Spanish Colonization Of America

Spanish Colonization Of America | Animated Map

Рет қаралды 12,441

Күн бұрын

Fearless discoverers or bold invaders? Whoever the Spanish conquistadors really were, they played a decisive role in the colonization of America. Let us make a historical excursion and go back in time with the pioneers when the history of the New World was created.
Subscribe to the channel and like the video.
Suggest topics for the next videos in the comments :)

Пікірлер: 26

@katespaulding4563 5 ай бұрын

Incorrect to say peace was disrupted for the Incas when the Spanish arrived; part of the reason the Incan empire was easily colonized by the Spanish was because of the conflict and instability it was experiencing at the time

@seananthony7494 Ай бұрын

They were quite literally going through a civil war😂😂😂

@NikhileshSurve Жыл бұрын

Indigenous/Native Americans being referred as Indians in the video sounds so odd when Spanish never met actual Indians the whole time which was good for the Indians as the tiny part of India that did saw colonisation from the other Iberian power the Portuguese experienced a horrible Inquisition.

@snakey934Snakeybakey Жыл бұрын

Indians or Amerindians is a better term.

@NikhileshSurve Жыл бұрын

@@snakey934Snakeybakey But how is Indians better when they're not from India? It sounds quite odd though. Indigenous or Native Americans make sense since they're indigenous or native to the Americas.

@snakey934Snakeybakey Жыл бұрын

@@NikhileshSurve yes but it also implies that mestizos whites blacks and others are not. To put this on context, the Maori have inhabited New Zealand for about as long is there have been European colonists in the Americas, and the Zulu have been in South Africa for even less.

@NikhileshSurve Жыл бұрын

@@snakey934Snakeybakey I'm not sure if I'd be able to show you my perspective about it but I'll try. I'm only referring to whoever may be inhabiting the particular land before & still exists today compared to others who may be inhabiting there now. Mestizos/mixed race, whites/Europeans & blacks/Africans in America imo are no different from mixed race, blacks/Africans, Arabs, Asians, etc in Europe even if many of them may be inhabiting in Europe for some centuries. But I'd agree that a big difference is that indigenous/native Europeans are still a majority in Europe while non Europeans or perhaps non indigenous Europeans may be a significant minority in many parts of Europe. I'd say Maoris are indigenous to New Zealand even if Europeans lived longer in Americas. I'd say Danish people being in Faroe Islands is not the same as Danish people being in Greenland. Zulus not being native to South Africa imo is similar to some Ethiopian ethnicities may not be native to Ethiopia, English may not be native to Britain or Castillians to many parts of Spain or Scandinavians to Northern Scandinavia. They're from my perspective still Africans in Africa & Europeans in Europe.

@snakey934Snakeybakey Жыл бұрын

@@NikhileshSurve That's understandable. The problem is you'd be hard pressed to find a single nation on earth who did not conquere the land where they live from someone else. And there is something of a double standard as well. I.e. The Zulu migrated to South Africa in the 1800s and conquered land from other tribes. The Afrikaaners meanwhile began migrating there in the 16th or 17th century. But one is seen as indigenous while the other is not

@gustavoblanco9723 Жыл бұрын

I Would like to hear how the Inglish empire colony USA

@don_hss Жыл бұрын

Try not to “Leyenda Negra” challenge: Level impossible

@masn9997 11 ай бұрын

¿Recomiendas ver el vídeo? Cuando veo a un anglosajón hablando sobre historia de España ya me espero un montón de mentiras.

@leosvm 4 ай бұрын

@@masn9997 lo que pasa es que ya no es culpa de los creadores de contenido, todas sus fuentes están llenas de leyenda negra, revisa la wikipedia en inglés y te sorprenderás de todas las atrocidades que dice 😭