SQ321 severe turbulence: Rapid G-force changes, sharp altitude drop caused injuries

Рет қаралды 46,583

Күн бұрын

Early findings into the extreme turbulence on Singapore Airlines flight SQ321 have been released. It showed that quick and sudden uncommanded altitude changes likely caused injuries. There were also rapid changes to gravitational or G-forces. More than a hundred passengers were hurt, and one died from a likely heart attack. Singapore Airlines said it has acknowledged the findings of the investigation and is cooperating fully with authorities. May Wong reports live from Bangkok.

Пікірлер: 97

@bobafett5757 4 ай бұрын

*May is such a dedicated and excellent reporter cos the public need to know the seriousness of those injuries caused to the passengers so that lesson can be learned when onboarding a plane*

@edwardtran1974 4 ай бұрын

This description is exactly what happens when you fly into a thunder storm.

@zzzowie 4 ай бұрын

CNA, why don't you apologise here for repeatedly giving incorrect information in previous news reports, for example wrongly reporting that the airplane was "free falling for 6,000 feet". Such incorrect reporting repeated after I had already pointed out in the comments that this was an incorrect interpretation of the flight data, as the 6,000 feet descent was regarding a controlled descent to a new flight level which took about 6 minutes

@SitocawithSorento 4 ай бұрын

so it only occured within few seconds??? not minutes? im confused

@bobafett5757 4 ай бұрын

Its seconds after minutes why dont u get that

@danlovesayu 4 ай бұрын

Maybe they were paid to DIVERT public attention? Hahahahaha........

@rsb2699 4 ай бұрын

report them to POFMA, fake news

@bobafett5757 4 ай бұрын

@@rsb2699 Most international news reported 6k feet so Pofme for what Fuuuuuullllll

@ahphong2904 3 ай бұрын

The media relentless milking of sq321 is air turbulence is disgusting. Chasing the passengers up to their hospital bedside.

@bobafett5757 4 ай бұрын

*So can this uncommanded altitude changes be avoided based on the dexterity of the Maneuver piloting the plane?*

@wheelfree 4 ай бұрын

No... everything is under the control and command of the Supreme Being!

@bobafett5757 4 ай бұрын

@@wheelfree Being or Boeing ?

@wheelfree 4 ай бұрын

@@bobafett5757 "Being". I trust the SIA technicians and engineers with whatever planes(Boeing or others) they fly, they'll make sure it's flight worthy.

@bobafett5757 4 ай бұрын

@@wheelfree What makes you so sure ?

@wheelfree 4 ай бұрын

@@bobafett5757 It's world class Singapore Airlines, We don't achieve Number 1 or 2 by luck or praying to Supreme Being.

@kamwenggoh8198 4 ай бұрын

3:55: only ABOUT 26 are still in hospital. You mean not a full 26, perhaps 25.86? Didn't know you can have a partial person. Something new.

@noelkwek 3 ай бұрын

Public shareholders initiating hints to privatise Singapore Airlines Limited after COVID-19 Pandemic caused stock price to collapse & latest turbulence disaster by SQ321. Calls to provide a premium offer to shareholders over latest average daily closing prices.

@krollpeter 4 ай бұрын

"It showed that quick and sudden uncommanded altitude changes likely caused injuries." Didn't we always know that? And what is "uncommanded"? When does the more accurate report with an understandable description of the incident follow?

@ninaboosexy 3 ай бұрын

It was hacked?

@AA-le9ls 4 ай бұрын

"Brain fractures"? Someone seems to think that the brain consists of bone tissue.

@ukmaxi 4 ай бұрын

I guess they meant 'skull fractures' 😅

@btrue2day 4 ай бұрын

Uncommanded??? Means the plane went rogue? and the pilot still went back to autopilot after the uncommanded altitude changes?

@jessicaregina1956 4 ай бұрын

No it means wedge antilles was the pilo

@ireumiobseum 4 ай бұрын

In this context, uncommanded means a change in the aircraft attitude (pitch/bank) which is not a direct result of pilot input. This is usually due to sudden severe turbulence or windshear. In very rare cases, it is technical fault. The pilots going back to autopilot is not a problem as the problem wasn’t even related to the autopilot in the first place. Also, the autopilot was re-engaged after the aircraft had been stabilised by the pilots.

@jessicaregina1956 4 ай бұрын

Could it have been skynet?

@btrue2day 4 ай бұрын

@@jessicaregina1956 🙀

@danlovesayu 4 ай бұрын

@@jessicaregina1956 ARNIE'S IS BACK YET AGAIN!!!!!!!!

@bobafett5757 4 ай бұрын

*Can CNA interview the pilot cos curious to know about his flight experience throughout his career and also was there a co pilot and other crew inside the cockpit when turbulence happened ?*

@danlovesayu 4 ай бұрын

I doubt that will happen as so far, SIA is keeping them silence and away from the public. Pilots are the one people only this planet know what happen but SIA will keep them away for sure. Pilots name have been kept as a secret also......but someone will dig and dig. Confirm sure can find trace of their names.......as there will be kaypoh people who are the pilot's friends won't be able to keep secret for sure. It's sooner or later we will know the actual truth. The more SIA try to delay, the more curious other media will be. Waiting for the biggest news of the year to blow out of proportion...........soon!

@LonganLee 3 ай бұрын

Would there be national self interest at play? I wonder who defines this self interest

@LonganLee 3 ай бұрын

In short, had belting up been more strictly enforced, less injuries. We have death penalty and detention without trial and fake news law. Why not Belt Up without Trail? Mandatory belting up or be jailed without trial. Jailed in the loo

@polarspirit 4 ай бұрын

Inaccurate journalism

@syq8888 4 ай бұрын

victims slamming 1.3 times their weight to the ceiling to follow by 3 times to the ground. Caused by auto pilot input.

@ABC-ed8cg 4 ай бұрын

That’s clearer than CNA explanation. 👍🏼👍🏼 How many G is a free fall? Assuming a lift free-falling & your feet can’t touch the ground..

@panda63725 4 ай бұрын

So autopilot slams people? So now we can conclude traffic lights kill people?

@ukmaxi 4 ай бұрын

Erm... No, not caused by autopilot 🤦🏻‍♂️

@alantam8520 4 ай бұрын

Wow.. pilots are blaming the skies for their incompetence.

@jazzjazznjazz 4 ай бұрын

Well you don’t seem to know a lot about aviation … do you ?

@AlanSmith88888 4 ай бұрын

Horribly unsafe Singapore airlines. Pilots and the company need to be held accountable. Lawsuits incoming. Gross negligence

@zandrakoon4651 3 ай бұрын

Why did the SIA pilots ascend, fly towards a developing storm, putting passengers in extreme danger ? This defy basic common sense...is this what SIA pilots are train to do when experiencing turbulence ?

@SJF15 4 ай бұрын

Didn't mention the controlled descent!

@bobafett5757 4 ай бұрын

Under investigation

@greenminer313 4 ай бұрын

LOL, seriously ? we do controlled descents all the time, that's just called a descent. when it's bumpy like that we just ask for a descent to lower FL. stick to your day job

@ukmaxi 4 ай бұрын

@bobafett5757 i have already explained to you several times about this. Just accept you do not understand physics or the fluid dynamic properties of air, nor how they interact with a wing's surface.

@gotmyonu1027 4 ай бұрын

Pls explain in English

@Cygnet174 4 ай бұрын

In a nutshell, flight SQ321 had a 54-metre (178 feet) altitude drop in 4.6 seconds, causing injuries to passengers and crew who were not belted up then.

@Mari_Selalu_Berbuat_Kebaikan 4 ай бұрын

Let's always do alot of good ❤️

@sujoyroy3157 4 ай бұрын

Where did the plane drop 6000 ft. More confusing analysis than before.

@zzzowie 4 ай бұрын

The 6,000 feet descent happened after the turbulence. It was a controlled descent to a new flight level (from 37K to 31K ft.) towards BKK and took about 6 minutes. So there was no 6000 ft drop; that was complete nonsense.

@rtjahyadi7868 4 ай бұрын

Vertical turbulence mate

@bobafett5757 4 ай бұрын

How to know where and how it dropped 6k feet if you dont experience it first hand

@k.vn.k 4 ай бұрын

Yeah descent != drop

@zzzowie 4 ай бұрын

@@bobafett5757 1) as I wrote, it didn't drop. The flight crew made a controlled descent to a new flight level. 2) How to know: you a plane constantly broadcasts lots of flight data, such as elevation, air speed, vertical acceleration and lots more. It is called ADS-B. Some receive and record this. You could have googled this

@tanpengjoo7205 4 ай бұрын

Human are just like an ant on ground, man can innovate the beat technologies but not matter how they can innovate still cannot " beat " natures powerful strength.those so-called A I and algorithm calculations are just useless and worthless if can't stop or prediict when the next turbulence will occur.

@joelchoo4412 4 ай бұрын

Look at the Video Title everything except SIA fault lol

@jakobie 4 ай бұрын

This needs to be translated to layman language otherwise, the investigation is lost on the common masses, i.e. the intended audience.

@ukmaxi 4 ай бұрын

This is a preliminary report, not the full and final one. Also, get good so you can understand.

@Cygnet174 3 ай бұрын

Reuters' explanation is that the aeroplane SQ321 had a 54-metre (178 feet) altitude (height) drop in 4.6 seconds, causing people not wearing seat-belts to be airborne ("flying" in air) and then falling down, resulting in their injuries.

@Now2Market 4 ай бұрын

I want to know who were the Pilots, local, new citizens, PRs or foreign hired hands. Wide body planes don't just fall 6,000 feet due to "natural" turbulence and when such a rare event occurs, usually there many other factors associated with it, including human "errors" that may include culture and ethic habits.

@zzzowie 4 ай бұрын

The 6,000 feet descent happened after the turbulence. It was a controlled descent to a new flight level (from 37K to 31K ft.) towards BKK and took about 6 minutes. So there was no sudden 6000 ft drop; that was complete nonsense. CNA mixes things up and kept on giving incorrect information. Never noticed any apology from CNA or even admitting they got it wrong.

@lordjim3109 4 ай бұрын

There are many questions and so far very few answers. Just plenty of conjectures presented as facts in the media. All we know for a fact is that the plane suddenly lost altitude, which caused injuries and damage. Then descended to an emergency landing in Bangkok. Even the "clear air turbulence" is only a theory at this point. What`s really insane is the media frame the story in such a way as to almost suggest that the "severe turbulence"" was brought about by the passengers who did`t wear their seatbelts, which they should have done even though the seat belts sign was off.