SNAP 2023 Prep Booster || Statements & Assumptions || Critical Reasoning

  Рет қаралды 3,164

MATHOLOGICAL

MATHOLOGICAL

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 34
@Invincible.gamers
@Invincible.gamers Ай бұрын
really very helpful sir💌
@randomizer09
@randomizer09 Жыл бұрын
What an underrated channel! Really really good content you're doing great sir 🙏🏻
@mathological
@mathological Жыл бұрын
I appreciate that! All the best for upcoming exam.
@Radharadhaa100
@Radharadhaa100 Ай бұрын
Thanks sir ❤
@kelvipatel9740
@kelvipatel9740 Жыл бұрын
Amazing session !!! Thank you🙏🙏
@mathological
@mathological Жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@joydeep400
@joydeep400 Жыл бұрын
At 10:49 the logic that you used which states that X must follow the advice of Y that's why he is receiving advice from Y, I think, is not implicit. He might have asked for an advice but it's upto X whether he will follow it or not. With that logic, I think that only assumption I is implcit and not II. Correct me if I am wrong.
@mathological
@mathological Жыл бұрын
Joydeep, we have to answer according to the given statement. It does not mention that X asked Y for advice so we do not assume this to negate the answer option. And if a statement is made, there will be an assumption preceding it. If I am teaching you, I assume you follow my teaching. Similarly if Y is giving advice to X, it is with the assumption that X is listening to the advice of Y. Feel free to ask again if a doubt persists. Don't worry I will make another 10 minute session with a structure for more objectivity to eliminate wrong assumptions.
@dhruvagarwal7012
@dhruvagarwal7012 Жыл бұрын
@@mathological sir it is an assumption but it is not implicit ke x listens to y
@mathological
@mathological Жыл бұрын
If X does not listen to Y, then the statement becomes meaningless. So this assumption is needed for the statement to hold true.
@dhruvagarwal7012
@dhruvagarwal7012 Жыл бұрын
@@mathological yess sir now understood thank you sir 🙏
@karanmalhotra4588
@karanmalhotra4588 2 ай бұрын
@@mathological sir mere ab bhi smjh nahi aaya ye reason. If we cant assume IIM to be a bad institute then why does it matter ki X listens to Y or not. Isnt it ambiguous
@KarmavsWild
@KarmavsWild Ай бұрын
thank you
@arijitkoner4010
@arijitkoner4010 Жыл бұрын
Sir 8:30 Assumption 2 has the word 'Always'. Isn't always makes it extreme? Usually extreme words makes an assumption explicit
@mathological
@mathological Жыл бұрын
Good question, Arijit. The statement clearly mentions MUST. So the 'always' in the presumption supports it.
@arijitkoner4010
@arijitkoner4010 Жыл бұрын
@@mathological missed that word. Thanks
@tanushree4755
@tanushree4755 2 ай бұрын
Thankyou sir , it was an amazing session
@mathological
@mathological 2 ай бұрын
Thanks and welcome
@marazbantavadia5385
@marazbantavadia5385 Ай бұрын
Sir I have my NMAT this saturday, and I'm only watching your videos for revision.. really great content sir! Please keep up the wonderful work. Thank you!
@funxone6564
@funxone6564 Ай бұрын
Last one was confusing
@khushipandey677
@khushipandey677 Жыл бұрын
SIR PLEASE PLEASE MAKE VIDEO ON CUBE CUTTING AND TIME SPEED AND DISTANCE
@mathological
@mathological Жыл бұрын
Video on Cube cutting wont be possible today...will try next week may be. Not that important a topic for SNAP. You may surely skip that.
@mathological
@mathological Жыл бұрын
Have already made one video on TSD, please check that one....will try making one short one tonight if possible.
@meghnasarkar2094
@meghnasarkar2094 2 ай бұрын
In the last question, isn't the phrase "are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago" supposed to mean that children aren't sent to school nurse now than they were 10 years ago? If that's the case then how is option c the fitting assumption? I am a bit confused about the last question.
@mathological
@mathological 2 ай бұрын
No, Meghna. 'More likely' is the key word here, the sentence "not more likley to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago" means that the likelihood/chance of sending a child to a school nurse after an allergic reaction has not increased (not more likely), and if it has not increased, only and only then the argument holds. Since if the likelihood is increased, even at the same number of allergic reaction affected children, number of children sent to school nurses will increase as I have cited with an example. Feel free to ask the doubt further, if still not clear.
@meghnasarkar2094
@meghnasarkar2094 2 ай бұрын
​@@mathologicalyes sir I got it after rewatching that part and reading your explaination for 2 to 3 times
@Aradhya-f5i
@Aradhya-f5i 2 ай бұрын
These are pyq of snap ?
@mathological
@mathological 2 ай бұрын
No, any PYQs of SNAP would be marked in the top left corner with the year of occurrence.
@rohitpatel8625
@rohitpatel8625 Жыл бұрын
Sir please can u make mix video on arithematic snap level cover majorly si ci pnl percentage
@pulkitmathur9623
@pulkitmathur9623 Жыл бұрын
Yes sir pls. it would be a great help for tomorrows exam.. Thanks!!
@mathological
@mathological Жыл бұрын
Have already made videos on profit and loss, percentage, dishonest seller, please check them. will try making one on SI CI if possible.
@Muskymuse
@Muskymuse Жыл бұрын
How do you know if the govt has enough funds, nothing has been said
@mathological
@mathological Жыл бұрын
If govt does not have enough funds, govt will not announce to give compensation. I do not know but government knows and since govt has decided to give compensation, it has sufficient funds. I hope it is clear, Muskan.
@Muskymuse
@Muskymuse Жыл бұрын
@@mathological Thankyou so much sir, It's clear now
Don’t Choose The Wrong Box 😱
00:41
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 62 МЛН
The evil clown plays a prank on the angel
00:39
超人夫妇
Рет қаралды 53 МЛН
The ONLY Video you need on IMPLICIT STATEMENTS | Tarkashastra | SNAP 2024
27:41
MBA Preparation - TarkaShastra
Рет қаралды 1,1 М.