Simulation of a Nuclear Explosion in LONDON

Simulate a nuclear explosion in London to calculate the estimated number of deaths that would result. Using data from leading researchers and highlighting modern technological developments, the film illustrates the very real danger that nuclear weapons still pose to humanity and life on Earth.
Article about nuclear incidents:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear...

[@RunPJs]

In other words it'll be even harder to get a Doctors appointment

[@williammore558]

How can it get harder when it's literally nonexistent 😅

[@davidmccann9811]

And finding an NHS dentist would be the same as now. You won't find one.

[@mariokreca97]

And its just 750 kilotons, not even 1 megaton. Russia detonated 58 megaton back in 1961.

[@petergroverd6626]

I already thought this morning trying to get through to my Doctors has it already happened.

[@Harbinger4Freedom]

Pmsl😂😂😂😂😂

[@danieloliver6563]

One way to sort out knife crime.

[@watcher805]

That knife on knife crime is getting rough 😂

[@wearetheremnants1615]

Lol

[@gwynlordofcinder6316]

🤣🤣🤣

[@paulh2107]

and ULEZ

[@cv507]

xäctlie v doubt sehr mäknetz ? ´äre you outta yör hämmrite mint v$?v

[@richardjones2811]

Luckily no British people would be harmed.

[@markbradley6602]

'Love that comment m8!'

[@OLDCHEMIST1]

Now, now, Sir, that sounds a comment against the Wokist agenda! But it was funny!

[@NewAlbionTV]

Westminster! LOL

[@richardjones2811]

@@NewAlbionTV Oh what a shame!

[@jamienhb9770]

send 1 to bradford please

[@hadb9084]

The damage to Brixton would increase the value of the properties there, and probably make it look nicer.

[@norfolkpartisan5767]

😂

[@carmanbazza]

Lmao

[@bluey8302]

LOL bruh

[@jamesstewartwilliams]

As a guy who lives there I can agree somewhat 😢😅

[@lucasgattesco3148]

Lol

[@ianclose123]

Sadiq Khan is likely to watch this and say "Nuclear holocaust is just part and parcel of living in a big European city"

[@grahamcook9289]

I wonder if the Mayor of London has a bunker? Would he, like the cockroaches survive?

It would probably improve the area by 100% to be honest 😂

[@The58stupot]

I must admit to giving out a " Hurrah " when he mentioned the blast hitting Westminster first.

😂👍

[@ConradAinger]

​@@The58stupot He said that people in Westminster won't feel anything. Oh.

[@DirkDiggler-qp3vm]

Most immigrants there anyways

[@IAN-DIXON..]

No argument there 😅

[@eric9095]

The most absurd assumption in these events is that there would be hospital functions at all. Who is going to clock in and work at the hospital. Who will get a paycheck? What government would even exist after nuclear war? The minute nuclear weapons detonate, everyone is on their own. There are no police, no military aid, no hospital, no jobs, just everyone trying to survive alone.

[@sacr3]

Who assumed this? Did you see a couple videos online explaining the aftermath, so now you jump around to videos like this and explain something that no one questioned?

[@Max-px5ym]

That's only partially true. There are indeed selfless heroes in hospitals who risk their lives to save others. In the darkest times, those heroes shine brightest

[@eric9095]

@@sacr3 if you watch past the first 30 seconds you will understand that the assumption of hospital staff being overwhelmed by treating nuclear weapon victims is made in the video.

[@eric9095]

@@Max-px5ym It’s a nice thought, but the only 10 staff employees at hospitals who show up without paychecks are the retired elderly volunteers usually working the gift shops, or entry greeters. I worked in a hospital for 5 years and two of those years during the first two years of covid. Nobody shows up without getting paid.

[@123mandalore777]

Everything you said sounds awesome though. Imagine no government, no cops, no modern woke military, no wage slaving. Just total freedom. I think the only people who don't want something like this are the entrenched well off who will lose absolutely everything in the situation. But the general public has nothing much to lose. If a nuke went off in my nearest major city and I didn't get deleted or radiated by it, I can only imagine improvements to my life. Everything that is currently making my life awful would be gone. We'd also be able to put so many dumb ideas to the test. We'd put equality to the test and see who's really equal and who is superior, who is inferior and what types of people are parasites and truly need others to leech off. It would basically unstuck humanity from this never ending cultural quagmire of the cultural war which everyone endlessly argues about, but no one is ever allowed to put anything to the test of prove anything because too many people would fear the results. So they want an endless limbo of uncertainty. I'm sick of that, and I also don't want to own nothing. So why not just let Bill Gates land get nuked? It's not mine. Why would I care if some rich billionaire mega property owner had all of his land nuked and irradiated. Not my problem.

[@timdougall5415]

I bet we would still have to pay the ULEZ charge

[@davidwright8432]

Damn! Is there no mercy? None at all? (sob).

[@killman369547]

That's just one bomb. A city the size of London is going to get at least 3.

[@dorkbrandon4422]

How generous

[@xianshi8896]

don't you worry. Russia has at least 6k(might be up to 12k upon WW3) warhead.

[@TheeWolfiee1]

@@xianshi8896no one is worried, id be more surprised if Russia could actually launch even half of their stockpile without blowing themselves up first….

[@jons9721]

Wouldn't need more than 1 . The UK would cease to exist a political entity if central London ceased to exist (and when I say central the entire city would cease to economically function if the centre went). The political tensions would utterly tear the country apart . There isn't the military or police to enforce martial law and you would just get local warlords taking over. Wales and Scotland would attempt to run themselves but there is nothing whatsoever culturally uniting England This doesn't apply to to other countries but London is the the UK economy and not just central political centre the only real discussion making body of any importance

[@luciussander8217]

@@jons9721 Been watching too much TV mate. What a load of cobblers you have just written.

[@johndean1634]

Can you imagine landing in your Rubber Boat in Dover just as one of these landed.

[@Theoriginalbigbrillo]

Lol, but i bet the fuckers would still get their benefits processed as a priority 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭

[@derekbrown7303]

The shock waves will send them back to France. Lol 😂

[@ravendark2422]

Just make sure Khans at home first.

[@BingoBet-It-AllBeaver]

Oh, you can bet he will be safely in his bunker somewhere far away.

[@leakoe3797]

ravendark2422- I totally agree Well said

[@B-uk8eo]

Id say Hackney had already been nuked some time ago

[@tomhiggins2562]

😂

[@coka7637]

You mean gentrified hackney full of white middle classes waddling down the street or are you just a out of touch bigot

[@jamesbarbour8400]

Isn't that Diane Abbots' 'manor' ?

[@nickbutler7935]

it's a tad drastic to get rid of Khan, but it maybe worth it. With luck Parliament and the HoL will be full at the time.

[@John-ou4rm]

Could make London property more affordable while sorting out those pesky heating bills.

[@rinvz]

well with all that radiation, we won’t need the heating.

[@Max-px5ym]

3:15 well no city is designed to survive nukes

[@DJquatermass]

There are but the UK doesn't care for it's untitled surfs.

[@Max-px5ym]

​@@DJquatermasspray tell what city do you have in mind? Appart from an underground city

[@serioussilliness2064]

Some are better designed than others tho. It's one reason every parking spot should be replaced with trees and bushes, and multistory parking garages as part of multipurpose buildings amidst cozier yet comfier, more spacious neighborhoods replacing sprawling cars taking up like 90 percent of space. Also, elevation helps. If you get hit by a tornado, same principal.

[@serioussilliness2064]

Shielded behind mountains, forests, etc. A bunker made to survive a nuke as close as possible is designed to survive everything.

[@killman369547]

It's probably not even possible to build a city that can shrug off a nuke.

[@RighteousPursuitMinistries]

No hospital would function anyway due to the electromagnetic pulse from the blast knocking out all computers and electrics.

[@Me-hv9fk]

If only 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. Billions of pounds of improvements in an instant.

[@SimpleJackPC]

Omg you're so edgy 😘

[@stevendavies7358]

The mayor said ULEZ charges will continue as normal

[@MrORANGEMAN1966]

No more fish and chips

[@vincent77295]

no more English breakfast ha ha

[@CarnivoreUltimateLiving]

Firestorms alone will kill of pretty much entire city so these casualties estemates are way to low.

[@jake51515]

Assuming there is a firestorm. Firestroms soley depend on flammable material and modern cities are literally mostly fireproof. Sure things would catch fire, but the high forced shockwave would extinguish them.

[@Protato666]

Thats a way to sort multiculti in London without affecting native Brits since there are hardly any left in the area

[@jedjones9047]

How big will it's carbon footprint be greta would like to know.

[@johng873]

How dare you

[@Afghanman25]

It will reduce a lot due to less people and ash blocking the sun

[@HumanScourgeYT]

im gettin the feeling we arent gonna have to "imagine" for too much longer

[@chrisfrazer2357]

Instantly causing 5 billion pounds worth of improvements

[@Bailiol]

Right now we're just 1 error and 30 minutes away from this - an error which could have occurred 27 minutes ago...

[@geoffsullivan4063]

How wonderfully uplifting ! Makes me feel all warm inside.. yay 🤗

[@Me-hv9fk]

🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍👍

[@jamesbarbour8400]

That's certainly one consequence of a Nuke going off near you, but because the reaction inside the bomb happens so unimagineably fast, even the nuerons in your brain would not fire fast enough to tell you that you'd just been obliterated - you wouldn't feel a thing - that's how I'd like to go out at any rate - this Country is doomed because of our bought and paid for Politicians - the House of Commons (and House of Lords of course), isn't nicknamed 'WEFminster' for no good reason !

[@leeanderironside1898]

How does narrator conclude that “we “ can prevent a nuclear catastrophe ?…. Not a chance ! Never before has the destiny of mankind been in the hands of so few !

[@freemenofengland2880]

Easy - Vote for a party proposing peace in the upcoming UK General Election.

[@leeanderironside1898]

@@freemenofengland2880 hello , thanks for your reply, …. Sadly , I have heard nothing of peace mentioned by any candidate in the forthcoming elections

[@freemenofengland2880]

@@leeanderironside1898 Reform and the Socialist Workers Party both have Peace for Ukraine and Gaza mentioned in their "manifestos".

[@LordGrandKaiser]

Unfortunately for all of us, nuclear armageddon seems to be more a probability than a possibility at this point. Prepare for the worst now, and good luck to you all.

[@4RST]

there's been newspapers and other headlines in England saying to start prepping

[@Zindo.Majesty.HisMajesty]

Naw, I was in West Germany during the Cold War. Just saber rattling.

[@philc1773]

​@@Zindo.Majesty.HisMajesty if it doesn't happen, how on earth will they cover up all the atrocities? 💉💉💉

[@PeterKnagge]

UN voted nukes globally banned in 2017. Spinoza was right, "nice guys finish last".

[@cun7us]

There's actually less nuclear arms now than there were during the cold war which was over 40,000 if you can believe it.

[@philoshaughnessy906]

Never mind London's hospitals. We're talking about just one bomb. This explosion alone would cause more casualties than all the hospitals in the UK could cope with. But this example is just for reference; it wouldn't end here.

[@yunkshione-1016]

Let's just pray we never get to this.

[@davidwright8432]

Prayer didn't help the Japanese. 'Course, they mainly ain't Christian. OK, that explains that.

[@stevewake6614]

Cos prayer has always worked in the past.

[@philkearny5587]

You might want to quit poking the bear, huh?

[@andydoney5581]

Four Vanguard Class Subs armed with dozens of Trident nukes say the bears better not poke at us either.......GOT IT???? Oh and may I add....ours are modern, well tested and maintained, not covered with rust and therefore will actually reach their targets and WORK......

[@freemenofengland2880]

@@andydoney5581 Four??? One is always in for maintenance, occasionally two, leaving two patrolling the sea. Russia would almost certainly launch as a result of NATO / Ukraine aggression, possibly in response to a NATO pre-emptive strike. In which case we ALL die, mostly during the Nuclear Winter.

[@andydoney5581]

@@freemenofengland2880 Yes you are correct about the fact that 2 are in refit while others are in service. However, I don't agree that Russia would launch at nuke armed countries unless there is a first nuclear strike. Former aides of Putin have gone on record as saying that listed targets of Russia in the first instance of NATO conventional aggression would be countries like Holland, Sweden, Poland etc, all the countries that do not have independent nukes. I don't think that NATO would put boots on the ground in Ukraine unless a NATO country was attacked in the first place. But the fact still remains that if we die, millions of Russians will also die by UK nukes, and that's a fact. Unless Starmer is in power and shits himself of course. But of course, as you say, Russia would retaliate to a pre-emptive strike by the West. You would expect that as it would be a fair enough response. But I think a pre-emptive strike is highly unlikely, any response to Russian escalation would be conventional in the first instance.

[@Gingycat100]

@@freemenofengland2880 Yes how dare Ukrainian's defend their country from a genocidal invasion?

[@80sandretrogubbins25]

​@@freemenofengland2880Nuclear winter might not occur with airburst nukes. The main worry is the absolutely huge destruction caused by thermonuclear/hydrogen bombs.

[@DiscoDougify]

Well, that's one solution to remove ULEZ and bus lane cameras.

[@benhurley8063]

Imagine the hopeless haggard husks of people wandering around the formerly beautiful streets of london ,,, then a nuclear bomb goes off !!!

[@killman369547]

Whatever problems they may have had, now they have MUCH bigger problems.

[@jamesbarbour8400]

Ha ha, good one ! 🤣

[@peterjohnston1224]

The Great Cities of the world have multiple war-heads assigned to them, possibly by more than one aggressor. London could expect more than a single 750 Kt air-burst. So, the 800,000 fatalities and 1,000,000 injured in THIS scenario are gross underestimates.

[@struvrim7637]

Approximately 70-100 thermonuclear charges of 800-2500 kilotons each are aimed at key global cities (London, New York, Moscow), in any case there will be radioactive molten glass and molten concrete

[@mattburrito]

im american i don’t want nuclear war to happen

[@gavinderulo12]

​@@struvrim7637you mean 800-2500 kilotons right? Not megatons.

[@struvrim7637]

@@gavinderulo12 yep

[@michaelsaint9181]

Not unimaginable at all anymore,....not with the woke leaders we have,....I'd say it's a certainty at this point.

[@tomhiggins2562]

The West would never nuke first. If a nuclear exchange happens it will be because of one lunatic in a bunker in a country next to the last man in a bunker, who fortunately didn't have nuclear f-balls to play with.

[@dorkbrandon4422]

Woke leaders are the biggest cowards of them all

[@StephenJohnson-jb7xe]

Wtf has woke got to do with it?

[@gwynlordofcinder6316]

@StephenJohnson-jb7xe Woke people are so stupid Don't underestimate the power of stupidity

[@daveeyde9622]

You can't even define woke. What woke leader are you talking about? Putin? Xi? Un? Ayatollah? Leader of India or Pakistan? Macron!! That's it. The French president is going to be the cause of a nuclear war bc..... why?

[@MarceloDinoYT]

Bold of you to assume London’s hospitals can currently physically cope with anything.

[@davidwright8432]

Hey! they're keeping me at least alive! - Grateful in Hounslow.

[@Ibcurious2Ibcurious2]

I still remember the first time I saw Threads! Pretty frightening!

[@Mark-ec3lp]

In my opinion not one film has beaten, or even come close, to how frightening and depressing Threads was (and still is today) when I saw it aired back in September 1984.

[@philoshaughnessy906]

@@Mark-ec3lp Absolutely true. The daddy of all nuclear war movies. "You cannot win a nuclear war!"

[@davidmccann9811]

'The War Games' is equally terrible. It's so close to reality that the BBC banned it in 1965, as they thought it would cause panic.

[@Mark-ec3lp]

@@philoshaughnessy906 No winners for certain, but right now NATO is pushing for WW 3, I feel they all need to watch Threads in the same room together, and maybe like Ronald Reagan changed US nuclear weapons policy after seeing The Day After. They seem complacent about nuclear weapons and the real danger they pose.

[@Mark-ec3lp]

@@davidmccann9811 Thanks David, I haven't seen that one. I might depress myself and take a look. It's amazing that even with these films, many still don't realise just how much death and destruction would follow even a limited nuclear exchange.

[@AB-gi3qy]

What a truly terrifying prospect, hopefully these weapons are never used again.

[@cun7us]

A thermonuclear weapon has actually never been used against humans. Only the atomic bomb which was used against Japan by the Americans in WWII.

[@freemenofengland2880]

@@cun7us The Manhattan Project was a joint project - mostly US / UK, but also including some Canadians. Observers in other planes included several Brits and if the B29 hadn't existed then Lancasters would have carried out the mission, the B17 not having enough bomb carrying capacity.

[@SomeOne-sq7ir]

this is pretty underrated

[@AngeloXification]

There would be no way to tell the ghouls and humans apart

[@GegeDxD]

Fireball radius would be much bigger than 0.95km. 750kt, that's 2-3 km in radius. The fatalities would be also much higher than the number mentioned in this video. This video literally underestimate the potential of 750kt nuclear payload.

[@chezjervisdcfc]

London...massive improvment

[@RobMelanson-mx1uo]

Why do all these videos miss the fact that large metropolitan cities like London would likely be hit with many simultaneous detonations this size? The entire city and surrounding area would cease to exist. Try to imagine 15 or 20 simultaneous detonations strategically placed to maximize damage. The damage wouldn't just be 15 to 20 times greater it would be exponentially greater. It would be a level of devastation beyond imagination.

[@garywatson]

A good point, but normally a planner would space them out by distance and time, so that you don't have fratricide between the weapons. A minute or two ought to be enough. So you might have a target array ABCDABCDABCD, where the three A targets get hit at once, then the three C targets, then the three B targets, then finally the three D targets. Also, targets are usually hit from south to north in a given area, again, to avoid fratricide. Not that much matters how much your rubble bounces while you are being incinerated - it's just that military types like to optimize things for maximum effect.

[@sacr3]

Because what they are simulating is one nuclear warhead detonating in one city, to show you the destruction of a nuke. Not to show you how military tactics would play out during a nuclear war, considering we have never been in one it is hard to say exactly what will happen and what tactics will be used.

[@r423sdex]

And Moscow.

[@visualiser3d]

I'll include a part about the metro in my next video, I haven't figured out which city yet, but maybe you can tell me.

[@chk6194]

​@visualiser3d you should now do Moscow to keep it balanced.

[@stringer-ik1pc]

Its like a foreign country anyway. It wouldnt bother most people

[@richardirish922]

It would be devastating, how would Khan make money out of this.

[@20165776YEAR]

he would put a charge on dead bodies

[@michaelbritain5546]

He'd charge you for putting the rubble of your home on a public street...

[@jamesbarbour8400]

​@@20165776YEAR 'bring out your dead' ! 🤣

[@CtrlOptDel]

Hey, I can see my house! …shit.

[@Alf1eN0akes]

A radioactive Essex ! The horror

[@rickbloke17CR]

Does that mean girls in Essex wont need their knickers around their ankles to keep them warm?

[@jamesbarbour8400]

​@@rickbloke17CR I'd heard that Cheshire girls had supplanted them in that respect ! 🤣

[@Knighted357]

British after a nuke .. love does the kettle still work.

[@dorkbrandon4422]

No nothing Dave not working ! Bloody hell this nuclear holocaust is a pain in the arse

[@cookiemonster2299]

The kettles constantly boiling Dave and it's not even plugged in 🫤

[@Followthepath89]

Fucken dusty clouds always fucking up my windows look at Sandra’s windows how are they clean

[@georgerobartes2008]

90% of the UKs Asian restaurants and take aways destroyed in an instant ......

[@showdown66]

We will see this in real life soon.

[@DavidOfosuAppiah]

It is coming ,London,England,UK get ready.

[@Ovw1]

@@DavidOfosuAppiah hope ghana is ready too

[@DavidOfosuAppiah]

@@Ovw1 UK is the one that provoked the Bear and Wrath of the Bear cometh upon the UK shortly soon.

[@superaleksibros2]

The british rushing in here to applause the destruction is what gets me😂

[@keithagnew5934]

There once was a doctors strike at hospital. The thing was. More patients actually lived through the strike. The percentage returned to normal when the doctors started work again.

[@jameslyddall]

Jeremy Corbyn with Diane Abbott (if this was a Russian nuke) would be immediately on the news saying we need to make peace with Russia as retaliation is not the way to resolve issues.

[@CharlieWielowski]

Putin wouldn't listen to those alliterate twats 😂 He'd look at us like a shower of shit FFS

[@njw1383]

That is truly scary. I hope and pray we never see nuclear war again

[@Evan_Bell]

Fairly accurate, approximately the right yield and right target location. But it'd be an airburst 1.69km high, and there'd be negligible local fallout.

[@Red-Revolution708]

We Need To Get These Psychopath Greedy Politicians OUT!

[@EnglishViking420]

Survivors of a nuclear war would envy the dead - Nikata Khruschev

[@samorayee420]

You have to talk with sunak because he don't know what's he doing 😢

[@Para_Saul]

Best thing about a nuke is that your stuff can't be looted.

[@BadActor-]

Those Who Survive.... Will Be The Unfortunate.... 💥

[@danieldunne68]

When do these improvements begin?

[@jamesbarbour8400]

Hang on, I'll just make a quick phone call to my buddy, Putin ! 🤣

[@alantorr4761]

Meanwhile in Dagenham, life is normal up the Heathway. African and Asian mini marts won't appreciate the extra horde's of flies, but thems the break's

[@bradleysmith9431]

Now do a simulation of an underwater detonation that creates a tsunami. How large would it be. How far inland would it travel. The majority of the population lives near the coast.

[@WhiteGirlHeaven]

The Poseidon (Russian: Посейдон, "Poseidon", GRAU index 2M39, NATO reporting name Kanyon), previously known by Russian codename Status-6 (Russian: Статус-6), is an autonomous, nuclear-powered unmanned underwater vehicle reportedly in production by Rubin Design Bureau, capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear warheads.[1][5][6] The Poseidon is one of the six new Russian strategic weapons announced by Russian President Vladimir Putin on 1 March 2018.[7] . Poseidon is a completely new category of weapon. It will reshape naval planning in both Russia and the West, leading to new requirements and new counter-weapons. A weapon which cannot be nullified with anti-missile defenses. In future nuclear tensions, if we live through this one, it will be a strong factor.

[@bennymutant]

Cobra Commander voice = instant like & sub

[@00wrongun]

Remember, panic buying won't help you at all

[@stevestruthers6180]

There is an error in your video. Airbursts, that is, nuclear weapons detonated high in the air to maximize the blast radius and hence the damage, generate little or no radioactive fallout. In a general nuclear war, most civilian centres will be subjected to airbursts, unless multiple hardened, underground bunkers for government and military use are present in those cities. In which case, groundbursts will be used to destroy these facilities.

[@thatdawghouse]

They will probably use both & double tap areas of interest.

[@80sandretrogubbins25]

This video presumably simulates a thermonuclear (fusion) bomb, in which case the radiation would be even less. A fission-based bomb on airburst, on the other hand, might generate more fallout than that, but still as you say less than a groundburst. Either way, this video is crap.

[@user-wu1dv6jk5s]

This would be like a dream come true!

[@user-wu1dv6jk5s]

@@HardcoreMasters "gangsters" in the 2020's, lol, what do they sell on the black market, soy milk

[@HardcoreMasters]

@@user-wu1dv6jk5s you sound like a nonc

[@HardcoreMasters]

@@user-wu1dv6jk5s you wouldnt last 5 mins

[@HardcoreMasters]

@@user-wu1dv6jk5s the police will arrest you

[@HardcoreMasters]

@@user-wu1dv6jk5s you brit then

[@predictablyunpredictable2757]

None of us would be able to put the kettle on and make a cuppa.... That is what scares me... like thats how we solve everything....

[@alongonen5651]

interested to see more details about the Thames how much would have vaporised, and its after effects , can you simulate please?

[@andrewlevick1015]

A nuclear war would send us back to the Stone Age. No fresh water, no electricity, no banks, no cars, rampant disease, homelessness etc etc. Even if the initial explosion didn't kill, the loss of social infrastructure would.

[@Bobblenob]

Your fatalities estimates seem a bit low to me.

[@cun7us]

That's what I was thinking. There would be well over 3 million casualties within the initial blast radius, especially if it's during the day.

[@80sandretrogubbins25]

Yep.

[@leakoe3797]

The government only have a very small number of bunkers mainly for government ministers & their families..NOT for joe public..!

[@spiraboy]

It’s incredible that the brits still poke Russia.

[@dislike7973]

These visualizations show 1 , but from the Cold War , Soviets Targeted thousands of bombs to UK , so cities like these would be hit 40+ times during the Cold War , maybe in todays Arsenal 4-6+ times

[@StephenGoddard-MiisterSpiice]

Can we have it on Slough instead?

[@carmanbazza]

Wonder if Genghis would charge us for being Radio active?

[@jotgrewal4390]

I know one group of people are taking notes

[@tomhiggins2562]

Why don't you show us what a 650 kiloton nuclear warhead exploding over Moscow would look like? Or St Petersburg. Or Kaliningrad.

[@20165776YEAR]

so you're saying there's a chance

[@petergroverd6626]

It would be the same there my friend. No winners anywhere in sight.

[@ppiki1973]

​@@petergroverd6626Few people be a safe... Exsactly they 10-20 people who doing this all. Westerns richies has his onli towns underground and hi and his familly will live with hapiness for mani years...

[@boxingmessaboutwithmydonro3347]

Well I live in uk so why would I care how it looks in Moscow. You sound stupid. The point is how it looks where you live

[@Stu49583]

Fallout 1 Soundtrack - Metallic Monks (Lost Hills)

[@mickd6942]

Yes but will the ULEZ cameras be destroyed ?

[@vosilerg]

There are much worse things that could happen than a thermal nuclear war.

[@poofighter3741]

Causing £2.50s Worth of damage LOL.

[@josin8374]

I’m not 1000% sure but I’m pretty sure the fallout of modern nukes are far less then what the first atom bombs were. To the point it’s not even that big a deal anymore. Your biggest problem is that they are much much more devastating blast wise and heat wise. You’re more likely to die of burns than radiation afterwards.

[@beng7845]

Depends.. ground burst kick up lots of fallout, airburst less fall out but the thermal wave travels further.

[@seanconnolly7386]

Environmentally friendly nukes "that's cheered me up"😊

[@80sandretrogubbins25]

Yeah, I heard that most nukes nowadays are hydrogen/fusion bombs which are less renowned for fallout, plus if they're airburst, even less so. Instead they cause enormous devastation through the energy released.

[@simonkisling860]

The message of all this is: we don't negotiate!

[@lester9448]

As long as there's food somewhere 😂😂

[@TheDeadlyraptor]

That will sort out the Ulez but air quality might be affected

[@Sha_Mone]

Why call the imaginable unimaginable when it can be imagined.

[@antistrix]

ok now its time to repost this without the voiceover just the cool destruction simulation

[@80sandretrogubbins25]

Since there seem to be a lot of thermonuclear/hydrogen bomb nukes around, fallout might not be so much. The blast itself and the resulting fireball, fires and shockwaves would do most of the damage. None of which of course helps at all.

[@makisa789]

this is my biggest wish.. I hope this year for my birthday. It would be the best gift in my life.

[@Moneh751]

Instead of WW3 what about organising eSports between US and Russia? 🤨🤨

[@philipharris-smith5889]

I think London would get 4-6 of varying yield.

[@afairdealfortaxidrivers4359]

The Hospitals can’t cope now, they are in a constant state of crisis!.

[@chriskopp6738]

How will I pay my loan after it? Whether concert tickets will be refunded? Whether will be still forbidden to make barbecue in nature? What sunblock factor to use in that case? Those are the questions that I'd like to find answer.

[@user-zz8nk2oc9p]

Why does this need to be the case! Give peace a chance! Make love ❤️ NOT WAR!!!! Lets all pray this NEVER EVER HAPPENS!!!!! 😢

[@sisiluv199]

That will rise the AVETAGE IQ on this planed dramatically...

[@cookiemonster2299]

Hopefully to the point where they can spell average. 😜

[@cartestgroupoy2441]

But it will clean area from alcoholism and cannibalism

[@NickMavromatis]

mind blown.

[@ginobragoli1448]

At least we'd have a bit of warm summer for a change!

[@SewingMink160]

Whys the voice sound Iike Vulpes Inculta from Fallout New Vegas?