Slavoj Žižek. On Melancholy. 2012

[@chrish12345]

Surely there's a contradiction in claiming he is 'ignorant' and yet that he 'dismisses' Jung - he must know it in order to dismiss it, which he probably does. He gives lots of hints that he has read far far wider than the material he actually conspicuously draws on, and he just looks them in the eye and moves on.

[@mkeenan1955]

Who was the Norwegian theologian he mentioned and whose name he spelled, I didn't quite get it. "Hzabffe"?

[@HAL_NlNETH0USAND]

45:30 so basically Zizek claims that psychoanalysts can fuck with your qualia?

[@julianferreyrachaka]

conviene far bene l'amore youtube---

[@radimlabuda]

in all his talk about the Book of Job ... i'm missing at least a hint of Jungian reading of that text! and Jung delivered some pretty revolutionary ideas in his "Answer to Job"! which i think resonate with what Zizek says but he never gets there to that point. i certainly understand what ground does Zizek stand on (Freud/Lacan), but OMFG! i can't believe he could be so ignorant as to completely dismiss Jung!!!