Speciation

Рет қаралды 31,714

Teacher's Pet

Күн бұрын

Learn about speciation and patterns of evolution in this video!

Пікірлер: 13

@raviolimaster6333 6 жыл бұрын

Learned more in 3.5 mins than I did in 1.5 hours... Thank you!!!

@psalm1tree466 6 жыл бұрын

We are told over and over and over that a new species shows evolution. Nope. Speciation does not support evolution as it is an example of stasis and stasis is the exact opposite of evolution. For ex. over 200,000 species of beetles are all still beetles. There are thousands upon thousands of species of birds, bees, lizards, trees, bacteria, trees, yeast, flowers, whatever. If a new species develops within any groups at all, you can bet your bottom science dollar that it will still be just a beetle, bee, bacteria, tree, fish, or whatever. . We are supposed to fill in the blanks here with...faith...and think, "Well! If a new species develops then things just keep evolving and evolving from there on." But the next step above a species, in the animal or plant kingdom, is a family. (A genus is just a grouping of similar species together). We aren't seeing any new families, much less any new order, class, phylum or kingdom forming. Anywhere. Ever. According to Darwin's so called Tree of Life and peer reviewed evolutionary literature, new families,classes, orders, etc. have evolved. Over and over and over. . However, nature operates today as it did in the past. In the real world, with trillions of life forms around us, we never see anything developing above the level of a new species. Those life forms out there have purportedly had eons and eons of ancestors preceding them which should be revealing at least one example of a part this family "transitioning" to be a part that of another family. Again, we see stasis. . We only see "transitions" to those higher levels in the purely theoretical, unverifiable, ancient past, in the realm of evolutionary literature, and never in any life around us. If there is no evidence for transitions from one family to another - and please provide data if you know of any such evidence in the observable and not theoretical realm - then there is no evidence for evolution. And that's just for starters on how evolutionism defies real science. . Kindly don't say some fossil provides the evidence. It is easy to point to a pile of petrified bones and make up stories about how its invisible and evidence free descendants turned into some other life form. But if you insist, use a fossil. Name it. Then tell how you know it even had a descendant, much less one significantly different from it, much less one that crossed the family barrier. Name the family it is transitioning out of and the one it is transitioning into. . While you are at it, since we are told evolution is driven by mutations and natural selection, great. Name a life form. Give data to show it is "evolving" as the result of a named act of natural selection or mutation. Remember, the poster kids for evolution are things like antibiotic resistant bacteria, some geckos, spotted salamanders, walking stick bugs, snowflake yeast, peppered moths, sickle cell anemia victims and lactose intolerant people. As always the "proof" for evolution proves the exact opposite. All the bacteria, geckos, etc. etc., and all their descendants, continue to be nothing but bacteria, geckos,, salamanders, homo sapiens etc. etc. Or if that is not the case, tell what they are "evolving" into that is not in those categories. . But no one ever names the life form or the act of natural selection, or mutation, that is causing it to "evolve." They usually try to change the subject or make excuses for why they can't answer. They may claim the answers to my questions are out there. On the net. Somewhere. Then they ask me to do my research and find it - while showing no evidene that they have done any research, themselves,at all. Not uncommonly they put down a smoke screen glut of words, but none of those words ever name the life form or the act of natural selection, or mutation I asked them to name. . You are not a goo through the zoo update. You have a Heavenly Father Who made you in HIS image and likeness. He loves you and wants you to know Him, and to love Him, too. If you are an atheist and evolution believer, if you are anyone at all, He wants you to be His child. Forever. I know I found that out myself when I was an athesist and evoltuion believer who had never looked outside the box.

@Aliwiw588 Жыл бұрын

@@psalm1tree466 bro it’s not that deep It’s probably just for school

@psalm1tree466 Жыл бұрын

@@Aliwiw588 I don’t know what you mean by it’s not that deep, or that it’s for school. Schools should not be teaching lies and propaganda. You apparently believe in evolution. This is totally typical of all evolution defenders I have seen replying to me: They totally evade dealing with what you seem to think you are defending. Namely, science. The truth is you really don’t understand how speciation works and you really couldn’t defend any transitions against rebuttals. Learn to think. Come out of the disinfo matrix. Find out who you really are. And this will be my only post to you as you obviously didn’t see the first one, what it was saying.

@psalm1tree466 Жыл бұрын

@@Aliwiw588 and p.s. I am not a bro. I am a lady. Learn to think outside the box. That might help you to escape the lies of evolution.

@psalm1tree466 Жыл бұрын

@@Aliwiw588 p.p.s. If you ever dare to look outside the box and learn to do critical thinking, and want to learn real science fiction: You could start with a short, funny vid called SEX Crevo Rant 13. Then you could Google: These quotes reveal the credulity of evolutionists. There you will see Nobel, prize winning secular scientists, many other secular scientists, including at least one world famous evolutionist saying that there is no evidence for evolution. You’ll see them saying that it is anti-science, and a kind of religion. Wake up guy. The real truth is out there if you really care about the truth.