The Weirdest Main Battle Tank

Decal link: tinyurl.com/42...
The Swedish tech tree in War Thunder is host to a plethora of very strange vehicles, with the best example being the Strv 103 tanks. Also known as the S-Tank, it has no turret and heavily angled armor. It isn't very meta, but I managed to get a nuke with it anyway.
Check the channel "About" section for the link to the creator of my profile picture.
Songs used (in order from first to last):
Command and Conquer: Generals OST
Second channel: / @spookstoon
Patreon: / spookston
#warthunder​​​​​​​​​​​​ #tanks​​​​​​​​​​​​ #warthundergameplay
The Weirdest Main Battle Tank

[@Spookston]

Gonna see if I can get another historical video done for next week :)

[@Coproductiongarage]

Thank u man for the awesome content over the years

[@Chimera700]

Bruh the Strv got 33% but the get a nuke with a low tier vehicle got 35%

[@peps_hy]

could you play AMX M4 in the 6.7 french line up ?! you will have a lot of fun

[@Fado__]

Could you play the XM-1 (gm), it is very ratlike and a unique MBT.

[@Iron_Blood_Enjoyer1933]

What happened to the video on the Conqueror?

[@djnotnice108]

This guy has gone from just a dude I watched occasionally to one of my favourite KZbinrs. His humour has taken over my friend group

[@thefuturist1867]

same

[@TheGrace020]

Same

[@Fry574]

same

[@yaboianz]

same lol

[@claudiocalabrese3865]

Same here, for me he is by far the best War Thunder youtuber not that other creators are bad, but I find Spookston’s content the only one with a perfect balance of both genuine humour and informative gameplay, aka, he is my first choice whenever I wanna see if a tank’s good before grinding it, having fun watching him struggle playing bad tanks or just playing rare vehicles

[@brosefmalkovitch3121]

The bars were actually a form of APFSDS defense. Even at the speeds the darts are moving, any disruption to their flight-path will cause the round to tumble a little when they hit the main armor, potentially greatly reducing the penetration of any dart that hits a bar.

[@kingoftheneeks3623]

It truly does work in game, they were making my m774 rounds Bounce when normally they'd pen with no trouble

[@shadowconquer-yv5yd]

Reason why I aim a bit lower. Thankfully I mostly encounter strv 103s when their engine is down, at their flanks, or I'm at the low ground.

[@Ragedaonenlonely]

APDS, not APFSDS. Don't mixt the two. They are very, very different and it's an important distinction to make. The armour was strictly designed to defuse HEAT, but they did find in testing that it could shatter or disrupt the trajectory of APDS when it impacted the bars as a bonus.

[@Oddball_E8]

@@Ragedaonenlonely Actually, it was found that it worked against both APDS (called underkaliber) and APFSDS (called "pilprojektil" in Swedish, and noted in the original findings to be effective against Pilprojectil and Underkaliber, so yeah... effective against both. (but originally made to combat HEAT, as you said)

[@triplus198]

why are so many leaking classified documents in this reply section? (obvious joke)

[@Cosmetic_Cat.]

The strv 103 is a very funny tank. But the unfortunate thing about it in warthunder is that if your engine gets shot out, you cant move. Unlike in real life, you could use the two engines separately, which is unfortunate.

[@jirinavratil6232]

In that case it would be more OP than it is. Its fire rate is almost like machine gun, frontally almost unpenetrable and very low profile with good speed... I hate facing this thing, its disgusting.

[@barrybend7189]

​@@jirinavratil6232so the Urbanmech of War thunder.

[@MrXPeaceLP]

At least the correctly implemented the ability to use it with just 1 crew member alive, which is cool.

[@01NSh10]

It was possible to use it without engine for some time, but aiming was horrible :(

[@MrTeddy12397]

@@jirinavratil6232 it's explodes from anything hitting it's lower front plate....

[@corwinhyatt519]

"You more or less find an alleyway and sit there" which is more or less what the Strv 103 was designed to do. That and camp behind dugouts or berms, falling back and setting up again two lines back to keep grinding down an invader.

[@Ragedaonenlonely]

Not really. It was designed to operate like any other tank, including on the offensive. They used staggered movement when operating offesively.

[@markusburstrom3485]

@@Ragedaonenlonely I've literally been in one and talked with the drivers. It is primarly made for defense tactics. It can be used in offensives. But it was designed to be a sneaky forest dweller waiting for prey. Hence the low profile. If it was to be like any other tank it would have a turret.

[@Ragedaonenlonely]

@@markusburstrom3485 Then you haven't read the manual, because there is literally no difference in operational doctrine between it and the Centurions. You're very wrong.

[@markusburstrom3485]

@@Ragedaonenlonely Ok what is the positive of not having a turret? Because it isnt ability to aim better when travelling through difficult train with a lot of obstacles. No you can only aim at your enemy then you can only go backwards or forwards. Which is a big minus in manuvrability while engaging. The low profile lets you hide way more easily than in comparison to other tanks who tower over you. It is better for entrenching positions. If you actually look at the video you will see what it is good at. A wall where other tanks turret would peak up it is invisible. You want to take a position and hold it. But most of all I'm gonna trust the actual Swedes I've talked with.

[@Ragedaonenlonely]

@@markusburstrom3485 Positive of not having a turret? Many, many things. Smaller profile. Less weight. Ability to slope the armour heavily. Easy use of an auto-loader (it doesn't have to account for the rotation of the turret or be limited by the available storage space of ammuntion), less crew because of the aforementioned turret, the ability to have a very stable mounting solution for the main gun, assisting accuracy and allowing for an increase in barrel length. If you actually READ about it you'll learn that the whole inspiration for its design came from documentation showing that most shells statistically hit the turrets of tanks and by deleting that you can make a more survivable vehicle. It's effective in a defensive position, but it's no less effective on the offense either where a smaller profile is nevertheless still very, very useful and it was not supposed to operate any more defensively than the Centurions. It design allows it to take advantage of Swedish terrain effectively, but that doesn't preclude it from doing other things too. All Swedish tanks were designed with that in mind, even the turreted ones. Hence the high levels of gun depression almost across the board.

[@Shaun_Jones]

To be fair about that anti-HEAT fence being classified, the actual secret part was probably the gaps in the bars, which I bet are the exact space apart to de-fuse Soviet HEAT rounds.

[@aiedenoldstien9751]

Yea but Gajin would see the fact it could defuse Soviet heat and just go "nah". Then let HEAT go through it.

[@GrainOnTheGo]

They also were anti APFSDS with the idea that it would absolutely penetrate the fence but put tumble into the round.

[@andyfriederichsen]

I thought Sweden was neutral during that time.

[@BlueScreenOfDeathPL]

@@andyfriederichsen They sure were, they bought equipment from the USSR... but they definitely would be on western side (culture) if they had to.

[@fuckinantipope5511]

​@@andyfriederichsenneutral but still fearing soviet invasion

[@miss_bec]

The Swedes really made a tank-sized robot from Battlebots and it actually works. I was half expecting it to have a flywheel hidden somewhere for melee.

[@Iron_Blood_Enjoyer1933]

Ireland made a vehicle combining British & Swedish technology, the Headless Coachmen. A Comet hull with the turret removed & a new open mount armed with the 90mm Pansarvärnspjäs 1110 recoilless rifle, but was cancelled due to lack of available funds.

[@ihatehandleupdate]

that thing looks so dumb

[@jbjb8335]

reminds me of the crusader self propelled gun

[@CAT3_V1]

Looks like a tractor, It'll be great at pulling a plow

[@liladoodle]

This would more likely than not be a premium for the British tree.

[@peepsbates]

I believe we also purchased our Comets without any HE, only AP. Because y'know, ALL the biggest tank battles occurred in Ireland, don't you know?

[@MrBananaPeace]

Fun fact: the reasonning behind this vehicle unconventional design was that the Swedish military needed a new tank, but they realized that if it was to get invaded, they would be in inferior numbers therefor on the defensive, which in that scenario this tank works very well.

[@Lillspratt]

Since shaped charges dont really work like they do in game, the fence was really usefull. Since it destroyed the shaped charge, making it not blow up at all.

[@lohenriksson9698]

Probably one of my favorite tanks for how specialized for the exact imagined fighting conditions of sweden it was.

[@pepse6813]

what I find coolest about Sweden is that even though this is one of the most bizarre things in the game, it can be considered "normal" compared to other things in the Swedish tech tree

[@No-one-you-know837]

It’s good for protection but you end up just staring at your enemy when they engine hit you

[@gavinthejanitor]

i've had someone fire a ridiculous amount of shells into it without so much as tickling my crew, managed to finish repairing and get on target right as the match was ending

[@patrioticmilkman]

everyone's gangster till the door wedge starts speaking Swedish

[@pokeydude]

The 103 was also a solution to a problem of the time, maximizing the efficiency of the autoloader, autoloaders would force the gun to return to a base position which severely limit its efficiency, thus they sought to solve this problem, two solution were thought up, the oscillating turret (Kranvagn/EMIL Project) and the unmoving turret/hull-aim (Strv 103)

[@hellono6501]

Spookston: Conqueror on Friday or Sunday Also Spookston: WE NEED SUFFERING

[@Spookston]

no

[@TheMiraOfAll]

@@Spookstonyes

[@juliosalgado8972]

​@@Spookstonthe British mains demands an sacrifice

[@Fry574]

mhm@@Spookston

[@lucassundwall6639]

​@@Fry574 Mhm monkey

[@Ziphoroc]

3:24 'Broken Arrow' is a term for an accident involving a nuke, typically when one is lost or missing. It does not refer to dropping artillery on top of your current position, the closest term would be 'Danger Close'

[@Stridsvagn-PanzerKommandant]

This thing is shockingly survivable, though painful due to constantly getting your engine and trans wrecked

[@allorfh2495]

yeah, every time I play that 54 second time always come up at least once unless I snipe across the whole map.

[@FiveTwoSevenTHR]

I maxed my crew's repair stats before anything else because of this tank.

[@jpppe]

Lol the word "unfortunate" has become part of my daily vocabulary just from your content.

[@leok9920]

Same

[@hris26]

You should try DF 105, it's very fun to play with 400mm of pen and 5 second autoloader.

[@IMAPRO9307]

lol

[@casperreininga3253]

Then the SK105 is more fun. APFSDS with a 4 second reload, thermals and a LR.

[@suzanarubi9254]

​@@casperreininga3253but it's at 8.7

[@agentp5218]

Feel like ppl are sleeping on it.

[@YourLocalFrenchMain]

"This is the worst version of it" Proceeds to get a nuke

[@gatoxd7544]

You could play the ab 41 at like 5.7 to show the true italian ww2 experience (pain included)

[@RustyDroid]

14:27 wow, an M2 failing, that's a rare one.

[@enkeksinimea4399]

Attempt number 2 of asking Spookston to play the RU-251, the faster and smaller mini-Leopard 1 at a lower BR that gets scouting. It's one of my all-time favourite tanks in the game (my other favourite was the standard American M41 Bulldog before it got nerfed into oblivion), has suffered some BR changes recently but it should still be great.

[@juntingiee2602]

gaijin try not to nerf US vehicles challenge impossible

[@Destroyer2925]

Fun fact: the STRV 103 is the only tank that can be operated by a single crew member.

[@TeamKill52]

Spookston Sweedish videos are always a pleasant watch

[@Worldoftankistenoob]

the strv103 wasn't actually made to be a mbt but more of an ambush tank as sweden rely more on a defensive strategy when it comes to war

[@arturreinholdunt7974]

Ooh yeah. The forbidden cheese wedge. The silly door stopper. The only tank that has brought me two nukes in a row.

[@carllinden533]

13:22 Don't think we didn't appreciate that.

[@RavenWolffe77]

The mere two notes of World Beater were enough to send my sides into orbit. It's internet law now that you HAVE to play World Beater whenever a Bradley is on screen.

[@MegaJani]

13:09 Bkan 1C Though it uses the same powerpack

[@Ragedaonenlonely]

Yup. The VEAK-40 also uses the same driveline fun fact. Initially it was intended to develop a MBT, SPG, SPAAG and APC all based on the 103's driveline to be parts interchangeable, but in the end they only made the 3 former and only 2 of those actually entered service.

[@kilianschoenauer1184]

13:16 sweden has many other vehicles with 103 parts like the bandkanon it has a longer 103 chassis with a 155 mm canon at 6.7 also can you play the bandkanon.

[@Thunderstar7]

Spookston upload to watch right after work? Yes I will never stop asking for T-35

[@Gregorio416]

“Who knew you could get so far by just…being a roadblock?” HR departments everywhere 😅

[@LPLGamer7]

The strv is the definition of smooth brain activity

[@owenvanscoyk3116]

Petition to make Stridsvagn Sunday, where spookston uploads a video on a Swedish tank every Sunday

[@michimatsch5862]

15:20 most competent nuke deployment.

[@MrX-un8cz]

I just love the fact that this tank can be operated by a single crew if they have to, just goes to show how much thought they put in and they want to make the most out of it Of course if you're on the offensive this is a horrendous tank for that role, but for defensive, it's do the job pretty damn well

[@blueshark7385]

14:59 Pyrocynical.

[@qBigBoo]

I bestow Spookston with the highest award I can think of: always being my background for when I need to eat 🙏

[@Meez2.0]

Day 19 of asking spookston to play the arl 44 tank destroyer

[@Mornomgir]

Im happily suprised the comment section for once when talking about the strv103 wasnt filled with mouthbreathers saying "iTs A tAnK dEsTrOyEr". As far as i understand we have the world of tanks game to thank for that particular group of flatearthers. Also it wasnt designed to be a turretless tank. The conlusion was more along the lines "turret bad. turret reason for many dead tanks" but what if we just stuck the turret on tracks....

[@generalmcshooty397]

Y'know what the best MBT is? The AS-42/47.

[@pengyvr]

I would love to see spookston play the swedish leopard 1a5

[@eyeblech2001]

1:34 Begleitpanzer? more like BEGONEpanzer!

[@Scriptum.]

I’ve been binging Spookston’s videos over the past few weeks. The humor and gameplay is continuously entertaining. Thanks for the countless hours of entertainment Spookston, hope you’re doing well man.

[@foolishsparky]

6:20 Technically correct but technically not. The STRV 103C was supposed to make use of the natural terrain and defensible positions to prevent breakthrough attacks. It's why it has hull aiming and the variable transmission, it's so it could lift itself up over berms to shoot at incoming armor. There's definitely a lot more complicated stuff that goes into its design than that, but it was never meant to function the same way as how we think the Abrams or T-90 tanks function. The Swedes prioritized a defensive front over an offensive one, which heavily influenced battle tactics, vehicle design, and even the way they constructed bunkers. The whole idea was to make Sweden a defensive fortress the likes of which no enemy would ever want to invade, and would cost the enemy terribly even if they did, with the hope being that their home forces could hold out long enough for NATO to reinforce them. Reminder, the STRV was designed at the height of the Cold War, with big bad Russia right on the doorstep. Like everything during that time period, it had a major influence on design mentality, and Sweden wanted to ensure its neutrality by force. Again! This is a very surface level dig into the entire situation, and I'm not an expert in any capacity, so I could absolutely have interpreted certain things incorrectly or misunderstood certain sources, but to the best of my knowledge, this is what I am aware of when it comes to the STRV 103's MBT designation.

[@Ragedaonenlonely]

Funny how you're calling him wrong when that was EXACTLY how it was meant to function. It used the exact same operational doctrine as the Centurions. It was not intended to be used any differently at all. The only thing is they used a staggered advance when operating offensively.

[@foolishsparky]

@@Ragedaonenlonely Operational doctrines differ by country and military. That's why I said "technically correct, technically not." rather than just saying he was wrong. Because he's not. It's just a different implementation vs what would be someone's first thought.

[@Ragedaonenlonely]

@@foolishsparky It's still wrong though. Because the Centurions and 103's share the same doctrine. Ergo they weren't designed to operate as defensive vehicles, they were just designed to operate as tanks the same way the Centurions were. Neither were they designed to not go on the offensive. Sweden never intended to carry out offensive wars, only defensive ones, however even defensive wars still require you to go on the offense to retake lost territory. Ergo the idea that the 103's were designed as defensive vehicles isn't any more correct than saying the Centurions were. In the Swedish military they just operated like tanks, same as any other.

[@drplays7978]

yeah i sold the recent swedish top tiered wheeled event vehicle and picked up the lower br premium strv 103 since i knew it was broken, and i knew i could quickly grind the swedish tree with it. ended up getting 2 nukes in a row after about 10-15 matches in it, almost all the matches i have had in it have been fun, which is insane. if you have been playing this game for years and are struggling to still have fun, pick this thing when its on sale and give it some back ups. its just high enough in br to where it gets all the good gadgets but low enough to where you aren't fighting in the terrible top tier.

[@Tomfooleryman57]

Would love to see a video on the M43 75/46 please

[@shocknaw]

no way, a spookston video where he doesnt flame german mains for existing?

[@INSANESUICIDE]

It becomes even more insane when you dive down the rabbit hole of the S tank development, recently they were being refurbished and modernised and even rebuilt to be remote controlled drones, sadly when most of the work done and most tanks ready it was just scrapped. As with so much when it comes to military spending😢

[@mcpuff2318]

Nope, the remote control model was just a one-off prototype with some cameras strapped to it. Not at all a ready product. And it wasn't recently, it was in the 90s. There was also one experimental mine clearing variant with a flail, the prototype is still around

[@adbp1513]

M60A1 RISE(P) is actually good with the BR changes, I was surprised after my original experience with it and I think you will be too. (It gave me my first nuke friday despite being stock.)

[@Giacomo020189]

I've spaded the RISE, now I started the TTS that got the round of the abrams plus thermal, but I always use them as a back up vehicle cause the grind is a pain in the ass since they are slow, at that BR I start with the XM803 which is cool

[@HEATSEEKR]

Funny you posted this. Been playing 8.0 Sweden and have really enjoyed diving back into the S-tank

[@Jump-Shack]

The STRV 103 is honestly the more normal S tank than the Strv 74

[@sundhaug92]

The 74 isn't an S-tank, the S-tank name came from it being the Swedish alternative in a competition

[@Ragedaonenlonely]

@@sundhaug92 Correct. They had 3 alternatives for coming up with the next MBT intended to replace the Centurions (though it never really did). Alternative A was an Anglo-American design, alternative T was a German-Franco design and alternative S was a new Swedish design of tank, aka the S-tank. The 74 was never intended to replace or serve as a MBT, more so as a light tank to give light support to the infantry brigades and it was already in service when the 103 was projected.

[@HephaestusSystems]

Got my first nuke ever with this tank. Unconventional but ridiculously effective when played right. Thanks for playing this guy!

[@TheMiraOfAll]

Day 17 of asking for a Cromwell v rp3 video

[@chicanamaoist687]

STRIDSVAGN MY BELOVED

[@teppygray4314]

hate to be a beggar but day 91 of ask for pantsir

[@Finstinlocker]

Yeah we’re the pantsir at?

[@Average_Nordic_Guy]

It’s never gonna happen dude he hates top tier

[@ThunderDanger0]

💀 pfp​@@Average_Nordic_Guy

[@teppygray4314]

@@Average_Nordic_Guy does he hate it more than cas though?

[@Just-My-Clips]

@@ThunderDanger0u know spookston is gay right?

[@pilotmanpaul]

10:50 This is me after I kill 5-8 enemy tanks in my Leopard 2A4 yet my teammates still somehow lose all the cap and we all die.

[@Sky_EggYT]

🧀

[@wallywolf814]

"How am I not dead yet?" Well that's the S tank experience for ya, it's absolutely ridiculously survivable.

[@jonvonboatman7062]

Your humor lines right up with the entire friend group, we’ll collectively screen share watch 30 videos at a time

[@thefancytiefling]

I would think the tank would do better if it didn't constantly shake like a maraca anytime you aim down sights and anything but solid concrete under your tracks

[@Feanor6450]

Another reason for the weird design was the gun, sweden wanted rapid fire autoloaders but at the time that caused problems with loading guns while elevated so their solution was to either use an oscillating turret like the French which was the emil project, (not to be confused with the Sturer emil) or simply not use a turret and have hull aim, which became the strv 103 in order to move the entire loader with the cannon.

[@joshuamueller3206]

That helicopter in the last match was the most Call of Duty cinematic thing I have ever seen in War Thunder.

[@shinobi_o_o___]

10:30 I've had cars eat KE-W before and gaijin still doesn't bat an eye. not to mention trees/busges only falling into my line of sight

[@fatrobin72]

"Drop the bomb"... tosses it up and forwards, good to see physics is still working...

[@regalplays7135]

The riff at 13:22 absolutely killed me

[@TheLordNovo]

You should play the SU-85. It’s a soviet casemate TD that has incredible penetration at its 4.0-4.3 BR range, and for a casemate, only having an 8 second reload is a godsend for having around 145mm pen. Easily became one of my favorite vehicles to grind with in the soviet tree

[@indyjons321]

Spook: "The T-55AM-1 is a tank I will never feel bad for killing. Never ever." Me/Patrick: "Never ever forever never ever ever?!"

[@vgames1543]

Spookston, heed my beggin, bush up the Sturmtiger to an absurd degree and troll around.

[@tty4393]

The most frustrating thing about this tank is the freakishly long repair time when you're down to 1 crew member to the point that I feel like J out and change to another fully functioning tank is the more efficient way to play

[@Eagron]

i love the design, but i hate playing against this lego 1×1 cheese slope

[@tiger_h1]

This dude is my favorite KZbin creator because he shows the game and nothing more but still makes me get asma from wheezing 😂❤

[@amarthon6597]

Spookston is so good he gets hit by a nuke and only takes wing damage

[@yugomonke1]

Strv 103: flat boi Strv 74: squished boi

[@WK-gx2zs]

Spookston's going into the Swedish book of grudges for this one

[@xmattthew201]

Spookston favorite word "unfortunate"😂

[@karl_franz_prince_and_emperor]

6:49 my guy incuring all the grudges in the domaz kron rn

[@Kat-b1z1y]

This man has started as explaining if war thunder was historically accurate to my favourite youtuber

[@58Rev]

Love the S-tank from the first time I saw it. Its weirdness was so appealing and an excellent answer to the Soviet tanks of its day. I don't know that urban, knife fighting ranges favour the little guy, but I think in its natural environment out in the hills and fields it would have fared nicely. The Strv 103С was the final iteration of the -103 series of tanks. The Strv 1030 was the precursor model, lacking the fence and armour ribs of the C model while firing the slpprj m/61 & 66 APDS rounds. Your C model fired both APDS and APFSDS so you're fighting the most combat capable of the line.

[@MberEnder]

I deleted the game yesterday. But anyway, I too think this is one of the coolest tanks ever made.

[@i0315]

This is my favorite tank in history (besides its proposed modernisation package though that never entered service) thanks for covering it.

[@TheSchultinator]

To be fair to that first CAS, there were three tanks there, it looks like he bombed long rather than targeting you

[@chris_hisss]

Hilarious edits into the great gameplay! What I have been noticing is that people really look mostly for turrets in war thunder. If you aren't moving especially people just don't see you. Seems like the case with this too. Those super flat Italian TDs are great examples. I also wonder if people are blasting music too further adding to your stealth. Like hey team turn down the sabaton and listen ffs! I am not sure I will ever get to these upper tiers to play this but I really want to. I also didn't see the reticle bouncing that took 5 years to fix apparently. I am at 6.7 in US and Ger and like 5.7 in Sweden. GGs

[@Feanor6450]

I listen to Sabaton, but yeah, I have started stopping because it makes it harder to hear enemies.

[@sharkslay12]

i swear, one day Spookston is gonna add the HL2 Stalker scream into one of his videos and im not gonna expect it

[@andreasottohansen7338]

Fun fact, it's full name "Stridsvagn", basically means "battlewagon"

[@riflya6012]

1:01 Spookston finally fight a SEA server player Like wtf, they either hunt you like you owe him money or just completely clueless

[@ODST_Parker]

For the record, he did NOT change his keybind for hull aiming.

[@CommandoDragon]

Spookston: "The STRV 103 is very situational" Me getting dominated by every type of STRV 103 when I try to fight it : Are you sure about that?

[@uphi-downlow5792]

The one vehicle I absolutely respect. I died to the exact same guy 2 times due to spawn camping, all I had left was my Wiesel 1A4, I scouted and warned my team, This guy was my last hope to get my revenge, he popped up, got shot on the side by a different guy, and it was 3 spawn campers, all I could do was scout and hope. Mad lad killed all 3, I got to see the guy who killed me explode, and saved our spawn point.

[@95Karlsson]

Fun fact. It is supposed to have a faster reload. IRL it could fire, reload and fire again in 2.8 seconds if the gunner was holding the fire and reload buttons.

[@Feanor6450]

I love this thing for 3 main reasons, 1 it is wierd and unique, 2 it actually worked despite being a wierd and unconventional vehicle, 3 it was brilliant for the intended role of being an ambush vehicle hidden in ditches and snowdrifts to rapid fire away at russian convoys using main roads. It was an excellent vehicle in that it would have been great at the job it was intended for and it was also a unique unconventional design, I love it.

[@V3RTIGO222]

When you take the idea of 'sloped armor' to it's theoretical limit. You've seen pancake, now witness... WEDGE.

[@newdenispro6430]

Ngl i think the tank looks pretty good

[@VNG_oof]

I love how Sweden made a slice of cheese into a tank and it ended up working alright

[@Kirito-qx6zv]

Swedish engineer: *Looks at doorstop*. “I have an idea!”

[@Blind_Hawk]

I bet that the reason the "fences" in front of the tank were so long classified is because someone just did not bother to de-classify them. Also, I hate that god damn thing every time I face it...

[@wyvernbravo]

7:59 bro brought full ammo SMH

[@Dhgbro]

definitely the funniest war thunder video ive seen so far , editing on point

[@psyborg4706]

2024 CAS montage already looking strong