You are just the best when it comes to this Man. Thank you so much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😊😊😊😊
@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn7 ай бұрын
You are most welcome. Keep watching for more
@mateobilbao62967 ай бұрын
Man you saved my semester, God bless you
@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn7 ай бұрын
Amen Thanks so so much
@stephenatiene34507 ай бұрын
Thanks for making this so easy😊, my maths lecturer just dey make this course look like its so difficult 😢
@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn7 ай бұрын
You are most welcome. Keep watching for more
@nemenlahfreeman47317 ай бұрын
That’s what they do
@TosinTibeju7 ай бұрын
Thank you. You made comprehension easy.
@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn7 ай бұрын
Thanks so so much
@miguelrodriguez-qc2ufАй бұрын
GREAT EXPLANATION! THANKS A LOT
@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohnАй бұрын
You are most welcome
@lilianbotchway65107 ай бұрын
Please do you have the matrix approach for this one ?
@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn7 ай бұрын
Not yet sir
@lilianbotchway65107 ай бұрын
Alright please , but would be looking forward to it .Thank you @@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
@MyCharm857 ай бұрын
If you followed the Jacobi method for the same problem, should you get the same answer for 2 iterations?
@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn7 ай бұрын
No please, this is because. The 2nd iteration for Jacobi takes the previous values for x1-3. While the Gauss Seidel takes the updated values in each step to find x1-3
@MyCharm857 ай бұрын
Makes sense, thank you for the good lesson and feedback. Interested to know if you would get the same answer with enough iterations using different methods
@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn7 ай бұрын
@MyCharm85 yes with enough iterations you are likely to get the same answers. But you are likely to arrive at the actual values faster with Gauss-Seidel as compared to Jacobi, since Gauss-Seidel has inputs updated every now and then.
@ALIEAKAMARA-gy2vo11 ай бұрын
Sir do have video tutorial videos on Applied electricity (D.C)