Softube Model 80 // Sounds like a Prophet 5 to me.

[@irife2771]

Softtube has really been hitting it out of the park the last few years!

[@RayTheProducer]

Superb video editing. The BBC wishes it had shows like this back in the day. Or now. Great demo and lush playing.

[@RobinRimbaudScanner]

Still impressed you managed to get Jason Statham to star in your video too! Great stuff! What a diamond geezer!

[@chrisstrobel3439]

Never was really a big fan of the Prophet 5 back in the day .. I chose the OBXa then switched to a Jupiter 8 as my working axe back in the day, but having said that this is obviously a very very good emulation of the P5 .. no difference to these 64yo ears. I see no need to have any analog synthesizers anymore with modern computer technology and VST’s. I still have a dozen old analogs laying around the house and they’re just dust traps .. a pain in the arse to keep dusted and clean, and they just jack my electricity bill up when they’re running. I only keep em around for nostalgic sake .. but even that’s gotten old. Perhaps I’ll revisit the Prophet 5 for giggles vicariously through this softube plugin. A belated thanks man for this review.

[@LB-pp7pu]

Love your videos Starsky, always a pleasure to watch them, cheers

[@StarskyCarr]

Love your comments :)

[@cesmcmyth]

@@StarskyCarr Ok I am watching getting surprised by the second. your dedication and professionalism to this is the best available. Thank you

[@joeclarmusic]

The way you had the oscillators up at the same time was mind blowing!

[@alexphilipp]

Would be nice to see comparison with U-He Repro-5. Model80 sounds really HUGE

[@zorancalic65]

Repro 5 - the best

[@arlandajim]

Brilliant demo ! Thank you

[@OperculumAudio]

Nice, thanks for the video. The Oscillator comparison live was great

[@JiveTalker78]

4:23 when those drums kicked in, I felt that in my soul lol

[@Sebastianandthedeepbluemusic]

Dope skit, more fun times in the audio youtube space is appreciated 😊

[@Geepstar]

Wow, really impressive. Thanks for again another great vid!

[@drsamurai009]

So love the Poly-Mod section on my Prophet 5. Being able to mod PWM of Osc A with Osc B (2) set to LFO plus Key track means every key has it's own PWM rate. Super creamy!

[@StarskyCarr]

i did something similar on one of my free presets. Its called 5 LFOs... does what it says on the tin :)

[@drsamurai009]

@@StarskyCarr Also my favorite patch to set up on the Nymphes with it's independent LFOs. :)

[@Sleepysidney]

The left right thing is interesting and different but for a listening test I don't favour it. You can't really hear the intricacies of each with both playing simultaneously.

[@StarskyCarr]

When they're this close I dont see much value in picking into intricacies that are essentially the same between 2 synths or even 2 voices on the same synth. I did try it at first but it was just soooo boring! :).. it really did come across as far too nerdy and pointless.

[@psprojectbrazil]

Exactly!

[@klstay]

For many (including myself) part of the magic of a hardware synth is the physical interface/workflow. If having this as a VST instrument makes sense in the rest of a setup and that is a priority the SoundForce SFC-5 could be just the ticket as a controller.

[@SebasAdamo]

The SFC-5 is indeed a fantastic Prophet 5 plugin controller (and also usable for many other plugins) and works much better than a generic MIDI controller because of the layout.

[@MichaelScott-ly2zo]

I totally agree that tactile control is all important, but it’s somehow more than that. I had the SFC-5 (& still have the U-he & Arturia softsynths) but yet I still found myself looking at the screen. Eventually sold some stuff to fund an actual P5 & never looked back. Hard to explain but there is something so immediate & satisfying about twiddling knobs on a hardware unit that I never got from plug-ins, even with dedicated controllers like the SFC-5.

[@AudioJanitor]

#1 Search on the internet: How to compare two things Starksky Carr: Hold my cup of PG Tips

[@iixorb]

Thanks for taking the time to review it in depth 👍. I’m in two minds on this though as I already have the Arturia version 🤔.

[@kaitsu9608]

Arturia version is probably a bit easier on cpu. I have repro too which is stunning but pretty heavy to use

[@TheSmkfts]

If you have Softube Modular then Model 80 is extra worth it because of the individual modules you get with it. Also you can run a 20 day trial and test if you like the sound of this better or the Arturia's.

[@paulguy2545]

I think we live in a Golden Age now where Software/Plug-in Devs can add Extra Features to these Classics... its SO cool! When you played the Chords from 'In the Air Tonight' originally by Phill Colins of course it hit me!!

[@RonWellsJS]

Superb demo as usual

[@Maluband]

Not heard the left right thing before, as I listen to synth stuff with headphones it works for me and I liked it. Thanks.

[@StarskyCarr]

It works on this as they’re so similar. If there were differences worthy of comment I’d have played individually and mentioned what I’d noticed. A few people don’t seem to get that. Glad it worked for you. 😀

[@torsandell]

Holy crap, it really sounds great

[@hansilamusic]

Playing with the demo here. Sounds good but the noise generator isn't quite hitting it for me. I love when the resonance is cranked with the filter closed a bit and some release on the actual Prophet. Love the channel BTW!🙌🙌

[@occipitalknot]

Sounds like it’s time for another famous Starsky plugin shoot-out!

[@StarskyCarr]

oh no.... :) could be.

[@JuanPabloVeTV]

Hey Starsky! At what sample rate are working on with the softube synth?

[@StarskyCarr]

I think its 44.1

[@gdansk12349]

please put it to the classic Starsky test. Shoot it out, filter sweeps, oscillators, distortion, od and all of that sweet stuff. That's what we're here for! :)

[@StarskyCarr]

It’s on its way… vs the Repro and arturia. takes ages though.

[@MusicZtorm]

@@StarskyCarr Can't wait for the "vs the Repro and arturia" ! + your opinion :) Have a good day and thanks for those videos !

[@daffgonzalez]

How to set the prophet rev 4 to (midi) control the Model 80? 🙏 My rev 4 doesn't control Arturia Prophet 5

[@the_JTowny]

Softube have always been one of the better software companies.

[@prendelalumbreofficial714]

Over arturia?

[@totopolo2379]

I can correlate that entirely, the interface may be not as cool but the sound is perfect. And we are about sound here

[@the_JTowny]

@@prendelalumbreofficial714 yes. Softube has been around for 20 years making top notch plug ins. I've been using one of their amp modeling plugins for what feels like their entire existence. The new bus compressor is outstanding. There's the Weiss stuff too. Forget waves and their dodgy practices. Get yourself a few demos downloaded and you'll see what I mean.

[@kimseniorb]

@@prendelalumbreofficial714 arturia never made fx plugins until the last couple of years. softube has been around for almost 20 years doing that

[@prendelalumbreofficial714]

@@kimseniorb thank you guys 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

[@allisterwhitehead]

Just trying out this demo now and It's certainly different to the Repro 5. I thought the Repro 5 was very good (it is) but this is something else.

[@deeno8]

Sounds great, I really get the Depeche-vibe from the jam😀

[@tenalock]

Sounds very good. Good first test imo would be polymoded pwm huge env with a big resonant very slow filtersweep with all oscillators on and a huge release. Does it work as a prophet 5 controller did you say - sorry had to rush through it a bit. Too easily sidetracked when working me...

[@StarskyCarr]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/boXEfIZug6qNp8k for a resonant sweep... sawtooth not PWM Im afraid :)

[@mikeh892]

That sound for $99 is a hell of a bargain.

[@terminalbliss]

Repro is better than the arturia, so im curious to see how it compares here, as i think it is hard to top. They might be so close it is like two vintage analogs compared to each other. I do love the effects and mod matrix in repro (even if repros mod matrix is limited)

[@chrisrevel2801]

Repro is a lot better than the new arturia but isn"t as good as this new softube

[@crime_wavcorp]

When you said it was the model 80……wow!

[@RobSanx]

Hi. In Melda's Oscilloscope you have a button to normalize the graphic, in case you didn't know.

[@StarskyCarr]

One thing to note with that … and I reason I don’t use it often is it also normalises noise. So when there’s nothing playing you get a distracting fuzz… but yeah it’s useful - I’ve just got out of the habit of using it because of that.

[@RobSanx]

@@StarskyCarr Oh, I see. 👌 I haven't noticed it because I don't use hardware synths.

[@cesmcmyth]

Thank you for that intro!! lol no better way to put it

[@noturbiz4670]

Can you compare with Repro-5 ?

[@happylittlesynth]

Haha that skit is straight out of a Guy Ritchie movie

[@mwl5]

1:26 great edit there

[@akagerhard]

DAMN I thought you'd make that an easter egg and not obvious. I'm typing this comment as my head is playing the drums and I'm singing: "I can feel it, coming in the aiiir tonight, Oh Lord!" and just in this second it pops up: "Can you feel it coming...?" Of course I can, man.

[@akagerhard]

okay, the ape playing the drums makes it okay. If you do it obvious, go all the way!

[@StarskyCarr]

Haha I do so many unobvious bits that no-one gets!

[@akagerhard]

@@StarskyCarr I'm probably guilty of not getting some, but I expect that more people get it than you think. Not everybody feels the urge to convey the fact that they felt it coming like I do! Another issue is, that one might recognize it, but can't pinpoint the name of the song or artist. Anyway, nice video, nice touch, keep them coming!

[@kimseniorb]

@starky carr any chance you could compare it to uhe repro?

[@DynADBox]

you can download a demo of both and compare 🤣

[@saardean4481]

Unbelievable but when I started the video I thought how great it would be to be listening to the emulation while seeing the original and what it does with perception and actual listening and then while thinking I hear you saying "but it is not the Prophet " and I am lmao Ps: Love the Rokkkit outro :-)

[@err4071]

In my opinion, some of the Dave Smith synths sound a little bit digitalish anyway, especially the newer ones. not in a warth way they're too precise with the digital control and the all-in-one packages they use. you don't really get the movement like you would do on a Moog etc etc unless you use the slop that is or a little tiny bit of pitch modulation etc etc. Not taking anything away from the plugin though it sound identical.

[@StarskyCarr]

I wonder whether thats a result of older synths having the vintage tone due to degrading components (hence the addition of slop).People say similar things about the Moog One. I wonder what a brand new 1980 Prophet 5 would sound like. I guess I'll never know. I've really got no idea what the differences might be... would be a fun experiment but unfortunately its impossible.

[@err4071]

@@StarskyCarr I am not sure but you get the best of both worlds they can sound vintage and modern and warm and bright.

[@anissbenthami]

I don't understand why didn't they make more than five voices. same thing for their previous synths

[@chakko007]

They do their emulations with full authenticity of the originals. So, no extra stuff there really. TBH, I prefer that.

[@anissbenthami]

@@chakko007 you can still use 5 voices even if there's 32

[@chakko007]

@@anissbenthami Sure, but, the original only had 5 voices.

[@andreievkalupniek5717]

Well the Prophet 10 had the same circuit with 10 voices - I don’t understand what would be the issue other than CPU load ( and some possible UI / modulation destination issues) of just doubling everything in software

[@vimfuego8827]

@@chakko007 I prefer it

[@JeffreySaxophoneTallNewton]

Half the price of the U-he, but no effects? What to do about that?

[@moritz_schoenermann]

From all you showed us, is this the best virtual clone of a hardware analog synth?? :)

[@StarskyCarr]

There are loads of really good ones now tbh.... and this is up there in the top bracket. All the Softube ones are amazing. I also really like the Roland Cloud ACB versions for the system 8.

[@christophertodman]

I gotta say the gforce SEM and 8 voice are pretty stellar. This and their Juno is next on the buying list for me

[@SoundAuthor]

I'd like to see how Model 80 stands up against Repro 5.

[@StarskyCarr]

Yeah I didn’t get into it here… as I said it’s a while other story. Maybe I’ll put this, the arturia and Repro together.

[@gdansk12349]

@@StarskyCarr that would be awesome! 😍

[@sunnyschramm9650]

1:19 Nice trap! 😃👍

[@Goettel]

At this stage, if you can't make great music with cheap or even free VST's, you won't be making it on vintage hardware either.

[@StarskyCarr]

Too true.

[@StarskyCarr]

Absolutely... its why people like me have rooms full of them! There's nothing quite like playing the hardware, but as @propoetide says you should be able to make something just as good with software. I know I can, and I bet you can too!

[@earlsfield]

Sounds like, but it is not a Prophet. All these emulations, Cherry audio, Softube, U-he, Arturia - its all good if you want to swap one patch, if you need it to layer something. However, even if we set aside pros and cons of having hardware unit, P10 is an absolute winner over all emulations, due to the new features - stack, poly unison, q compensation and many others. I have Prophet 10, OB6, REV2, Evolver... had P08 and 12 too, there is something in Sequential poly synths that sounds unique and sticks with you when you use them for a longer period of time. P5/10 oscillators are raw monsters, however, you might get me fooled if i listen to super compressed lossy format - but there is no mistake with both Curtis and Rossum filters engaged. Add vintage to it, i can tell software from hardware. That drift of the envelope shapes is a spot on tell, especially on a Rossum SSI filter. It is nice to see good software alternatives though.

[@niceheartwhitesuit]

fooled by the intro!

[@johnpaulpatton9786]

Sounds great, looks terrible. I wonder how this compares to the u-He version.

[@tomburden]

u-He is all I need. Softube makes great stuff though.

[@andreievkalupniek5717]

They even look the same on the oscilloscope 😊

[@MrDahlbacken]

You think? I don't think so. There is a difference definitely.

[@andreievkalupniek5717]

@@MrDahlbacken I am referring to 9:38 to 10:21 - the filter section- It looks very close.

[@danm3570]

dude. F--- yeah, just gonna trial first to see how runs(always have sizing problems on my big screen tv)😎

[@palindrone]

Lovely stuff

[@tomburnell8453]

Not quite sure if it was the sound or some other indicator but from quite early I was waiting for you to say we were listening to the plugin not the actual thing.

[@hsitz]

I was wondering the same thing, but I don't know the Prophet 5 at all so it wasn't a sound thing. Was some other indicator for me.

[@humansrants1694]

Updated Fixed Windows 11 was in power saving mode. Uses 90% CPU in Ableton when its idle doing nothing.

[@wearenorthcolour]

i9 10 Core here with Ableton latest version and it doesn't go past 17% no matter what patch I put on it. Something is up with your system.

[@humansrants1694]

@@wearenorthcolour Windows 11 update set it to power balanced , its ok now now its in performance mode in power settings and running Model 80 at 96khz. I did update everything as well the RME driver and it's bios so could of been that.

[@maxterwel]

Sounds really good for an emulation but ofc like any other lacks the attack, body and the filter/resonance sweep of the real thing.

[@busywl69]

We live in spoiled times. No matter what the purists will tell you. I'm in love with my Cherry Audio synth bundle.

[@Itaketoomanypics]

thats my next buy

[@HOLLASOUNDS]

Good video indeed.

[@79Daver]

Just got the splice bundle with the Model 72,80,82 and 84 and love all of them. Crazy quality. The model 80 is a cpu hog though! Its crazy how much power it uses compared to the other ones

[@keykiyox]

Seems like I made a right choice in buying this immediately (last night) even though I am away from my PC as I am traveling and I will be home two weeks from now😊

[@danielscott7985]

I couldnt teally hear a difference with the steeeo separation

[@MrThecarrott]

Sounds good enough for me to sell my rev 4

[@kimseniorb]

are you sure? the hw sounds more organic to my ears

[@MrThecarrott]

I think right now it doesn't justify the cost of these insane expensive synths. It's 90% there.and the prophet is absolutely the best instrument i Ve ever played..

[@maydaygoingdown5602]

@@MrThecarrott I litterealy just came back from a live Gig performed by Midure, he was performing all of his old Ultravox tracks. His total synth rig consisted of 2 midi controler keyboards hooked up to a Mac. No hardware synths at all. When you think, he was only using VSTS of old Analog synths, however you couldn't tell in comparison to his original early 80's tracks performed on the original hardware synths. It just shows how good in comparison to the originals these VSTS are when the Original Artists are using them.

[@christophertodman]

Wow about Midge Ure

[@maydaygoingdown5602]

@@christophertodman haha, yeah it was very good, he ain't lost it:).

[@markkilley2683]

It does sound good even to these old ears. Seems to have hidden menu.

[@timandtheocean]

I wasn't convinced and heard directly it was a plugin.

[@StarskyCarr]

… or was it? 😉

[@timandtheocean]

@@StarskyCarr I hope it was otherwise I cannot trust my ears. doesn't sound so bad btw.

[@benzmobil]

Softube really nailed it this time. The sound is fat and wide, it has that gritty character and musical instability that the other emulations lack. I feel this one will really sit well in a mix and is generally a highly usable plugin. However, the hardware sound still has its edge and that 3d quality which especailly becomes noticable after fx processing.

[@chakko007]

I really like it. Will have to play it some more later, but, it sounds very good to my ears. Was a total impulse buy. Saw the email, put in the voucher code, and hit the buy button. 😉 I knew that it'd be good, but, I really need to consider those impulse buys...

[@benzmobil]

@@chakko007 I will probably end up buying it too. But I haven't received the email yet. Whats the voucher code this time?

[@chakko007]

@@benzmobil I wrote a reply, but, somehow it was deleted, probably someone voting it down, or someone thought it wasn't OK to share the voucher code. Which is hilarious, because, everyone subscribing to their newsletter gets it, and, the code is nothing secret really. 😉

[@gdansk12349]

@@benzmobil SUPERMODEL80

[@benzmobil]

@@gdansk12349 Thanks!

[@robotempires]

Tried to get the Demo and once again It was a nightmare. I refuse to deal with anything Softube. Pace and their own installer and dumb activation.

[@INHALTVIDEO]

From note 1 it was obvious it’s software. Having said that softube is the business and do great plugins.

[@StarskyCarr]

What if the next video shows it was a double bluff 😂😉 thanks for stopping by.

[@INHALTVIDEO]

@@StarskyCarr but it won’t lol the giveaway is that digital distortion on cranked resonance.

[@StarskyCarr]

@@INHALTVIDEO 😀

[@christianthompson1473]

Software instruments sound amazing nowadays, but i rarely play them. Without all them knobs and sliders? It's just too much hard work with that flippin mouse.

[@wrmusic8736]

The beginning sounded off to me, as if lacked certain lushness - I attributed it to "Rev3" mode at first, being quite surprised it sounded somewhat worse than my 600, until the "plot twist". It was a surprising blind test but I guess I could tell the difference after all. Still Softube did great, admittedly.

[@halion9]

Good try, Starsky, but I knew straight away it was the software at the intro!

[@vaiman7777]

No foolin” those golden ears

[@sagnier]

Actually, it was software throughout the entire video. He merely told you he was comparing them.

[@StarskyCarr]

Or was it a double bluff 😂😉

[@JayTheLane]

Lol Bizzies 😂

[@kierenmoore3236]

Don’t like the L/R channel comparison format … Please just do a proper A/B Test … !!!! Thanks!!

[@StarskyCarr]

Haha.. the reason I did that was because there was so little to say. There were no characteristics in particular to pick out - it was a pure geekfest of ‘they sound the same’ over and over - so went with this instead.

[@timothyrylatt1231]

Really good emulation spoiled by the lousy preset browser.

[@garlander2238]

Repro is still my fave. 1 and 5

[@chrisrevel2801]

Repro is a good synth but softube sounds better and more " real "

[@garlander2238]

@@chrisrevel2801 only the real thing sounds real

[@chrisrevel2801]

@@garlander2238 Yeah i used to think that , I ve collected a lot of gear over the years. There was a long period of time where the difference was massive but then it started going the other way , for ex : i own 2 Sh101s and I prefer the softube version

[@garlander2238]

​@@chrisrevel2801 I have maximum respect for Softube. I love Tape and Zener Bender and stuff. But I never got friend with their synths. Too perfect somehow. IMHO.

[@chrisrevel2801]

@@garlander2238 yes old analog gear tend to be become unreliable and sometimes unusable ... I also did many blind tests with friends in perfect conditions ( good speakers, level match , no visuals ... ) and they get it wrong around 50 % of the time , it is a visual thing ... if you don't see the hardware working you are highly likely to fail a blindtest

[@t.c.494]

Slighting those who think the right left comp is unsatisfactory by saying "tough, I think it's cool" is kind of out of touch don't you think? Why voice disregard, there is no need.

[@StarskyCarr]

Well they gave ma a whole load of grief previously. If they had paid for the content I could understand but they didn’t… some people are so entitled that they expect others to put in a whole lot of effort aimed directly for their benefit without even a thanks… just abuse. There’s a backstory but hey… you didn’t know - no worries. now you do.

[@t.c.494]

@@StarskyCarr OK, I get ya. But remember, if we don't know the backstory, sending out a blanket burn might hit the wrong ear, like mine. I was kind of hurt, but I admit, I am a bit touchy. No scattergun replies please! I think your videos are great, really the best synth channel I know of. However, I never like to be told my opinion doesn't matter, even if it is shared by some meanie. The comp picked my ass viciously. I am sorry if others responded with a hack and slash, that's lousy. I assumed you must make enough money to do it for a living, because your presentations are so good and plentiful. I find it discouraging that you aren't compensated properly. You deserve to be fully supported, your work is too good. Thanks for taking the time to explain your reasoning to me, I appreciate your respect and the time you donate. I'd like to think our fandom is payment, but maybe I owe you more. Duly noted. You are right, people who snipe you are not fans, f**k those dudes. I humbly apologize for my assumption. Peace man.

[@KNHSynths]

It's so far from a P5 that you didn't even try the usual tricks you love to compare softwares to the real synths (take the common minimum and show that it's the same sound, I've seen all your videos or almost and I understood your operating mode :-) ). But this time you didn't dare. That says a lot, and confirms what my ears have heard, a simple VST, once the placebo effect of a P5 appearance removed. So, no, it's not convincing. And the fault is not with the demo which is always well done (apart the left/right trick that is indeed confusing). But you can't make a racehorse out of a donkey... not your fault.

[@StarskyCarr]

No… I was of the impression this time that the differences were so slight comparing in that way was pointless. Watching back a couple of older videos I thought I was becoming a maniac at times!

[@theboofin]

Jesus....

[@johanh9637]

amen @@theboofin

[@JayKaufman]

No one wants the fuzz after you for 'avin' a go, mate.

[@RJ1J]

The left/right thing is a nightmare, comparing single ear sources on headphones only?? Awful. Impossible to tell the difference with your review technique.

[@StarskyCarr]

The point is that there’s so little difference it sounds like the super 6 binaural effect - there’s little point in playing 2 essentially identical tones next to each other. It became a bizarre crazed comparison of a lunatic listening to the same thing twice. Maybe I could do a comedy version doing just that.

[@RJ1J]

@@StarskyCarr Every other channel that compares soft synths to hardware plays one, then plays the other. I totally don't understand your technique for the majority of people, and I've never seen it done by anyone else. Just saying.

[@StarskyCarr]

@@RJ1J I normally do... this was a first, precisely because of the reasons above.

[@en5001]

1st

[@sub-jec-tiv]

Yeah you seriously can’t compare them when one is panned left and one is panned right. I’m not going to download your youtube video and play it through my DAW so i can send left and right channels into mono with solos to compare them. Softube makes great stuff so i’m sure it’s close. But you’re not allowing people to hear a real comparison. This video is cool but essentially useless as a comparison. I know a lot of people can’t hear a difference but i’m a professional mix engineer with 35 years experience so i can. And I appreciate a proper comparison for professionals, not just comment fodder for opinionated 19 year old synth nerds. Ymmv.

[@StarskyCarr]

Save yourself the bother and watch my comparison Prophet 5 Shootout: Softube, Repro-5, Arturia vs a Prophet 5 Rev4 kzbin.info/www/bejne/b3ywaaONm8x7nbc

[@t.c.494]

You sound ungrateful to your fans. What would you be doing if it wasn't for them? Would you be touring the world or pumping gas?

[@StarskyCarr]

Of course I’m not I love my viewers but people you describe as fans aren’t the ones who gave me a load of Sh!!t last time I tried it. I haven’t done it since but here it works really well.

[@t.c.494]

I wager that making videos all day is a very nice way to live. It would be nice if when you feel contempt for your viewers you wouldn't share it with them.

[@StarskyCarr]

This is a hobby that just about pays for itself so there’s that to consider before assuming I’m paid to play with synths all day. I’m not. …. It’s not contempt, most people enjoyed it last time, only a few really vociferous people got very annoyed. I think I’m allowed to do things my own way and not cower from people who don’t give any useful feedback.. just take the videos and complain if there’s something they don’t like it’s not like anyone’s paying for a service. Most people are grateful for the effort I put in, which is considerable. This took many days and I did it for free. Probably made about £20 from adverts… so there’s all that to consider when thinking I show contempt. I don’t, I just do what I do and try to make it interesting, informative, fun and musical.

[@nuriamarti100]

Filters are identical--what? you didn't even compare them, you just put them both in to self-resonance. You could use any synth and say they were "identical." What is this channel? It's just total bs, actually makes me a little mad.

[@StarskyCarr]

I've done so many filter sweeps on 100s of videos tbh that these were so similar I was just going over old ground,.. and felt like a bit of a psycho.Like comparing 2 identical mugs.. just seemed pointless. I have to try to balance the length of the videos, interest and pace with relevant info. If there was something to talk about I'd have shown it and discussed why they were different. Maybe got the balance wrong for you this time? Calling it total BS is a bit off the mark. Be mad but there's tones of info in here. Sorry the specific bit you were after isn't.

[@nuriamarti100]

@@StarskyCarr I say an objective reviewer/tester would try to prove they are different, not the same. Anything else is a sales pitch. If you've done 100s of these, you know enough to know where to look.

[@StarskyCarr]

@@nuriamarti100 an objective review doesn't try to prove anything... simply demos what's there. If there are differences they are demo'd if not you don't try to find stuff for the sake of it. That's not objective. So yeah I do know where to look, I looked and I found there was nothing of note to comment on.

[@nuriamarti100]

​@@StarskyCarr OK but I can't remember any of your reviews where you say this synth does not do a good job of emulating the hardware its based on. Or hardware does not sound like the original. I guess I have different expectations when something is said to be "identical." No hard feelings here.

[@StarskyCarr]

@@nuriamarti100 yeah but there’s loads of stuff I haven’t connected with and haven’t done a review. Just because I don’t like it doesn’t mean others won’t, but I’m not going to take it down just because I don’t connect. I also get loads of grief when I’m not sure about something. The OBX8 is a good example - and I even bought it. Having a negative response to something gives me so much hassle I’ve taken stuff down and moved on. So you’re right, you’ll only see videos where I like something, or I find a unique angle to use it, or can appreciate what it is. Take a look at my Cherry Audio 106 comparison. I like the idea of it but just couldn’t get it to sound like my 106. For the price it was worth it, but it’s not an exact emulation if my hardware and I say that. Off the top of my head.. don’t think I was very complimentary about the Odyssey software I tried (maybe you haven’t watched them all!) I’ve even been sent hardware to review that I’ve spent a while trying to understand and sent it back.