Рет қаралды 1,965
Seems like I cover this once every few years, compression & efficiency along with squish bands and why it's worth getting to the .018 to .022 range on these little simplistic sub 100cc two strokes. I think the first time I covered this on video was in 2014 time frame. First time on the boards prolly around 2004. Problem was then I assumed everyone knew this so it was buried as incidental information in the video's of the time on something else. After watching some of the larger than my channel's attempts to cover things about making these things run better/different its apparent the basic physics of these little two strokes aren't really well understood and certainly not discussed. Not that is is my place to do that, but if I don't at least "kick" the bee's nest from time to time, it won't even be discussed and the freak show saws will dominate the conversation vs. good solid two stroke fundamentals. Funny to me is the history. Two strokes have been sorted out for decades. I doubt the power to weight ratio of the road racing Yamaha's from the 70's and 80's has really been improved on. Maybe with better materials pushing the edges of physics... Out board went one direction, snow mobiles another but the fundamentals are the same. Relative to saws.... Husqvarna as a company had pushed the performance of piston port single cylinder two strokes along with the rest of the Motocross manufacturers in the 60's thru 70's to the point of diminishing returns w/o things like water cooling, power valves to alter timing and even fuel injection. Not a surprise to me the Husqvarna EARLY on in the late 1960's entered the market with a light weight and powerful piston port design which is the genesis of MANY others spawned from the same research out of the major Swedish manufacturers of the time. Here in the States companies were selling heavy reed valve solution's while those Husqvarna's drove the marketplace to where every manufacturer has a similar layout. Always wondered how much of the Motorcycle RD team experience impacted the saw designs of the time. :) Any way going into the weeds. The "Tricks" and concepts I cover here were ones I learned back as a kid racing 125 motocross in the 1970's and as an engineer in the 1980's these same concepts were used to "tweak" my race bikes of the time. Of course they were WAY more advanced by then than ANY chainsaw build period. The cylinders looked like swiss cheese, pistons too as they squeezed more and wider power bands out of those little things. Eventually case reeds and water cooling with power valves won the day but who can forget the Piston Port KTM's Husqvarna's and Maico's of the late 70's :)