Social Welfare Fn Overview

[@NoboMike]

I have to say, the way you explain is very clear! thanks a lot!

[@GuaGua000]

Your explaination is really clear and helpful! Thanks!!

[@sahilsehraj9136]

I like your teaching accent the way your are teaching is so excited totally marvleous 😀

[@Ethan-om1wc]

thank you for your videos, they are very helpful!

[@dfdfgdfkih]

Useful video. Thanks and support :)

[@munichgerman1036]

Thank you for the Video, i love the explanation :)

[@raulrkirkpatrick4430]

Great explanation. Tank you!

[@karylcate684]

thank you!

[@samiarox]

thank you

[@vivekjungpandey2507]

thank u

[@krispyskins2122]

Good. But so many adverts for a segment less than 10 minutes.

[@natureabioros8686]

Your description of utilitarianism calculus as not worrying about the worst off seems very odd. A utilitarian would recognize that before utility is produced by an individual during consumption, you have a heavier weighting of the worse off due to the law of diminishing marginal utility(The next $1000 produced more utility if you have $100 but not much if you have $1 mil. . If you added up everyones utility, you inherently get a heavier weighting of worse off individuals, you wouldnt have to apply a different weighing system after the fact. Still enjoyed the video!!

[@AshleyHodgson]

You're right. Utilitarians don't completely ignore the worst off. And, as you point out, it is definitely a better spend per dollar to spend money on the worst off under a utilitarian social welfare function. They just don't give them as much focus as Rawlsians.