SpaceX Reveals NEW Raptor V3 Engine!

SpaceX Reveals NEW Raptor V3 Engine!
Last Video: The Real Reason NASA Developed The RS-25 Engine!
• The Real Reason NASA D...
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslasp...
Business Email: [e-mail]
#Spacex #Space #Mars

[@ricardoabh3242]

Crazy years to come…

[@TheOtherSteel]

It looks like a Starship booster with 33 v3 engines will be able to dig an even deeper hole in their launch platform.

[@climber950]

Anything is possible

[@KamalaChameleon]

I've always thought that the first IFT test was done purposely without water diverters just to get data on how much damage they can do, so they can build a good data model for how to land and take off with all those engines safely.. and how strong their infrastructure has to be.. or how tall landing legs have to be..

[@nirbhay_raghav]

I hope you are not on YT now. Because it is full of aesthetic launch videos from IFT2 and IFT3. WITHOUT ANY PAD DAMAGE AT ALL!

[@sgfx]

3:30 Increased efficiency and power translate to reduced fuel requirements for achieving the same weight-to-orbit ratio. Consequently, this advancement enables several potential benefits, such as shorter booster stages, taller starships capable of accommodating larger cargo (not necessarily heavier), or increased fuel capacity for orbital refueling purposes.

[@thomabow8949]

Larger cargo is a rather important point; observe the JWST (James Webb); it had to be intentionally segmented in several parts to fit in delivery vehicles, requiring systems on board to extend and assemble for function. This introduces many critical points of failures.

[@TheAmericanCatholic]

This also allows starship to spend less time fighting gravity thus saving fuel

[@jimmyrussell9749]

Perhaps the tank itself were the cargo then fuel could be put in from Mars atmosphere as their now planning.

[@Damn-good-deal]

man this vast/spacex partnership is gonna yeet us into the future so fast

[@JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke]

I predict that with engine improvement, the heavy booster will evolve to use less engines.

[@cjmixmaster]

If the engines get better would they not just push more mass?

[@jason_m_schmidt622]

A good idea as less engines equal less possible points of failure.

[@TrumpsEarBandage]

Whatever decreases the cost per ton to mars is what they will go with

[@cjmixmaster]

@@jason_m_schmidt622 and less redundancy.

[@thegouse]

apparently they were considering making the top part of starship taller

[@rpmcitycruiser]

Remember, the Neutron rocket isn't fully reusable. There is a second stage that they won't recover.

[@phaysyk]

This is more interesting than Twitter 😂

[@milindghodke9821]

So true Hah.

[@anthonyshiels9273]

I am glad to see that Arthur C. Clarke's station from the film "2001 - A Space Odyssey" is finally taking shape.

[@francom6230]

"I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that." -- Scary thought with AI taking our minds ...

[@Dunbar0740]

"Those Iconic wheel shapes we've seen in moves like the Martian...". I think we saw them is some other old movie once, I might be wrong... (...and breathe...).

[@EnnuinerDog]

A certain little film about an odyssey of the space variety.

[@paulhaynes8045]

No shuttle to get you up there now, though ...

[@richbarrows3922]

I thought NASA found the rotating wheel would not work for humans because the coriolis acceleration of centrifugal motion would mess with the inner ear making balance near impossible?

[@ReddwarfIV]

@@richbarrows3922 For a small drum like _Discovery One_ had, sure. But the larger the diameter, the less coriolis force affects your inner ear.

[@nawwk79]

I am from the future, 1 SpaceX Raptor 17 engine just sent 160,000 tons of payload into Mars.

[@rancejones5634]

Can you do an update on companies that are tracking space junk? I hear Leo Labs wants to be the Google Maps of space.

[@conradnelson5283]

Yeah, it’s getting very crowded up there

[@bureboburebo4188]

19 billion in revenue? Something is wrong there. Also, the Neutron, while very cool, is not really fully reusable. It's more like the Falcon 9: only the first stage is reusable.

[@catchnkill]

Neutron reuses fairing. The fairing will be reusable and thus will be recovered for each launch.

[@bureboburebo4188]

@@catchnkill Yes, that is true, but is not sufficient to make the vehicle fully reusable. The 2nd stage is not reusable.

[@tylercreger6762]

He meant $19M.... their 1Q23 revenue was $54.9M, $19.6M from the Launch Services business... the rest was from the space systems busienss

[@johnstewart579]

Very exciting that more private companies are entering the lucrative space industry

[@spitfire2885]

There's a company named Weyland corporation their logo says building better worlds ....that looks very promising too ..

[@jason_m_schmidt622]

🤣

[@smoochfa973]

Do you by any chance enjoy the warhammer franchise?

[@lizmramsey6852]

WOW amazing

[@juanandresgalindez9883]

Le pusiste un Nivel de protección térmico interna de la raptor es 30 % . Carbono y cerámica

[@diverbrent]

Great work, thank you!!!

[@TheGoldNinja101]

Raptor 4: ~375 bar

[@dumpeeplarfunny]

What are the odds of SpaceX buying Vast eventually?

[@Zanagash]

They could also put less engines on super heavy and carry the same weight… or a little more payload since they don’t have the weight of the engines.

[@jason_m_schmidt622]

The most important factor to using fewer engines is less possible points of failure.

[@juanandresgalindez9883]

Todavía queda cosas que mejorar

[@douglaswilkinson5700]

Very nice but can't match the power of the Saturn V's F1 engines.

[@eatsomedust1]

yeah

[@viarnay]

I disagree because you can buy a lot of raptors for the price of one F1

[@NicholasNerios]

😎 cool 😎

[@jason_m_schmidt622]

At a certain point the limits of current metallurgy catch up with you and you pay the price.

[@juanandresgalindez9883]

Ya no puede contruir o diseñar modelos nuevos de raptor . Conformante con eso

[@MariaOrtiz-th4ne]

Eoln que dios tebendiga mucho amor ❣️💋❣️❣️ que todo tu sueño secumplan ❤amor ❣️💋❣️

[@godagon97]

Question: Why did they build the R3? Answer: If it is within the laws of physics, we will try to make it a reality. -to paraphrase Elon Musk

[@SherryFulghum-o1v]

OMG

[@harbifm766766]

The whole rockets business is not 19 billion!!! how Elcton rocket is making any money at all not 19 bullion? your numbers must be extremely wrong

[@vibecheck2787]

This has to be bait

[@wesleyjohnson597]

Gd what grammar skills

[@lonestarvoid]

Start a podcast bro

[@Jam-In-With-Ben]

hi

[@Damn-good-deal]

dont they have plans for a "heavy starship" that could be why they are pushing so hard for new engines

[@jason_m_schmidt622]

Yes. The proposed “Starship 2.0” with an 18m diameter would require approximately 100 Raptor engines.

[@jebes909090]

@@jason_m_schmidt622 ya that thing aint gonna happen :D

[@jason_m_schmidt622]

@@jebes909090 SpaceX would need to design a new and very large engine. They already have too many possible points of failure with 33 engines

[@jebes909090]

@@jason_m_schmidt622 its ironic that elons favorite axiom is 'the best part is no part' then goes and makes a rocket with 39 engines that has to be caught by a tower 😅😅😅😅

[@thanaphonnawarak8753]

i love you

[@Bosscheesemo]

Remember...."Cryptocurrency" means "Tax dodge" If you're willing to dodge taxes, you're willing to dodge more, and in light of Oceangate maybe dodging policy might not be the best business model? Cool ideas though definitely hope it works. Won't trust it if the CEO himself doesn't take the trip

[@obiang24]

Rocket lab has made 19 billions this year?

[@dglsdgls3663]

So RocketLab made $19B from revenue of $211M somehow?

[@mmchipoperwa]

Bro you deserve a million subs

[@FrankieMusk-x5c]

Twin are special he always imuse me because we are twins can nobody but god can stop twin flan gbbusy🎉😂❤❤❤❤

[@n.g.s1mple29]

All these worlds are yours, except Europa. Attempt no landing there

[@alex-q8-q9]

? What

[@williamtsmith9668]

​@@alex-q8-q9 It's a quote from the end of the movie, 2010 Space Odyssey. You might watch it.

[@RA-II]

Do you really think this will happen ??

[@คมไผ่แข็งแรง]

Follow

[@iknujbyhvtgcrfxedw-nb6ew]

I'm sorry

[@eatsomedust1]

?????

[@thisguyhere85]

Astra will be bankrupt by August 2023

[@Study49]

Space X’s heavy launch vehicle and its Raptor engines are promising breakthroughs, however; several engines failed during the first stage’s launch and ascent. An outside source stated that it appear: E1, E6, and E7 had failed at launch. E18 failed violently at T+30; E19 failed at T+46; E22 failed at T+60; E23 failed at T+94; at T+122 flames were visible at the thrust section; and at T+130 the rocket started spinning out of control. Also, the rocket did not reach its design attitude for stage separation.

[@MrXMasterTrader]

Those are old batches of engines they wanted to get rid of.

[@FrankieMusk-x5c]

Cogrartionly❤😂🎉

[@dieterkoch6563]

Try a new tack-report only what has been done-showing video proof, NOT what is promised. This simple system will give you unmeasurable credibility.

[@iceetmarne3571]

Lol. Why don't you try NOT watching if you don't like it my egotistical friend!

[@dieterkoch6563]

@@iceetmarne3571 Do not worry , that was the first and last time

[@iceetmarne3571]

@@dieterkoch6563 fair enough.

[@CliftonDavis-je7qu]

Seam's like a wast😅 of time just build deep space 9 already 😅

[@terryhigson434]

nonsense, almost all of it....

[@paulhaynes8045]

So now they can blow up the whole launch stand...

[@chrisallton4409]

First they built the v2 1944 then Saturn5 1960s now those same people are trying to launch the starship.

[@BUMHEAD1100]

Wow - you kids will believe any old rubbish…..

[@vreality.]

first

[@Marcus001]

congratulations

[@menotyou1234]

KZbin was hiding this video from me. It had over 700 likes when I finally found it. I am subscribed, but it was not showing up in my main list. It showed 4 hrs old. Had to scroll all the way down over 200 subscriptions to get to channels that start with the word "The" then click your channel to find it. I could see the vid listed on my phone..?? Not on my large tv with the same account..?? 👽👽🤠👽🏗🚀

[@eldarshamukhamedov4521]

Starship could launch a Space Shuttle as payload if it wanted to.

[@SherryFulghum-o1v]

Wow ELON MUSK

[@kristiankoski3908]

4:48 Was that Halo? Pretty neat.

[@chiefpoko4907]

masterchief is coming

[@jimmyrussell9749]

Idea would be a Flying Explorer. Inflatable guided parachute design concept. Vertical lift. No extra weight of landing gear.