The Venus' design is synchro focus, the anamorphic elements are moving. That means its a 1.6x squeeze at infinity, but like 1.45 or 1.5 at close focus.
@connornyhan7 ай бұрын
@gothamindembaum aperture has nothing to do with it, it’s minimum focus vs infinity
@mattspadesoundandvision7 ай бұрын
It’s still a pain in the rear when paired with the Saturn 35 to try and fix the squeeze based on focusing distance.
@BootStrapTurnerVideography6 ай бұрын
Have a set, paired with the 1.25x adapter the squeeze becomes a consistent squeeze throughout the entire focus range.
@connornyhan6 ай бұрын
@@BootStrapTurnerVideography only with the 1.25x adapter though since it features a variable diopter focus system.
@BootStrapTurnerVideography6 ай бұрын
@@connornyhan actually the 150mm in my set has a constant squeeze without the adapter.
@JackMajor5 ай бұрын
The video I have been waiting for for several months, thank you so much!
@mattspadesoundandvision5 ай бұрын
Sure thing! And thank you!
@doeme017097 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for this! I've been looking everywhere to find a comparasion of these two lenses
@mattspadesoundandvision7 ай бұрын
I was too! I kinda fell into this review when I was sent the wrong lens, the Saturn. Before I returned it, I had the Venus in my hand and decided to do a short comparison to see which one I liked better. I’m so glad this accident happened because I ended up, loving the Saturn much more! Cheers!
@westwoodmanorfilms77796 ай бұрын
Me as well. Thnx.
@ZidaneLeonhart3 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for making this video. I’ve been trying to find info on the difference between these lenses.
@mattspadesoundandvision3 ай бұрын
I was fortunate to have stumbled upon having access to both lenses. I'm glad it helped and thank you.!
@uncleronnie5897 ай бұрын
venus has a inconsistent squeeze ratio across different focal distances which they fixed in the saturn
@mattspadesoundandvision7 ай бұрын
I thought I heard that from various reviews so this is good to know. Cheers!
@lime617 ай бұрын
This is the answer
@SlaughterHausD3 ай бұрын
Yeah the Venus Ana-lens is located in the base rather than the end. If anything it should be more consistent. I've never heard any other reviews mention an issue with this. Any chance you got a dud?
@mundifuturi41456 күн бұрын
Thank you very much! Kind of clear the trouble for me!
@mattspadesoundandvisionКүн бұрын
You bet! Glad it helped.
@BootStrapTurnerVideography7 ай бұрын
Dipping my toes into Anamorphic. What would you recommend to start with, acquiring a single lens at a time as budget permits, 35mm, 50mm, 75mm or larger? I suspect 35mm to start, but would love your opinion. Probably bundle the SIRUI 1.25x Anamorphic Adapter with the first lens purchase to make it 2x de-squeeze, probably improving the bokeh.
@mattspadesoundandvision7 ай бұрын
That's a great question and it really depends on what you're shooting and what distance you have between camera and subject(s) The 35 is more like a 22mm, the 50 like a 31mm and the 75 will give you more a focal length of a 47mm. You can get magnification dioptors for well under $50 for these that'll allow you to get closer toy our subject, but the background will be completely blurred. I think the 35 & 75 make a great combo but I started with the 35. Hope tatb helps! Thanks!
@visual_playground_by_zlatan7 ай бұрын
Thank you for video. As beginner who is interested in anamorphic I found this so useful.
@mattspadesoundandvision7 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful! Thank you so much!
@nwonomad6 ай бұрын
Thanks, great job man... I think you just saved me from making a massive mistake
@mattspadesoundandvision6 ай бұрын
This is so good to hear! I’m sure the Venus line shines at focal length like 100 but I’m happy with the Saturn at 75. Cheers!
@whyjaywonders7 ай бұрын
As they are using planet scale, Saturn lens should be heavier. Just saying...
@mattspadesoundandvision7 ай бұрын
Haha! This is true! Love it.
@AndrewLXiong20 күн бұрын
Thanks for the review comparison...for me the weight matters especially for run and gun stuff and the flares on the Saturn just looks nicer with a straight horizontal flares instead of an oval flare in Venus.
@mattspadesoundandvision19 күн бұрын
Glad it helped! I love how for some the weight of the Venus is better but I agree for gimbals and the flare I prefer the Saturn.
@swolodkin6 ай бұрын
This video came at a perfect time for me. Now that I have the BMCC6K, I'm ready to get some affordable anamorphic glass. From your examples I can clearly see that I prefer the Saturn over the Venus. Now I just need to decide if it's blue or neutral flares. Personally, I really like the blue - but when shooting for clients it could be a problem. In any case, thanks for the video - I was hoping someone would help me out with some examples, your video was just the ticket.
@mattspadesoundandvision6 ай бұрын
This is great to hear. I love it! I went through the same decision and luckily fell into a scenario where I was sent the wrong version. I had some time wth both on hand to try out. I love the Saturns and will probably add the 50mm eventually. Thank you again for this, and that you're going to love that BMCC. Keep us posted on it.
@swolodkin6 ай бұрын
But before the anamorphic, I need to find a solid standard zoom (~24-70mm). I'm struggling with this because the very fine Sigma Arts aren't stabilized unless I go back to adapting the older gen DG OS HSM from EF or F. Further complications arise considering I have a set of inexpensive Rokinon DS primes which are Nikon F (which work fine), but if I simply adapt the Art OS lens, I will lose the electronic functions, but keep the OS. If I try and save the electronics, I have to spend another $$ on an active EF to L adapter. And then there's the Panasonic S and S Pro which also have issues. Do you have any experience with this apparent quagmire? Am I too concerned with getting stabilization, do I really need the electronic functions?
@j.b.71335 ай бұрын
Great video , exactly what I needed
@mattspadesoundandvision5 ай бұрын
Glad it helped
@pats_seidl6 ай бұрын
thank you finally there s a comparison!
@mattspadesoundandvision6 ай бұрын
Awesome! I hope it helped!
@dovgurewicz3 ай бұрын
Great video thanks so much!
@mattspadesoundandvision3 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@TaisonServicesPhotographie3 ай бұрын
donc le meilleur es le saturn ou venus en anamorphic 50mm full frame ?? merci
@mattspadesoundandvision2 ай бұрын
I haven’t tested the 50mm in either Saturn or Venus. Since I already own the Saturn 35 and 75 I might go with the Saturn option,
@Hail_Sagan4 ай бұрын
Great explanation, thank you!
@mattspadesoundandvision4 ай бұрын
@@Hail_Sagan Awesome! And thank you.
@Renstar3334 ай бұрын
Thanks Matt!
@mattspadesoundandvision4 ай бұрын
Sure thing!
@CINENIMUS5 ай бұрын
*aspect ratio on 6k full frame at 1.6x is 2.4:1 even.
@verebellus3 ай бұрын
the flares on the saturn to me are more pleasing, but the general image on the venus is more my vibe
@mattspadesoundandvision3 ай бұрын
If I had the budget, I’d own both as I like the warmth of the Venue image.
@socialmediainfo-um6hw4 ай бұрын
any FX30 footage?
@mattspadesoundandvision4 ай бұрын
I shoot on black magic cameras so when I purchase these lens, I purchased the L mount. But I bet they would look spectacular on that Sony camera.
@morelz59545 ай бұрын
Thanks for this video❤
@mattspadesoundandvision5 ай бұрын
Sure thing! And thank you.
@CINEMAPALACE3 ай бұрын
Interesting, but you should have compared Venus and Saturn with the same focal length...
@mattspadesoundandvision3 ай бұрын
I did. In this video, I'm comparing the 75mm of the Venus & Saturn series.
@robertsakowski7 ай бұрын
Thank you, thats very interessting!
@mattspadesoundandvision7 ай бұрын
My pleasure and thank you.
@thiagolimadop7 ай бұрын
Thank you. I shoot with 35mm saturn and 150mm venus and they match.
@mattspadesoundandvision7 ай бұрын
That 's great to hear, as I was considering the 150. Thnak you.
@Alecaom6 ай бұрын
THANKS!!!! :D
@mattspadesoundandvision6 ай бұрын
Sure thing!
@NoSuRReNDeR0015 ай бұрын
Focal length is simply the point where the lens is at its "optical center" IT DOES NOT dictate field of view. Let me repeat that... focal length doesnt dictate Angle/FOV... you can expect a certain fov range at say 50mm typical listed in degrees... Try out 10 different 50mm lens on the same camera and due to this and other factors you will see a slight variation in whats in frame.
@mattspadesoundandvision5 ай бұрын
Focal length does indeed influence the field of view. A 24mm provides a wider field of view, while a longer focal length such as an 85mm gives a narrower field of view. And while it is true that different lenses/ same focal length can have slight variations in FOV due to design differences, coatings, and optics, these variations are generally minimal, with the sensor size determining the primary FoV. While slight variations can occur between different lenses of the same focal length, the fundamental relationship between focal length and field of view is consistent and significant.
@MrJojoringo3 ай бұрын
Surei? 😂
@mattspadesoundandvision3 ай бұрын
According to their spokesperson it’s pronounced “Sue-Ray”
@mdcorbett2 ай бұрын
In Asia, I think it should be closer to seer-ree, from my memory of Chinese class (going by Pinyin rules, "i" is pronounced more like an e). But it's been a while, so I may be a little off. Just got the 50mm Saturn. Can't wait to "really" try it out tomorrow! Thanks for the video!
@mattspadesoundandvision2 ай бұрын
@@mdcorbett Fantastic! I can't wait to add the 50 to my list! I'll have to find the video where the CEO of Sirui answer in interviewer about the pronunciation.