So I bought an RTX 4090 for 1080p gaming...

[@project_anti]

4K Ultra High Settings ❌ 1080P Ultra High settings ✅

[@SL1PSTAR]

I used to do this until I realized I didn't need 150+ fps in all games creating unnecessary heat and gpu stress.

[@project_anti]

@@SL1PSTAR I can't live without my game going smooth. The first time I had an 144hz monitor, I hated anything less then 100 fps.

[@SL1PSTAR]

@@project_anti Me too man! I love my 240Hz. Anything less feels nasty. I don't aim for high FPS with games like, Grounded, Satisfactory, Path of Exiles, Ark, 7 Days To Die and many more because the gpu ramps up heat and energy usage which I don't really need. Competative shooters though! Ramp that thing all the way up.

[@smalltowngoose]

@@SL1PSTARi used to be happy with 75hz until i got 165hz... now anything less than 120 looks choppy. high refresh rate is blessing and a curse

[@SL1PSTAR]

@@smalltowngoose The diffference is like night and day!

[@Kazymedic]

So I bought a rocket for my toilet.

[@MrJays]

"My name is Johnny Knoxville, and welcome to Jackass!!" 😂

[@ichisenzy]

So I bought a skibidi for my toilet

[@picklechin2716]

They marketed the 4090 for 1080p 😂

[@wwild2k]

@@ichisenzythat is most cancerous shit ive ever seen

[@joe_bidnass]

​@@ichisenzystop

[@blaux]

2016: $380 GTX 1070 for 144fps 1080p native ultra. 2023: $1600 RTX 4090 for 144fps 720p upscaled to 1080p with interpolated frames. Being happy about 70fps dips at upscaled 720p on a $1600 gpu is just crazy to me. Edit: Since people can't seem to understand my comment, I'll explain it. In 2016, you only needed to pay $380 for a GPU guaranteed for 120+ frame rate at 1080p ultra for triple A title games released within that generation. In 2023, you need to pay $1000-$1800 to reach that performance target for triple A titles of this generation, and even still, a game like Cyberpunk that was released 3 years BEFORE the 4090, cannot achieve 144fps in 1080pMax on a 4090 without the use of AI. So, who do we BLAME? The game developers? NVIDIA and AMD? The blame goes on the consumer! We keep buying up these standards. Nvidia and AMD release the 40 series and 7000 series, where the only performances gains are in the high end market, because we'll buy them anyway. Developers are lazy and don't work on optimizating games, because they know we'll buy them anyway. It's not about DLSS, or FSR, frame generation AI crap, it's that the pc gaming industry saw how truly desperate the community is for the products during COVID and the semi-conductor shortage, and then matched their marketing to satisfy that enormous demand. They've been riding out the same wave for 4 years now. Hell, AMD literally said that they won't be making high end cards next generation. They don't need to! They're so satisfied with the amount of demand and desperation we show them, to where they only need to work on worse product to increase profit overhead.

[@AndInMyBalls2]

He is just another paid shill by nvidia lol. Talking about how pretty a game looks while playing at upscaled 720p is just hilarious. The moment these people have to pay out of their own pocket they will drop the facade

[@MrJays]

LOL I only have 2,800 subs dude! I'm already getting called a shill, this is great! That means I'm on my way!! I bought this card for mah self like a big boy!! :D

[@MrJays]

Yeah, that's not how this works, but okay lol

[@blaux]

@@MrJays Lmao ok

[@zSwoof]

@@AndInMyBalls2I understand that not all 40 series cards are good, but the 4090 is actually worth the price to performance difference

[@abdou.the.heretic]

As a guy who grew up poor and with no family, I had a crappy 2gb ram dx9 igpu laptop, barely playing GTA SA at 20ish fps. Now that I'm more fonancially stable, I bought an RTX 3070 laptop and my friends laugh at how I still play some games sub 1080p. Some things never change and I'm a glutton for crappy visuals lmao.

[@ssacrred]

Don't worry man you do you and don't worry about what people say. I also have an RTX 3070 and it still is a good GPU. I bought mines 3 years ago and I'm still using it till this day. I got it for my first pc build and it was really popular around the time I got it so it felt good to get it. Now that time has passed and new GPU's have released I still look at my 3070 and admire it for what it has done. Enjoy your gaming man

[@taicunmusic]

Wow 3070 sub 1080p? fps must be amazing I have a 4gb 1050ti and play at 1080 too lol

[@RedTrainerZ]

I have a RTX 3060 12gb with 1600x900 75hz Monitor (Sceptre)... XD

[@Jormungand47]

1050ti club here)

[@planetmoises2405]

​@@RedTrainerZrtx 3060 240hz

[@SL1PSTAR]

The only insane thing about the 4090 is the price people are willing to pay. IMO.

[@arefx]

thats an opinion relative to an individuals wallet size, unfortunately.

[@spicepirate]

for those who have the money, 4090 is actually the best value for the money

[@Riyozsu]

It's the only powerful 40 series card worth the upgrade ​@@spicepirate

[@jamegumb7298]

@@arefx I could buy it and refuse to. Even if I had a million lying around, I'd buy socket SP86 F and cpu over an RTX4090.

[@goochipoochie]

4090 is the best gpu upgrade over a generation in probably the last 20 years and nothing comes close Keep coping. 4090 is a beast and well worth the money to whoever can afford it

[@g-pc6wp]

now do 480p

[@Captain_Euphoria]

Lol

[@randomgamingin144p]

240p next

[@chickennugget-agentfuture]

144p

[@Gepeszmernok_Kepzo]

1p

[@ReadItCoward]

pp

[@aNotoriousPhD]

i think the ideal screen size is ultrawide 1440p. a little bit less demanding than 4k, and more immersive (imo)

[@MIGHTYYGAMES]

Yes 🔥 I have a 5120x1440 31:9 monitor it’s literally amazing

[@Xxx-wd8rb]

@@MIGHTYYGAMEShey dude what’s the name of the monitor?

[@MIGHTYYGAMES]

@@Xxx-wd8rb AOC AGON (AG493UCX)

[@JoeMama-yl1ow]

Actually not cause it wont push the card hard enough.

[@MIGHTYYGAMES]

@@JoeMama-yl1ow it doesn’t I have a 7900XTX and I play on a ultra wide 31:9 the card doesn’t struggle at all

[@Wolfy527]

7950x3d + 4090 has been an amazing combo for me for 1440p 144hz gaming as well as for VR. Definitely recommend an x3d chip for gaming with the 4090.

[@MrJays]

Thanks for sharing! I plan on grabbing one of the newest gen CPUs that they are coming out with soon, and also upgrading my motherboard and ram too, so I can really see this GPU fly! LOL

[@casmithh]

@@MrJays yep, make sure to go for a 7800x3d instead of a 7950x3d because those have problems

[@Nitedontdie]

@@casmithh Did AMD never actually fix that? I know for content creation you either want the normal 7950X, 7800X3D or 13900K if you want peak gaming performance (it has more overclocking headroom as the Ryzen processors massively ramp in heat with clock speed/vcore increases). I was hard Ryzen only for the past few years since Zen 2, decided to switch back to Intel for 13th gen and will likely keep upgrading through Intel even though it uses different sockets every gen fuck them.

[@casmithh]

@@Nitedontdie i'm decently sure there still have been some reported issues trying to get good performance out of the 7950x3d. 7800x3d works like a charm but specifically the 7950x3d (and maybe 7900x3d) have problems related to the ccd.

[@ThisIsLau]

​@@MrJaysBetter go to at least 1440p so you can see your gpu fly

[@tony_T_]

I think people forget just how mind-bogglingly, stupidly fast new GPU's like the 4090 are. Half of these games should be easily pushing 200+ FPS WITHOUT frame gen or DLSS. Unfortunately, modern games completely brush off game optimization like it's nothing because they think these new technologies and cards can handle it... they can, but these should ONLY be supplemental, not a reliance.

[@kyperactive]

Its like buying a supercar to drive around a karting circuit.

[@IronIsKing]

Better than buying a supercar to look nice in your garage or drive at 10 KM/H because of traffic

[@I_JxR]

For a 4090, 1440p is totally doable at high frame rates. I've got a 4090 and a 7900X3D and the only game that I need to use DLSS is cyberpunk with PT. Without DLSS it can run natively, but there's some dips. My monitor goes to 265hz at 1440p so in more competitive games, dropping the graphics gets you the framerate with no issue, while in more story focused games I aim for 100 ish.

[@MrJays]

Oh nice! That's awesome! I'm sure that looks awesome! I am planning on getting either a 14th gen Intel, or an 8000 series AMD cpu when they drop, I had no idea my CPU was so outdated after only 2 years... LOL

[@s8r4]

After around a year of using a 4k monitor, it's extremely hard to go back to something like 1080p, to the point where it doesn't matter what kind of graphics you're running, since it will just look pixelated no matter what (though youtube makes it look much worse than it would look in person as well). That being said, I was somehow expecting higher frame rates, and when you said let's see how it runs without frame generation, it was shocking, since I was thinking that was the native fps lmao.

[@stove.d]

Yeah, 4090 is made for higher resolutions. It's not like it's much faster than the 4070, it can just handle so many more computations at once.

[@australienski6687]

It's because his CPU is holding back his GPU from reaching max FPS. There would be almost no bottleneck with a 7800X3D

[@brawldude2656]

@@stove.d It is also a lot faster but yes when it comes to scalablity 4090 is such a beast that he sits on his own peak

[@jaylenjames364]

1440p > 1080p I have eyes of a 70-year-old man. 1080p is starting to look blurry to me. Especially on games with large maps.

[@reezwave]

We should all do this more, 1080p is normal, I mean, we all watch 1080p videos most of the time on internet anyway. Or at least 1440p, but not 4k, it's great, but not necessary.

[@pumcaliber7483]

To be honest,you did a right thing. I personally bought 4060ti,but decided to stay at 1080p,so i won't have to upgrade my hardware over and over again because of res being too high. Gives me 100-144+ fps in Cyberpunk on ultras + rt ultra on with FG and DLSS,and it's with the fact that i haven't upgraded my cpu yet and it's heavily bottlenecked.

[@killerra]

The 4060 Ti is a 1080p GPU though guv.

[@pumcaliber7483]

@@killerra It is more 1440p leaning,which obviously eats performance,like any other higher res does,which is why i'm staying on 1080p.

[@SW-by3yt]

@@pumcaliber7483你好，请问你的cpu是什么型号的呢

[@pumcaliber7483]

@@SW-by3yt Ryzen 5 3600,going to upgrade to Ryzen 9 7900x next month

[@SW-by3yt]

@@pumcaliber7483 谢谢

[@estacaotech]

If I had an RTX 4090 I would prefer 1440p 144hz gaming too, I think 4k is awesome for playing above 42 inches

[@MrJays]

Yeah, I'd love to try 4K gaming at some point, but I don't know if I'd make it my default resolution due to having much lower frame rates. so 1440p is my sweet spot :D

[@kristo2212]

​@@MrJaysyea but u can play on 4k monitor with dlss quality or balanced preset with similar fps like on 1440p native so if I have 4090 I would get that new oled 240hz 32" that's coming i think early next year idk but u can get oled 27" 1440p 240hz already that's great for 4090 too

[@Denbot.Gaming]

Someone who actually talks sense 😅 4k it pretty much pointless below a certain screen anyway, I'll sure it's around 60-65" as well.. 1080p is still the sweet spot 1440p is super nice 1440p ultra wide is where its at 1440p mega wide though 👀

[@Denton1944]

@@Denbot.Gaming Sitting with a 32" 4K screen on my desk and it's perfect. Image is way more detailed than any 1440p.

[@Denbot.Gaming]

@BornJordan im not saying it's not better... It's more of a case that it's not worth it, it comes down to the dpi and pixel count needed for such a small screen. 4k isn't really needed for anything less than 65" with a viewing distance of 2-3 meters 😶‍🌫️, think back to those old CRT screens 480p, you know when you could see the pixel even while sitting across the room on the sofa or even at 1080p you make them out on the 21" plus screens.... but how often have you noticed the pixels on say a 32" 1440p screen ? Probably never so is 4k worth it? for sub 60 FPS in many games? unless you own a 13900ks and an 3rd party 4090... see PC gamers tend to aim for 120 FPS or more... not 30 fps.... Personally, I'd opt for ultra wide 1440p over 4k, 3440x1440 is just shy of 5 million pixels vs 8.3 million of a 4k screen... so the FPS takes a massive hit trying to refresh all those pixels, unless you ops for DLSS or FSR, but then you're degrading the quality, making the 4k screen pointless for competitive gaming 🤷‍♂️

[@Klyptic]

It's like buying a porsche 911 to buy groceries and never take it to the track

[@yowhatsup9909]

But that's what 99% of 911 owners do.

[@pspmaster2071]

​@yowhatsup9909 all about showing off

[@raevod6361]

nfs has a really optimized proprietary engine that handles mulithreading like no other engine. Note how all of the workload of the game was eavenly spread between all of the 32 threads you have resuling in maxing out the gpu all the time.

[@MrJays]

I LOVE what they did for NFS Unbound! It blew me away with how it handled my hardware!

[@AntiGrieferGames]

The newer Need for Speed games are the poorly optimized racing games ever made...

[@coreytaylor7367]

​@@AntiGrieferGamesyou're on something.. works great on 4090fe and 13900ks. The only thing that's bad is that TAA doesn't work on windowed borderless so using my multi monitors kinda sucks. Needs to be fullscreen exclusive. Game is fantastically optimized

[@coreytaylor7367]

Also forgot to add my old PC 5800x 3060ti OC the game runs great on medium to medium high very great. Looks better than on console.

[@AntiGrieferGames]

@@coreytaylor7367 On what resoltuion?

[@abdogaming4613]

1440p is the best i think the quality will increase a lot and the fos won t be mediocre btw i love that i found someone who have this idea i feel 4k isn t that important

[@MrJays]

I'm thinking the same thing! I think 1440p is the best middle ground for FPS and a slight resolution bump!

[@ryo-kai8587]

@@MrJays The great part about 1440p is that it actually looks significantly better than 1080p but is much less demanding than 4K. I've never cared about 4k too much because I know what it means for performance, but I'd never wanna go back to 1080p. Upgrading my 2080ti to a 4090 while staying at 1440p 155hz has been a wonderful experience.

[@eniff2925]

it's only 33% more pixels, not that big of a jump. I would go to 4k if it was more affordable. will probably wait it out

[@abdogaming4613]

@@eniff2925 it is veeery big but i agree that 4k is even a bigger jump, but the performance cost is what makes 1440 p a bigger deal for me because it is much much cheaper to get high framrates

[@eniff2925]

@@abdogaming4613 i play starfield at 720p upscaled to 1080 with xess on my 1660 super and honestly its fine. I have to use a pretty strong sharpening filter though, i use marty's immerse depth aware sharpening filter. The final result is suprisingly good. I would have never thought about going under 1080p but it is honestly fine. This way i can put the game on medium and it looks much better than if it was on low.

[@Amfibios]

am i the only one unimpressed? DLSS + Framegen on a 2K GPU and Plague tale runs at an average of around 140 with dips as low as 100fps at like 100% utilization. i'm more impressed that any other card can run it adequately if anything

[@HPISRP]

same the "ooooh aaaaah wooow" telling us about the groundbreaking 260 fps in nfs unbound. bro doesnt know that the 130 fps frame gen nets him dont actually do anything. yet he still used 1080p WITH DLSS thats pathetic imo

[@TheConfed01]

Most of the games he ran were ue5 which is what most games are prolly going to do soon plus he was cpu bottlenecked not much tho

[@zaneverovati]

0:24 I thorougly enjoyed the content that started at that point in time. Thank You.

[@sussy_61]

this is why game devs make the game super unoptimized, they make it for 1080p with 4090

[@IMPALUX]

wtf i thought this was 1 mil view video with how well edited this is!

[@MrJays]

That just made my day, thank you so much! We're still a very small community, but we're a great community! And I always try my best for videos!

[@xenird]

Not too far off

[@probablyyourneighbororsome8412]

Here's the thing with literally every high end gpu that comes out. I don't think its that unspeakably dumb to use 4090 at 1080p because some day.. say 6 or 7 years from now were going to probably look back and say "Yeah the 4090 is a great used option for 1080p gaming"

[@MrJays]

Exactly, they all become 1080p cards eventually - I'm just using it now to get stupidly high FPS LOL

[@Daniele63]

This is literally me in 2015 buying a gtx Titan X graphics card for 1000+ euro only to have it run like garbage because the rest of my pc was bad

[@code_renard]

I think we should have stopped the chase for the "best graphics" a long time ago. Anything has barely progressed since 2015 when it comes to visual quality, and since then it's only become more lunatic the amount of resources you need on your computer to even get a passable framerate and even storage

[@ryo-kai8587]

I'm at 1440p 155hz, and it's amazing. I had a feeling right from the start that even the juggernaut 4090 was gonna be a 1440p card if you like graphics AND framerates. Sometimes I have too much GPU and my i9 9900k is CPU limited, but not all the time-and with the advent of UE5, the card will still get solid FPS on Ultra at native, even when maxed out. The next upgrade will be a cutting-edge CPU and RAM. Eventually I'd like to experience 240hz in games that allow, and "next-gen" stuff will still run smooth, but probably closer to 120.

[@speed999-uj5kr]

What's the proof ?

[@ryo-kai8587]

@@speed999-uj5kr Proof of what? That high fps is amazing, or that even the 4090 can hit its limit at max graphics and high fps? The "proof" is seeing it for yourself, which you have to do in person since you need the tech-and streaming services all seem to cap at 60 anyway.

[@speed999-uj5kr]

@@ryo-kai8587 claiming that you have all that stuff ! 🧢

[@ryo-kai8587]

@@speed999-uj5kr Whatever dude. Even if I had lied about that it wouldn't help, 'cause the original comment doesn't make me cool or popular in the KZbin comment section, lol. Seems to me like your jealousy is showing

[@NahBNah]

You’re going to be bottlenecked no matter what, cpu or gpu bound it really doesn’t make a difference lol. Why people get worked up on it, just get the best cpu you can afford and best gpu you can afford and play the game who gives a shit about whats bottlenecked. Also ram wont make a difference in gaming either unless you have like 16gb then maybe.

[@bindernsafiron2233]

High quality video, but sadly it deserve much more views

[@MrJays]

OMG Thank you for the kind words! Here before it pops off?? 👀

[@bindernsafiron2233]

@@MrJays i hope so 🔥

[@olddogruffs9523]

Thank you for making this video! It’s something ive always had on mine but never had the resources to buy the very best, it would be amazing for you to try even lower resolutions!

[@MrJays]

You are so welcome! I'm glad you enjoyed it! I have actually considered trying this at 720p as well, for fun :D

[@Wobbothe3rd]

@@MrJays I like the video but you really need a lower latency memory tuned CPU to do 720 meaningfully.

[@MrJays]

@@Wobbothe3rd I'm glad you liked the video! And my plan is to upgrade my CPU and get a new 1440p 240hz monitor :)

[@Kuli24000]

Today I learned that the 4090 is weaker than I thought it was. How could something so expensive do so poorly at 1080p?

[@MrJays]

Don't judge, I'm CPU bottlenecked hard.

[@thewhyzer]

If I had a 4090 and a 1080p monitor, I'd use 4x DSR so games run at 4k internally and then get downscaled for display. This provides THE best anti-aliasing possible. I do this with my 1050 ti on reaaaaally old games.

[@Denbot.Gaming]

I'm using the 5950x as well... I find the main game threads tank the CPU on a couple of Cores and that holds the whole thing up

[@peppernickelly]

Ryzen Master has a game setting that drops half the CPU for higher clock speeds on the other half. It may work better to turn off cores based off maximizing CDX availability.

[@camronrubin8599]

I’ve tried 60 hz and 240 hz and really don’t care enough to go beyond 60fps. But holy shit 4k is incredible compared to 1080p. 1080p just looks super blurry to me now . OLED is absolutely insane as well. I’d rather take 4k OLED 60hz over 1080p 500hz any day of the week, but to each his own

[@JosiahKreifels]

That's cool and all but how are you testing 1080p on games? If you're using a 4k monitor and setting the resolution to 1080p it will look a lot worse than a native 1080p monitor.

[@camronrubin8599]

@@JosiahKreifels I have a native 1080p monitor . And a native QHD monitor . They both look like dogshit now after switching to 4k

[@MrJays]

I'm actually envious of the people like that who can't see, or don't care for higher than 60hz! If I were like that, I'd have a 4K HDR monitor by now LOL

[@JosiahKreifels]

@@MrJays I know a few people who can't see the difference and I feel the same way as you. I love high hz and recently I bought a 360hz IPS panel with HDR and my goodness is it beautiful compared to a TN panel. I don't own any 1440p or 4k monitors but I do have friends who do and I can't see too big of a difference to switch from 1080p.

[@camronrubin8599]

@@MrJays 1080p and 1440p looks like absolute trash, a blurry fuckin mess. It’s hilarious because this guy spent all his money on a 4090 like a retard when lower end GPUs get the exact same FPS at 1080p . 4090 is only optimized to get higher fps in higher resolutions in most games. 3080 gets practically the same FPS as 4090 at FHD in many titles. The 4090 only becomes faster at 4k

[@JosefK2275]

when you decide to play on a 4k 65inch tv with a custom-made widescreen aspect ratio, you'll never want to go back to 1080p

[@MrJays]

I'd love to try that!

[@johnnyslap1009]

so true the only down side is not having the high 244Hz but I have got the LG QNED 65inch which can run 1440p at 120Hz and 4K at 60Hz

[@Makkiebobo730]

A 4090, though they are inconsistent, can do high settings at 4k and still get over 100 fps

[@scgmike7805]

I never understand people who go "I want the highest settings, the max settings" Then turn on DLSS which removes anti-aliasing which removes smooth edges.. of .. everything.

[@MrJays]

Well, I just want the fancy graphics, and DLSS uses DLAA as well, or at least can use it. So essentially, you get better AA than like MSAA or FXAA. And it uses less performance than traditional AA.

[@scgmike7805]

@@MrJays I got the point watching further, it's only about fps and not resolution so it's all fair. I really do recommend just mentioning something in your video about how DLSS and FSR actually take away "max graphics" because you can only run max settings in native. Also, if you notice, all of your reflections/lighting effects are reduced greatly in cyberpunk, DLSS basically shadow bans max settings.

[@bonkiru9818]

Well you can play at this resolution for another 9-10 years or 1440p for 6-7 years. So I'd say it's a well earned investment.

[@sufyanlyrics]

Maybe 3to 4 year more

[@midnightrunners1470]

GPU's lifespan is like 5-7 yrs at most. Even if he did play for 1080p it would be long gone until that time period

[@johnnyslap1009]

@@midnightrunners1470 Im still running a 980ti so would last abit longer than that

[@kotztotz3530]

You NEED to enable DLDSR! It'll be even more beautiful and still get insane FPS!

[@Claudiu10101]

What is wrong with ppl in these comments💀 Not everyone is rich enough to have a 4k display. 1080p is all we have so we gon play like it

[@MrJays]

Exactlyyy! I also chose this monitor like 6 or 7 years ago when 1080p 144hz was considered fast LOL

[@feralshad0w]

Honestly, I'm pretty much with you. I want to play at 1440p though. I just got a 4080 super and it's great. Maxxing it most games at native 1440p with fps above 90 is amazing. It's what I've always wanted

[@marcelhaase8416]

I just want so say how polished your videos are. I looking forward for more content like this :)

[@MrJays]

Thank you so much for the kind words! I try my best for each video! I hope you will enjoy my future content, and the other content on my channel! :D

[@scarecrow5848]

I understand why people say 8k and 4k gaming performance is a waste to focus on in 90% of cases but... you also have to remember VR. VR requires super super high resolutions at 90FPS or higher. the better the resolutions at high FPS the bettter VR can become. I play VR and I just bought a 3060 but now I need a new PSU so I can actually use the card, that should give me 1440p easily for my headset at 90FPS (in most titles and depending on graphics settings) which is super exciting.

[@MrJays]

If I had more space, I'd love to get a VR headset and do more VR content! This 4090 would be soo good for VR games!

[@scarecrow5848]

@@MrJays playing VR feels like the opposite of a FPS over graphics gamer; 90hz is enough to get fully accurate tracking yet you easily need 4k for easily legible text; also nothing in VR necessarily goes obsolete; the index is still a good VR headset, only downside being the low resolution.

[@MrJays]

@@scarecrow5848 That's definitely a concern of mine, is the FPS being too low in VR. But I think the 4090 should be able to handle it on most games, right? I haven't looked into VR much with this card lol

[@scarecrow5848]

@@MrJays not at 4k but yeah, it can get close. again, you really just need to reach 90 and your good 👍x3d helps the most with it

[@CeceliPS3]

Thanks for posting this. I have 12700k, a 1080p monitor and my 4090 is on its way to me now. I'm gonna do it just like you, ultra settings with ultra FPS. LOL Obs.: yeah, eventually I'll get a 1440p monitor. And F' 4k monitors!! haha

[@MrJays]

WOOP WOOP!! FPS is KING!! LOL Enjoy the 144hz or higher, and thanks for watching! :D

[@pcgamerzzzchannel3407]

if i were you, i would grab the gigabyte m28u great budget 4k gaming monitor.

[@xlr555usa]

​@@pcgamerzzzchannel3407I have the gigabyte 28 inch and it is decent. Price should be dropping.

[@CeceliPS3]

Thanks! @@pcgamerzzzchannel3407

[@pcgamerzzzchannel3407]

@@Ajwhayahaha here my setup , be quiet okay? Pc Specs Aorus Master z790 Corsair Venquence 2x 16gb DDR5 5600 CL36 Intel Core i9 13900k Corsair H170i elite LCD Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090 SSD samsung evo 850 500gb SSD samsung evo 860 1TB SSD samsung evo 870 4TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB M.2 SSD Seagate HDD 2TB Corsair 7000D Corsair hx1200 Creative Soundblaster AE-5 Plus Logitech-G G915 Lightspeed TKL GL Tactile QWERTY US Logitech-G Pro X wireless Gaming Headset Logitech-G Pro X Superlight Logitech speakers Z623 MSFS Setup: HP Reverb G2 Logitech-G Pro Flight Yoke System Logitech-G Pro Flight Rudder Pedals Win 11 Monitors AOC AG271QG 1440p 165hz Asus Rog Strix XG27UQ 4K 144hz LG 32GQ950-B 32" 4K 144Hz

[@arlbzl]

This is something I would do since 1080p is fine for me. I've never used a 1440p or 4K monitor.

[@Krypto121]

The Borderlands 3 benchmark always stutters in the same spot all the time, but during game play, it's super smooth.

[@francescosorci5595]

I found the jump from 1440p monitor to 4K 144Hz actually not that drastic. Most games I play stay over 144fps at 4K, most settings on high. Forza Horizon for example I got 190fps at 1440p but 160 at 4K and looks SO much nicer and sharper. Got the Gaming X Trio 4090.

[@MrJays]

Hmmm, interesting! I'll keep this in mind! Glad you're enjoy your 4090 as well!

[@crowntotheundergroud]

U mean the performance decrease was not that drastic, or the res? For me, the switch from 1440p to 2160p was just as impressive as 1080p to 1440p. I remember in 2013 when I had sli gtx 780 and I picked up the first 60hz 4k monitor that Dell made. The only other 4k 60hz monitor was an ASUS. They were the exact same monitor. It was so sick, but the 3GB of vram wasn't enough for newer games.

[@mttrashcan-bg1ro]

4k is just too glorious for me to ever want to go back to 1440p even if the 4090 starts struggling

[@MrJays]

I'd love to try it out some day! I've never really seen true native 4K gaming before!

[@___astro___]

hey mr jays. it looks like you doubled ur sub count in 3 weeks thats amazing. im seeing all the bad comments and i want to say keep it up man. i have the 4090 and play super ultra wide at 1440 by 5120 and can tell you i get 240 fps in a lot of classic games like kf2 and siege and even in vr! youll love the xperience just dont upgrade every generation like i do. i waste a lot of money doing so. anyway keep it up!

[@MrJays]

Thank you, I appreciate that! The negative comments don't really bother me too much - they help me more than anything because it's still engagement on the video lol. And I don't usually plan on upgrading every generation, but going from my 3080 to the 4090 seemed like a necessity for my work (KZbin and Twitch) but also, for the future when I get either 1440p or 4K monitors, I'll be ready :D

[@___astro___]

@MrJays for sure man. i definitely love the great middle ground of 1440 even if super wide is taxing

[@Lapsio]

I bought 3090 to play Skyrim in 1080p and I have 28 fps

[@metabang03]

Those micro stutters are because you didn't do any OS optimizing, or latency reduction aimed setti gs changes in your os. It takes a few hours to do even if you know what ur doin to accomplish but your fps would raise 10-30% still. My 3070 with i7 7700k does nearly as good at 1080p but no stutters lol. Use latencymon to view your system latency and don't stop learning about reducing system latency till you see 5-50ms overall system latency. And don't forget to use regedit to get the default windows data queue on your mouse and keyboard to reduce the data queue from default windows settings of 100 down to 5-16ms or else u have minimum up to 100ms input lag

[@roonyroo855]

Epic comment, thanks.

[@KuntChitface]

bro make a guide for us please

[@badzylla2072]

i love the cam replacement you're using , the cat that reacts to your inputs is pretty clever ngl

[@Emシ]

nah man i play at 1440p and thats what i want a 4090 for

[@HiNerd831]

This was such a great video!!! That intro tho!!! 😂

[@MrJays]

Thank you so much!! I'm so glad you liked it! hehehe, that intro was fun to make! :)

[@astreakaito5625]

With an OLED tv with BFI setting maxed (or a CRT/Plasma TV or VR headset), 60FPS has the motion clarity equivalent of 150FPS on a regular PC gaming monitor. At 120hz, it's equivalent to 250FPS of motion clarity. I'm saying this because most gaming monitors have no BFI or strobbing mode. So it always makes me laugh when people claim to be framerate snobs but only understand the numbers and miss out on the whole aspect of how the human eye sees those frames and how you can make games looks even smoother with a simple trick without requiring a 4090 or fake AI frames or bad motion smoothing.

[@CTC420]

U suggest gaming on a TV?

[@Jairjax]

I'm sorry but if you can't feel or see the difference between 60fps with BFI and 120+FPS no BFI you're insane.

[@conservativeperspective366]

I have a 4090 that I manually overclocked and I always play on 1080p. There are still some early access games that I play that still manage to run like complete fucking dog shit.

[@MrJays]

Oh yeah. Hell, even some AAA games like Watch Dogs Legion. That game still drops to 40 FPS for me. Even with a new CPU, it MIGHT get 60 FPS in 1080p. Who knows.... Poor optimization

[@N00bie666]

this is the way. literally set for life with a 4090 at 1080

[@ruufiss9922]

Just got one from a 2070 super, the super was good but at 1440p it ls average was pretty much low 40s to mid 60s. And if you turned rtx on it basically halfed that. But these games are all 100+ fps and then drop to 60 - 80 with rtx in most titles

[@MrJays]

Nice!! Congrats on getting one!! I love mine, totally worth the price of rent!! LOL

[@ruufiss9922]

@@MrJays lol yeah i financed mine instead, still on backorder actually but it should be here soon. the anticipation is insane

[@Rubinrus]

Pro-tip: if you sit on 1080p, you don't need something like 3090 or 4090 to get 100 fps in the latest AA or AAA titles. Even 4060, 3060 or even 20XX will be plenty without dlss. If you want to update your PC, here's the instruction: 1) If you don't have 16 gigs of RAM - update RAM first, you can even go with DDR3 sticks if your motherboard doesn't support it 2) See how powerful your power unit, if it's less than 600V - I recommend updating it (of course, the targeted CPU/GPU combination also matters) 3) After you done with first two, get a new GPU. 3060ti or 3080 are great for how much they cost. If you can do a test of a used GPU before buying - do so by all means, mined 30XX series can be a real deal when it comes to price/performance as long as they're in decent condition 4) Finally, update your CPU and possibly motherboard 5) If you haven't done 1 or have DDR3 - time to update RAM

[@Akash_Banerjee]

from 1080p 144hz tn 4790k 1070ti 16gb to 1440p ips qled 5800x 3080 32gb and a nvme its feels better a lot better :)

[@oinkment]

People sitting at 1080p don't want 100 fps, they want 240 fps, people if you want to get 200+ fps buy a 4070 ti, it'll perform the same as a 4080 at 1080p with the cost of less dollars, i played with a 3070 ti for 2 years and never reached the 240 fps in a game like warzone but a 4070 ti smashed it, so please don't settle for less and you'll thank me

[@StupidusMaximusTheFirst]

There's people buying BMW GS1200s, they get all the survival gear to travel the world cause they seen it on TV, and they just get from their home to the closest cafe. It happens to the best of us.

[@matthewmontgomery7764]

That’s such an accurate analogy tbh

[@davidwatt3843]

The cpu and gpu in my brain is doing an amazing job of letting me interact with this reality at 24K.

[@MystC909]

When the 4090 is at 1080p it doesn’t use all its power source your not going to get insane frames sometimes I get even more fps on 1440p in certain games

[@MrJays]

I do mention that in the video. And, I need a newer CPU, I'd get like 30% more performance if I did

[@MystC909]

@@MrJays my bad dude didn’t finish the video yet I was at work! Thanks for the reply. Great video man I’m not hating

[@AlphaMikeFoxtrot88]

This is the way gaming should be. Hardware overkill at 1080p, all the time.

[@Sleepless2402]

240hz monitors are smooth like butter ~ using one for 2 years now I don't want to go back

[@Julianborchart]

1080p 360hz for the best results.

[@CVoYager]

24" a high quality IPS monitor with 240hz would provide better experience than 4K DLSS 60fps imo. But I can't afford one. I hope I will try out one day though.

[@MrJays]

That sounds like such a good monitor to get, that might be my next upgrade! I was already looking at 24" 1440p 144hz, but 240-265hz and IPS sounds great!

[@MrJays]

The 4090 is such a ridiculous GPU... 😂 Cyberpunk 2077 2.0/Phantom Liberty DLC test at 4K! - kzbin.info/www/bejne/rISXaY2NqLBmb6M Like the video if you enjoyed, and subscribe if you're new! 🤍

[@Blox117]

if you "play" starfield the 4090 becomes a literal 1080p card

[@MrJays]

@@Blox117 Not if you install the DLSS mod :) I can get 100+ FPS in 4K with it. And soon it will be natively added in

[@Blox117]

@@MrJays if it cant run it natively at good FPS on the MOST POWERFUL GPU, then DLSS wont fix the problem. neither will people buying garbage

[@MrJays]

But I'm literally saying it DOES run good with DLSS... So DLSS DOES help. And any other 40 series GPU will have the same benefit. I'm not denying the game runs poorly, but DLSS absolutely does help.

[@Les7295]

I think you are the person that new 500hz 1080p monitor aims for

[@scarumanga]

I got a 4080 for 4k gaming. If this video card pricing trend continues, I'll go back to a curved samsung 1080p display and keep 1080p gaming with my 4080.

[@TazAlonzo]

As a person that 1) has not perfect eye sight and 2) doesn't breath down my monitor, I never really got the whole craze of anything above 1080p. I personally use my own 960p as it's really hard to tell the difference above that. And even though I have a 3070 Ti I still like to optimize my graphics before starting a game lol.

[@ItsRayden]

I did experienced CPU Bottleneck few years ago on BFV ( i7 4770 / GTX 1070 / 1080p) , i lowered the graphics to get to 144fps but it would push the CPU to 100% and cause some freezes so i raised graphics to cut a bit of load on the CPU, dropping down to 80/90 fps and i was fine. On NFS you said if was pretty much CPU bounded, and we could see that most game you played CPU was running around 30/40%, and on NFS you were around 70%. So i guess unless your CPU goes up to 100% you're not CPU Bottleneck, the reason you're not getting much more fps than 4080 etc is probably related to the fact that these GPU were engineered and optimized for higher resolution.

[@TheConfed01]

False broski cpu bottleneck is cpu is not sending frame data fast enough gpu is just waiting hence 70-90% usage….gpu only displays frames on what cpu gives it…if your gpu isn’t at 99/100% usage it’s a cpu bottleneck…even tho 4090 wasn’t made for 1080p gaming it’s that we currently don’t have fast enough CPU’s to push it at 1080p make sense ?

[@ItsRayden]

​@@TheConfed01 The low usage to me is related to which resolution the GPU was design for. I'm 100% sure if he benchmark the card with that CPU it would reach full usage. Used to have a R5 3600x with a 3080 in 1080p, GPU was bottlenecked because CPU was almost at full usage, overclocked it gave me a 10-15% margin and no bottleneck anymore. i'm still on 1080p, with a 7950X3D and 4070 Ti obviously i don't have any bottleneck, but i bet going with a 4090 in 1080p wouldn't cause any bottleneck, if his CPU wasn't sending frames fast enough he would experience frame drops which wasn't the case. Just some kinda low fps that " doesn't make sense " considering the GPU he's running. To me CPU no reaching full usage = no bottleneck, because bottleneck is indeed a CPU to slow to the send frame at the right time to the GPU, but when it's happenning the GPU is forced to skip frames, which results in freezes and sudden frame drops

[@JG27Korny]

If you are in competitive gaming that is the way to go too. Good card, 1080, super high refresh rate monitor like Alienware 27.

[@MrJays]

I don't typically play competitive games, but I am definitely wanting the highest FPS as possible because it increases my immersion :D

[@faali4874]

We have 8k displays and we can’t even play higher than 1080p we are stuck at 1080p for 10plus years now!

[@arkham7610]

honestly, modern day games at ultra graphics can be played with a upper 20 series card at 1080p easily so so if you want a 1080p card get like a 2070 super or 2080/ti

[@MrJays]

Not if you want to get high FPS with Ray Tracing and Path tracing on ;)

[@EwokEight]

By the quality of your content I assumed you had more subscribers, I have no doubt you'll get more.

[@MrJays]

This means so much to me! Thank you! :D I try my best!

[@ThePeca1988]

Thank god i only play older games (3-4-5 years old), i usually achieve the same with a 2080ti, 1080p, usually max settings (plus 1440p supersampling on), lows are usually over 90fps, on average about 120, and it maxes out at about 180fps. The card cost me 250 euros last year :D

[@Seizuqi]

i got a 4070 super for 1080p, i use 1080p instead of 1440p because it will last way longer, future games will play good at 1080p but not 1440p, im not rich enough for a 4090 but 4070 super is still considered "overkill" for 1080p lol. cool vid

[@HonestHans365]

I never understood the appeal of 1080p gaming in 2024 until yesterday. I tried 1080p with my 4070ti super and was shocked by the low latency.

[@jinx8624]

this is kinda interesting since most people dont test this card at 1080p

[@EmreAbiOfficial]

Friends, do not forget that the RAM is using 3600mhz, you need to look at it that way to avoid a sudden fps drop, and I will also test it on the i9 13900kf today :)

[@luciano12sa]

The fact that a RTX 4090 of all cards is using DLSS at 1080p, just made me realize how ridiculously overpriced high end pc parts are. DLSS at 1080p for THAT performance? jeez, high end pc market is really a weird place.

[@MrJays]

Keep in mind that I am majorly CPU bottlenecked. Like, almost 50% less performance than I should be because my PCU is a few years old.

[@luciano12sa]

@@MrJays ah. I rushed to judge then

[@pylypbutin5799]

when it comes to 1080p and 1440p gaming , 4080 performs relatively the same as 4090. 4k gaming is where 4090 shines really. You could of gotten 4080 which is much more available and cheaper , it would achieve the same results.

[@alexandruciordas4941]

but then he couldn't make this video and say how good 720p upscale to 1080 looks, not mentions the stuttering and framerate drops.😂😂

[@GewelReal]

At 1080p the 7900XTX is a better choice

[@loganwolv3393]

I agree, graphics fidelity over resolution anyday of the week.

[@kxwid]

I got a 1440p OLED monitor for my 4070ti and dude it’s insane

[@MrJays]

Dang dude! nice, enjoy!

[@93836]

I have an LG 120 Hz OLED. And I always use my 4090 for 4K. And using the DLSS technologies, I am always able to get a locked 120 FPS with maxed out settings and all tracing enabled. And the image quality is unbelievable. I have 20/20 vision, and I can’t see any difference between native 2160p and DLSS, even down to “Performance” mode. So, if you’re okay with 120 FPS, the 4090 is definitely ready for 4K.

[@braindead2813]

Investing in a 4090 for a channel your size is wild. I feel like most 4090 sales are from small content creators and streamers 😂

[@Voidlingg]

Honestly 1080p will never die out like 720p kinda did because 1080p is actually a sharp image and most people don’t really care to experience 1440p and up but you can definitely tell the difference on a good 24+ inch

[@Ghostlynotme445]

really? It isn’t sharp when I look close at my 1080o 24inch screen

[@Ghostlynotme445]

@@chinering23 it’s literally $399 - 350 for 4k monitors now and 8k still expensive

[@Ghostlynotme445]

@@chinering23 sht I see good one at $500 dollar mark you ain’t looking out there you think a good one 1k dollars a good one still got issues then cheaper ones buy the best one at 1k broken in a less of a month

[@goingalloutcuz]

I love how he is amazed at the graphic of a game running at 1080p. I I ruined my gaming experience when I bought my first 21 by 9.

[@x5ilco]

if you hit 144+fps on 1080p you're arguably hitting a more smooth and detailed image than 4k or 1440p at 30fps, i just dont understand why people craze over it.

[@thedreadedgman]

What's actually "insane" to me is that everywhere with DLSS "Quality" is actually rendered at 720p.. upscaled... I feel like 720p ultra at 70ish FPS isn't as impressive as it sounds

[@nickc5845]

11:28 NFS Unbound, I enjoyed this part of the video so much. Like watching a anime racing cartoon show xD

[@MrJays]

I LOVED that game! It was so cool!

[@Sajingu]

Even though I probably won't own a 4090, it's still amazing to see how much FPS it's able to pull out of these games that require beefy hardware.

[@thatfirstone]

A 4090 can't even MAINTAIN 185fps in any recent AAA title at 1080p. It's a complete waste of money at any resolution other 4K 80-120 fps.

[@DevilRoom360]

Alan Wake 2 says hi.

[@samneb6969]

Now use RTX 4090 for 720p gaming

[@avs_ytb]

1080p with DLSS on a 4090 is an insane thing to do💀

[@prodigy_xd]

i play in 3440x1440 with my 4090 and i get 240 FPS in "Forza Horizon 5" with everything Max + HDR. My CPU is a Ryzen 7800x3D and my Monitor is a 240 Hz OLED.. it is just amazing to drive at max speeds. Yes, the card is super expensive, but it delivers, once you match all the other parts.

[@oafk]

well if u have money have fun with it lol

[@supersammy149]

Playing 1080p on a 4090 should be a war crime. This video is fine though.

[@Andrushe4kanka]

I dunno why people complaining about cyberpunk fps on “720p” for instance. I play cyberpunk with 2060 and 1440p 165herz monitor and get amazing graphics with good fps. U are not obligated to use ray tracing which has way lesser impact on graphics than hdr. And medium settings looking the same as ultra.Also dlss quality makes the image sharper than with out it

[@BearillaGames]

I was going to do the same thing but decided to go 1440p 240Hz. Liking it so far and scored a 4090 FE from Nvidia during a brief restock. Setup is SOOOOOOOOO dope.

[@MrJays]

Dude that's awesome! I'm glad you're enjoying that! I think that's me new plan - 1440p 240hz, and a 14900k when they drop!

[@Maxaker]

They don't really sell 144Hz Monitors anymore, they are all 165Hz+ now

[@MrJays]

Yeah, I've had this one for about 6-7 years now, time for an upgrade I think.