Parallel testing in Cucumber step by step

[@ankurraj7709]

Thanks, it was helpful.

[@rajukarmakar6101]

The stuff you are explaining is pretty good, but according to me it would be far better if you can slow down your explanation. Thankyou for the video

[@amitdhanke4013]

hi i have one runner file and one scenario file that scenario file having multiple tags so i mention all tags into the runner by tags={"@1","@2","@so ans so"} but it is not running github.com/webdriverio/cucumber-boilerplate/issues/207

[@SpecializeAutomation]

Check my new video for auto generate runner class I'm using multiple tag and running in parallel, for scenario level, It was working for the earlier version, for latest version, it won't work, please find the changes in latest version. --tags @dev stays the same --tags ~@dev becomes --tags 'not @dev' --tags @foo,@bar becomes --tags '@foo or @bar' --tags @foo --tags @bar becomes --tags '@foo and bar' --tags ~@foo --tags @bar,@zap becomes --tags 'not @foo and (@bar or @zap)'

[@akhilaabraham9379]

Hi, I have a feature file with 1 scenario. I want to run the same scenario in chrome and firefox parallelly. Is it possible? How do we achieve that?

[@ashuaswini8877]

Hi , i have created 2 runner files and using extent reports for generating reports. Inside before tag i have used createTest method but if i use 2 runner classes how can i mention it in before tag because when i try to execute it it will always take feature file from 1st runner class and directly it is executing before tag. so, createtest method is failing please help me how to resolve this issue

[@ramana9525]

hi, how to run the one feature file with three browsers sequentially? in this video i have observed you mentioned, three different feature files and in each feature file you have taken one browser . Can you please make a video that there must be a one feature file and three different browsers will run inorder .

[@SpecializeAutomation]

Simply create the runner class for different browser and select three runner, and run those, it will execute one by one.

[@diwakarkumar2758]

If I have to run my scenario as parallel instead of feature how to achieve

[@debarnabbanerjee7583]

Hey Aditya, Thanks for such informative tutorial. I am also planning to implement cucumber with parallel running in my project and till now I could generate seperate json reports for individual runner classes. But I was wondering how to club the json reports into one so that I can get the final html reports containing all the features. Can you please help me with it?Thanks

[@debarnabbanerjee7583]

I need to do this merging of html reports during runtime.

[@puneetgupta5622]

Hey, did u tried merging the reports. Any luck ?

[@manikantan2457]

Hi , Kindly make a video on Parallel Testing for Feature Files based on Tags for BDD Framework with Appium..

[@keshavdwivedi5192]

Hi aditya, I have a scenario and in my scenario I have to test two sections of the application i.e signup and login so should I keep one runner file or should I keep two runner files separately for both the sections of my application please advice which approach would be better?

[@SpecializeAutomation]

Sorry for late reply, as was away for few days, okay, first of all I would like to have one runner class only, where I can mention individual feature file or tag also , then why we need a separate one, we can omit any feature or tag we don't wanna run. If we speak for more granularity, maintaining step defs for each feature files, we're already achieving it. Now depends on requirement, you can create separate separate runner class also only when you have lots of feature files or huge set of functionalities to validate, to make things more maintainable.

[@keshavdwivedi5192]

Specialize Automation thank you so much aditya for clearing my doubts and as per your suggestion from now on I will maintain only one runner class so that it will lead to more simpler code and further if we have to execute one set of scenarios from a particular feature file then we can also make use of tags

[@SpecializeAutomation]

Welcome, let me know if you stuck anywhere, and I'm replying your mail about reporting issues.

[@Ashokkumarg8]

Hi, How it differs from Cucable plugin?

[@nandiniarumugam9772]

Hai, can you make a video on built automation, like if a Dev team member commit a change the automation testing must run automatically.

[@SpecializeAutomation]

+Nandini Arumugam We can do it by triggering the build through jenkins. Okay, I will keep that in mind :)

[@nandiniarumugam9772]

Specialize Automation Thanks a lot. I tried it in local and it works fine but when it comes to server side integration I'm facing many problems. Thought of getting help from you. I'm waiting for your amazing video

[@srinivastrully3789]

actual stuff starts @11.45

[@zeinepmuratbekova2661]

Hi, for some reason it is giving me maven dependencies exception, where i can find your pom.xml file? to see the structure

[@SpecializeAutomation]

Check my GitHub link shared in my profile, u will get Cucumber tutorial part related all things over there.

[@anandchaurasia9062]

Hi, I am not getting run option on right click on pom.xml file please help..

[@SpecializeAutomation]

Anand Chaurasia Make sure you have done configuring maven properly then only it shouldn't happen. If still issue persists then share me the screenshots and error log if any, you are getting. Mail to: [e-mail]

[@anandchaurasia9062]

Aditya, as you showed in video right click on pom.xml you are getting run as option but I am not getting it at all. I am using intellij

[@SpecializeAutomation]

Anand Chaurasia I would suggest if you can getting the option Add as a maven project after right click on that Pom.xml file. You can also refer the below thread, stackoverflow.com/questions/12304177/intellij-right-click-on-a-test-does-not-present-a-run-option

[@anandchaurasia9062]

Ok Aditya I will try tomorrow..thanks

[@SalimKocabas]

I could not catch what you say. Too fast narration.

[@bharathk859]

could you please share this project

[@prakashpohi7314]

please provide the git repo details

[@chivalrous_chevy1163]

Hello. Sorry for my bad english.

[@survivorfighter4683]

Slow down man! It is almost impossible to understand what you are saying

[@MrShynedagod]

Slow down man!! Buy a better mic.

[@AK-em7md]

poor explanation and communication, simple thing made it complicated