Can you solve this Cambridge Entrance Exam Question?
24:48
Higher Mathematics
Рет қаралды 134 М.
1995 British Mathematics Olympiad problem
20:59
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 108 М.
2 to the x = 9, many don’t know where to start
16:17
TabletClass Math
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
99% of Math Students Still Find This Difficult
16:05
TabletClass Math
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
A Functional Equation from Putnam and Beyond
12:07
SyberMath
Рет қаралды 269 М.
A very tricky interview question: the rectangle in a triangle problem
6:08
MindYourDecisions
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
WHO CAN RUN FASTER?
00:23
Zhong
Рет қаралды 46 МЛН