Group IIA Elements: Astronomical Guesswork with the Hanle Effect

Group IIA Elements: Chromospheric Partial Redistribution vs the Standard Solar Model!
• Group IIA Elements: Ch...
The Chromosphere & Second Solar Spectrum: Monitoring the Chemical Playground of the Sun!
• The Chromosphere & Sec...
Astrophysics Papers vs Einstein Coefficients: Chemical Coordination & The Second Solar Spectrum! • Astrophysics Papers vs...
Beryllium - Hide and Seek in the Sun!
• Beryllium - Hide and S...
Relative Solar Abundances of the Elements: A 100 year perspective!
• Relative Solar Abundan...
Two Electron Transitions in the Chromosphere!
• Two Electron Transitio...
The MOST IMPORTANT Tool in Astronomy - Analysis of Spectroscopic Lines! • The MOST IMPORTANT Too...
Spectroscopic Lines in the Solar Atmosphere
• Spectroscopic Lines in...
D.L. Lambert and B. Warner, The Abundances of the Elements in the Solar Photosphere - V: The Alkaline Earths Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1968, 140, 197-221.
adsabs.harvard...
M. Bianda, et al., Hanle depolarization in the solar chromosphere, Astron. Astrophys. 1998, 331, 760-770.
articles.adsab...
J.J. Bestard, et al., The Effects of Three-dimensional RadiativeTransfer on the Resonance Polarization of the Ca I 4227 Å Line,Astrophys. J. 2021, 909, 183, (15pp).
iopscience.iop...
E. Capozzi, et al., The polarization angle in the wings of the Ca I 4227: A new observable for diagnosing unresolved photospheric magnetic fields, Astron. Astrophys. 2022, 657, A44(9 pages).
www.aanda.org/...
L.S. Anusha, et al, Generalization of the last scattering approximation for the second solar spectrum modelling: The Ca I 4227 Å line as a case study, Astrophys. J. 2010, 718, 988-1000.
iopscience.iop...
C. Sasso, et al., The Mg I b triplet and the 4571 Å line as diagnostics of stellar chromospheric activity, Astron. Astrophys. 2017, 604, A50(8 pages).
www.aanda.org/...
P.J. Mauas, et al., Mg I as a probe of the solar chromosphere: The atomic model, Astrophys. J. 1988, 330, 1008-1021. articles.adsab...
Y. Chung, et al., Quenching of Spontaneous Einstein Coefficients in Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 60, 1122. journals.aps.o...
Y.-C. Chen and J.L. Lebowitz, Quenching of Einstein coefficients in plasmas, Phys. Rev. A 1990, 41, 2127. aip.scitation....
F. Aumayr, et al., Quenching of Einstein Coefficients by photons, J. Phys. B, 1991, 24, 4489-4504. iopscience.iop...
H. Cao, et al., Quenching A-coefficients by photons in a short discharge tube, J. Phys. B. 1992, 26, 4057-4064. iopscience.iop...
G.S. Agarwal and S. Das, Electromagnetic field induced modification of branching ratios for emission in structured vacuum, New Journal of Physics 2007, 10, 013014. iopscience.iop...
A. Ruavskyi, Influence of environment on spontaneous emission, Relation 12(1). www.rug.nl/res...
Second Solar Spectrum
A.M. Gandorfer, High Resolution Atlas of the Second Solar Spectrum
www.irsol.usi....
www.irsol.usi....
NIST lines data
physics.nist.g...
Solar Fraunhofer Spectrum with assignments
bass2000.obspm...
Solar abundance data
arxiv.org/ftp/...
Digital Fraunhofer Spectrum
bass2000.obspm...
Thank you for viewing this video on Sky Scholar! This channel is dedicated to new ideas about the nature of the sun, the stars, thermodynamics, and the microwave background. We will discuss all things astronomy, physics, chemistry, and imaging related! We hope that the combination of facts and special effects will aid in learning even the toughest concepts in astronomy. If you enjoyed this video, please subscribe.
Pierre-Marie Robitaille, Ph.D., was a professor of Radiology at The Ohio State University from 1989-2019, and also held an appointment in the Chemical Physics Program. In 1998, he led the design and assembly of the world’s first Ultra High Field MRI System. Readings from this equipment brought into question fundamental aspects of modern thermal physics, such as Kirchhoff’s Law of thermal emission.
Outro Music:
Foria: Break Away
/ foria
• Foria - Break Away | M...

[@MrThomas48]

I love how out of nowhere Dr R just throws in a scathing, condescending, verbal pile-driver on the ignorant ‘standard’ model and just continues on his merry way 😏

[@jiminverness]

He's great isn't he? : )

[@jsonjsoff]

@ian w Ian is subscribed to Sky Scholar to hate watch lol

[@jsonjsoff]

@ian w "nobody sane is taking a blind bit of notice of his physics illiteracy" - ian w So what does that make you? You have ~450 comments on his channel lol

[@jiminverness]

@@ianw5439 Come on, 'fess up, ian. You don't understand more than a few words of what he said this video, do you?

[@jiminverness]

@@ianw5439 _"Just like flat earth."_ So you _don't_ think Dark Matter, and even more, Dark Energy is just like flat earth belief, huh?

[@kimberleebrackley2793]

Always a pleasure Dr.Robitaille, take care, there are trolls out there XD

[@sdvc244]

Thanks Pierre, awesome to see complications with real applications in progress, Cheers!

[@davidp591]

🙏R.I.P. Wal Thornhill you will be missed...he was the reason I discovered this channel and Dr.Robitaille's work

[@fredfarquar8301]

Wal fought the steep uphill battle against dogmatic orthodoxy most of his career. He will indeed be missed.

[@fredfarquar8301]

@@ianw5439 Yeah, I remember you. Believe what you will, the coming years, if actual science information is still allowed to be disseminated, at some point will open your eyes. But until then, just go away, be happy in your own thoughts and don’t attempt to drag others back into your gravitational dungeon with insults and derogatory remarks. It is not flattering.

[@axeman2638]

comments are being deleted from this thread

[@michaelc424]

@@ianw5439 This man just died. And you mock him. You are a very sad example of a human being. I hope you are happy with yourself. To me, you are a cad.

[@Critter145]

First I’m hearing of it. When did he pass?😔

[@Critter145]

Ah Dr Robitaille, my spirit animal from the Great North. I hope all is well. Thanks for the GREAT explanations of stellar mechanics.

[@allanroser1070]

Cheers Dr R!

[@konjuer]

Most read "standard" as "standardized", unwilling to accept that knowledge strides forwards, regardless.

[@hardchemist]

These videos remind everyone that each system in any body of science is usually more complex than we initially think. Like our own atmosphere as the decades have progressed so has the nuanced complexity driven by an increasing number of variables discovered. As you show with the sun. We can't rest on our laurels of the simplicity of yesteryear, we have to incorporate these new data to fully appreciate what's going on. My $0.02.

[@hardchemist]

@@ianw5439 Very interesting! Good luck, Ian.

[@senseibear2436]

These videos are getting good! Thank you for another fine (and free) lecture xx (this comment was made with recycled energy.. #intellectuallygreen)

[@Devast8r34]

Thank you Dr. Robitaille and team

[@stevecrothers6585]

There is no team. The scientific analyses presented by Dr Robitaille are entirely his own. The scientific analyses presented by his guest speakers are entirely their own. Dr Robitaille's son owns the channel.

[@JaneNayes]

@@DrWhom Yeah this guy has been debunked too many times to count.

[@alpineflauge909]

nice

[@davidmcguinness9187]

Thanks

[@MrWolynski]

To those who watch his videos, if you are confused, then you understand the situation perfectly.

[@MrWolynski]

@@DrWhom your brain cell is defunct

[@MrWolynski]

@@ianw5439 oh my! I am scared! 😅

[@michaelc424]

@@ianw5439 Ian, you are the one who needs meds-- and strong ones at that.

[@michaelc424]

@@ianw5439 Those meds... they will help you.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@DrWhom Gerardus, now, now, that it unbecoming of a serious man of science. Shouldn't you be working to discover the truth instead of degrading your beloved field of astrophysics?

[@MyMy-tv7fd]

algo-friendly comment

[@paulahoskins9972]

The same "elements" in chemtrails. Interesting.

[@Barbreck1]

And in food!

[@rogerscottcathey]

Naturally, as the sun is spewing material outwardly every second. A jet engine will suck in and spew out whatever is up there, heating them and rapidly cooling them attracting moisture whereupon they will eventually settle by raining down . . . Great observation!

[@paulahoskins9972]

@@rogerscottcathey And crank up a few earthquakes. Might wanna' research a few DOD/Military weather mod patents. 👍🙋

[@flyfin108]

shining light onto sapphire should keep it stable, specially if it has strong spectral lines

[@gratefulprepsnj]

🇺🇸

[@timothy8426]

Extreme pressure expands cold resistance of space itself into mass in equalization to pressure. Hydrogen under extreme pressure expands resistance within it to equalization of interior pressure and exterior pressure. Mass is always equal to resistance within and without. Spheres are equalization of pressure in and out of entanglement of mass. Density can't exceed resistance within it. Hydrogen under extreme pressure expands into helium. More pressure exerted, more resistance within. Equalization. Hurricanes equalization of pressure. Tornadoes equalization of pressure. Force equalization of pressure. Perpetual motion as propulsion and repulsion to propulsion. Conservation of maximum momentum velocity, in resistance. Ice under pressure expands into water. Squeezing resistance into mass in equalization to pressure. Theoretically. Factually?

[@MrThomas48]

Are you high? Water expands to become ice and pretty everything you said sounded like the ramblings of a drunkard…

[@SempreGumby]

Roughly Speaking?

[@MrThomas48]

I get the nuance…. There are two forces. Repulsion and attraction. But I felt like I was reading poetry 😂

[@jasonwarren9279]

Have you tried writing in sentences?

[@Barbreck1]

Yes, there are a multitude of phase changes taking place as a result of the pressure that is present as a result of the mass and the energy released that wants to escape and expand. It is a constant and violent interaction of condensed matter. And the whole reason the fusion scientists are failing to achieve net energy generation is precisely because they are attempting to do so with non-condensed matter… plasma! This is why NIF achieved a small net gain recently… they used a solid pellet that is by nature condensed matter… and they got a result! Who’da thunk?… Robitaille!

[@lmwlmw4468]

Great video Doctor.

[@michaelc424]

@@ianw5439 Gee Ian, that comment makes you sound like a porn dog. Are you? It is OK if you come clean here as we will all understand your addiction-- maybe. You are now 'Ian the Cad'. Do you prefer that moniker over Ian the Shrill? Either way, you should probably simply shut down. You are a sad example of a human being.

[@michaelc424]

@@ianw5439 I take that as an admission. Are you a porn dog or not? Why the sudden focus on porn? Porn is not science, so why the porn comment?

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@ianw5439 "Michael? Get an education you clueless rube. Stop falling for b0ll0cks on youtube." If Dr. Robitaille is all b*llocks why is it that you always fail to make an argument?

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@DrWhom "Pot. Kettle." Haaaaaa!

[@gi169]

Thank you SkyScholar.

[@gi169]

​@@DrWhom weird, but if that's who you think the person who made this videos, okay

[@rogerscottcathey]

Interesting the inverse relationship of magnesium to calcium of the sun to that observed in sea water

[@JaneNayes]

what are you even trying to talk about?

[@rogerscottcathey]

@@JaneNayes : Magnesium predominates in the limb of the sun, calcium predominates in ocean water. I find that interesting. So what?

[@JaneNayes]

@@rogerscottcathey "Magnesium predominates the limb of the sun?" Do you guys hear yourselves lol. That doesn't even make sense. Calcium predominates in ocean water? Well not even close, sodium does. That's why it's SALT WATER.

[@rogerscottcathey]

@@JaneNayes : Actually chloride, sodium,sulphate, calcium, magnesium, potassium. But you're being silly. I am talking about ratios of two ions: Mg++ and Ca++. They're inverted contradistinctively Don't be a quibble dibble

[@rogerscottcathey]

@@DrWhom : you came here to snipe I see. You have nothing intelligent to contribute, so you talk smack.

[@razorcain74]

Keep up the good work Doc! Reading the butt hurt fake professor dave fanboys pathetic trolling replies are a bonus!

[@FlightSimDude]

👍

[@keithnorris6348]

" Air support. " that`s somthing you don`t want to hear, said in Russian.

[@JoeDeglman]

Not sure how many have read 'The Nature of the Atom' by Edo Kaal. The SAM model book. But it seems that the SAM claim that a structured atomic nucleus with fixed charge points on the nucleus, dictating the outer electron positions, dove tails with this. SAM claims that some elements might have different configurations of the nucleus that might seem to explain forbidden electron transitions of the same element. By a structured rearrangement of the nucleus occurring at the same time as an electron transition, for the same element. Just throwing that out there. From what I see in the SAM model, here in this video, and the known solar particle abundances it seems then that fusion occurs in the solar atmosphere but is not the primary source of energy that drives the solar wind, but a side effect. Perhaps a break down or fission of the hydrogen proton in the photosphere, AKA proton fission is the main source of solar energy.

[@JoeDeglman]

@@ianw5439 have you read it then? I assume? To say that SAM is nonsense then implies that Robitaille and the particle abundance figures from solar probes and observatories are also nonsense, because they lead to the same conclusion. The standard nuclear model fails in those aspects. If you have read it, I am interested in what factual data leads you there, compare/ contrast with the standard model.

[@JoeDeglman]

@@ianw5439 I have two books by Wiley and Springer that say otherwise. It is data from solar observatories and solar probes. Particles are propelled out of the chromosphere by pondermotive forces and by first ionization potential. Particles that are not ionized drop back to the chromosphere surface. There are also horizontal electric currents in the lower chromosphere. That can only occur in plasma experiments when the particle abundance is above 10^13 per cubic centimeter or better. Robitaille points this out as well Solar Energetic Particles: A Modern Primer on Understanding Sources, Acceleration and Propagation - Springer Space Physics and Aeronomy, Solar Physics and Solar Wind (Geophysical Monograph Series Book 258) - Wiley When you look at the SAM model it assumes a structure to the nucleus and that fusion process will tend to pass over helium and favor of a more stable dense pack configuration of oxygen and carbon for example. Helium then is from the breakdown of heavy elements that are created in the atmosphere, back into lighter more stable elements. There are several arXiv articles out, stating that helium must create as an alpha particle in the flux ribbons and flares, not per the theorized 'proton-proton' chain. We still cannot do the proton-proton chain in labs. What I am interested in is observational or experimental data that I can look at, not that it doesn't conform to the standard model or what you believe or just name calling it woowwoo.

[@JoeDeglman]

@@ianw5439 Try an article called 'Observing the Sun in Hydrogen Alpha By: Brian Ventrudo and Manish Panjwani August 17, 2016' It shows the electric currents in the lower chromosphere. To get such current flow requires a dense plasma. Robitaille actually does cover that but from electron transition data. Saying that the chromosphere must be a minimum density. Robitaille also shows the particles abundances in his videos. Robitaille has a much better track record. I would rather watch that rather than listening to the propaganda of the standard model. Also check out an artcile 'The impact of multi-fluid effects in the solar chromosphere on the ponderomotive force under LTE and NEQ ionization conditions' Basically, the standard model is full of bovine droppings.

[@JoeDeglman]

@@ianw5439 also Eugene Wigner won a Nobel prize for his 'face-centered-cubic crystalline lattice, a structure of the atomic nucleus. Before the failed Einstein movement, that set us back 100 years, it was commonly accepted that the nucleus was made of protons and electrons. It is time we get back to science instead of the failed standard model. I am merely asking for a reference of some sort that is from experiment, that I can look at, rather than hearing that you have succumb to confirmation bias.

[@JoeDeglman]

@@ianw5439 The word in the article is flux rope, or filament, which from plasma experiments requires an electric current flow. Try these arXiv artcles Generation of electric currents in the chromosphere via neutral-ion drag Are Electric Currents Heating the Magnetic Chromosphere?

[@stevecrothers6585]

I'm answering ian_w here so that everybody can see the exchange. (1) “Why do we see mass displacement in lensing observations of colliding clusters?” Ian w Dr. Robitaille has not addressed this issue. Stick to Kirchhoff’s Law, the Sun, the Stars and the CMB. As for colliding clusters, get your answers elsewhere. (2) “Why do we see the CMB lensed by distant structure?” Ian w We do not. What you do see are examples of terrible overreaching by the astronomers. The CMB is not being lensed, because the monopole has never been measured away from the Earth’s orbit. It has never been measured at L2, contrary to your suppositions. Since you believe otherwise, give a citation. This is the entire argument about the CMB. Give us a citation demonstrating that the monopole of the CMB has been measured at L2! The claim that the CMB anisotropy reveals the last scattering surface is the stuff of dreams. Cosmologists have no idea when the last scattering event took place for any microwave signal arising from distant locations. (3) “Why do we see the CMB affected by the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect from distant structure?” Ian w We do not! The Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect is one of the great farces in CMB alleged science. Dr. Robitaille treated this nonsense in this video (@10:40): kzbin.info/www/bejne/o17Nl2CdZ5Z_pdU He demonstrated that the image processing involved was more than just slightly overreaching! (4) “Why do we see the CMB affected by the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect from distant structure?” Ian w We do not! Dr. Robitaille has addressed the nonsense on the Sachs-Wolfe effect once again in this video (@7:50): kzbin.info/www/bejne/o17Nl2CdZ5Z_pdU (5) “Why do we not see his impossible water signature when we look at the oceans in the same frequencies used by COBE?” Ian w We do see it! It is seen by all our satellites monitoring the Earth and its oceans in the microwave. These scientists however have decided to assign the signal to the cosmos based on the terrible science of the astronomers. These satellites are not shielded and as such they are unable to ascertain the direction of origin for the 2.7K signal. Dr. Robitaille has covered the issue in this videos: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bpWrpYOAZ99sh8U In this regard, you continue to ignore the clear proof provided by Professor Herouni that the monopole of the CMB does not arise from the cosmos. Here is the link to the associated video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pmnPfISDer6Mgtk

[@demonmonsterdave]

@@DrWhom Abuse is consistent tactic when protecting a belief.

[@demonmonsterdave]

@@ianw5439 I can't see it either. You could post it again.

[@demonmonsterdave]

@@ianw5439 You seem quite emotional.

[@demonmonsterdave]

@@DrWhom As is a total lack of self-awareness.

[@demonmonsterdave]

@@DrWhom It's not about me.

[@JaneNayes]

This guy has been debunked hard by Professor Dave and yet people still continue to unironically watch his videos lol. Good luck to y'all!

[@bushmangrizz4367]

Hi Jane: If I'm Not a Professor Dave is your go to science guy, the guy who failed his chemistry masters twice, then you need to find a new channel, and stay off of this one. Dave gets everything wrong. Dr. Robitaille responded here to Dave: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gIPVhamGbpqenJY Dave is a scumbag. And if you think you're the first person to try to criticize Dr. R. with an idiot Dave video, get in line. You are not original. You are dull and likely have no friends.

[@thenatureofnurture6336]

Professor Dave is a tool. He couldn't hold a candle to Dr. R.

[@JaneNayes]

@@bushmangrizz4367 Dave has a Masters silly! And so do I :) Stay jealous or go back to school. Science 101.

[@johnmactavish4838]

@@bushmangrizz4367 Professor Dave has a Masters degree in Science Education and withdrew previously because of funding. You stand corrected.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@JaneNayes "Dave has a Masters silly! And so do I :) Stay jealous or go back to school. Science 101." Yes, of course, the credentialism argument. When you don't have a point tell everyone how educated you are. I'm not a professor Dave has an education masters in teaching chemistry, no where near the same as getting a masters in research chemistry. Degrees from education faculties aren't worth the paper they're written on. So no, nothing to be jealous of. And Dave is a scumbag. He gets everything wrong.

[@michaelc424]

Ian is now talking about porn. I hope he is not stuck on this addiction. But he is the one who brought up the idea of porn. Ian, we need to be reassured that science is your motivation, not porn. Can you get that through your head? Can you handle that one?

[@michaelc424]

Ian....Oh my goodness Ian. No one else will apparently see your response/post to my post. And your response was a very typically crude one. Apparently youtube does not allow your kind of response. Addictions are serious issues. Drugs, gambling, alcohol, and even sex addictions need to be dealt with. There is hope for you. I hope you find your cure. Godspeed.

[@michaelc424]

@@ianw5439 Ian, I am praying for you. I know you are better than this.

[@michaelc424]

@@ianw5439 That is right. I am religiously praying for you. And I honestly hope you find peace. I hope you find civility. I hope you find grace. I hope you have family with whom you can enjoy life. Call me a nutjob all you want because all I wish for you is goodness... and upon occasion graciousness. There you have it.

[@michaelc424]

@@DrWhom So you think I have an "essentially nasty nature"? I take that as a compliment, coming from you. Fight fire with fire. Can I join your group now?

[@bushmangrizz4367]

Braveheart Ian makes the stupendous claim that metallic hydrogen could never exist in the Sun. Braveheart should really do some reading and comprehending. In Dr. Robitaille’s paper on page 96, of his paper he refers to the work of Dr. Setsuo Ichimaru who is one of the preeminent scientists on high density plasma physics. Setsuo proposed that the solar core was made of metallic hydrogen acting as a one component plasma. Braveheart’s deep analysis will reveal that Setsuo did not know any physics and was a clown and a hack, just like Pierre. Ian Braveheart explained to the hack Pierre in his lettuce salad post that a star cannot be formed from hydrogen ion clusters. Not surprisingly, Ian displays his lack of chemistry understanding by invoking the Pauli Exclusion Principle which has nothing to do with cluster formation since there existence does not violate any chemistry principles. Then Ian tries to unsuccessfully claim that Dr. Robitaille does not have access to free protons. Completely laughable. A farce. Cosmologists want the world to believe that 95 % of the universe is made of dark energy or dark matter. Yet Ian won’t permit access to a simple proton. More word salad nonsense.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@DrWhom You're quite welcome.