Bottom line- as long as you don't need the high ISO 12,800 the FX 30 arguably gives you a bit better image quality - if you need the super high ISO then the FX 3 is the winner...
@TechThroughTheLens2 ай бұрын
Well put sir. Come write for us. I always find the comments put things so much better than i can
@YoungBlaze2 ай бұрын
8:12 did you get the cameras mixed up i thought the fx3 had the native iso at 12,800
@itsRonDavis2 ай бұрын
Exactly my question, too.
@davidmaxfieldgolf3 ай бұрын
Bro this video is incredible. Love it. I think for most people FX30 should be the first purchase then as you progress grab an FX3 and use the fx30 as a b-cam and then you’ve got really all you need for professional film making
@TechThroughTheLens3 ай бұрын
Im so glad you liked it. And i agree. But also consider that in that 2 year span . Sony might just have the fx3 mark 2 out
@davidmaxfieldgolf3 ай бұрын
@@TechThroughTheLens definitely looking forward to that. I’m gonna start saving up already for the fx3 mark 2
@marlenelandstravelsАй бұрын
Just get a wide lens for apsc lol, plenty of them on the market to achieve the “same” wide look! 99% of people won’t notice, especially if it’s to put it on KZbin. Save your money and travel the world, pay for a workshop to up skill yourself. If nobody is asking you or paying you to use a FX3, don’t bother! You can always rent one
@AhmedAdel-ej8scАй бұрын
You simply left zero questions to be asked, well explained and my decision is made already after this! Thank you
@scienceinfo72292 ай бұрын
I have both of this but most of the time i like the quality of FX30
@ShadelessDen2 ай бұрын
Currently shoot with the FX30, and I am still curious about the FX3. Great video!
@1stMikeWhite10 күн бұрын
@1:20 and @11:50 which camera is better for shots
@Paklu8528 күн бұрын
Best lens for fx 30 ❤ please reply me
@ourtabletennisdiary5 күн бұрын
I saw a video of a videographer using fx30 with tamron 35-150. He does sport videos. Hope this helps!
@_triNity873 ай бұрын
What about A7SIII vs FX3...🤔
@TechThroughTheLens3 ай бұрын
The a7sIII is missing some of the software features. but its very close . Its Almost the same camera but in a photo body. Again almot the same camera, Not 1000% the same
@Attitude-Media16 сағат бұрын
Great video, thank you. Would you be able to advise which we should opt for when shooting offshore powerobat racing from a fast moving boat please?
@abdieltorres69883 ай бұрын
Can you make a video comparison between the Sony Fx3 and the Fujifilm XH2S after Fujifilm releases its Firmware update?
@TechThroughTheLens3 ай бұрын
That would be interesting but the xh2s is so different than the fx3
@uzolimankoАй бұрын
Thanks, man! This is the best comparative review of these two cameras that I found on KZbin! You are amazing! Very useful video. But I still hesitate. Your advice will be very valuable. I shoot travel videos and plan to shoot documentaries in the near future. Mobility, speed and autonomy are important to me, because I shoot all day. Also, so that when shooting handheld, the frame is as stable as possible. And to have a good picture in different types of natural lighting. What do you think, in your authoritative opinion, is better in my case: FX-3 or FX-30? Thanks in advance for your answer and your time)
@TechThroughTheLensАй бұрын
So both will be equally stable they have the exact same stabilization. The fx3 and fx30 will perform the same in day time natural outdoor light. but indoors and dark places, the fx3 will be much better. Hope that helps
@arnaldoleon1Ай бұрын
My man... this video was absolutely brilliant and pretty much settled this question for me. Thank you!!!
@max7w31114 күн бұрын
I've been enjoying your videos what would you pick between the nikon z8 and the fx3 for one man band crews?
@TechThroughTheLens13 күн бұрын
It really depends on my style for the project. My instinct says got for z8 if i am using cinema lenses. But the fx3 if i use native sony lenses. But its super dependant on what you are shooting
@escutia2007Ай бұрын
The FX3 for vlogging as a first camera. It’s perfect
@noth606Ай бұрын
The Fx30 is not a lower end Fx3, if you don't understand that then you have no business talking about the subject pretending you do. The main difference and that which should be the main point to consider for a potential buyer of one or the other is ... LENSES! All the other stuff is irrelevant in comparison, except maybe for extreme lowlight and optical matching to other cameras. The optical matching is a no brainer, since if you need a lens to work and look the same as some other camera, you have to match the sensor size of that other camera, and none of the other stuff matters. The lens thing is basically that there are 10 times more lenses that are 1/10th of the price for the FX30. Yeah, let that sink in for a moment. An FX3 with a set of good lenses is easily $10-15k or more where an Fx30 with equivalent lenses is at most 5k. Also, people talk about crop like it's actually a thing. It's imaginary. Cropping implies cutting out. That's not what is happening, what IS happening is capturing less of something in badly matched scenarios, ie when using a lens made for fullframe on an APSC camera you're using a lens that creates a bigger image circle than what your camera is built to capture, so it doesn't capture the biggest possible chunk of it. There is no cropping. Talking about it is the equivalent of talking about people who are less tall than others as 'cut downs' and going on about things like everyone should be 6'4" and if not they are a 'cut down'... Not very logical.
@31pas0Ай бұрын
> there are 10 times more lenses that are 1/10th of the price for the FX30. Soooo, you're assuming there are 10 times more lenses for aps-c than for a full frame? Have you ever heard that they were making lenses before the 2000s? Like, cheap vintage lenses 10 times better than your modern aps-c crap?
@kervinmorales5607Ай бұрын
how about the rolling shutter?
@tysonbirmann3 ай бұрын
The field of view part of the review isn't really that accurate. Sure the same lens gives you a tighter shot on the FX30... But using a wider lens will be fix that.
@TechThroughTheLens3 ай бұрын
SO i do say in the video you need to manage your lens selection. But often people forget different lenses render in different ways. So just becasue you have 2 lenses that have a similar field of view. You will still have different looks/ render from the images. A wider lens will introduce distortion and bowing
@naamSafal-p7l3 ай бұрын
Brother uhhh nailed it man.....what an amazing way to simplify the specs through your Video & make it Simple fo us to make a Choice.
@TechThroughTheLens3 ай бұрын
thankyouuu sooo much! that means a lot! I’ve really been working on how to make the info more engaging. you comment is very kind
@FxctorsGFXАй бұрын
Thinking about getting the fx30
@Rancho_Music16 күн бұрын
Great info, thanks!
@RealNuruMusic10 күн бұрын
Just ordered the fx30 now on KZbin tryna justify my $1800 😅💸 not to mention crop censor selection especially from third party vendors is vast and cheaper. If you want wider shots by wider lenses 😂
@sammyvandenburg16 күн бұрын
underrated video, ty for making this. fx30 it is
@TechThroughTheLens16 күн бұрын
Thankyou i appreciate you saying that sir
@escapingdeception57993 ай бұрын
Sony FX30
@omarsmediaКүн бұрын
I believe the FX6 is a slightly better value option than the FX3. If you have the extra $2000, I would grab the FX6 and get an FX3 or FX30 as a B cam. The FX6 has traditional Video/Cinema camera body form factor. However, either of these cameras can produce high quality motion picture with the right creative techniques.
@AwesomeSaussage3 ай бұрын
Well, you always compare both cameras with the same lens (focal length). And then you mention a few times the wider shot on full frame, and because of that cropping in way more on the full frame. You should have compared both of them with lenses with similar field of view ie. 20mm on the apsc and 30mm on the full frame. Then your arguments would have just fallen apart 🤷🏻♂️
@TechThroughTheLens3 ай бұрын
Both cameras have the exact same lens
@lingham20993 ай бұрын
@@TechThroughTheLensThat’s his point. You should have used appropriate lenses for the respective camera
@1stMikeWhite10 күн бұрын
You got the cameras mixed up at the end lol
@TechThroughTheLens8 күн бұрын
I did, i had being saying fx3 fx30 so much. that For a whole week i called my self fx30.
@amosdasilva60823 ай бұрын
Very good video, thank you man you got knowledge what you talk about it
@TechThroughTheLens3 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@aleksdeveloper6982 ай бұрын
None because I have a6700 which is best for price and what is generally needed
@TechThroughTheLens2 ай бұрын
I love that camera! i made a video on it and people have told me i am wrong about how good it is. Please tell em
@aleksdeveloper6982 ай бұрын
@TechThroughTheLens it is my first camera, which means I have never owned any other camera before, but because it is aspc, very lightweight, cheap body, cheap lenses, AI, dual chip, viewfinder, etc. the only problem is heating, but it happens 60fps 4k video, so i shoot at 24fps. Plus I do photos, I get paid for it, so overall it is all I need.
@mattdugue243 ай бұрын
Drop the r5 vid
@KODAKEAKINАй бұрын
great video bro fr fr
@x256h13 күн бұрын
the fx3 does not have a physical shutter
@TechThroughTheLens8 күн бұрын
yes it is does...the fx30 does not have a physical shutter
@tradeisinvestАй бұрын
i choose cheaper one cuz i dont have money
@thedoerofstuff3 ай бұрын
Good video but damn you talk fast man!
@footprintsbeijing3 ай бұрын
The choice is simple: when budget is not an issue choose FX3, otherwise, choose FX30.
@TechThroughTheLens3 ай бұрын
I wouldn not agree with that at all. The fx30 has alot of advantages over the fx3
@oshanefa2 ай бұрын
at the beginning I was skeptical . it was looking as though gonna to be low level video . half way I must say its amazing vid for peeps whore in the market for one of these . kudos
@TechThroughTheLens2 ай бұрын
Thankyou! though just as feed back for me . what made you think it was going to be low quality. and what changed your mind?
@LightshaperQ3 ай бұрын
The FX3 is such a waste of money….
@TechThroughTheLens3 ай бұрын
tell me more. why?
@LightshaperQ3 ай бұрын
@@TechThroughTheLens if you have to ask, then there’s a problem already. Would for sure rather wait on the FX3 II
@Gabriel-b3r3r3 ай бұрын
@@LightshaperQ Bro really said “You asked me a valid question. Ima pretend I didn’t hear that”. 😂
@LightshaperQ3 ай бұрын
@@Gabriel-b3r3r I’m not your bro pussy
@shesaiditroll2much3 ай бұрын
@@LightshaperQlol u can’t explain why because u don’t know why, smooth brain
@SharkVR-o2t3 ай бұрын
What is the best camera for nature under $1000?
@TechThroughTheLens3 ай бұрын
I would say the canon r50 for nature photos mainly because of the great in camera colors. If you can stretch your budget I would get a Canon rp or canon r8
@dmdjr721Ай бұрын
The sharpness between 12 and 26 megapixles is night and day. I was going to get the fx3 but maybe I'll wait to see if they come out with an fx3 mark 2 (one with hopefully 26 megapixels).
@RyzoneАй бұрын
They’ll never do this because it’s the 12mega pixels that make the fx3 such a beast in low light and that’s why most people love them and A7SIII
@jean-philippegrignom64793 ай бұрын
Bro just read off the spec list
@TechThroughTheLens3 ай бұрын
Really? Did you even watch the video. at what point did i just read off the specs?