This leaves the question - what is better: internal combustion trucks, or spontaneous combustion trucks?
@trazyntheinfinite98959 ай бұрын
😅
@OffGridInvestor9 ай бұрын
Best comment yet on EVs
@johnvanzoest45329 ай бұрын
Do you mean in practical terms, or for sheer entertainment?
@موسى_79 ай бұрын
External combustion, also known as jet engines
@pawebernaciak15819 ай бұрын
trains
@justlisten829 ай бұрын
Nikola should change their name to Newton since they use gravity for propulsion 😂
@mr.lumbergh9 ай бұрын
Well played.
@danieldeblasio93689 ай бұрын
Nikola is actually selling trucks. How man trucks has Tesla sold?0
@justlisten829 ай бұрын
@@danieldeblasio9368 Tesla already sold some to Pepsi albeit less than Nikola has sold in total. Was a funny comment that's it.
@lombardo1419 ай бұрын
You definitely borrowed this joke from somewhere else cause I have heard it before. Still funny though
@danieldeblasio93689 ай бұрын
@@justlisten82 No, they are still testing them out. THERE IS NO SALE DUMMY!
@pencilcase80689 ай бұрын
You gotta give them credit, they are a persistent bunch
@magnetospin9 ай бұрын
Even if they do somehow fix all the engineering issues and get a working truck running, their best hope is probably to be acquired by an established motor company.
@vorpalinferno97119 ай бұрын
Toyota?
@cybernoid0019 ай бұрын
... they have a working truck, they have done tons of ride-alongs with people and had it at CES, opening the hood and showing the fuel cell and hydrogen tanks. They've even delivered some of the fuel cell vehicles to customers already, along with fuel stations for them to fuel up with.
@magnetospin9 ай бұрын
@@cybernoid001 Well, having a working truck doesn't mean all the engineering issues are solved. As mentioned in this video, they have some major issues.
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
@@cybernoid001 no, Nikola hasn't built a single hydrogen fuel station. Its joke HYLA business proposes to deliver mobile hydrogen refueling via diesel trucks.
@BeyondEcstasy9 ай бұрын
Wouldn't GM have already done that if it was a sensible move?
@moneymondays9 ай бұрын
Best thing they could do is literally sell the company to someone who wants the name "Nikola".
@amrana97499 ай бұрын
Sell to tesla😂
@nikolaunfit7 ай бұрын
Yeah
@ZacThaBarber2 ай бұрын
That names forever tainted unfortunately
@EdwinSteiner9 ай бұрын
"We suspect foul play because a vehicle was spotted close to the company grounds and we all know that our trucks like to combust spontaneously when approached by other vehicles."
@BangBangBang.9 ай бұрын
Electric/battery semi only works at shipping terminals where you need the power to pull heavy loads. They're called "yard dogs" sometimes, its a flat faced semi tractor because its not on the road requiring aerodynamics. Or they pull containers between facilities in a city. But on the highway/interstate, nope I don't see it happening. I've got tons of experience in trucking dealing with owner/operators.
@BangBangBang.9 ай бұрын
I could see Volvo coming out with a hybrid. The issue with on the road (OTR) trucking or any trucking in general is the math of your actual weight of tractor and trailer plus your load. Unnecessary weight, like on a Model S is 1300lbs+ so I can see a semi truck using multiple ones. Bringing multiple loads to a facility per day with less cargo weight over time leads to a defecit versus using diesel. And with trucking 24/7, "charging your truck" isn't an option. Owner/operators want to keep costs down so they'd have to buy one tractor specifically to pull loads while one recharged.
@Victor-vj5ds9 ай бұрын
80% of trucks dont go more than 300 miles a day, Tesla already has a battery teuck that goes 500 miles at full cargo. The trucks can be used in 90% of truck use cases if the infrastructure is built out
@ianhall66149 ай бұрын
The cargo weight of the Tesla semi is far less than typical semi trucks because of how heavy the truck is. So you pay more for a truck that can take less cargo a shorter distance than what we already have. And on top of that nobody even knows when they are going to be delivered.
@Victor-vj5ds9 ай бұрын
@ianhall6614 the cargo weight reduction is a small fraction of the total cargo capacity, the truck is not that much heavier. Most trucks aren't weight limited, most of the time they are space limited which is related to the trailer they are hauling. The cost savings in fuel and maintenance is the selling point, about 200,000$ in savings every 3 years.
@usptact9 ай бұрын
One of the many zombie companies continue to linger around
@aaron68069 ай бұрын
Nikola will be finished any minute now. It was lots of fun trading their options because of the insane volatility, but I firmly believe the end is here and the slow grind to zero has begun.
@ricardodeleon13079 ай бұрын
I drive by offer by their headquarters in Tempe and I'm always amazed how it's still going lol
@oldleatherhandsfriends40539 ай бұрын
The building isn't even finished inside. All the solar panels on the parking shades aren't even hooked up.
@Urfinchannel9 ай бұрын
Wrong@@oldleatherhandsfriends4053
@Urfinchannel9 ай бұрын
It is finished ,even with a Bosch fuel cell line @@oldleatherhandsfriends4053
@jamessmyth59499 ай бұрын
There are people who invested a whole heap of their money into this company. So all who got sucked in are trying to keep it afloat otherwise their investment is all going to go down the drain with no hope of getting it back. The way they're doing it is kind of like trying to keep a sinking ship afloat by stuffing newspaper into the holes to stop the leaks.
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
$NKLA has returned to being powered by Hydrogen Hype after a brief flirtation with EV Excitement, after the whole gravity powering the truck down the hill scam. Plus it shares Nikola Tesla's name with the most valuable automaker in the world, that's got to be worth something. To the moon!
@07831559 ай бұрын
Basically it's a copy-paste of the Dutch company Lightyear.
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
@@0783155 They're quite different. Nikola raised many times more than Lightyear, Crunchbase says as of December 2023 Nikola raised $3.4 billion over 11 rounds, I think Lightyear was only around $280M. But Nikola never even tried to deliver on its core value proposition: develop its own hydrogen fuel cell trucks and solve the chicken-and-egg problem by making its own green hydrogen to sell at its own 600 hydrogen refueling truck stops. Instead it screwed around with CGI renders of a jetski and an off-road vehicle and the debacle of the Badger pickup truck, then cobbled together a battery electric truck. It didn't focus on the main mission because lyin' Trevor knew that the trucks and fuel and H2 stations would remain hopelessly uneconomic for years, possibly forever. Lightyear was commendably focused on an efficient solar car. It just ran out of fuel in the valley of death between building cool prototypes and needing $750M to manufacture at scale to bring costs down; Aptera, Arrival, Canoo, Einride, ElectraMeccanica, Faraday Future, Mullen, Phoenix Motors, Ree Volta, Xos all face that deadly stretch that has already killed Arcimoto, Proterra, Smith Electric, and Volta . Nikola did a lot of lying and tap-dancing to distract, but it's driven part-way into that same valley of death.
@docvolt52149 ай бұрын
Imagine investing on any vehicle that doesn't use gasoline or diesel.. Geniuses
@serebii6669 ай бұрын
@@docvolt5214 Yeah imagine it - the ICE is the candle/kerosene lamp of today.
@allhailderpfestor48399 ай бұрын
As much as i wanna see a cool story of the fraud company turning into a legit successful business, it seems Nikola won't make the cut.
@БеловБорис-у4щ9 ай бұрын
I am sure that some engineers and other prefessionals went to Nicola to make future not fraude. Its kind of pitty for their careers and efforts
@onsokumaru46639 ай бұрын
@@БеловБорис-у4щ A company is defined by its leaders
@Meatball20229 ай бұрын
5:33 nothing like a CEO putting the company’s financial status ahead of possible lives lost…
@namele557779 ай бұрын
boeing?
@ashtontyler37749 ай бұрын
Tells you how much of a scam some of these "businesses" truly are.
@SchwaAlien7 ай бұрын
The correct path to truck electrification has always been diesel-electric plug-in with varying amounts of battery modules depending on the application… it allows for full electrification in areas that get the charging infrastructure and diesel based charging / operation where there isn’t charging infrastructure, like every diesel-electric freight train.
@jackryan91839 ай бұрын
How the heck did Trevor Milton only get four years in prison for such a massive fraud?
@EnterTheSoundscape9 ай бұрын
White collar crime
@Terrorbrot9 ай бұрын
They prob felt pity because hes that stupid
@Karl-Benny9 ай бұрын
It`s how the US works the other top 10% looks at him as a hero
@aaaaaaaard95869 ай бұрын
It's nothing compared to Elon and he's not even in jail
@dickylegita62116 ай бұрын
What did Elon do@@aaaaaaaard9586
@libertarian16379 ай бұрын
$297k per truck to replace batteries; the trucks cost less than that. Subsidies need to end as they just seem to be blowing up these EV bubbles that are just unsustainable.
@samsonsoturian60139 ай бұрын
The remaining firm appears to be legit, but to make vehicles profitably you need robots that are expensive. Maybe they should just sell parts rather than completed trucks
@oldleatherhandsfriends40539 ай бұрын
They don't make parts, they buy nearly everything from other manufacturers. I've been in thier HQ and production areas. The co.pany is a joke and deserves to fail.
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
Nikola has ZERO parts or intellectual property of its own (unless you count lyin' Trevor's "HTML5 Supercomputer!!"). A Tre fuel cell truck is Bosch fuel cells and a Proterra (now bankrupt) battery pack in a modified Iveco S-Way cab-over truck.
@RA-HADES9 ай бұрын
If you recall a bunch of vehicles for spontaneous combustion issues, why park them bunched together? Why not spaced apart, with some fire extinguishers nearby?
@OffGridInvestor9 ай бұрын
Reminds me of chinese covid testing. They didn't have the people 6ft apart. They had them chest to back so tight they couldn't move.
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
Bear's Workshop channel has a recent flyover video "Nikola Motors update, is it real???" showing 350 recalled (and never-delivered anywhere) battery trucks and a few dozen fuel cell trucks. Nikola removed the battery packs, they're the black squares near the trucks. Sad!
@PopSmokeWo9 ай бұрын
@@skierpageThey are delivering the recalls to fleet owners. You seem uninformed. WattEV has orderder new BEV trucks while on recall
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
@@PopSmokeWo I don't think so. Nikola has not announced a fix for the battery fires nor a new battery supplier. It liquidated the Romeo battery pack equipment that it acquired in July, so it would have to qualify a new battery supplier, and Proterra that was supplying batteries for the fuel cell Tre went bankrupt. Also in July Nikola said it was transitioning the battery Tre to build to order. I can't find any information about WattEV since "Nikola recently announced the upcoming sale and delivery of the trucks to WattEV" in May 2023. You seem to be fantasizing that this company isn't a complete disaster. Provide dated statements from Nikola that suggests otherwise.
@michaelmoorrees35859 ай бұрын
Well, at least they're giving it a try to make something. The current management is sort of obligated to give it a try. That's the only way to try to reimburse the investors. Though it probably still go belly-up. Especially, with the battery problems.
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
Management is gifting itself millions in shares almost as fast as the stock price drops. "Nikola granted ‘performance’ awards valued at $567 million to executives last year [2020]". Management should be honest and declare bankruptcy so creditors get something, but that would immediately make their stock worthless.
@scottlauren31459 ай бұрын
They're doomed. I love your videos dude.
@BangBangBang.9 ай бұрын
Nikola's semi stunt video and Elon Musk's "robot" requiring a human operator to fold a shirt to give you an idea what it "would" look like if they had the technology.
@twenty4play9 ай бұрын
Elon has pulled the same stunts (if not worse) as Trevor Milton… and continues to. Pumping stocks on Twitter, embellishing progress.
@peoplelikefrank9 ай бұрын
Musk, fake it till you make it. So many lies. So much tax payers money lost.
@charlesloomis22247 ай бұрын
I want to be the next CEO of Nikola. Get paid, leave the company in 2 years, accomplish nothing!
@Ryan_DeWitt9 ай бұрын
The more I see about electric trucks and cars, the more impractical they seem to ever replace ICE unless there is some incredible change in battery tech which most scientist say in reality is unlikely anytime soon despite countless promises that never seem to come.
@zarpeter_19 ай бұрын
I work in Battery R&D, there is the technology to have a exceptionally good cycling stability and very very fast charge & discharge but it is prohibitively expensive to do because you need to treat the surfaces - look up; 3D Battery Design
@george69779 ай бұрын
Reminds me of early cars replacing the horse.😂
@norgeek9 ай бұрын
Electric has a LOT of advantages over ICE; an electric motor us much smaller, weighs a lot less, has much better torque and torque curves that make multi-speed transmissions unnecessary, they have far fewer moving parts and require much less servicing. For the vast majority of users we're already well beyond the necessary range of battery-electric vehicles for typical daily driving distance -- but that assumes that you have the ability to charge at night in your garage or driveway or on public charging. For occasional longer trips you're dependent on a well constructed high-powered charging infrastructure. In both cases it seems like the US is lagging far behind (northern) Europe in those regards, where both at-home charging and high-speed charging is very accessible to most people. My old EV has a ~100-150 mile range and it's completely non-problematic for me to drive across the continent from my home in Norway to southern Spain or Italy, for example. Electric last-mile distribution is also becoming common here, along with electric busses etc. For long-haul transport we're definitely running into issues with battery capacity vs weight/size. Ideally we'd need batteries that lasted 4,5 hours and charged in 45 minutes to match the mandatory drive/rest regulations here, I assume it'd take even more range to replace diesel in the US or Australia. Hydrogen is a more likely solution until then, with all the benefits of electric but without the downsides of a battery. Does need yet another infrastructure buildout, but it would primarily have to focus on truck stops and freight distribution hubs rather than in-city locations for passenger vehicles. Hydrogen is still *problematic* in many ways, from fire risk through hydrogen embrittlement to the extremely inefficient use of energy to generate hydrogen in most cases.
@BSJinx9 ай бұрын
@@george6977 This is why ICE vehicles and not electric ones replaced horses.
@somethingsomethingsomethingdar9 ай бұрын
The main limitation is the battery. And while many suppose solutions have been proposed, no battery is yet being mass produced that can replace lithium ion batteries. The most likely future batteries that will make it feasible or carbon nano tube batteries. Once you see those enter into the electric formula cars that’s when it’ll be close to where electric vehicles will replace ice vehicles completely
@MarlinWilliams-ts5ul6 ай бұрын
Hydrogen fuel cells are a bad idea for motive power. Hydrogen is expensive to make, is highly explosive, corrosive, hard to contain in tanks and pipelines due to its light weight, and has to be stored in its liquid state at -450°F. Hydrogen is a nonstarter.
@BSJinx9 ай бұрын
At least NIkola seems likely to go out with a bang and not a whimper. Or maybe a BOOM! (And it is really a good thing for California's hemorrhaging economy to be the last resort for otherwise unworkable technology?)
@MichaelHarto9 ай бұрын
They didn't really need to tilt the camera to shoot the truck running downhill. On some mountain highways, the road and the landscape looks totally flat when you see outside your vehicle, but when you stand still, you could feel that they are slanted. Sometimes when you're driving a car, you couldn't even tell if you're going uphill or downhill, because the road is so long and flat.
@Seoulsearch6169 ай бұрын
I always enjoy these reports! 👍🏼
@jfkastner9 ай бұрын
Electric Trucks are wonderful for dense Cities like NYC/Manhattan because of Air quality issues. Anywhere else they might fail.
@the0ne8099 ай бұрын
For short trips, Electric trucks are fine. Tesla semis are trash for long haul. That's why Pepsi uses them to carry mostly chips in short trips.
@toomanyaccounts9 ай бұрын
cold weather in chicago and other places are making ev users go back to gas
@OffGridInvestor9 ай бұрын
Short trips they're great too. Otherwise it's pretty pointless
@kulls139 ай бұрын
Please cover Arrival Bus next. They're pre-revenue and literally just stopped filing SCC filings like 1 year ago.
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
TechCrunch had a good article on Arrival in November, "This EV startup was going to revolutionize how cars were made - now, it’s on life support." W$M could equally well cover the stumbles and disastrous financials of Aptera, Canoo, Einride, Faraday Future, Mullen, Phoenix Motors, etc. Too late for Arcimoto, Proterra, Smith Electric, Volta, etc. who (I think) have gone bankrupt. Elon Musk: "Prototypes are easy, production is hard", also "Production with positive cash flow is extremely hard."
@arranf9 ай бұрын
Arrival was finally delisted yesterday so may be not worth doing a video now.
@ChangingFrames9 ай бұрын
Even though some of the contents that you mentioned is true, some of the other contents are not true like: how did you come to know of the cost of a fuel-cell truck? And blaming for what they did before and continuing to use that against them isn't fair to a growing company. I hope Nikola survives all these and comes out strong.
@Qs_Internet_Cafe9 ай бұрын
"And blaming for what they did before and continuing to use that against them isn't fair to a growing company" - Ah, that explains why scammers exist ! Because people like you ! Noice !
@phyarth80829 ай бұрын
More Scania trucks with pantographs coming to Germany's. Economical question if route is so packet with truck traffic why not make full electrified train railway line. 1.5 tons battery pack is issue because it is 1.5 tons lost cargo.
@norgeek9 ай бұрын
A 1.5 ton battery doesn't translate to 1.5 ton of lost cargo weight - you're also losing almost a ton of diesel engine and transmission compared to an electric motor and reduction gear, and typically 500-1000kgs of diesel. Additionally, a lot of trucked cargo is limited by permitted cargo volume rather than weight.
@phyarth80829 ай бұрын
@@norgeek Truck have four electric motors and I guess it will have some kind of transmission to increase torque it probably will be permanent or e-motors must be very big and cooper is most expensive part of vehicle besides lithium battery. Diesel is very energy dense fuel 45MJ/kg and lithium 0.6MJ/kg thus way beyond 20 times denser than lithium battery. That is biggest failure of any EV vehicle. 500-1000kgs of diesel. is to exploit driver not to make unnecessary fuel stops, at least EV truck maybe more humane.
@ryaneylee9 ай бұрын
@@phyarth8082 that assumes equivalent energy conversion efficiency though, but a lot of combusted diesel is wasted as unusable heat
@phyarth80829 ай бұрын
@@ryaneylee Good point, if and only if all electricity been produced with renewables. But 80% electric energy is fossil fuel, and yeah 1kg of fuel only 0.4 kg converted into electric energy (40%) which in EV motors have 80% efficiency converting into kinetic motion energy. And here we get that in total 0.8*04=0.32 or 32% thus diesel and petrol efficiency is 30% but if you count energy looses in transmission and battery charging losses - 25%. To many "middle-man" in process of energy conversions EV is less efficient than ICE.
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
@@phyarth8082 You ignore the energy it takes to refine and ship gasoline and diesel. What matters is battery electric trucking is both cheaper per mile and much lower greenhouse gas (and particulate) emissions overall than a combustion-engined truck. Since the majority of new generation is wind and solar because they are cheap and quick, every EV on the road will only get cleaner.
@Karl-Benny9 ай бұрын
Trevor Milton should be forced to pay back every mom and dad investor that lost Money
@mikafiltenborg75729 ай бұрын
Trevor Milton have fun time in prison now 😂😂😂
@SomeoneFromBeijing8 ай бұрын
It’s kinda crazy that they’re trying this in the US. Trucks in Europe and Asia are more frequently doing short distance deliveries, while American trucks usually travel hundreds of miles a day. Not surprising that Volvo is selling more trucks.
@ferrarikg9 ай бұрын
Just shows how good of an idea hydrogen trucks is
@borisyeltsin66069 ай бұрын
I can't tell if this is sarcasm and it's genuinely concerning
@cyclopsvision63709 ай бұрын
@@borisyeltsin6606 Hydrogen fuel cells are a mature and proven technology. The problem is that it costs around $30/kg, which is 5x the operating cost of diesel.
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
@@cyclopsvision6370 and a $750,000 truck. At least battery electric is cheap to operate.
@cheddarcheese9 ай бұрын
I drive by their HQ ~once a week and think, wow thy are still there.
@MarlinWilliams-ts5ul6 ай бұрын
I say the same thing about Rivian.
@nkugwamarkwilliam88789 ай бұрын
well i guess no wants to lose money that's why they are keeping it alive and all those still in want to pass it on to some else
@marcopalladino70489 ай бұрын
To show unbiased facts about NKLA, you should tell people a couple of days ago HYLA, subsidiary energy co of NKLA, opened the first hydrogen refueling station. They plan to open up to 9 stations by the end of 2024. In a market like US, most of of trucks burn gasoline to run but soon or later this thing is about to change. Companies need to lower their carbon footprint, hydrogen could be a cheap option, but its adoption is years behind and its production is scarce (that's why it costs a lot per kilogram). In Europe Eni and others petroleum giants tryed to pump a misure of hydrogen and others inert gasses into their existing infrastructure with success. Maybe it's only matter of time.
@frosmof23069 ай бұрын
8:35 Note that gasoline is also extremely flammable and can be deadly (and contrary to hydrogen, it doesn't dissipate)... Both carburants have high enthalpy, that is basically why we can use them as fuel in a vehicle... so that is not really an argument against using hydrogen as fuel.
@dosmastrify9 ай бұрын
The presentation about how they were going to be owner operator focused and have their own Marketplace was not a terrible idea
@user-hq2jl6sm1n9 ай бұрын
Good topic for a video, can’t believe nikola still exists.
@mikafiltenborg75729 ай бұрын
Scam compagny Nikola Motor bankrupt Q2 2024
@blubb77119 ай бұрын
FCEVs are just to expensive. Hydrogen Combustion engines are the future.
@OffGridInvestor9 ай бұрын
You realise that the tanks won't hold any hydrogen as soon as they get above some temperature that's DRAMATICALLY below freezing? You know that 7 series BMW from 2005 that ran on hydrogen combustion? Couldn't even hold the hydrogen in the tank for more than 8 hours before venting it all. It primarily ran on gasoline
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
Hydrogen combustion is far less efficient than a fuel cell powering a motor (which is less efficient than putting electricity in a battery) and it has emissions. It is even more dead than hydrogen fuel cells.
@blubb77119 ай бұрын
@@OffGridInvestor you mean cryo hydrogen tanks which aren´t used anymore. The standard now is 350 or 700 bar pressure tanks, safe up to 120°C.
@cacbdb2 күн бұрын
@@blubb7711 good luck driving on top of 700 bar pressure tank (no matter the gas type) and having an accident.
@blubb77112 күн бұрын
@@cacbdb it’s perfectly safe.
@heavierthanheaven888 ай бұрын
Nikola will take off soon. New management of GM vets making great moves this quarter.
@mikafiltenborg75728 ай бұрын
Nikola have Less than 200 costumers pr year
@mikafiltenborg75728 ай бұрын
You sound like a NKLA bagholder😂
@glowing_clod9699 ай бұрын
I have a hard time seeing electronic cars and similar vehicles taking off in the near foreseeable future. Smaller transportation such as bikes and scooters at least are capable of having multiple batteries you can change mid travel like a gas can unless evs can come up with something similar for cars the power problems aren't easily managed.
@cpm10039 ай бұрын
It seems to me like electric cars already have taken off. I see tons of them on my commute every day, and they do make pretty good sense for local commuting purposes. They make a lot less sense for long road trips, and electric semis are a totally insane idea.
@vylbird80149 ай бұрын
Depends where you are. They are increasingly popular in Europe and the UK, for example - a combination of high fuel tax and urban planning that favors higher density cities. Over here, a hundred kilometers is a long journey. In the US, it probably wouldn't even take you out of your home state. We don't really do the long road-trip journeys that are common in the US (we have decent passenger rail), and less use of sprawling suburbs, so electric cars are much more viable. There's some interest in electric trucks, but not for long-haul. Just local distribution, from depo to restocking small businesses.
@Keylevitation9 ай бұрын
There's already a Chinese car company doing very well with battery swapping stations
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
Despite your lack of vision EV car sales grew 50% in the USA and 55% globally last year, and the growth will continue for the foreseeable future. EV trucking will follow. Good EVs add 200 miles of range in 20 minutes. No swappable batteries required.
@benwise9699 ай бұрын
worth the put or are premiums too high?
@braddeicide9 ай бұрын
That's bizarre to have a risky start-up reinventing something that's already mainstream...
@jewymchoser9 ай бұрын
Milton will leave prison rich. He got away with it.
@rodrigomohr12779 ай бұрын
The problem is that it is not competitive to manufacture in the US.
@pistolen879 ай бұрын
Just the name Nikola feels like a knock off Tesla. How did they think it would be a good name for a company?
@EleanorPeterson9 ай бұрын
Um... because Nikola comes before Tesla?🤔
@Hossak9 ай бұрын
At least they showed us the quality of the us stock market. Be warned.
@jonr66809 ай бұрын
Start with the name... A lazy table napkin idea that should never have been pursued after sobering up.
@Zminator19869 ай бұрын
I'm surprised people are still doing business with a company that turned out to be a scam.
@tamsamsom9 ай бұрын
Another prime example of the opportunity of the stock market. Neither efficient nor rational in the short term, means opportunity in the long term to the smart and patient investor.
@VeryProPlayerYesSir11229 ай бұрын
and???
@sam_s_9 ай бұрын
@VeryProPlayerYesSir1122 This comment is the start of a chain of bot comments that will all tell you to use some scam investment guru. Not sure what happened to the rest of the comments.
@tamsamsom9 ай бұрын
@@VeryProPlayerYesSir1122 and what? I'm saying that the fact Nikola still exists proves the market is irrational and that there are equally undervalued companies out there = opportunity
@dingdingdingdiiiiing9 ай бұрын
A week ago Norges bank bought 100M worth of stocks... Why would they invest in a sinking ship? Or do they know something we don't?
@aqgh18 ай бұрын
Sometimes firms buy up dead companies because their property, plant, and equipment is usable or sellable. If there are a select few that hold most of the shares, when entering bankruptcy court these players can end up with everything and leave everyone else stuffed. It's how the stock market is played. Just depends on how they go down.
@dingdingdingdiiiiing8 ай бұрын
@@aqgh1 bruh... never thought of that, thank you!
@jasonveto23209 ай бұрын
Cant believe heavy d sparks is still schilling for those guys. Im almost positive he said it wasnt a fraud at one point. Hes got a history of promoting scams. When established titles got exposed instead of giving them the ad money back he flew to scotland to stand on his supposed plot of land with the ceo of the company.
@254399 ай бұрын
Heavy d is a goof who doesn’t know what he’s doing, watch his rescues. What an idiot
@Bodiddly558 ай бұрын
The Mormons like to keep the money in the family. They are all Mormons
@User-ALphC14 ай бұрын
Yh some this lot are still going.. it’s really impressive how they have rode out all these disasters and controversies.the answer is It’s their backers.. black rock and vanguard are bigger than whales.. I bought in very early, it still surprises me how they are still slugging it out..I think they might just pull through..strangely
@damianblohm85709 ай бұрын
Top brand, top guy, stop hating
@TiberianFiend9 ай бұрын
Who's still holding on to Nikola stock? Lunatics from WSB?
@jesussalinas90579 ай бұрын
they should just lease them out and at least in the long run they make money.. and buyer has no risk if the truck goes bad which will make more likely to take a risk
@joeblogs53148 ай бұрын
Every EV manufacturer has had its fair share of fires not just Nikola lets not over look this.
@wandery2k7 ай бұрын
So has every ICE manufacturer. Chevy, Ford, Hyundai, etc have all had recalls in the hundreds of thousands for spontaneous fires. But the absolute blatant fraud at the core of it’s creation was my stop sign.
@MoonBull135 ай бұрын
The balls for suspecting "foul play" ... 😂😂
@theminer49erz9 ай бұрын
Tesla did try to release trucks, they just couldnt. They even have a few out there that are not great from what I have gathered. They may be back at the drawing board but since musk said they were alredy designed, was providing milagie estimates (WAY OFF) and touting their self driving that "[they] can do [then]!". Saying it will beat rail too in its current state in 2017. If they are still taking their time why did they say they would be available in 2019, release a very few that fell very short of what eas advertised, and of course, cost a lot more? Even if somehow they manage to pull it off in 10 years or so after many others, thaat shouldn't be seen as a win or even acceptble. That BS take money away from more capable more innovative groups that may not have the willl to overhuype and set unrealistic expectations to have money thrown at them so they can try to do what they said they could already do. Unfortunately not everything we need will not make some people filthy rich...er, so we cant count on the market to do it. Its a shame that its come.down to trying to be the biggest paying most attractive slot machine in the "casino" in order to get any funding. Its not even like they are being cautious. They cant help but thow down on the big jackpots the odds or understanding of the "machine" be damned. Its disheartening. $ end /commrant\;
@danparish13449 ай бұрын
750k for a hydrogen truck? 🤮
@downix9 ай бұрын
Nikola tried to out Tesla Tesla. A smarter option for them after the scandal would have been to buy an existing platform from an overseas supplier of electric semis, like BYD, rebadge them, and modify them for the domestic market. Get the core business basics down first.
@mariofornarelli10679 ай бұрын
Elon hyped his stock by saying the Tesla semi would come out soon then he keep saying it's getting delayed. Also, the Tesla semi quality concern is really concerning because Tesla semis keep getting towed showing they unreliable compared to Nikola semi trucks
@dosmastrify9 ай бұрын
8:24 why hasn't anybody nicknamed these Hindenburg trucks? I demand an answer
@exploshaun9 ай бұрын
When the guy who built the ship did it to scam people, I don't know why the new owners would try to fix the completely broken ship instead of just building a new one.
@Bodiddly557 ай бұрын
They did, the partnership with Iveco to supply trucks was the new beginning, Nikola never had their own production of anything other than lies from Milton.
@jonesy666919 ай бұрын
So he will be out of prison just in time for GTA VI... lucky bastard.
@sl57149 ай бұрын
Wish I had seen this video last year when I bought the stock.
@vonniofdoom55909 ай бұрын
Would’ve succeeded with hybrid trucks
@rave400v69 ай бұрын
The more time people wait at the charging station, the more money they lose.
@hadjaissahemza9 ай бұрын
Another thing: wework market cap is $9 mil as I'm writing this comment
@Kabodanki9 ай бұрын
time to invest WSB
@bossusa3659 ай бұрын
Nikola is here to stay and will have its best year in 2024 per CEO Girsky .. Haters gonna Hate .
@mikafiltenborg75729 ай бұрын
😂😂😂Bankrupt Q2 2024 NKLA a penny stock... Delisted soon
@ashishpatel3509 ай бұрын
To be fair Nikola has done less fraud than Elon has at Tesla
@MakerInMotion9 ай бұрын
Well at least a Tesla can move on its own without being rolled down a hill.
@samsonsoturian60139 ай бұрын
Bagholder detected
@ashishpatel3509 ай бұрын
@@samsonsoturian6013 lol I don't own either .
@ashishpatel3509 ай бұрын
@@MakerInMotion 😂 most of elons demos are just put on pre existing cars with small barriers barely able to make it a few miles
@samsonsoturian60139 ай бұрын
@@ashishpatel350even if that were true, you're still an obvious greedo
@TehPwnerer9 ай бұрын
You should at least put the ticker in the description
@roegoleg9 ай бұрын
As long as you can pump the stock …
@fglatzel5 ай бұрын
This Nikola truck makes the most sense, because you have a 12m roof on your trailer to fit an existing hydrogen generator. Fitting a 10 ton battery in an EV truck like Tesla does, is a really dumb idea. Obviously, nay-saying Tesla fan-boys will disagree.
@thedave17719 ай бұрын
FFIE is somehow still around too. I’m a shareholder of both, entirely for giggles. My self-managed portfolio outperforms all of the managed funds I own as well, so don’t judge me, I can buy a couple jokes too. 😂
@KingUnKaged9 ай бұрын
Hydrogen anything can really only succeed in a world where green energy, or more likely nuclear energy produces radical electricity surpluses to offset all the inefficiencies.
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
In that world charging an EV becomes even cheaper.
@AugustusOmegaАй бұрын
lol being put in prison for marketing, like Ford and GM dont do photo shoots. No this is something else, I believe Milton had an aggressive new trucking model, he was going to give away the trucks at cost and pay for all fuel and maintenance and the trucking company just pays a dollar a mile. I believe the industry players may be behind this companys downfall, nothing to do with presenting a proto finished product.
@Adaptive3D9 ай бұрын
Why there is no book about this story like Theranos, Uber or FTX?
@Tie5099 ай бұрын
How does a *proven* fraud still exist? Why???
@mikafiltenborg75729 ай бұрын
Scam compagny Nikola Motor bankrupt Q2 2024
@regolith13508 ай бұрын
Spoken in a British accent: “We’re not dead yet”
@philippebarillecavalier92759 ай бұрын
What? They actually sold a product? At least they won't go away as pure vaporware.
@jonchowe9 ай бұрын
Still less controversial than the founding years of VW...
@joeblogs53148 ай бұрын
Probably THE BEST TRUCK IN THE WORLD. !!
@derek041519 ай бұрын
Cash burner....the scam that keeps on going.
@ziyanyang97779 ай бұрын
I read the title wrong, i thought it was Nokia 😅
@danielstapler43152 ай бұрын
15/8/2024 NKLA's market cap is $390M
@LIONTAMER3D9 ай бұрын
Spontaneously combustible trucks? lol
@ferrariscuderia42909 ай бұрын
I still don't see how EVs will ever be the future, let alone electric trucks. Besides them being an investing scam and a green left-wing ideology, they are economically unviable once subsidies die out, or as in the case in Chicago, once temperatures drop dramatically so too does the range of EVs as well as charging stations failing completely.
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
You live in some weird bubble where millions of EVs aren't sold every year and sales didn't jump 50% in the USA and globally last year. Tesla chargers mostly stayed up and Tesla quickly repaired the ones that broke. New owners didn't realize that in freezing weather you need to pre-heat the battery so it can charge at a reasonably quick rate.
@steak55999 ай бұрын
First thing that need to happen is Battery Production price needs to come down, and battery capacity needs to go up. Lithium Ion battery production cost already went down 10x compare to a decade ago. By the time Solid State Battery production cost also goes down to an acceptable level, EV could have more potential. Cheap Oil can't last forever.
@sqbronco19 ай бұрын
agreed 100%. spot on
@dannylo58759 ай бұрын
Its not a bad bunch...its an idea that was never executed correctly at all.
I think 4 years is too little. He should be locked up for 20 years.
@mikafiltenborg75729 ай бұрын
120 years😎
@theianmce9 ай бұрын
We work was like this
@Skaahn9 ай бұрын
why no investments in capturing/filtering carbon from fossil fuels ? Every one is investing in alt energy
@skierpage9 ай бұрын
Who are you talking about? Captured carbon is almost worthless except to %$#@! fossil fuel companies capturing a small amount of a refinery's CO2 emissions and pumping it into wells to increase output of oil and gas... that will be burnt to produce more CO2. Direct Air Capture (sucking the CO2 out of the atmosphere) is insanely expensive and there are plenty of articles about the carbon capture and storage scam generally. We need to end fossil fuels, not greenwash them.
@christophercarrigg37759 ай бұрын
I owned nikola stock for about two weeks and made some good money
@mariofornarelli10679 ай бұрын
$NKLA 🚛🌊⚡🔋
@mikafiltenborg75729 ай бұрын
NKLA a penny stock. Delisted soon...
@mariofornarelli10679 ай бұрын
@@mikafiltenborg7572 you can't saying that they would be bankrupt every year. I won't be convinced by you bc your assumptions didn't come true