Me too, the more absurd and steam punk looking the better.
@destructionandregeneration Жыл бұрын
@@robdixson196 it’s just fucking cool
@grumples15173 жыл бұрын
thank you for the content
@TiptonBros3 жыл бұрын
The pleasure is all mine! Thanks for the support.
@Colt45hatchback2 жыл бұрын
I know you said it was somewhat successful, but i cant help but think that it looks like a shed, a bus or possibly a tram and a few aircraft got joined together in some sort of misfiling of blueprints where they all got stapled together. Haha I mean i like it, and i fully embrace function over form. But it is an amusing looking aircraft to me
@TiptonBros2 жыл бұрын
You are absolutely correct, it looks like sheet metal shed with wings. A pretty hideous and comical design.
@higgs9232 жыл бұрын
You cover some interesting aircraft. This one has that distinctive Tupolev interwar look. You know: like it's powered by steam. That said, in 1930 the US Army's heavy bombers were twin-engine biplanes.
@grendelgrendelsson5493 Жыл бұрын
That was very interesting, thank you.
@donlawrence14282 жыл бұрын
a classic monster!
@hugogayozzo9568 Жыл бұрын
AMADO TUPOLEV TB3
@L_Train Жыл бұрын
Thats like 4 fighter planes tied together with a boat on top
@ColCam9 ай бұрын
I wish that you would have talked about the gunners
@Electricslam773 ай бұрын
Pretty f’n wild aircraft design…
@hyenafur2 жыл бұрын
Not a bad video. Enjoyed it, but Narration is a bit choppy.
@TiptonBros2 жыл бұрын
Appreciate the input.
@jean-francoislemieux55093 жыл бұрын
I like the parasite version... 5 airplanes?
@TiptonBros3 жыл бұрын
Up to 5 is pretty crazy, unfortunately I couldn’t find any pictures. Thanks for the support!
@zosxavius2 жыл бұрын
It was a major failure. But certainly novel.
@Wobblybob2004 Жыл бұрын
Comrade Tupolev, how aerodynamic shall we make the new heavy bomber?... What?
@SuperUAP8 ай бұрын
Sir, We have removed the engine during mid flight to save weight. 😅
@frankperdue6585 Жыл бұрын
Just land that on the ROAD
@SuperUAP8 ай бұрын
Having a doctorate in fabricating shoes for fish and a degree in potato 🥔 proctology I am qualified to say this is probably some type of airplane 🛫 😂
@keepyourbilsteins3 жыл бұрын
Is this channel robo-voiced?
@TiptonBros3 жыл бұрын
Lol, no. I research, write, and record the scripts myself.
@keepyourbilsteins3 жыл бұрын
@@TiptonBros I must commend you on your excellent elocution in that case. It's uncanny Valley levels of consistent. Forwarded to a linguist friend.
@TiptonBros3 жыл бұрын
@@keepyourbilsteins I appreciate the compliment, it means a lot.
@tiperik993 жыл бұрын
Hard to imagine that design got picked. Probably the ugliest plane I’ve ever seen. Good job on the history of this bucket of a bomber.
@zosxavius2 жыл бұрын
It wasn't all that different than the German WW1 bombers. It has some innovations too. The corrugated metal skin was novel for the time. Most planes were covered in fabric up until that point. This is far from the weirdest Soviet plane but it's clearly a Tupolev design. Some of his other planes were far crazier. Don't forget up around WW2 the soviets were behind the times in aviation design. There was nothing else like this plane in 1929. The rest of the world caught up rather quickly.
@harrison00xXx2 жыл бұрын
The whole video i didnt know if i should cry because of the ugly design or laught because its that hilarious looking. I still cant believe it was effective... this thing is looking very deadly (to the crew!) Also, you cant tell by the looks if its a basic sheet metal construction for "art" purpose, a big water can, a submarine or crazy looking ship transported on wheels. Never seen such a ugly and stupid design. But i guess that makes it special and awesome
@SuperUAP8 ай бұрын
Having a doctorate in fabricating shoes for fish and a degree in potato 🥔 proctology I am qualified to say this is probably some type of airplane 🛫 😂
@SuperUAP8 ай бұрын
Having a doctorate in fabricating shoes for fish and a degree in potato 🥔 proctology I am qualified to say this is probably some type of airplane 🛫 😂