If you want to get Zizek's 'I WOULD PREFER NOT TO' t-shirt you can do so here: i-would-prefer-not-to.com
@momenakod63994 жыл бұрын
"I'm approaching the end" "To conclude" and "Just two minutes" are Zizek's opening slogans
@bizambo1004 жыл бұрын
"I say this to provoke you"
@morgengrauen19774 жыл бұрын
"Now I come to my final point" at the beginning of his speech 😊 but Zizek is a brilliant mind and a fearless thinker.
@MartinHonc4 жыл бұрын
and so on and so on and so on
@harrynac60174 жыл бұрын
@Mike Oxenfire And you know because you were the dog.
@harrynac60174 жыл бұрын
@@leco452 You are forgiven 😇
@85MasterV4 жыл бұрын
He almost did my favorite move.. the triple sniff noserub double handed facepalm technique
@ryanmichelz944 жыл бұрын
Lololol
@nikthough31104 жыл бұрын
Sauce 🔥🔥🔥
@whitebeltforlife4 жыл бұрын
hehehe
@dh55734 жыл бұрын
god I hope he’s self-quarantining...
@projectjayme11094 жыл бұрын
This comment deserves more attention
@karolstylok5424 жыл бұрын
Great that Zizek can explain such complicate topic in such accessible way in English and translate everything into sign language at the same time
@valentinocaruso92824 жыл бұрын
ahhahahahhhah
@user-mn3ez2kl3v4 жыл бұрын
“All lives should matter. No its a lie." Sounds funny out of context.
@gregoriosamsa27224 жыл бұрын
possessed by Stalin's soul for that instant
@gondor5324 жыл бұрын
sounds stupid in any context
@cameroncampbell69314 жыл бұрын
@@gregoriosamsa2722 HAHAHA Good one
@singhatar09124 жыл бұрын
Trudeu
@davidwuhrer67042 жыл бұрын
They are lying when they say "all lives should matter". That's just facts. They still swat flies.
@KnowThyself6194 жыл бұрын
It amazes me how he manages to talk on difficult ideas while snorting cocaine every 10 seconds at the same time. What a badass.
@deskryptic4 жыл бұрын
great!
@nedsanders32464 жыл бұрын
This is the first KZbin comment to actually make me pause the video and laugh out loud in years.
@HusseinMohamed-ej3ch4 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@business31584 жыл бұрын
territorial piss this man’s intellectual is far superior than all of your family routes combine
@minstromusic75664 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@JanBabiuchHall4 жыл бұрын
Oh god the automatic translator thinks he's speaking Italian. No, Google. He's speaking Zizek.
@sirius53384 жыл бұрын
Italy does border Slovenia
@sebasdan32154 жыл бұрын
Jajaja
@dsm5d7234 жыл бұрын
Is Babel Fish out of water?
@johnxina27324 жыл бұрын
Indica Ganđa but its a totally different language (roman not slavic)
@sirius53384 жыл бұрын
mmcmmxll it is romance but it could be the accent. Most Slovenians I know sound Italian
@kendrickjahn12614 жыл бұрын
I've been unfair to Zizek in the past, saying that he doesn't make sense and babbles. I retract that, especially the more I pay attention. He also wrote a great piece about the Pandemic a few weeks ago. I was wrong to say that he's just an entertainer and creates mere word salad. I'm going to stop that nonsense and listen more.
@amnesiaguess4 жыл бұрын
I am proud of you
@aleks_rebisz4 жыл бұрын
Oh don't look at me I'm worth nothing I was so wrong. xd
@nihilist92164 жыл бұрын
bcs now you agree with him one one topic? you should listen to every supid or smart thing
@Requiredfields24 жыл бұрын
Don't be hard on yourself. He is damn hard to hear.
@hulubulu2804 жыл бұрын
So your like the majority of people, judging before really listening? 😉 But, great for you, he is a Darling..
@CactusLand4 жыл бұрын
Slovoj is truly brilliant. One of the few people that whose thinking is truly critical AND creative. He is so right. Identity politics is the desperate attempt by people of European descent who have lost their identities to try and create one. They are trying to create an identity out of debasing their abstract idea of who they were. Those who truly have an identity have no need for identity politics, it is existential nonsense. Imagine asking my Irish Catholic grandmother what was her 'identity'? I really don't think African Americans need Ivy league intellectuals to define their identity, because, as Slovoj says, as soon as you define it, it's gone.
@jahcuzzi4 жыл бұрын
I think Zizek, as a lacanian, would doubt that anyone could ever feel not alienated by their identity. Which is why he dislikes the term Native- and African-American (it appeals to some primordial and impossibly "pure" identity). It's also why I doubt he would agree that Americans of European descent have "lost their identities", since that is exactly the fake universality in which the liberal claims base themselves on
@CactusLand4 жыл бұрын
@@jahcuzzi But that is the point, there was nothing universal about ethnic identity, it was one's natural 'in' group. It was completely unselfconscious, pre-modern. Think JFK for example, he rarely mentioned his ethnic identity, it would have seemed absurd. Then look at a Mike Pence, when he does mention it, it is obvious that it is a total construct.
@jahcuzzi4 жыл бұрын
@@CactusLand I see your point, and I agree that certainly the alt-right and the liberals have more in common than they would like to admit. Both of them appeal to identity in a time when global capitalism (or the Empire like Huey Newton says) makes it clearer and clearer how hard it is to "affirm" your identity without reproducing the structures that, in a sense, created that identity, and at the same time make it a contradictory one. Here I think of the tourism industry, which locates zones of "authentic" culture while in that same process destroying that "authenticity" (via gentrification, etc.). But this is the point where I would maybe disagree with you, because I don't think there was any chance for authenticity or spontaneous identity in the first place. Since you can only see such authenticity through the viewpoint of capitalist postmodernity, it is an impossible object to reach, once you do it is already tainted. Which also means that we shouldn't think of pre-modern peoples as at ease with their conceptions of identity. In a sense these tensions are inherent to the concept, so there is some universality to identity, the universality of struggle like Zizek emphasizes
@CactusLand4 жыл бұрын
@@jahcuzzi Excellent point about the tourist industry, I love that idea of it as a postmodern journey in search of 'the authentic'. I really think that is the obsession with tourism, it is a yearning to encounter something real. You really see no way to 'shake off' capitalist postmodernity? A few hits on a DMT pipe come to mind.
@jahcuzzi4 жыл бұрын
@@CactusLand I really have no answer to that question, and maybe any idea of simply stepping outside postmodernity is an illusion, since we can't really think outside its categories or imagine anything outside it. Either way, being aware of contradictions seems to me like a big step forward, and their critique will hopefully allow us to see what those fictions were hiding all along! Cheers!
@eduardlazarus49354 жыл бұрын
This is what I understand: the only way to be able to say "All lives matter" is to acknowledge black suffering - "Black Lives Matter" - the concrete universality.
@divineantiwokewarrior2 жыл бұрын
all live should matter you racist prick BLM is a racist and ethnomarxist organisation, ethnomarxism should not be considered acceptable and so should not ethnic states which is exactly what the leftists in the west seek to create
@boomgoesdynamite4177 Жыл бұрын
Black suffering is rhetoric....and define "acknowledge." Guess which demographic in US commits the most hate crimes against Jews?
@Xenor9hhh Жыл бұрын
Suffering is not an accurate because every race has suffered in many ways .it's not specific to black people like for example most people dying in ww2 and ww1 were white and Jews not black so this goes to show every race has suffered.what is special in the black case is not suffering but racism and we need to acknowledge that.
@LaserLyn4 жыл бұрын
Its a miracle that zizek can go anywhere in these corona times
@clumsiii4 жыл бұрын
Zizek is the Vector
@clumsiii4 жыл бұрын
@damn boi The Coronal Flare for your Private Affair
@laKrishinda4 жыл бұрын
This is old I believe, but brilliant.
@dhruva81064 жыл бұрын
hahaha, but I think this is from an older talk
@magicbean8204 жыл бұрын
Well his audience is definitely 2m away
@sayan16673 жыл бұрын
If i have to judge by reading the comment sections under the videos with Slavoj Zizek, my opinion is that people should look somewhere else but Slavoj and people will understand him better and they will take him more seriously. I really cant believe that people are more absessed to make fun of a something that this Man doesn't have control. I strongly believe that one of the biggest problems in global sociality is that people look only the surface of things and very few people have the ability to concentrate to listen or to look at the real point.
@darklordbingus87052 жыл бұрын
Dude totally, people missing the forest for the trees is a global epidemic.
@teoteo3522 Жыл бұрын
Would be easier if he at least TRIED to be concies
@farrider3339 Жыл бұрын
I totally agree. The level of stupidity by commenters is galactic and these are one's mostly liked. We ARE LOST with such fellas populating the planet. And I mean it !
@maximkovalkov13344 жыл бұрын
"Now I will do... Now I will do something to really annoy you *S* *N* *I* *F* *F* " Thanks that was quick and effective
@phaedrus49314 жыл бұрын
the man promises, the man delivers
@greenbluegrass4 жыл бұрын
That's funny!
@tiramboelaan4 жыл бұрын
LOL
@danielebarolo58514 жыл бұрын
All comments here are to make fun of how he speaks and are not reporting answers (wich is paradoxal cause my comment is neither doing so). It would be nice if we would use this opportunity to comment and share more thoughts on what was said by Zizek
@mrrohitjadhav4704 жыл бұрын
Yess
@00st307-m4 жыл бұрын
💯
@grezende40564 жыл бұрын
Problem is, as someone who doesnt have english as their first language... Understanding what he is saying by itself is a challenge. He has a very strong accent
@camorraII13 жыл бұрын
thank you. gosh I hate these stupid people commenting the same old same old...
@sigurdvj12743 жыл бұрын
I agree, but the format of the KZbin commen section is not proper designed for such a discussion. Anyhow, here is what I think: I admire and look up to his great academic ability to radically discuss sensitive subjects. In many respects his portrayals of transgenderism, Black Lives Matter, LGBT+ etc. will in popular culture be received very bad. However, he is able to place it as a subject matter of reflection that provokes valuable thoughts. It is not to counterargue BLM or the horrors of violence, but it is essential to examine the epistemic roots of the discussion going on. I really enjoy the critique of the essential nature of identity politics and the power relation at play between notions of nations within colonialist theory, and the conclusion that it becomes the all inclusive subjectivity. I want my SoMe-profiles to be assigned the very "+" as label for my personal categorisation of gender identity. With Zizek's line of thinking in this clip, identifying as + may be the solution for now. Or the opposite: that acquiring the "+" as an identity reinforces essentialism and is thus no longer able to contain its sheer subjectivity - similar to the paradox of answering the question "Why do you love me?". Once you claim it identity-wise it is no longer pure identity/subjectivity. But even in that case, selecting it on SoMe encapsulates the embedded paradoxes in identity politics and enacts my subtle, rebellious, anticapitalist agenda.
@Oggy_Oi4 жыл бұрын
Like, Wife asks “do you love me?” I replied “what you on about, I love everybody!” 🤣😂
@Curioinfinity4 жыл бұрын
😱😱😱
@deldia4 жыл бұрын
That’s not analogous. The analogy would be that the wife feels discriminated against because of a specific characteristic she cannot control. She then goes to her husband and protests for hours she needlessly suffers and it matters. The husband agrees it matters but they should assess all their problems and work on solutions. He then also suggests watching some interviews with Coleman Hughes on the topic of systematic racism.
@ArtUnbowed4 жыл бұрын
More like, wife "do you love me" husband "I love all my wives".
@ArtUnbowed4 жыл бұрын
@@greenbluegrass wife "I need shampoo", husband "I will get shampoo for all my lovely wives"
@ArtUnbowed4 жыл бұрын
@@greenbluegrass all wives matter
@davidbutler93234 жыл бұрын
If Slavoj had Covid he would be a super spreader.
@mandar13119894 жыл бұрын
Rolling on the floor... hahahahaha. This is an incredibly witty joke
@carlliu28874 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@dsm5d7234 жыл бұрын
Maybe so, the RNA would bacdafucup after five minutes of trying to infect him. Like a debate. He might well retain an excess of virus in his magnetic field, making him a potential super spreader, but he is probably not out on the town.
@SydneyD28-64 жыл бұрын
And the question comes: Does it even exist.?
@christopherlopez25914 жыл бұрын
This is me at 6am talking about my childhood in some after hours nightclub with 3 other people in a bathroom stall lol
@ishtiaqahmed-fh7sr4 жыл бұрын
Ah the good auld devil's dandruff.
@rusne.4 жыл бұрын
hahah, same!
@ec88104 жыл бұрын
Best analogy I’ve ever read.
@heermoes79164 жыл бұрын
"Now I will do something to really annoy you." -> *Sniffs*
@Faustusin4 жыл бұрын
People watching this expecting a definite solution to identity politics need to understand Zizek is not going to give you one line solutions. He brings out points on both sides, he may have personal bias towards one side of the argument but he will not stop from explaining the other side too. No wonder you are not able to get any grand solution from his talks. There is none. World and real life are nuanced. There is no Theory Z which fits everything.
@risen17264 жыл бұрын
Its hard too understand him speaking ..is the any transcripts?
@nerdimusprime87534 жыл бұрын
He has such a postmodern view for someone who disapproves of postmodernism
@Trainwreq314 жыл бұрын
Damnit. Ya really nail it in with this. Life is fucked if you do and fucked if you dont... No! there is no one size fits all solution. We go along with what we can and make the best of the worst, if we can now, make anything at all. Chaos makes no apologies for our feelings.
@balkanblackpillvideosandmo84564 жыл бұрын
@Ak Kher Balanced , as all things should be
@mmikaojONE4 жыл бұрын
And so on.. and so on!
@srikarpamidi19464 жыл бұрын
For all the memes, a brilliant mind. Utterly refuses to compromise the left to liberals. My personal favorite : "If you will allow me to be...perverse here, a little bit."
@davidbolha4 жыл бұрын
[sniff] 😄
@villegas244 жыл бұрын
Zizek is brilliant. I wish I could go back to Uni and attend some of his courses.
@Mcweeever4 жыл бұрын
Like James Brown.. I am coming to the end... wraps himself in cape and continues... I can’t go on... hobbles off continuing... the last word... continues and so on AND SO ON! 😂 love this guy .. absolute legend.
@deskryptic4 жыл бұрын
Genius comment!
@austin70374 жыл бұрын
"For the mindset of the flesh is death, but the mindset of the Spirit is life and peace."
@johnrambo999994 жыл бұрын
I've seen hundreds of videos of Zizek, I still dont know what his opinion is on anything.
@georgie35934 жыл бұрын
@@daysurge2525 yeah same maybe i'm stupid but i dont know wtf hes really on about lol
@THOMASCOLTON14 жыл бұрын
He's a thinker, not a populist or staunchly entrenched in political party ideologies.
@FoulUnderworldCreature4 жыл бұрын
@@daysurge2525 Read his books. He makes clear commentary on philosophy, but not really on politics, which is what you would expect from his "Hegelian turn"
@NoahsUniverse4 жыл бұрын
@@daysurge2525 He is an analyst of the mind, hence his work in psychoanalysis, specifically Lacanian psychoanalysis. His point is to make you think, and there will be many points along the way. This is a psychoanalytical talk.
@lukejensen68024 жыл бұрын
He is a critical theorist with a psychoanalytic bent, in lectures and articles I’ve seen he seems more interested in deconstruction than proposing solutions or opining. His deconstructions are meaningful though as they can reveal hidden motives lurking in ideological movements
@GalacticBeatz4 жыл бұрын
He literally touched his nose more then a 100 times.
@danmaks10474 жыл бұрын
Cocaine
@grippercrapper4 жыл бұрын
We need to get him some surgery to fix those nasal passages.
@srf2224 жыл бұрын
@@grippercrapper I'm from Slovenia. Źiźek suffers from nerve demadge and inspite this hard demadge he is brilliant soul. Show some respect to people who are not lucky with good health.
@grippercrapper4 жыл бұрын
black olive - My goal isn’t to be disrespectful. I do respect the man. In this case stating what was absurdly obvious was just humor, not disrespect. I in no way fault him for having physical disabilities.
@totalSLACK4 жыл бұрын
The "new normal" awareness has me thinking if he doesn't get covid, it def doesn't exist lol
@gretashapiro41184 жыл бұрын
Professor Sylvester the cat
@TommWayfarer4 жыл бұрын
I always laugh like a child with that analogy.
@deldia4 жыл бұрын
🤣
@jasminfumarate56204 жыл бұрын
(Amazingly nice!) Hahahahaha...
@Fabzil4 жыл бұрын
Where is my jewish joke ?
@EGnoSecondG4 жыл бұрын
here, at the beginning of this video :) kzbin.info/www/bejne/amiVnXZ7rpmXeNk
@nodeviscera3424 жыл бұрын
@@EGnoSecondG Awesome! thnx.
@davidwuhrer67042 жыл бұрын
Are you nothing enough to get it?
@farrider3339 Жыл бұрын
"The problem with identity politics is that they presuppose that identity exists. I DON'T THINK iT EXISTS !" Precisely for this statement by master Z. I've been waiting for a long LONG time. I knew he knows this, but saying it explicitly is an ultimate a super heavy bomb to ALL societal and cultural construct's we're so proud of as mankind. Hail Zizek 🛐
@samyrandome4254 жыл бұрын
This actually makes a lot of sense. Subjectivity and the struggle to conform to a specific identity is based.
@user-yw9in2sb5r4 жыл бұрын
Why not fly free within your own being
@samyrandome4254 жыл бұрын
@@user-yw9in2sb5r that's definitely cool too whenever possible
@user-yw9in2sb5r4 жыл бұрын
@@samyrandome425 Yessir 💕
@bierrollerful4 жыл бұрын
subtitles available: Zizekian
@leonli45274 жыл бұрын
If you try to turn on the subtitle it will say Italian (automatic)
@iv77964 жыл бұрын
Im usually not a Zizek guy but damn when he is right he right!
@dimitriosfromgreece42274 жыл бұрын
Yes yes ,, 😃 love from sweden ❤❤❤
@suddenuprising4 жыл бұрын
"when he supports what I already believe he is right!"
@iv77964 жыл бұрын
@@suddenuprising yes, you got it buddy!
@dimitriosfromgreece42274 жыл бұрын
@@suddenuprising AMAZING 😀
@veganevolution4 жыл бұрын
No more depth than the next pop star
@stygianxv27974 жыл бұрын
The ideals on labels is something I've been thinking about for years. It seems like a primitive system being held on by a desperate need for identity.
@davidwuhrer67042 жыл бұрын
It is a primitive system being held on to by a desperate need to maintain a veneer of legitimacy for racism.
@ዮናታንፃድቅ4 жыл бұрын
"What is hysteria in subjectivity sense? asking identity at least in a primitive level"
@Wissahickon4 жыл бұрын
“Water is Sacred” Talk about praying to the mountains, I want Zizek’s opinion on the Dakota Pipeline protests.
@veganevolution4 жыл бұрын
Honestly, his comment about Native American identity disgusted me. Having studied Native cultures in college, I know their beliefs have been deeply rooted in love and appreciation for nature. Imagine how they felt throughout centuries of genocide and industialization of the vast majority of their land... Its crude to generalize their historical connection with spirituality as cliche
@veganevolution4 жыл бұрын
@Ginger Ginger It should think for everyone but it does not, only the top 1 percent or so.
@domsjuk4 жыл бұрын
@@veganevolution Interesting take, and I agree that he as so often (for the sake of simplicity and him not really caring that much) oversimplifying and probably mostly ignorant about the actual culture of these people. But I nonetheless think what he implies about the folkloristic reduction and romantization of native American culture is right and is consistent with his other claims. A point he often makes to support this is the fact that - I'm paraphrasing - despite having an ideology of living in a harmonic symbiosis with nature, just as almost any other form of civilization in history they never truly did, i.e. they exploited their own ecosystem more than was sustainable etc. and much of it is of course mere superstition and tradition. While I am sympathetic to the spiritual experiences and insight these cultures did and do achieve in communion with nature and them preserving parts of their living culture and languages is hugely important, there is the obvious danger that this aspect together with all the folklore is being absolutely essentialized. Native American identity is thereby excluded from the frame of western/liberal universality and the people have a hard time establishing their own version of universality, of modernity and secularism, making it seem to remain in an external and particular rather than an internal opposition to the dominant ideology, universality and capitalist system. Being in external opposition works, of course, in countering threats (like big corps digging through their land), as it has some widely accepted legitimacy, but it can also petrify an identity that is basically defined as a "relative complement" to the dominant culture. That is why I think the collaboration with e.g. nature protection initiatives, or people fighting for different forms of land use and ownership or even schooling or health care, or wherever their struggle is in line with that of other "particular identities", is very important there and should fill in and undergird the cultural aesthetics.
@veganevolution4 жыл бұрын
@@domsjuk you just disqualified your own defence of him in saying he doesn't care about the very thing he's defending. Unless you can say something simply and with substance (which is easy if you are defending true ideas), I would reccomend you look into Seventh Generation, which is a Native American-run company that makes cleaning products in a way that is sustainable for the next seven generations. Seven generations of sustainability is a concept of the Native Americans well before the industrialization of their territory that has ultimately led to the deterioration of the planet's biosphere, as well as the atmospheric toxicity. It frightens me that ti this day there is still so much ignorance around what happened to the tribal communities and families who were slaughtered and right up through the 1970s, sterilized without their consent. Their religious traditions and cultural beliefs actually venerated nature and the animals they had to eat to survive. I would wager my life that with if the type of belief systems and conscientiousness that the Native Americans have always celebrated were practiced throughout the development of our modern culture, we would not be experiencing such massive destruction and species extinction on a global scale.
@domsjuk4 жыл бұрын
@@veganevolution Eeehm, I think we are not quite on the same page. Sure, I could put that statement more simply, but - no offence - frankly, if you didn't get that, I don't think you can follow what Zizek is trying to explain here about universality and forced and constructed identities in the first place, nor do you in fact seem to care about that at all, because all you do is pointing out some insights and opinions about native American culture. That was an example primarily and not the actually crucial thing about his claim, but yeah, here we go... Ignoring arguments for petty sophistry is certainly one way to go about it, and evidently not every simple statement is true or relevant either, but I will respond to your point - btw, ironically, even without caring too much about the details, he made a deeper point than you seem to realize... Now, just so you know, I'm not an American, and I don't have any sentimental inhibitions towards or romantic ideals about the genocidal aspects of European/white settlers' expansion in North America, basically until the present day, I am in fact very sympathetic to the spiritual practices and cultural expression of those peoples and I don't endorse ignorance on that, so as an alleged learned person, I invite you to check or dismiss my points with examples. I think your representation of NA ideology and spiritual practice as indicative of their actual life style is slightly romanticized and misleading, which is just what Zizek is criticizing (note, he is not presenting a deep evaluation of NA civilizational practices, nor is he purporting they aren't useful and wise, or even more sustainable, just referring to the well-known cases of patronizing naive whites idealizing NA culture and history in that way and limiting the modern NA identities to this image). I really have no doubt, that NA traditional pre-modern life style is way "more sustainable" than our modern growth-fetishizing industrialized mass-societies, just as most primitive societies were for the mere fact of their technological standards. But to make a slightly cynical point: inter-tribal war, plights, natural disasters and the small-scale decentralized nature of most of their communities may have allowed things like the very practical slash-and-burn practices in many places to remain sustainable enough, just as much as the NA ideology of venerating nature and their spiritual tradition has, which you exemplify with that seven generations principle. Ideology though usually has some discrepancies with everyday life practice. And contrary to the previous point the over-exploitation of natural resources is a reoccurring theme all over the globe and in the Americas as well, afaik the Mississippi culture, to stay in that area, suffered from it as well, and it seems to some extent an inherent curse of establishing urban mass-societies in history. What is important now, as I alluded to previously, is to take as many of the ideology and cultural practices as possible and assert them in a way compatible with a universalist, humanist and secularist perspective - if this can mean something like your example of an ethical business practice, that seems fair enough to me. But this obviously has to go well beyond the traditional ways of previous centuries and the assumed particular NA identity, which as I said is often just patronizing and exclusive.
@andrehayworth89114 жыл бұрын
I am certainly not a communist, but I LOVE this guy
@DaveE994 жыл бұрын
Only true struggle is the struggle for universality (Hegelian I assume)
@simone97814 жыл бұрын
The universal starts from the individual
@robdale884 жыл бұрын
I'm relatively new to Zizek and Hegelianism. What does he mean by this struggle for universality?
@chalinofalcone8714 жыл бұрын
"Literacy remains even now the base and model of all programs of industrial mechanization; but, at the same time, it locks the minds and senses of its users in the mechanical and fragmentary matrix that is so necessary to the maintenance of mechanized society. That is why the transition from mechanical to electric technology is so very traumatic and severe for us all. The mechanical techniques, with their limited powers, we have long used as weapons. The electric techniques cannot be used aggressively except to end all life at once like the turning off of a light. To live with both of these technologies at the same time is a peculiar drama of the 20th century." [Understanding Media, Marshall McLuhan, 1964, Ch. Weapons]
@stjepan_89024 жыл бұрын
Precondition for this struggle is questioning the nature of things and this in many cases transcends into the struggle between subject-object perception and state of oneness, cravings of ego and deeper states of being. A state of questioning is at the center of the search for universality, not an argument to be won.
@robdale884 жыл бұрын
Thanks but what does that mean in non-obfuscated terms?
@A_Box4 жыл бұрын
Easy answer "to why do you love me?" >I love the cluster of characteristics that make you up. I couldn't reduce it to any particular one.
@MoroccanAnwar4 жыл бұрын
:)
@davidwuhrer67042 жыл бұрын
So if any of those characteristics changes at all, you'll stop loving the person, correct?
@bahardan85444 жыл бұрын
I like reading him but damn listening him is so tiring! I just can’t...
@pastiche94 жыл бұрын
What have you read recently ?
@bahardan85444 жыл бұрын
Daaniyal Hassan Violence 😊
@pastiche94 жыл бұрын
@@bahardan8544 i recently started 'Sublime object of ideology' can't get through . Is there some more basic Zizek book ?
@Drnkrocklee4 жыл бұрын
Daaniyal Hassan I’m reading Like a thief in broad daylight right now and it’s pretty accessible
@pastiche94 жыл бұрын
@@Drnkrocklee funny names ain't it ? When I read Zizek I'm kicked into Lacan, Hegel and Kant . I get lost , but I'm trying to make through.
@holden61044 жыл бұрын
Dude, can I just get a transcript?
@tiramboelaan4 жыл бұрын
Agreed, I can't watch this guy without getting really uncomfortable.
@adrianmercuri89564 жыл бұрын
Do you mean a face mask and a visor?
@DIYTFY4 жыл бұрын
No.
@MorningStar-nd3yg3 жыл бұрын
His accent is very thick, hard to understand on what he's saying.
@arkanstigers60073 жыл бұрын
because English wasn’t his first language and My man has a permanent cold lmfao
@onurbole79214 жыл бұрын
It reminds me of Suzan-Lori Parks, a brilliant playwright who often complains that critics think she only represents black people as if a black writer can't create universal works. But in my opinion, her "blackness" is that "excess +" Zizek is talking about, based on her essay where she defines "black theater." I know Zizek hates the idea of decentralization, and seems to reject minority resistances, but that's what I would like to ask him: Is it not possible to use one's "non-universal" features not as an identity but pure excess? Another question that comes to my mind is, is it not cruel to force someone to take the hysterical position and ask the authority why he/she is what it defines them as? Especially when you are beaten and killed and criminalized for being black, isn't it crucial to get rid of that specific injustice before we ask them to stop defining themselves as black? What if they say, to use one of Zizek's favourite quotes, "I would prefer not to reject blackness"? May someone not take the opposite path of hysteria and say "I am blacker than what the system says black is"?
@pedrocamara90884 жыл бұрын
What's the difference between identity and pure excess?
@EJtube4 жыл бұрын
Getting rid of injustice starts with getting rid of that definition.
@onurbole79214 жыл бұрын
@@EJtube A bludgeon slashing your skull open is not a definition.
@pedrocamara90884 жыл бұрын
@@onurbole7921 Would you like to say the difference between identity and pure excess?
@EJtube4 жыл бұрын
@@onurbole7921 Yeah and where does that happen in western society exactly?
@RICHARDGRANNON4 жыл бұрын
6:22 ☝️🙌
@nukepizzaa4 жыл бұрын
Explains feminine hysteria as the root cause for the feminist chaos
@litao53873 жыл бұрын
zizek clearly defeated google speech recognition.
@paulstrahnickiy17244 жыл бұрын
He touched his nose in this video 180 times :)
@iv77964 жыл бұрын
@Alf Mucha whats wrong with a little coke?🤣
@user-mo9fw7iw4u4 жыл бұрын
@Alf Mucha lol, he's got tourette syndrome, read up on that
@IdealLessons4 жыл бұрын
@Alf Mucha I disagree about the "stupid" part. His Interrogating the Real is a fantastic book, as one example.
@shelleybrock36244 жыл бұрын
Pain pills will do that.
@Bigbossdeadlift4 жыл бұрын
Alf Mucha He has a tick, anything to say about his arguments tho?
@alvarov42794 жыл бұрын
He seems like a great thinker. But I’ve tried to listen man, if only I could understand what he’s saying....
@dd-ry6tp4 жыл бұрын
My first language is not English. Could any kind enough to provide English CC here? I can't hear what he said
@forestaltmer88994 жыл бұрын
Even those whose first language is English can't understand what he's saying lol
@delightfullypiquant7654 жыл бұрын
Native English speaker here, and I’m watching it a third time trying to parse out his words. I still can’t make out everything.
@no_peace4 жыл бұрын
It's almost unbearable for me as autistic native English speaker
@GijsInc4 жыл бұрын
Uh it's quite easy for me as a (autistic but I don't see the relevance) non-native speaker. If you can't understand it i recommend picking up one of his short books, he repeats himself a lot.
@bi78434 жыл бұрын
Plot twist: length of video is 9:11
@marlonhengtgen30044 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of that tragedy
@marlonhengtgen30044 жыл бұрын
@jaleel appleseed I was simply quoting Norm Macdonald lol
@marlonhengtgen30044 жыл бұрын
@jaleel appleseed What is the supposed end goal of these perpetrators? Genuinely curious.
@davidwuhrer67042 жыл бұрын
What plot?
@HodBend4 жыл бұрын
Can someone do the professional voice over and maybe add some animations so I can actually watch this video?
@Miningfox4 жыл бұрын
Very up to date...
@ElectricChaplain4 жыл бұрын
This is the best rebuttal to "All Lives Matter" I have ever seen, and the actual implications of the statement "Black Lives Matter".
@Tom_Tom_Klondike4 жыл бұрын
Something like: Identity politics fails because decolonization is no longer possible.
@harackmw4 жыл бұрын
This is perhaps the best comment here.
@davidwuhrer67042 жыл бұрын
Not quite. Identity politics perpetuates the very issues it claims to address. Decolonisation is a red herring based on identity politics. It is a good example of how identity politics cannot and will not solve the issues and only make them worse.
@laurioho20412 жыл бұрын
@@davidwuhrer6704 Identity politics is the system forcing an identity on you and through colonialism destroying the posibility of any alternative identity
@davidwuhrer67042 жыл бұрын
@@laurioho2041 That's one thing it does, yes.
@GwazaJuse4 жыл бұрын
Žižek is back!
@mel.jackson4 жыл бұрын
The sniff of Sisyphus.
@b42thomas4 жыл бұрын
sniffyphus
@syrianization4 жыл бұрын
Watching zizek makes my nose itch.
@clarkstepo4 жыл бұрын
give this guy a medal for most facial touching in 2020.
@franktheco4 жыл бұрын
Almost more than the kid from dazed and confused.
@VolkColopatrion2 ай бұрын
We do not usually look for allies when we love. Indeed, we often look on those who love with us as rivals and trespassers. But we always look for allies when we hate. It is understandable that we should look for others to side with us when we have a just grievance and crave to retaliate against those who wronged us. The puzzling thing is that when our hatred does not spring from a visible grievance and does not seem justified, the desire for allies becomes more pressing. It is chiefly the unreasonable hatreds that drive us to merge with those who hate as we do, and it is this kind of hatred that serves as one of the most effective cementing agents.
@zachzorn99304 жыл бұрын
This should be used as an anti cocaine ad
@cliffroberts17744 жыл бұрын
Zach Zorn Good to see you here Zac lol
@ReckerFidelWOLF4 жыл бұрын
I am a new subscriber and I am a Communist of 3 years. My position is leftcom and I would have to concur that many times before I have proven Marxist-Leninist's wrong on many key arguments before. This guy, puts actual real knowledgeable 2 senses in his analysis instead of baffling theories straight out of a book. This guy needs to educate Marxist-Leninists that Lenin is not just daddy and can't solve every single thing by the centralization of government that perpetuates bourgeoi control over the National economics. Essentially restarting the bourgeoisie.
@nerdimusprime87534 жыл бұрын
When he repeated the quote from the black panther founder my mouth was gaping open, because I was just like " Woaaah, that's some true stuff"
@milton77634 жыл бұрын
I never knew Daffy Duck was so smart
@dsm5d7234 жыл бұрын
To anyone who young, on the Left and a fan of Zizek, i implore you to watch a 1990 film that I think encapsulates the still-current resentment of this confused and angry generation. Google has become the cultural memory and identity matrix of the minds of a generation, going on two, and most take their constructed, deconstructionist social reality as such. The Life of the Individual seems not to register in the face of algorithmic compression. "Pump Up The Volume," starring Christian Slater, expresses the post 1960's, middle class white ennui with what had been left to discover and change, the power and paradoxical anonymity of communication (pirate radio in a small town) and the sense that all that remains is Zizek's hedonistic and self-satisfying Western Buddhism, no matter how many people your voice reaches. All this in the context of "late" capitalism, as clouded as that is conceptually. Change mass communications and the minds of the people using the physical culture, and here we are.
@dsm5d7234 жыл бұрын
@ⰄⰓⰄⰀ Moron. It is the same EXACT story with more toys and less intelligence.Times END mmathemaically. Insect brain.
@emmettwalsh69014 жыл бұрын
When you take pre workout but remember you have to do a quick lecture first.
@MrBillcale4 жыл бұрын
this man is totally insane , and i love him for it
@Neoentrophy4 жыл бұрын
Wow, where even to begin, I feel like Ive had a brain haemorrhage after that
@Jaxcen-xr3me4 жыл бұрын
Is there a place where I can read what he is saying instead of listening?
@oliverbender37644 жыл бұрын
Shnoobers Stark I suppose that he reiterates his ideas in his book.
@elrecursodelmetodo4 жыл бұрын
@@oliverbender3764 which one specifically?
@oliverbender37644 жыл бұрын
If I remember correctly, he simply called it “Corona!”, but I might be mistaken. I recently read a review about it in the Guardian, in tandem with a more theological essay on how we could explain that God would let us suffer this pandemic.
@joshuadaley2244 жыл бұрын
It's up there in the title. 'For a Left that Dares to Speak its Name', is the name of the book.
@icaliver4 жыл бұрын
Was this part of a larger Q&A? If so is the full interview online? I’m intrigued by this point of view.
@darthbanana74 жыл бұрын
כן
@joshadamson68744 жыл бұрын
Zizek is hilarious and insightful
@LeonWagg4 жыл бұрын
Here's a full talk kzbin.info/www/bejne/p6ndZa2hhMSWm5Y
@markmasters42594 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one out there that can only understand about 40 percent of what he says? Lol it should be mandatory to put subtitles in every video in which Zizek speaks, of course there's auto generated subtitles but it thinks he's speaking Italian 🤣
@caspar_gomez3 жыл бұрын
does anyone know where that newton quote is from? I want to read more but im not sure where to start
@beansandapricots85344 жыл бұрын
does anyone have a transcript?
@jdwoods20084 жыл бұрын
He said, "I can't feel my face. I mean, I can touch it, but I can't feel it."
@Johannastairwellstudio4 жыл бұрын
Yes l would love that also if anyone has
@MS-il3ht4 жыл бұрын
Cam Bell it goes as follows: Epstein didn‘t kill himself
@Johannastairwellstudio4 жыл бұрын
Sunny Midnite hi l saw you’d answered my post and l can’t for the life of me wee where your response is regarding the transcripts. Definately my bad with regard to using this platform properly! Arghhh l will keep looking.
@Johannastairwellstudio4 жыл бұрын
Sunny Midnite well done thank you for persisting. Have no idea how to copy and save but will figure it out. As it won’t highlight etc. but huge thanks again sunny
@katherinek5994 жыл бұрын
i love the captions
@pipersolanas33224 жыл бұрын
Love this man omg
@PunkyReggaeBuddhA4 жыл бұрын
This is quite similar to Raimon Panikkar talking about identity. He also specify how the great mistake of western civilization is to confuse the identification, which is for istance how tall are you or what color your skin is, with the identity.
@gartenstuhl23964 жыл бұрын
Could someone elaborate what Zizek means with 'concrete universality' in context of the "all lives matter" response?
@UserName-ii1ce4 жыл бұрын
If I were to venture to guess I would say that it is systemic racism that is present everywhere but most visible in government
@beanbagchair4 жыл бұрын
I understood it to mean popular appeal for a cultural singularity - proponents of "all lives matter" seek to dismantle the need for "black lives matter" because it contradicts their ingrained belief in a singular (white) ethnostate in which all of culture exists. In terms of historical reality, universality doesn't exist, which is why it's problematic to construct one's ideology around it. He loosely defines those adherents to concrete universality as reactionaries, essentially. In terms of white liberals, identity politics are useful to their fallacy of universality because it assumes that identity is innate or inborn, rather than learned or constructed. I think?
@fufubunnyiz10064 жыл бұрын
I may be wrong, (it's very possible) but it seemed like he was saying: defining ourselves "we are___" & ""they are ___" divides us, and creates a weakness in our character, that can be exploited. Just as responding All Lives Matter, creates discord, making many people recoil from the issue of systemic racism, in an attempt to defend those they identify with. The more ways we find to label ourselves, the more cliques we form...the easier we are to be emotional and get offended, and the less we seek truth or justice, with objectivity AND the easier we are to manipulate.
@fufubunnyiz10064 жыл бұрын
I think in terms of Nationalism, the "clique" is your country and it implies, you are with us or against us...even when your national government doesn't serve everyone, equally.
@THOMASCOLTON14 жыл бұрын
The struggle is the universality, not them & us, slave traders didn't only oppress black people it was a systemic oppression of many groups over time by an elite ruling class. Marxist perspective.
@Muchowski_B4 жыл бұрын
Absolutely spot on
@casualobserver23804 жыл бұрын
I really wish I could understand him better.
@craiuirinel41034 жыл бұрын
Yea this man has a learning curve attached. I suggest watch his movies and you will understand him better
@casualobserver23804 жыл бұрын
@@craiuirinel4103 I am not speaking from a comprehensive standpoint, I literally mean I can't make out what he is saying half the time.
@Platos-Den4 жыл бұрын
@@casualobserver2380 to completely understand it, you must speak Spit. The Sylvester school of Speach can assist you with this.
@craiuirinel41034 жыл бұрын
@@casualobserver2380 hey man, it will also help with that because zizek has some ideas that he expresses a lot. It will become easier to understand his speech after that. Also, the documentaries are good.
@Fabzil4 жыл бұрын
@@craiuirinel4103 Love the comment about the learning curve ^^ Hey Casual, here is how I did it : - I watched and watched and watched videos of him until I could understand his words - then I researched some key points ('cause I know shit about philosophy and hegel and "contingent" and that son of a bitch of Lacan) - I never gave up
@samfelton50094 жыл бұрын
Thanks KZbin for the Italian auto-subtitles 😐
@ashbirk46814 жыл бұрын
Despite how it seems he doesn’t have COVID-19
@RobertSullivan4 жыл бұрын
He actually said an interview with HAARETZ newspaper in Israel that he sometimes wishes that he would catch COVID 19... because it would put him out of his misery.
@caspar_gomez3 жыл бұрын
ay romantic zizek always gets to me
@drshohinidas40513 жыл бұрын
I don't know who you are but this comment is hella attractive
@caspar_gomez3 жыл бұрын
@@drshohinidas4051 aw thanks, I try 😌
@deadcarnivora86484 жыл бұрын
I love the words google translates zizeks speech into 🤭🧕🏼
@feigerle54164 жыл бұрын
watching this on a sunday ... i can feel him and his nose :(((
@tubespore4 жыл бұрын
I am becoming more interested in Slavoj ; however when he says "universality"; I draw a blank. that is an abstract term for abstraction; does he mean "equality"(?) Its seems unlikely in the context. It seems doubtful that it is a Kantian style universtality. Its seems his thought centers on this "universtality" but I havent found any explantion for it.
@madnomad914 жыл бұрын
I’d recommend you read Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Then you’ll understand
@alexvlair92904 жыл бұрын
I thought he was talking about American capitalism as a global cultural reference point... like, white universality would be white people associating their own identity with global capitalism, which stems from American culture but is "for" all nations (meaning it is exported and adopted in one manner or another). They see themselves as the "owners" of this universal culture, meaning they have this element of universality. But I had a bit of trouble understanding this video to be honest, so if anyone has another explanation I'd love to hear it...
@OddPain4 жыл бұрын
Morgan Hanam when he talks about „universality“ he refers to Hegels definition (which he considers the purest form) look it up. Hope this helped :D
@RICHARDGRANNON4 жыл бұрын
A universally agreed upon perception of an objective unquestionable reality - something like that. It doesn’t allow for relativism
@codyedwards58274 жыл бұрын
Zizek is a Hegelian so any time you see the words "Universal","Particular". "Abstract", "Concrete" its always in the Hegelian Sense. Read Hegel for yourself if you want to understand Hegelian notions
@inspir.edmusic3 жыл бұрын
Woah
@blazearmoru4 жыл бұрын
Zizek clearly hasn't watched RE:Zero. Rem will completely destroy your question of "why do you love me".
@laurioho20412 жыл бұрын
lmao
@alymbekdzhanybekuulu994 жыл бұрын
When I saw that slogan "Black lives matter" I thought that slogan itself is racist because all representatives of different races and ethnicities are killed by police every year not only black people so if slogan was "Human lives matter or All lives matter" that could be called FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE for all not only for black people. Law matters and despite black,white,yellow etc all people have to be equal in front of law and justice or people think that black people should be treated better than asians, mexicans,native americans and all other races and I think black people are not supreme over the others and should not be. Police men who committed that crime have to be punished not only because they killed black man(that man could be white,mexican,russian,jewish etc) but because they committed a crime having killed human.
@stevenclark51734 жыл бұрын
I don't know if you're from the U.S but I'm guessing no. All Lives Matter is condescending since everyone already agrees on that. The problem is that black people are specifically targeted by law enforcement, they are arrested more, and sentence longer for the same crimes, and police kill them in greater numbers when it seems like they don't have to. Whereas with white folks like Dylan Roof, the somehow manage to deescalate the situation and seem to be less likely to resort to violence. I don't know all the reasons for this but it leads the black community to be scared of police and treat them with distrust.
@victorgrauer58344 жыл бұрын
Typical Zizek. He leads us to believe he's going to say something definitive and then allows himself to get lost in a side issue -- resulting in a hopeless (but nonetheless entertaining) muddle.
@selfdribblingbasketball97694 жыл бұрын
Yeah Victor I think u should just rewatch the video if you didn’t get it
@davidwuhrer67042 жыл бұрын
He didn't get lost in side issues, he was making his point by using references.
@Phessington4 жыл бұрын
Blank out the heavy accent and the sniffing, what do you get. A very good analysis . I do like the slur of, word salad Zizek has been accused of.
@aleksnedovic79854 жыл бұрын
but, don't we ourselves on a personal level choose to identify with a certain role? goes for those a person can construct themselves and existing ones. Oh how I miss philosophy lectures and discussions
@beanbagchair4 жыл бұрын
@Nicholas Williams Building on what you said, universality is convenient for adherents to identity politics because it assumes that identity is inborn or absolute, rather than constructed or learned. In Sizek's terms, identity doesn't exist, which I think he means in a material sense - in terms of historical reality. Identity, as a societal phenomenon, is assigned by culture, institutions, and systems. I don't really read or follow Zizek much so I don't know what his tendencies are, but (speaking to what OP said) I assume he is speaking to identity as it's defined by popular consciousness, and not by metaphysics or existentialism. This seems like a snippet from a longer piece so I'm making a lot of assumptions but yeah.
@davidwuhrer67042 жыл бұрын
@@beanbagchair The terms "identity" and "universality" are misused by certain political agents to means something else than the technical terms mean, to give their agenda a veneer of legitimacy. The same is the case for the terms "virtue signaling" and "learned helplessness", which actually mean pretty much the opposite of how they are used by those same political agitators. They did the same with the terms "liberal" and "libertarian".
@davidwuhrer67042 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't say we necessarily _choose_ a certain role. In social contexts, we are put in a role of superior, subordinate, or peer; or we find ourselves in the position of an agent or a patient. What political group we identify with does not define our identity. But our choosing to identify with it defines the group.
@gaseti4 жыл бұрын
Definitely just had a bump before this talk. Maybe even during it.
@harunhernandez4 жыл бұрын
Identities are limiting
@pencilkid11234 жыл бұрын
yo can I find a video of this guy with half-way decent mic quality???
@chaidle4 жыл бұрын
How come this east European guy manage to be aware of everything happening in US? Except for some outsider's position from left leaning ideologists?
@danakaleb48824 жыл бұрын
vos je Central European according to geography.
@Deliverygirl4 жыл бұрын
Eastern Europe has had a lot of ethnic struggle and conflict. Ask any person from the Balkans what they think of the current race riots.
@danakaleb48824 жыл бұрын
Deliverygirl You don’t want to know what we think about it.
@Deliverygirl4 жыл бұрын
@@danakaleb4882 I think I know already, as echoed from friends from the balkans. As a southern european, it all looks surreal to me. At this point a race war almost seems inevitable, everything has been building up to this for many years now, if something isn't done, it will coalesce into a full blown race war.
@danakaleb48824 жыл бұрын
Deliverygirl Well, Europe never recovered from two world wars. We’re watching fall of Roman Empire once again. Europe is sick and vultures are already gathering to tear it apart. USA is not far behind and sick since the very beginning. Unfortunately, when Roman Empire fell, so did its culture, knowledge, achievements. We entered dark age. Same will happen in near future. Not just civil war, maybe even global war. We have wars, famine, locusts, ‘plague’ even. Signs of times to come. Wheel is turning once again. My heart is sad for our children. Too bad. Stay safe, stay healthy, peace!
@afacere7364 жыл бұрын
"Should you ever intend to dull the wits of a young man and to incapacitate his brains for any kind of thought whatever, then you cannot do better than give him Hegel to read. For these monstrous accumulations of words that annul and contradict one another drive the mind into tormenting itself with vain attempts to think anything whatever in connection with them, until finally it collapses from sheer exhaustion. Thus any ability to think is so thoroughly destroyed that the young man will ultimately mistake empty and hollow verbiage for real thought. A guardian fearing that his ward might become too intelligent for his schemes might prevent this misfortune by innocently suggesting the reading of Hegel.”
@afacere7364 жыл бұрын
@yvwe 888 Not for a Hegelian, where up is down, left is right, and isonomy is inequality.
@davidwuhrer67042 жыл бұрын
People mistake empty verbiage for real thought without reading Hegel. All self-help books are proof of that.
@megcook14864 жыл бұрын
Someone should subtitle this
@MrInterestingthings Жыл бұрын
Erik Erikson was a unique white man Huey Newton lives forever ! I must read this important thinker but watching him is difficult . Scriabin was like this couldn't sit still says Hoowitz when he met him as a child .
@louisecook64834 жыл бұрын
We are all one race, the Human Race
@jwhit40754 жыл бұрын
Can someone post written text of this whole dialog? Its difficult to understand what he says with the way he speaks
@jesseperez51854 жыл бұрын
This guy is as easy to understand as DMX was back in his coke days.
@marker7943 жыл бұрын
Due to the connection of colonization and decolonization there must be something more then one can imagine about connection because as with idea and impression and the contradictions/ ideologys there has to be two things creating that occurence with the connection giving the accursed conciousness an ability to have such choice.🤔
@justinmartinez54854 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know if he’s got a coke problem?
@troile6664 жыл бұрын
sure seens like it
@antihero1054 жыл бұрын
It's a nervous tick he has that's exasperated from public speaking. SUPER funny tho, pretty sure you're the first to point it out. *slow clap*