Skywatcher 130mm Reflector Deep Sky and Planet images

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Thanks for all the comments over the years everyone. I haven't done as much AP since my final school years and finishing school unfortunately, but I do it still from time to time with better camera equipment. Hopefully, once COVID settles down I can finally get back into this properly. I am going to be upgrading to a nice EQ mount, and with the help of my current camera, Canon 5D (Work Camera) I should be able to get some great photos in the future! Im overwhelmed with the comments and views, and I am trying to catch up on them. Looking back my photos do look quite newbie, however I was only 16/17 at the time. Wishing everyone the best, and good health!

[@TheAstroChannel99]

So I did as I said I would and bought some cool new equipment which you can see the results for in my recent upload!

[@LJbeauty]

@@TheAstroChannel99 is that the closest it gets on the planets? I wanna buy one but I want one that can see closer. Are there different lenses to show you something closer? Ik they have lenses that show more detail but what about closer?

[@eSpace-fr]

Very beautiful images of the deep sky. Bravo ! Unfortunately i don't see those jewels in my urban sky.

[@TheAstroChannel99]

+XIV Espace Why is this so?

[@eSpace-fr]

+TheAstroChannel99 I live in Paris, the sky is not ideal for astronomy and photos. The only things i see are the planets and the brightest stars. Try to see Andromeda Galaxy, for example is very difficult or impossible.

[@TheAstroChannel99]

That is too bad! Do you ever think about driving out to do some observing?

[@eSpace-fr]

+TheAstroChannel99 Yes, go out the city is the only way. Last time i tried there were too many clouds : sometime it is a question of luck ;-)

[@njava05]

I am in the middle of heavy polluted city and I can se pleiades but barely

[@indoguju]

Just amazing quality from such a small telescope!! Good job man

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Thank you! Persistence goes a long way ;)

[@ManishFrenchStudio]

Superb video ❤️❤️❤️ lovely, thank you for sharing ❤️🎉🎉🎉😎

[@Bitterbal05]

Awesome! Are you also able to see this with the Celestron Astromaster 130EQ

[@TheAstroChannel99]

I'd assume the views/photos would be very similar being the same specs. Glass would be different quality but not too different.

[@cdyt6634]

Nice pics what was your telescope focal length, mine is FL-600m

[@GazooGs]

This one is 650mm :)

[@soreem2738]

Can you see saturns rings in realtime through the telescope?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Absolutely you can! Especially in my larger scope that I have now.

[@DoomWalker42]

What camera did you use? I have tried a few different cameras. I don't own an EQ mount yet. Though I tried a Barlow Lens. Did not help much. I did get a better eyepiece that let me see Saturn much better so I could finally see the rings.

[@TheAstroChannel99]

I used the Sony A57 at the time of this video, as I say in the description. Good quality seeing is better than a good eyepiece in my opinion.

[@kuffarkurd4713]

What lens did you use?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

It was my Sony A57 attached to the Skywatcher 130mm Reflector telescope.

[@jimmystevetron4428]

Hey mate I'm about to buy this very telescope - an expert told me that if I were to get a 2X barlowit would greatly improve the view. did you ever use one? cheers :)

[@TheAstroChannel99]

+Jay bird With this telescope, if you have it collimated very well and have very good seeing conditions you shouldn't need a Barlow. By using a higher magnification, you decrease the field of view which decreases the amount of light you are able to see which can affect the quality of things you see. Unless you are looking at very bright objects, a Barlow isn't always necessary. They're great for planets, like Jupiter if you want to get a better look at the cloud belts which I have done. But when it comes to deep sky you want to allow as much light as possible to come through. Barlow = Great for planets and Moon features. Hope this helps! :)

[@jimmystevetron4428]

+TheAstroChannel99 Thanks so much! I really appreciate it - ordered it a few hours ago, really looking forward to using it :) one of my main goals is to look at jupiter and possibly saturn :) would a 2x barlow help with taking images of saturn/jupiter do you reckon? thanks again for the reply, learnt a lot! the skies are always crystal clear here in New Zealand :) PS awesome video - was the decider on the kind of telescope I went for :P

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Jay bird The barlow makes views of the two gas giants very pleasant!

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Jay bird Glad to hear I can offer help mate, best of luck!

[@ericaroundtheworld]

Hi may I know if u have had tried using the following telescope that I was recommended 1) Orion starblast 4.5 AZ 2) Orion starblast 4.5 EQ 3) bresser messer 130/650 table mount . 4) skywatcher 130 AZ What do u think it is good for beginner and some people said EQ is for astrophotography. But required a bit time to learn . And table mount is for grab and ready to use . Will it take away the fun .or it would be more fun to start observing for a busy life working person . . ? Thanks appreciate ur thought on these or u have others u would recommend

[@BangBangSticks]

What accessories are you using to take the pictures? Picking one of these telescopes up for someone and they currently have a cheap telescope and holding their cellphone over the eyepiece for a pic.

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Sony A57 with an adapter T ring for this video. :)

[@franz5905]

Hi, did you use the eyepieces which were included in the packaging or did you buy new ones? Your pictures are unbelievable beautiful and very clear. Yesterday I observed the stars the first time with the same telescop, but to be honest i was a little bit disappointed, because the quality of the stars were just as good as with my binoculars. Maybe the eyepieces have not a good quality? I mean the area surround me was very dark and I put my telescop one hour before observation out. Maybe you know the reason why i can not see the objectes like you. Btw I am a newbie :). Best regards

[@wakingforbacon6439]

Because his is through a camera and longer exposure times brings out the details and light. With just a quick view can't really get the shuttle details. For planets a low mm eye piece like a 8 or 6 mm maybe a 10 with a 2x Barlow. And for nebulas usually a long focal length eyepiece like a 17-25. The camera really brings out the details though. Have to have an eq mount to really get the same detail.

[@TheAstroChannel99]

@@wakingforbacon6439 Thanks for answering mark! I now have an EQ mount. You can see the results in one of my latest videos. :)

[@wakingforbacon6439]

@@TheAstroChannel99 I'll check it out.

[@Un_loved96]

What tripod do you use to take photos? Do you have an electric motor for the telescope?

[@jimmystevetron4428]

what was the song you used called? :D

[@TheAstroChannel99]

+Jay bird This is a song i grabbed from the youtube list, so I don't know the name. Sorry mate.

[@bornajambrisko7915]

+TheAstroChannel99 is this 130/650 SkyWatcher Newton?

[@extreme_5137]

I come with news! The name of the song is "Buddhist temple" by peace time.

[@blessed7927]

just the scope and your dslr? No stacking or anything? Can you direct me to the exact make and model including lenses and mount? Thanks! I love you FB page!

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Hey there! Just the Scope and Camera. :) Skywatcher 130mm 650mm with the ALT-AZ GOTO mount. You can buy the equivalent from Orion, Celestron and Saxon. :)

[@LucasSenafln]

Mate, did you used the EQ Mount? I also have a DSLR Canon and want to buy this one but with star tracking for longer exposures in deep sky...

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Lucas Sena This is actually on an ALT-AZ mount believe it or not! Many people say you cant do decent deep sky photography on an ALT-AZ, but I say otherwise. To hell with the norm of astrophotography!

[@ir8free]

TheAstroChannel how do you do 30" exposures without star trails?

[@Wub892]

@@ir8free I had to make a wooden wedge with turnbuckle to adjust the mount head to my latitude, trick the longitude of the controller to the north pole and try to do a sloppy polar alignment with the wedge. You dont get much in exposure gains from my experience. Maybe an extra 5 seconds from 10 to 15 seconds without trailing. Your better off buying something like an orion atlas or Sirius.

[@SWEArcher]

Quite beautiful! I just got myself a Skywatcher 76mm reflector telescope, can it produce any of these images?

[@Jar0fMay0]

Somewhat.

[@TheAstroChannel99]

My first Pictures of Jupiter were through my 70eq. You can do it :)

[@denofearthundertheeverlast5138]

You need a focal extender for the planetary images, maybe even eyepiece projection using hi power eyepieces, scale is just too small.

[@TheAstroChannel99]

I am looking to invest in some new equipment since being back in the AP game. Been out far too long. (School, work, etc.)

[@doganefe.]

Did you photoshoped this images or not?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

I'm pretty sure If I Remember correctly, these were edited using Registax or Photoshop after taken.

[@john5743]

Amazing pictures! Unfortunately most of the deep space objects that I want to view are out of the horizon. I'm not willing to stay up till 4AM to look at them lol

[@TheAstroChannel99]

I understand how you feel! :D

[@MrKdr500]

go to bed early night before then wake up at 4am....

[@tykingcrystal864]

You could always look for some new things in your sky, then view the ones you really want to when a season passes.

[@danielfuest2313]

awesome pics ! how did you take the pictures ?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

DSLR mounted to the scope!

[@atomstetic5521]

I recommend using a 2x or 3x Barlow for more further objects like saturn

[@ot7beatz185]

What tracker did you use? Amazing images.

[@tobyaustin9195]

Hey bro did you use a tracking mount? Thanks

[@TheAstroChannel99]

This was on an ALT-AZ GOTO mount. :)

[@renatoe6663]

Estimado, te puedo preguntar con que ocular puedes observar los anillos de Saturno?, 1:20 seg, y por cuanto tiempo pudistes verlo sin tener que corregir la dirección de enfoque?, o sea en otras palabras... cuanto tiempo permanece sin salir del espectro de visión con dicho ocular?... saludos y hermoso el video y la música :)

[@TheAstroChannel99]

This was used with a 1.25x Barlow lens and a T-ring adapter with my camera. The telescope has a tracking mount so it would stay in view until I moved it. :)

[@rozza6068]

Do you use mount for capturing messier objects? Can i use nikon d5600 for it too?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

I used the ALT-AZ mount for everything bright enough for my 130mm to pick up and my camera at the time to image. I was quite limited. I've recently tried out things like M8, M20 and M16. I get good frames on my Canon, I just can't hold the exposure open long enough without the frame rotating too much. And the weight of the new camera is much heavier than my old small Sony A57, which the mount does not like. You can use any camera, provided your mount can hold it. :)

[@taparany]

Great video. Can I get such views with my telescope? It has a focal length of 650mm and the aperture is 130mm. It's name is the Celestron Astromaster 130eq

[@TheAstroChannel99]

All these Deep Sky photos are long exposure. Long exposure photos allow for light to be captured and processing reveals colours and details that are hard to see with the eye.

[@synk7647]

How do you put DSLR to a reflector telescope? I really want to take pictures but dont know how

[@TheAstroChannel99]

I had a T-ring adapter to a 1.25x Barlow with a compatible thread. :)

[@diegoitanoobb8116]

what is the focal length?

[@whatnotzone6866]

Well done!

[@SidBarnhoorn]

Excellent images! I just started with astrophotography last weekend! I have a Skywatcher Heritage 130p and want to attach my Nikon D3300 to it for making DSO images. What kind of adapter do you use for your camera? I know I would need a T-Ring, but is there another adapter that is needed? Thank you!

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Hey mate, sorry I don't respond to comments frequently. Hope you managed to get it sorted without my help. I was using the relevant T-Ring attached to my 1.25x Barlow.

[@steffangriffiths7508]

probably gonna sound like a big noob here but how come the deep sky objects are much better quality than the closer planets?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Hey Steffan! Great question! This is because when i image deep sky objects, i take long exposures. This will take in a lot more detail and light and produce a great image if processed correctly. However, for the planets, since they are smaller in comparison to DSO's, and their light is basically concentrated into one area, they are not great for long exposures unless you have a great imaging set up(Planetary camera, great tracking mount). I haven't tried stacking planet images before so i cant say for certain whether it is good or not. Hope that helps! -TAC

[@steffangriffiths7508]

Ahh yes that did help ,thank you.i orderd my first scope today :D the explorer 150P

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Steffan Griffiths You will have a lot of fun with that :)

[@saurogaudenzi]

Hi, I'd like a little information, I own a skywatcher 130/900 and it doesn't focus on me, what's the focal point of your telescope, if it was 900 like mine, you can kindly tell me and explain well how you did it fire?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

How is your camera mounted?

[@saurogaudenzi]

@@TheAstroChannel99 Ok TheAstroChannel, I own a canon eos 1100d fullspectrum, I also have the extension tube for focus, then I also own a camera zwo asi224mc color

[@GazooGs]

@@saurogaudenzi It could be the length that the camera is away from the OTA.

[@saurogaudenzi]

@@GazooGs In my opinion being a f 6/9 is not very bright,it would take either a focal reducer or a fire extractor,i.e. an extension tube, but in my opinion for this ota is not worth it,with the same money you buy a bright ota and suitable for astrophotography

[@TheAstroChannel99]

@@saurogaudenzi I'm currently deciding on a couple of scopes to suit a new mount I'm buying as I'm getting back into it. I feel like f5-f8 is fair range for visual and photography.

[@alexmeun8892]

Hi, did you mod your telescope to achieve focus with your DSLR?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

No modifications at all. Just a patient hand. :)

[@alexmeun8892]

Oh i see cause I can't reach focus with mine. :/ I have the 130/900 on eq mount version. I guess you have the syscan version. :)

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Synscan for the win :P

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Alex Meun

[@corkycat674]

so I have this ota on a goto mount, I think I need to bin my MS HD modded webcam & get something similar (cheaper) to your Sony, impressive results!

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Always nice to have an upgrade every once in a while. Many thanks!

[@istvanfarkasinszki3628]

Hello! I am planning on buying one of these telescopes and I just want to ask that how many afterwork is in these pictures? Or the raw images were this colorful and sharp too? By raw I mean with your naked eye

[@darriageangos4411]

Have you bought this telescope?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

The raw images contain some decent light data, but a few frames are required to combine light data and get a nicer looking final image!

[@alessandrogomes6793]

You used the skywatcher 130mm Eq 3 or dobson flex tube 130mm?

[@ricardandres2883]

eq3 or eq5 with synscan for dss imaging.

[@ricardandres2883]

+Ricard Andrés but the images on the video are made with a alt az goto mount

[@MrFlokos]

Big big question ( newbie here :D ) ...You see everything nebula grey through ur telescope and what is the result that i'll have, observing through a skywatcher 6inch dob?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Hey Flokos! Great question! My telescope being of 5 inch aperture reveals only very bright deep sky objects to the naked eye. The 6 inch (depending of make and mirror quality) will reveal a bit more detail in deep sky objects. Colours wont be as prominent as they are in photos but you will still be able to pick out dust lanes, fainter clusters and some faint colours. :)

[@MrFlokos]

Thank you very much :)

[@MrFlokos]

I bought the Skywatcher dob 8inch and is really good, even in Athens ( where i live ) , but the truth is that i need a very clear sky ( without light pollution) to be able to see something more than planets,Moon or Orion Nebula :p

[@TheAstroChannel99]

MrFlokos If you live in an area/city with a lot of street lights or other lighting (Airports,highways,etc.) it is definitely worth travelling. I am lucky because i live 20 minutes away from my city by vehicle. However my views north are sometimes overwhelmed by the big international airport which is 5 minutes away. If you can move to an area where you can see faint patches of nebulosity with your naked eye such as the Andromeda galaxy or faint star clusters then you are in a great area.

[@MrFlokos]

TheAstroChannel99 Well there are some spots where light is much less in Athens, plus my village is about 1h30m and the view of the sky just by naked eye is great :)

[@Fuar11]

How long were each exposure and how many did you take? Did you stack them with darks or flats? Because it doesn't really look like it. Also doesn't look like you did a lot of post processing.

[@TheAstroChannel99]

I had a very rough collection of frames, and was new to stacking with lights and darks. I think the lack of the EQ mounting hindered my ability to have consistent frames of good image data. And my Camera Sensor at the time wasn't great for AP with lots of noises prominent in dark photos for AP and in general lifestyle pictures. I also didn't really know how to process properly, especially since my camera didnt shoot in RAW. Times have changed, and since my line of work involves Photography, I've learned a lot over the years, and photos I get now are much much better. :) Hopefully I can come back and post a then and now video sometime in the next year or so!

[@dsjc666]

Could you please state which model you used ? I'm looking to purchase and am unsure what to go for

[@TheAstroChannel99]

I used a Sony A-57 DSLR which i purchased for around $600 AUS at the time.

[@muhraka123]

What is the focal length of your telescope?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

650mm!

[@parreraz]

@@TheAstroChannel99 Will a 900mm be a "better" scope for dso,or make it worse? I just bought a 130/900 scope,in your opinion will that be a better scope than 130/650?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

@@parreraz Well my current scope is an 8" with a focal length of 900mm. The higher the FL, the more magnification and the more accurate your guiding needs to be. Depending on the size of your scope, I think for scopes between 5"-8" a Focal length between 600-900mm is a good spot. Less FL means more room for error with tracking and photos.

[@Demondark7]

do you recommend this telescope to watch nebulae?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Not for the naked eye, although this is a great starter scope that offers great planetary views and some DSO's.

[@KaranShamaliya]

These have shown real images of Planets and Nebulae rather than fake images who shows wrong images of planets in 130 Or 127mm Reflector telescope.

[@ivansevo8326]

do you need any special lens to see nebulas?I can't seem to find any with my starseeker 130mm

[@TheAstroChannel99]

+chito sandoval With a scope this size, nebulas are almost invisible. As you go larger in aperture, structures and some faint cloud become visible. There are no len's which are designed to see nebulas, but there are filters which you can buy to try and enhance features. The only way to really see most DSO's through your telescope in detail, is with astrophotography.

[@lucaspeters1463]

Impressive deep sky photos but the planetary was not that good. I got better results with my 130mm reflector on planetary, with a smartphon, but i haven't done any deep sky yet, and, btw, how long were the exposures u did?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Gee, I wish I could remember the Image exposure's and settings, it was quite some time ago.

[@saurogaudenzi]

Hello TheAstroChannel, I ask my question better,I own a telescope Skywatcher 130/900,I have a lot of difficulty taking deep sky photos,kindly, I would like to know what focal has your telescope,and what instrumentation you use to make such beautiful photos,kindly even the accessories you use to take photos

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Hey mate, When I was doing this I was using my Skywatcher 130mm Reflector on a ALT-AZ GOTO mount, using a Sony A57 with a T ring on a 1.25x barlow. Exposures had to be short for Deep Sky due to frame rotation. Nothing fancy. :)

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Focal Length of mine is 650mm.

[@saurogaudenzi]

The focal length of mine is 900mm@@TheAstroChannel99

[@Jaem01]

Could u see this through a Meade Instruments 216006 Polaris 130EQ Reflector Telescope

[@TheAstroChannel99]

It would be similar views, just depends on the focal length.

[@Hopkins22Hoppo]

i got this scope as my first one what lens did u use for these ?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Just the camera body with an adapter to a barlow 1.25x lens.

[@Jbay2608]

Does anyone know what the diffence is between the Sky Watcher SK and BK products? The specs look identical??

[@Gaz2598]

Is this the 130 skywatcher dobster

[@sexspecwannabe6020]

+Gaz2598 Newtonian :)

[@bryanyanez9143]

130/900 or 130/600?

[@darriageangos4411]

I dont think he will see this com

[@darriageangos4411]

You own a telescope?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

130mm and 650mm Focal Length :)

[@salvadorochoa6664]

Hi. those images are very nice. Did you make them from a Light polluted area? I want to know how much L. Pollution affects the observation if I live in a big light polluted city. Does it affect enough to not buy a 130mm F/5 Reflector telescope?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Thanks mate! I live about 25 minutes from our major city, so the light pollution isn't terrible but it is still noticeable when looking East and South. It affects observing to a degree when looking at darker and deeper objects, but the brightest ones you can still see. I have a larger scope now, so that does help especially with filters.

[@asif8208]

U purchased to see the dots only!

[@TheAstroChannel99]

My camera skills weren't too great 6 years ago, the views are much better with the eye than they are in this video. :)

[@mateuszek8635]

This is Sky Watcher 130/900? (BK1309EQ2)?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

I think its the 130/650 from memory..

[@mateuszek8635]

@@TheAstroChannel99 thanks

[@danielrodriguez2722]

se ve mejor que la foto cuando lo miras en primera persona?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Algunos objetos, como algunos planetas. Espero haber traducido esto bien. :)

[@franklima8516]

até que um telescópio 130 dá para ver coisas impressionantes, além de planetas ver estrelas e nebulosas mais nítidas

[@Mateusz234]

You life in Australia or South America?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Aus!

[@Mateusz234]

TheAstroChannel i known, because Tarantula nebula is see in South America or Australia ;) but in Poland i don't see this nebula :( I want to see it 😂 Nice video!

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Thank you very much. You see things I cant see in Poland! :)

[@Mateusz234]

TheAstroChannel Yes, more viedo :)

[@Demondark7]

How many moons of saturn can you see? i want to buy a 130mm telescope for holidays, think worth it?

[@TheAstroChannel99]

On a perfect clear night I can faintly see a couple of the brightest moons, but the camera brings the majority of the main ones out.

[@TeamGamingSWE]

I have this telescope but when I look at Jupiter and Mars it shows red blue colours with the barlow lens on, no details at all. What can cause this? It looks better without the barlow lens because it doesn't show red/blue colors, but I can't see any detail on Mars or Jupiter they only look like stars.

[@TheAstroChannel99]

It can depend on lens quality with barlow, and seeing conditions. It could have something to do with the glass inside the barlow.

[@TeamGamingSWE]

@@TheAstroChannel99I bought a better eyepiece and barlow, and I finally also saw some detail on mars for the first time last week :D

[@TheAstroChannel99]

@@TeamGamingSWE Awesome mate! I'm waiting for some good seeing conditions here so I can do some observing myself. :)

[@MAzurekkk1]

What's focal length in this telescope

[@TheAstroChannel99]

This particular scope is 650mm which makes it an f/5 scope

[@andyappleton3353]

What does this telescope cost around?

[@lt3533]

About 230€.

[@InfinitesimallyInfinite]

Splendid!

[@ElBantosClips]

hello! I am thinking about getting a 130mm refractor... this one langwoodsphotography.com/eshop/SKY-WATCHER-130-650-BLACK-DIAMOND-PHOTO-REFLECTOR-TELESCOPE-OTA.html . . I'm from nz, and just wanting to know how your telescope is? is it good for viewing planets? and have you ever seen the Andromeda galaxy? cheers

[@ElBantosClips]

langwoodsphotography.com/eshop/SKY-WATCHER-130-650-BLACK-DIAMOND-PHOTO-REFLECTOR-TELESCOPE-OTA.html

[@TheAstroChannel99]

+kiereniskwl From my location, The andromeda is very low on the horizon and is often ruined by light pollution from the airport. From my experience, Sky watcher instruments are usually very good in quality and offer great views. I know for a fact that the 130mm offers great views of the larger/closer planets and some Deep sky.

[@Listopia10]

good work bro.......

[@motoflatdrag]

I have a stupid 12" LX90-ACF GPS. The computer freezes up. I have to reboot and realign it to get it to work again. Headache. It started after I had it for 2 months. It's still under warrantee and Meade says they will fix it if I pay $400 for shipping! I will never buy another Meade product!

[@FAniesamowity]

Wow

[@metinsariyar]

Apparently Skywatcher 130 much more better than Celestron 130 which only shows just jupiter and saturn

[@TheAstroChannel99]

Please see my latest video (First in 5 years) kzbin.info/www/bejne/nl6mnIygZq57o9E

[@flanker1659]

It's not true lol, Jupiter is much bigger in this telescope

[@TheAstroChannel99]

It is much better to look at with the eye compared to my equipment at the time of this video. :)

[@flanker1659]

@@TheAstroChannel99 Ha ha now I get it, sorry for my tone but back then I was just starting my adventure with astrophotography Btw Nice to see ur respond 😅

[@Sharpless2]

Jupiter really so bad ? ._. i get better views with my 76mm Reflector from noName ... (seben 76/900 reflector)

[@sexspecwannabe6020]

+GD DSTXD This was with a camera remember, It usually is much better with the eye! :)

[@Sharpless2]

uhm your name completely distracted me.... SexSpecWannabe

[@sexspecwannabe6020]

+GD DSTXD Yeah, its out there I admit.

[@Sharpless2]

SexSpecWannabe ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[@TERRAJOVEM6000]

OBRIGADO POR MOSTRAR TUDO EM 2D, PROVA A TERRA PLANA!

[@Shadittarius]

wandering stars and not planets

[@stavrophotography]

The planets look too far away. My 90mm refractor, does better.

[@TheAstroChannel99]

My recent photos are much better than what they were when I started out. They are quite small in this video since I was new and unexperienced in Planetary imaging. My new Camera and experience definitely help now with more crisp and slightly larger images. :)

[@mariaeleniignatidis6475]

wow fkn Gold

[@TheAstroChannel99]

:)

[@tomdonlen]

First

[@joserobertosantos2659]

Estranho. Você consegue captar uma nebulosa bela mas os planetas ruins pacas. Será q é mentira?

[@dimensio_italian_magician]

Planets are way smaller than nebulas, sweetie.

[@japbfamilia]

S

[@darknaonak]

130 mm = clown télescope

[@MarsFranke]

+KrystoF Astromateur Arrogant Idiot! Not everyone can afford big telescopes. There are even more reasons than just money, why someone uses a 130 mm telescope. A lot of professional astronomers still use 130 mm and you can have pretty decent views with it.

[@ricardandres2883]

dude and 130 Apo Ed triplet refractors? 130 mm maks? They are very good telescopes. Also a 130mm refl. is a good telescope for dss imaging.