Mustard would have made a 3d model and shown it in flawless animations. Simon Whistler would have had a ghostwriter make a 11 minute script that he could recite from his chair. Half as intresting would have made a episode about all the An-22 crashes.. Sky - finds one and goes onboard! - Awesome!
@ZIGZAG123454 жыл бұрын
Simon Whistler would have also edited it in enough ways to duplicate it across all the 792 channels he speaks on!
@Mungobohne14 жыл бұрын
Oh yes the top 5 guy
@mateuszzimon82164 жыл бұрын
@@Mungobohne1 u mean buissnes blaze guy?
@dragoonTT4 жыл бұрын
Ah Half as Interesting would tell you half truths for 10 minutes with some lame jokes.
@mrrolandlawrence4 жыл бұрын
@@ZIGZAG12345 he has turned into just a talking wikipedia channel these days. he needs to trim the ego and the beard. shame as simon was good once.
@Foomba4 жыл бұрын
When I was in the US Army I met one of these at Andrews AFB in 1973. We had 3 trucks and we transported luggage to various hotels in DC for an advance Soviet team preparing for a summit between Nixon and Brezhnev.
@aaronlopez35854 жыл бұрын
Epic at 22:06 you have the star of video the An-22 and in the lower right corner you see the iconic An-2 reminding us where it all started.
@TheWagman8 Жыл бұрын
I have always loved and admired the An-22. I was lucky to see and hear 5 of them in formation in 1993.The roar of 20 contra rotatating engines is something I will never forget! What an aircraft ❤
@michaelsowden5892 Жыл бұрын
If you were ever fortunate enough to see the AN-225 in person it was truly breathtaking. A flying building. Helped up believe in mega human engineering. RIP AN-225. Russia did not have to destroy her in Feb. 2022. She flew a lot of mega cargo around the world. RIP.
@Errr7173 жыл бұрын
Antonov was definitely an aeronautical genius. And to think that this plane and all others at the time were designed using the most basic engineering tool ... the Slide Rule!
@tomascernak6112 Жыл бұрын
Not really, when was AN-22 designed, OKB Antonov already had multiple floor computers and of course aerodynamics and structural integrity was calculated on supercomputers in CAGI. But yes, at that time, engineers were carrying slide ruler, because pocket calculators were not real thing yet, neither in East or West. They were introduced in 70s.
@glennredwine2896 ай бұрын
Slide rules are capable of carrying out some pretty precise computations!! The A-bomb was calculated w/ slide rule!! I have one, inherited from my father but haven't mastered it yet.
@MrAudioBill Жыл бұрын
I appreciate both your research and the subtle humor/sarcasm in the videos. Thsnks
@SiVlog19893 жыл бұрын
I had the unexpected pleasure of watching an AN-22 landing and taking off at Manchester Airport in December 2017. I was there awaiting a flight to Brussels at the time and heard what sounded like a distant wasp buzz, but instead saw this huge plane. Turns out it was enroute from Kiev to Canada, it was in Manchester to refuel
@CzarOfMars4 жыл бұрын
11:10 "behind the cockpit, a rest area where escorts could be accomodated" damn, didn't know the russian air force took such, ahem, care of its pilots ;)
@choochootrain38073 жыл бұрын
"Antonov knows what a pilot wants."
@tsvetangeorgiev3 жыл бұрын
you say this as a joke, but the truth is probably not that far off :)
@jaredkennedy65763 жыл бұрын
I don't know why else a cargo flight would need half a dozen stewardesses.
@guyjonson63643 жыл бұрын
He meant ford escorts
@mike305343 жыл бұрын
With an aircraft the size of the AN-22 and capable of carrying over 700 people, the cost of joining the Mile High Club was finally within the reach of most Soviet men and women. That affordability combined with regular, scheduled flights gave rise to their motto: "If this plane's a-rockin' don't come knocking."
@KamilMB3 жыл бұрын
I've been to Spyer museum in Germany. It is enormous! They also have the early ex-Lufthansa 747-200 and even by it, the An-22 looks BIG! Cheers from Poland!
@tronlegacy26644 жыл бұрын
As an American I love its design and agree this plane is awesome
@kevinbarry714 жыл бұрын
Naming an aircraft after a character in Greek mythology who was all powerful as long as he always had some part of his body touching the earth seems an unfortunate choice
@SkyshipsEng4 жыл бұрын
Yes, there are still many questions about why the plane was named Anteus
@frankgaleon51244 жыл бұрын
@@SkyshipsEng The NATO name is also strange)
@TommyWylie4 жыл бұрын
@@frankgaleon5124 Cock. Well it's long and tubular.
@CristianValenzuela21554 жыл бұрын
@@frankgaleon5124 Do russians have anything to do with OTAN/NATO name?
@kevinbarry714 жыл бұрын
@@SkyshipsEng given that only 69 were built, during the time when the Soviets built a lot of everything, I think we can consider this design a failure. 69 airplanes is small by American military standards and practically nonexistent by the Soviet standards
@Thinkcity4 жыл бұрын
A few years ago I was working in my garden when I heard a deep unusual rumble in the sky. As a former military pilot and a long time airline captain, I knew what was up there was a rarity. It was the An-22.
@AubriGryphon4 жыл бұрын
Heh! I used to work under the approach path to a joint airbase in the US, so I got to where I could identify the fighters and transports that frequently operated out of there from the sound of their engines. It was always a treat when they had an airshow and I could learn the ground-shaking roar of a C-5 or the B-52's weirdly high-pitched shriek.
@allanben97953 жыл бұрын
For a long time I had been searching for the perfect documentary for the An-22. Thank you so much for the video. Wow! you have answered every question I had on the An-22.
@zenepow4 жыл бұрын
Aircrafts with propellers are always my favourite
@SkyshipsEng4 жыл бұрын
Extra propellers charisma)
@warplanner88522 жыл бұрын
"Your videos go from strength to strength. Your narration and English vocabulary are nothing short of impeccable." ..said by another viewer; echoed here. It's a pleasure to listen to your erudite narration and your Russian accent. Big fan of your videos. ~A former cold warrior.
@kelph2284 жыл бұрын
That aircraft always had a special place in my heart. I really like the design.
@bombfog14 жыл бұрын
I used to love seeing these on the tarmac at Al Asad Air Base, Iraq. I was a US soldier but could still appreciate the aesthetics of these birds. Great video as always.
@I_Cunt_Spell4 жыл бұрын
Who flew them on that occasion?
@bombfog14 жыл бұрын
@@I_Cunt_Spell I didn’t work on the flight line (or have anything to do with air operations) so I am not sure. When I was in Afghanistan, I flew on several American contracted Soviet era helicopters, crewed by airmen hailing from former Soviet dominated states. So, maybe the AN-22’s were similarly operated.
@I_Cunt_Spell4 жыл бұрын
@@bombfog1 Interesting. I have read that your armed forces are quite fond of Mi-8 and Mi-17.
@bombfog14 жыл бұрын
@@I_Cunt_Spell I enjoyed flying in Russian helicopters because they were more spacious than our Blackhawk. However, during one flight in a Mi-17, an extensive electrical fire broke out at about 100m altitude, just after takeoff. The entire aircraft filled with acrid electrical smoke, including the cockpit. I was surprised the pilots were able to get us back down in more or less one piece. It was a very hard landing but everyone of us survived. My lungs burned for a few days and my lower back ached for a few weeks, but those pains certainly were better outcomes than the alternative.
@I_Cunt_Spell4 жыл бұрын
@@bombfog1 Wow! At least it wasn't a cia-supplied stinger missile hit.
@drywinddotnet3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video. Giant turboprops are endlessly fascinating and unlike the better documented TU-95 variants, the An-22 was more obscure. Thanks so much!
@dewayneblue18342 жыл бұрын
Soviet, or, since it's an Antonov, Ukrainian.
@drywinddotnet2 жыл бұрын
@@dewayneblue1834 Good point. Updated
@borfer93662 жыл бұрын
@@dewayneblue1834 Antonov design bureau was founded in Siberia (Novosibirsk) in 1946, Antonov himself is also Russian. But at the whim of the fool Khrushchev, bureau moved to Kiev in 1952. Now it has virtually disappeared, impoverished Ukraine is not able to support it.
@gulfstream72354 жыл бұрын
That's one fine looking aircraft....
@davep52273 жыл бұрын
I'm in Love with the C-130, my first military flight. It's comfortable and very capable in the Arctic.!🥰
@poland56063 жыл бұрын
You are right it looks just fine
@Cat-y4w3 жыл бұрын
I feel like this thing would make for a great bomber
@brendanwhite37313 жыл бұрын
It could also save lives instead of killing them the Afghanistan people could do with one it would be its mercy flights ✈️ of freedom !! Brendan IRL
@disgruntledfaerie3 жыл бұрын
All the details are a little unusual, but taken as a whole, she's lovely.
@AddictedtoProjects4 жыл бұрын
Your videos go from strength to strength. Your narration and English vocabulary are nothing short of impecable. Many native English speakers do not posses such command of the language, including emphasis and clarity. My hat off to you. Not only do you produce very interesting aviation videos, but you also do it in a second language! :)
@franek_izerski3 жыл бұрын
Why is it, that the only spelling mistake you made in your entire comment, is the word "impeccable" (instead of impecable)? Oh wait, I found another one, "possess" instead of posses. I'm just messing with ya! Please don't get angry with me.
@CristianValenzuela21553 жыл бұрын
@@franek_izerski fRANKIE Frankie FrAnKiE....
@landryabraham6423 жыл бұрын
True is just amazing how he does it
@billynomates9203 жыл бұрын
he even said: chubby cigars 🙂
@sonkejager33052 жыл бұрын
And his accent is absolutely charming!
@Astrobaut4 жыл бұрын
8:55 "A total of 69 aircraft were assembled." Nice.
@gamergaming66043 жыл бұрын
Nice
@ollylewin3 жыл бұрын
Its NATO designation was "cock". I kid you not.
@noobplayer_233 жыл бұрын
@@ollylewin FR?
@ollylewin3 жыл бұрын
@@noobplayer_23 Yes. Google it.
@ollylewin3 жыл бұрын
@Johnny Gustav We used to do aircraft recognition in the ATC. I never really understood why they made such a big deal out of it. Turns out it was a hangover from WW2. AA gunners were using it to know who to fire at lol. I guess it is important.
@btrdangerdan20104 жыл бұрын
The NK-12 is my favorite turbo prop engine.
@frankgaleon51244 жыл бұрын
The most powerful and charismatic. And loud)
@btrdangerdan20104 жыл бұрын
@@frankgaleon5124 And The most musical to my ears. The engine bureau should release and build a modernized version of the NK-12 engine.
@marcamant72584 жыл бұрын
I agree, although i prefer it when fitted on tu 95
@saverskhanna90053 жыл бұрын
Do more military planes
@bernds14883 жыл бұрын
i liked it on the a90 orlyonok
@kentbrady33642 жыл бұрын
We were living in New Delhi during the AN-22 flights to Bangladesh following the Bhola cyclone of November 1970. Our home was near the approach to the Delhi International Airport, a stopover. The roar of the counter rotating props was unbelievable on the approach. I can’t imagine what it must have been like to have been near the takeoff flight path.
@thefrecklepuny4 жыл бұрын
Good video. The An-22 is one of those planes which still has an enigma despite being widely photographed and documented.
@corn19713 жыл бұрын
Been inside one of these beasts. It is truly massive. Navigator in the nose must of had one of the most amazing views while traveling.
@gmarie7013 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation! I was able to tour one of these giants at the industrial museum in Speyer, Germany a few years ago and this video really gave me a better appreciation for what Antonov achieved in this design. Thanks again!
@timtim84683 жыл бұрын
Still flying, one visited Leipzig this winter. Seen it approaching the airport, knew when it left by it's sound, you can't miss it, so loud and unique.
@geraldtrudeau32233 жыл бұрын
I'm an American, and I'm in my 70s. For most of my life I was never able to get any good information about Russian and Soviet aircraft and equipment, except for grainy old black and white videos or pictures. So this is a great time for me, personally. To be able to exchange information across the world with people that I've been told to hate, and now to be able to do it without the filter of either side's government propagandists is a great thing. Thanks to the internet we are all able to see that, at our core we are all the same. We all love the same things, we all desire the same things for ourselves and our families. Peace, security, and justice. I believe this is what it was made for
@EEE-14093 ай бұрын
Aeroplanes will be the thing that brings humanity together ✈
@dannyboy-vtc574119 күн бұрын
How so? Was there a prohibition on soviet tech in the us? I grew up in the 70s and early 80s in europe, i was in aircraft models, you know that you buy and assemble on your own, anyways i had more or less equal number of soviet and american models, well more soviet ones in fact especially for the large turboprops military and civilian, but because the had more models in use, a lot of beareaus producing whatever they concieved basically, as the gov would pay for it, at least for the few samples of everything imaginable if not for serial production. I grew up in socialism, but i often think you yanks had harder censorship than anyone bar soviets and chinese, and ofc koreans. Granted, our socialism wasn't a warsaw pakt socialism, but unaligned one, so in my socialism we grew up on hollywood movies and bbc sitcoms, coca cola and levi's jeans, our diesel locos were emd's, electric ones were swedish aseas, both licence built here, our peasants had massey fergusons and their later licence builds here, state owned agricultural enterprises had big green john derees exclusively, cars were domestic, half of it, the rest imported or licence built, small number soviet ones, but the majority were, german, italian and french ones, off roads were land rovers or austrian puch, to a degree later cheap lada nivas for private use, but military and police only the western ones. Aeroplanes were mostly mcdonnel douglas, with occasional boeing, but dc 6, 8, 9, 10 were the bulk of it thru the eras, they just were popular here. None of the soviet stuff was prohibited, it just didn't cut it for the most part, if we don't talk tanks or migs, but helis, attack and recon helis for instance were french gaselle, domestic jet production was based of rr engine and avionics, remnant and sharing a lot of platform with sepecat jaguar, our nuclear powerplant was, still is the westinghouse type, so not soviet, french or british, but american one, funny that socialism of ours was indeed, but i think you actually had a huge amount of censorships for a "free world".
@geraldtrudeau322319 күн бұрын
@@dannyboy-vtc5741 I wouldn't exactly call it a Prohibition, but anything made in the Soviet Union that showed up in the United States for sale was rare to put it mildly. And those things that were were generally regarded as inferior or substandard and not worth the money. I know now that that wasn't true but at the time the Cold War propaganda in the United States was just massive. Many Americans still haven't shaken off that anti-Russian propaganda. They just carried their prejudice over from the Soviets to the Russian Federation. I remember when Belarus tractor company first appeared in the United States. The media coverage that we got portrayed as if it might as well have come from Mars. It sounds like the Europeans back then had more access to Soviet Goods then we did over here. Anything Soviet or Russian or Eastern European was portrayed as being, ''Commie stuff'', and should be viewed with disdain. It wasn't until the 1980s that I purchased my first Eastern block item. It was an East German Practica 35 mm camera. It was actually a very good camera but other people that I knew that had Canons and Nikons were kind of dismissive about it. The way that everything including Manufacturing in America has declined over the last 40 years, I believe that Good's coming out of Russia are of a better quality than we're creating here, because we aren't creating anything except War in America anymore. We're just getting our stuff from China. The world indeed has changed a great deal.
@dannyboy-vtc574119 күн бұрын
@@geraldtrudeau3223 yeah, i had a practica actually, it was a good camera, good optics, good lightmeter, but it wasn't soviet, it was german, eastern german but german, i could comparw it to canon and minolta, and sure maybe wasn't exactly the match, but it was the same league, russian cameras were not, i had a ciouple, my dad was into photography before me, so i had cameras, russian optics were a hit and miss, they were bulky af, mechanics were atrocious, but were good say to carry on places you usually wouldn't carry a camera as not to damage or lose it, but not much less. Yeah soviet products in general weren't good or quality for the most part, but some were good, all were cheap. But not today, if you think american manufacturing is shite, russian is tripple of that, what they managed to produce at all was with european and american parts and tooling and know how, even their few modern weapons use western electronics, navigation systems and other stuff including missiles. And customer stuff nowadays in russia is absolute trash, like apliances etc, it's equally chinese, just for the western market we get premium chinese products if you can believe it, they get chinese level or chinese export for third world level, i'm in contact with some russians from different spheres of society, everyone agrees on that tho. Do you know they amended the law for car production and now allow production of new cars without airbags and anti skid brakes. Dude i think that you went the other way, and now giving them more acknowledgement than they deserve, yes the west deindustrialised, but russians deindustrialised more than anyone in history, south africa retained more institutional knowledge than russians did, i don't think you understand that they built only one oil refinery since soviet times, that one near rostov, and that was completely western technology, not theirs, it's not just consumer industry, but military industry too, pharmaceutical, a domestic one doesn't exist, chemical too, it's either western or chinese, if they were any good, they wouldn't need iranian and north korean stuff. So yeah tldr -a practica you could compare to canon, similar type of stuff, a zenit you couldn't, but you could bring it to fishing in some swamp from a local wooden swamp row boat, and if it dissapears in some muddy water, no big deal, but a soviet tv, radio or amp no matter how cheap, nobody would buy that because it was a total trash, so they weren't sold at all, like our police and army even in socialism used motorola, or some domestic equivalent based on motorola for a reason.
@erictaylor54624 жыл бұрын
33:00 "It is unlikely it's craters thought it would still be flying in the skies of 2021." while an An-2 taxis in the back ground. I'm betting *IT'S* creators would be even more surprised the An-2 would still me flying in 2021.
@frankgaleon51244 жыл бұрын
Haha, yes the creators of the an-2 in the 1940s would have been shocked to learn that this plane is still flying
@erictaylor54624 жыл бұрын
@@frankgaleon5124 The An-2 is a good, well built airplane. It's also huge for a single engine plane. There is a video of a small plane caught in the wake turbulence left from an An-2. Even with full opposite aileron the small plane rolled over and crashed. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gYnPp2Rsermom7c
@AubriGryphon4 жыл бұрын
I noticed that too. XD Russia really seems to be the country of "Only THIS aircraft can do what it does."
@93ndani3 жыл бұрын
I flew on one when I was a child
@erictaylor54623 жыл бұрын
@@93ndani You were lucky. The Soviet Government did not want American children to fly their planes. I wanted to fly a MiG-21 but they wouldn't let me. Nor would my dad.
@schehans46813 жыл бұрын
I once flew on a AN22, as I dit on a AN12, AN26, AN124, all chartered by the firme I was working for then to deliver freight all over Europe starting in EBOS. The AN22 is the one that surpriced me the most. The last AN22 landed on EBOS in september and it had then 200 flying hours left.
@supertyfon17364 жыл бұрын
The sound alone at altitude can be heard 80 km away when it's quiet.
@chumichov6g3714 жыл бұрын
FAA:🗿
@mardiffv.87753 жыл бұрын
The AN-12 uses the same engines as the TU-95 Bear, the NK-12. These engine are so noisy that US submarine sonar crews could hear underwater, when a TU-95 flew over.
@chumichov6g3713 жыл бұрын
@@mardiffv.8775 No an-12 use "АИ-20" engine from an-10
@mardiffv.87753 жыл бұрын
@@chumichov6g371 Allright, I did not know. Thank you for telling me that.
@chumichov6g3713 жыл бұрын
@@mardiffv.8775 Всегда пожалуйста)
@dyzoly3 жыл бұрын
I love this plane! They're still flying above my home town from time to time, you can hear them coming from 5-10Km.
@TheWizardGamez4 жыл бұрын
Your channel deserves more viewers.
@SkywalkerTibor4 жыл бұрын
I always know when the 22 flies over my head. It is the loudest turboprop I've ever heard.
@carsten91683 жыл бұрын
Antonov An-22 'Antei' still flying after more than 50 years ! What an amazing huge transport plane.
@M16_Akula-III2 жыл бұрын
@Arieta .-.
@notastone48322 жыл бұрын
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNND its gone
@MikoyanGurevichMiG212 жыл бұрын
@@notastone4832 no, it hasn't.
@ElenarMT3 жыл бұрын
My man, you know your videos are bloody amazing, right? Of course you do. I think after reading actual Jane's Defence, your videos are probably my most favourite. Ever. Great job
@doctoresotericodeltarot3 жыл бұрын
Soviet aeronautical engineers were always great they designed more to the limit than western engineers the AN22 is simply a magnificent legend regards from Colombia
@CH-pv2rz2 жыл бұрын
The fact that so few were produced is proof of how much of a failure this aircraft was.
@zahrans2 жыл бұрын
@@CH-pv2rz Using that same logic, the US Space shuttle can be called a failure cos how few of em were produced.
@jimheimerl16373 жыл бұрын
I heretofore require anyone/everyone posting videos to KZbin to watch this video to learn how it's done correctly. This was incredibly well-produced and -presented. I am looking forward to watching all the videos on this page. My boss may get mad at me for doing that instead of working, but hey, this stuff's important.
@nilsfinken4 жыл бұрын
Well-written and extremely informative. Great narration too.
@davidmurphy81903 жыл бұрын
Better than many other sites.
@nexpro61182 жыл бұрын
uuummm....everything he is saying is found on, Wikipedia and some other forums and or articles. lol. it's not some hard and crazy information to find and learn. it's just most people today are too damn lazy to do their own research for learning stuff. ha.
@Glen.Danielsen4 жыл бұрын
Russians are turboprop kings. My _gosh,_ the _SOUND_ of that AN-22 should be on iTunes! 😮
@frankgaleon51244 жыл бұрын
But not jet kings in fact
@TocTeplv4 жыл бұрын
@@frankgaleon5124 Troll much?
@AgnieszkaPiasecka3 жыл бұрын
Antonov is in Ukraine and however part of Soviet Union, both Antonov Engineering and Motor-Sich are both in Ukraine till day and most of the engineering thought is local. Mass production is of course Soviet indeed with all their powers.
@ignaciomunizdiaz51943 жыл бұрын
@@AgnieszkaPiasecka The biggest part of the antonov's engeniers was russians
@robdawg71833 жыл бұрын
How can 69 aircraft be a king over 2500+ C 130s
@k.ravattentrager36994 жыл бұрын
Awesome plane! Looking forward watching the review! Thank you sky! 👍
@tariqsyed4452 жыл бұрын
A great aeronautical creation, and contribution to aviation history !
@horusfalcon2 жыл бұрын
Much respect to Antonov in the creation of this huge aircraft. Thanks for sharing it with us.
@myronplichota79654 жыл бұрын
High quality. Thanks for posting!
@wernerheil66974 жыл бұрын
One more ABSOLUTELY AMAZING video - Please keep up this excellent work !
@paulh49434 жыл бұрын
The only commercial AN-22 took of a few times from Ostend Airport in Belgium last year, I live 40km away and I could hear it when it was just in the air.
@frankgaleon51244 жыл бұрын
And it still not so loud as the Tu-95)
@WilliamHostman2 жыл бұрын
It is wonderful to see the tech from "behind the curtain." Many of the non-combatant aircraft were largely unknown to me.
@nexpro61182 жыл бұрын
uuummm....everything he is saying is found on, Wikipedia and some other forums and or articles. lol. it's not some hard and crazy information to find and learn. it's just most people today are too damn lazy to do their own research for learning stuff. ha.
@sidefx9963 жыл бұрын
Just found another absolute gem on here. These videos are just fantastic!
@Chainsaw-ASMR3 жыл бұрын
Sky, I know I'm late to the party, but thanks for the English channel. Your vids are so well made!
@simondoutre62254 жыл бұрын
Crazy, Also techmoan music in bg lol
@COIcultist4 жыл бұрын
Many thanks as always Skyships.
@greenlover2473 жыл бұрын
looks real nice from the front end ........... top post
@Quasquaquorne4 жыл бұрын
Such a huge work here again! Excellent
@richardlouisnewman10644 жыл бұрын
I enjoy all of the aviation themed videos on KZbin, but yours are always the best. The sound of your voice is such that you could narrate a video on rubber bands and make it entertaining, it is as uniquely your own as are the voices of Frank Sinatra or Tina Turner. Couple that with excellent material, accuracy and superb editing, and it is, another top-notch production, as always.
@meunomeeplissken30883 жыл бұрын
The contest about turboprop vs jet enginners it was clear the winner was AN 22 🤩. Embrace from Brasil love u channel.
@trash4cash4544 жыл бұрын
National Geographic! Awesome Sky!
@guaporeturns94724 жыл бұрын
Just found this channel and love it .. subbed
@SkyshipsEng4 жыл бұрын
Welcome!
@N1RKW3 жыл бұрын
Fascinating! I had often wondered about the details of this aircraft. Thank you for such an enlightening video!
@graysono4 жыл бұрын
Loved this vid sir! AN22 is indeed a legendary aircraft. Enjoy your channel!
@SkyshipsEng4 жыл бұрын
Glad you like it)
@eliaspeter76892 ай бұрын
32:52 "In any case, Antei can be considered a happy plane~" Well you just need to look at that big smile. c:
@williamkeith89444 жыл бұрын
There are AN 124 based out of Houston International Airport used by a freight airline. Beautiful beast I enjoy seeing from a nearby commuter highway.
@sanramondublin4 ай бұрын
Loved every moment of it . And probably my 4th time. Thanks from California.
@AgnieszkaPiasecka3 жыл бұрын
I was the guest on board of Antonov 12 in 2019. From Dnipro to Kyiv-Zhuliany with some VIPs, it was so cool to fly this :)
@dufushead3 жыл бұрын
Ace video, and the quality of the narration was superb. Whoever does the narration should be awarded an Oscar.
@justfuture65854 жыл бұрын
The old soviet AN-22 is just an awesome plane!
@mikestirewalt51933 жыл бұрын
What a well done documentary! Thank you for the no-nonsense presentation and clarity of narration.
@hinduwarrior1233 жыл бұрын
Awesome narration, and excellent information on this beautiful monster!👍👍👍👍👍👍
@apegues4 жыл бұрын
a real workhorse, simple and effective
@jetfuelboy3 жыл бұрын
Fantastic aviation history lesson. Great job!
@erictaylor54624 жыл бұрын
16:45 Also, it is helpful to put the rudders into the propwash of the engines. This was seen in several models of bombers and large cargo planes of the 1930's and 40's.
@haroldaranda80422 жыл бұрын
A lovely design concept. I once watched a video of the AN-22 landing in a dirt strip to deliver harvesters and tractors to remote collective farms. And the application of a turboprop helped with short-field performance, fuel efficiency and FOD damage.
@bloodyhotspur29153 жыл бұрын
My favourite big plane. I grew up in a USAF family and it wasn't till I got older did I really learn to appreciate the genius of Russian aircraft design.
@Joewylie33 жыл бұрын
Congratulation to you. Fascinating and honest.
@SAIUN2 жыл бұрын
That drop scene at 03:50 is pure madness! lol
@chuckcawthon3370 Жыл бұрын
Fascinating Aircraft Story. Well Done . Magnificence
@johngustaf3984 жыл бұрын
love these vids man
@philippelarocque42074 жыл бұрын
Great video, love all the details!!
@GaryCSchade3 жыл бұрын
Extremely well done, (as usual 👏), thank you for sharing.
@ollylewin3 жыл бұрын
I've seen one in the flesh and it is loud and big lol. Leaves a great smoke trail too.
@timsedmunds3 жыл бұрын
I think you are a wonderful man for both the very high quality of your work and the extensive coverage of aircrafts. Thank you so very much and keep up the good work. I hope they pay you well!
@danielocarey9392Сағат бұрын
Rather informative. Good work!
@jakubkubinsky86273 жыл бұрын
28:46 War, war never changes, I see what you did there. Started rewatching all your videos again. Love your style. Are you planning on making a video about Lockheed L-1049?
@thedevilinthecircuit14142 жыл бұрын
What a beautiful aircraft. BRAVO on the video production!
@evanwhitford62574 жыл бұрын
I wish you did documentaries on Nebula or early release. Amazing video. Love your Chanel, and keep going
@gooner723 жыл бұрын
Great video mate, I really enjoy your channel!!! I like the way you narrate these well researched, well put together and interesting videos, often with a hint of humour
@paulmillard11303 жыл бұрын
I loved this video very interesting.I wish I could visit such places and see the aircraft.
@thomasbelmont8104 жыл бұрын
Another great video from Sky! ☺️
@cobracar13 жыл бұрын
Great video! 😁👍 I really enjoyed all the info and stories from so many perspectives and decades. Nice work! I wish we still had all the research, developments, and design breakthroughs like the 50's and 60's.
@nexpro61182 жыл бұрын
uuummm....everything he is saying is found on, Wikipedia and some other forums and or articles. lol. it's not some hard and crazy information to find and learn. it's just most people today are too damn lazy to do their own research for learning stuff. ha.
@maxi44923 жыл бұрын
I've seen it twice this year in Belgrade, imagine coming home from work and seeing a giant turboprop line up on final.
@lucrolland74893 жыл бұрын
When I was ten, I saw this airplane flying over our quiet suburb of Montreal and I was so impressed by its size. In those days, Aeroflot was coming to Montreal Dorval which is one of the most beautiful airport with its cool sixties design and designers seats. In 1962, Montreal had the largest airport terminal in the world where every airliner used to land. I remember seeing these Swissair Convair 880 next to an Air France Boeing 707 next to a Russian Il-62 looking similar to that VC10 of BOAC. TWA, Pan Am, Olympic and many more made you dream when you saw your father embarking in those Air Canada DC8.
@Billhatestheinternet3 жыл бұрын
For those wondering about the An-22 parked on the tarmac with 2 turbofan engines on the left side; it is being used as a test mule for a new engine for in flight testing. This is not unheard of: in the US in the 1960's, when B-52's were plentiful, one had it's inner right pod of two turbojet engines replaced with a ridiculously large (there are pictures if you look hard enough, and this engine is like 3x the diameter of the turbojets on the aircraft) high bypass turbofan. That engine was being tested for, and later powered the C-5 Galaxy.
@troopieeeeee4 жыл бұрын
great, as always!
@marpag1233 жыл бұрын
Well done Sir, a fine piece of work, most interesting.
@jeffmitzel98624 жыл бұрын
Excellent content, very well done..a unique window into Russia/Soviet aerospace technology.
@rushfan33 жыл бұрын
The an-22 came along at the right time and to this day have capabilities that nothing made today can match. Good job of letting us meet this giant from the past Sky.
@stalag144 жыл бұрын
Another great video 👍👍.
@michaelcoker31973 жыл бұрын
A brilliant documentary! Well narrated, with humor and knowledge.
@Beef3D4 жыл бұрын
I still beat myself over the head with the fact that I had a rare opportunity to go and see a real flying AN-22 from the Antonov airlines that was present at EBOS, about 90 kilometers from my hometown back in 2017, but I missed it... I mean, how often do you come across such magnificent beasts let alone ones that fly?