Stanley Kubrick, Moon Landing promo

Original video here from the Christian Marek channel • misja Apollo 11

[@nunuvyerbizness]

Kubrick filmed the fake moon landing, but he was such a perfectionist he insisted on shooting on location.

[@generalkang1969]

Best description I have ever seen for this!

[@TotalDec]

Like, the 30th time I've read this attempt at humor.

[@mariosstefanitsis5374]

This video is fake!! Only moonlsnding by Kubrick,was in Space Odyssey 2001!!

[@gadsdonflag4289]

@@TotalDec Keep reading.....you'll get it eventually. smh

[@lucasoheyze4597]

This joke needs to be retired

[@BradleyParker-m4i]

Why doesn't anyone ever bring up how the Soviets were tracking it, and verified that we indeed landed on the moon

[@ABBATributeNZ]

You just did, post a reference, but remember, USA saved Russia from a famine during this time. In other words, bribed with life saving grain to look the other way.

[@moonwatch7963]

that'd be a first, the west actually listening to Russia

[@yazzamx6380]

@@ABBATributeNZ - Quote the YEAR of the 'famine' you're speaking of please, because the last time I checked it wasn't in the 60s :-)

[@wildboar7473]

....seen a LOT of someones bring that up! Never seen explanations on how, 1969 Space tracking was not quite fine tuned, no moon satellites, frequency is needed. They had spies on Moon to check? No One told me that!

[@yazzamx6380]

@32ModB - Radio waves travels at the speed of light, where communication was achieved with massive house-size radio dishes pointed DIRECTLY at the moon (that's not how your phone works :-)). It takes 1.3 seconds for radio waves to reach the moon from the Earth and vice-versa, meaning when Nixon heard the astronauts he would reply immediately (why would he delay himself? :-)), but his reply would take 1.3 seconds to reach the moon and the astronauts response would take another 1.3 seconds to return. So the minimum time it would take for us to hear the astronauts respond directly to something Nixon said would be 2.6 seconds, which is what happened.

[@alfinpogform4774]

NASA July 1969: "We faked the moon landing, let's do it again!" NASA Nov 1969: "Ha, we got away with it a second time, let's do it again!" NASA April 1970: "Ohhhh, let's adds some extra drama this time around!" NASA Jan 1971: "Ha, we got away with it a third time, let's give it a go for a 4th time!" NASA July 1971: "Geez, everyone keeps falling for this, we're on a roll, 5th times a charm!" NASA April 1972: "Our friendly competitors down at the CIA reckon we couldn't get away with it a sixth time; the bet is on!" NASA Dec 1972: "My God the American public are such Bozo's to fall for this 6 times in a row, one more time just for laughs!" NASA Jan 1973: "Ok, that's enough, against diminishing odds of repetitive subterfuge we've fooled absolutely everyone, but there's a chance in the future that certain people who have "special insight" and who have "done their own research" might spill the beans on us......

[@ABBATributeNZ]

Yes, that's how propaganda works, the bigger the lie, the better it works, as humans fall in line for fear of being kicked out of their tribes. Do you think on 9/11 those buildings could possibly have been brought down by planes, whose fuel and kinetic energy was already spent? Quite a psych-ops. Love the BBC lady who got fed (compartmentalized) info that building 7 had fallen, but it was 20 minutes behind schedule and still standing. Isn't 911 a very handy and American number to remember, if you're pulling off something big? 😉

[@alfinpogform4774]

@@ABBATributeNZ Nope, intentional faking something as incredibly complex as the moon landing seven times just increases the probability of being caught out. ***"planes, whose fuel and kinetic energy was already spent..."*** Kinetic energy was already spent, yes. Fuel, no. Fuel in liquid form doesn't burn, it is the vapour that burns. Considering there was around 40,000 litres of fuel on a plane I'm happy to accept that that a great portion of unvapourised liquid fuel poured down into the guts of the building and continued to burn as it vapourised and weakened the superstructure to the point of eventual failure. I find your use of the term "tribe" interesting considering that it is a fairly archaic terminology that few people in the world would describe for themselves nowadays. Is it possible that your use of the word comes easy to you because you feel part of a small "tribe" of people that feels marginalised because you are "the only group of persons that really knows what's going on"?

[@SkepticAurora]

​@@alfinpogform4774 Apollo 11 is real. Cope and seethe.

[@ominus2338]

@@ABBATributeNZ Are you implying that the planes that hit the world trade center towers were "out of fuel"? 🤣.... and kinetic energy? 🤣🤣

[@Scarhead_Ed]

​@@ominus2338it was an inaide job tho.

[@roquefortfiles]

FYI. Stanley Kubrick is not a special effects technician. He hires people for that like Doug Trumbull, Wally Veevers, Con Pederson. The "Lunar surface" in 2001 was accomplished with miniature landscapes and paintings.

[@WayneBrejcha]

Kubrick strived for naturalistic everything in 2001Space Odyssey. But, in the late '60s and early '70s, there was no convincing way to fake astronauts doing the very subtle thing that happens when they stand and walk and bound in 1/6 the earth's gravity. The actors playing astronauts on the Kubrick's "2001" moon scenes are pretty obviously standing and moving full Earth gravity. They just move slowly. That was the best the fx could do. The NASA footage of the astronauts really moving about on the moon shows very clearly how 'moon mass gravity' affects the astronauts' stance and mobility. Not to mention how the dust thy kick up ascends and falls.

[@wildboar7473]

bla bla bla obviously subtle hopping and bouncing falling and kangarooing indeed indeed no umbrella like in Mary Poppins (1965 uk), those were *WAY* HIGH incredible jumps! Nothing Godzilla could do. Clearly and actually. 🥸👏

[@Terry-q7y]

They looked like they were in low gravity when walking and jumping because they were attached to helium balloons

[@willibrordusa.vanderweide2962]

Spacetravel is a hoax, technically nonsense

[@yazzamx6380]

@@willibrordusa.vanderweide2962 - Because you believe the Earth is flat? :-)

[@soflowwill8939]

This is correct. There were no "special effects" in the 60s and 70s that could simulate dust fall with 1/6 gravity. This is particularly evident in films with dust kicked up by rover tires. You can't do that on earth, and it's impossible to fake on film without CGI. If somehow they DID fake it, you'd have to say, Boy! They thought of everything - every last detail! (Except for all of the "evidence" hoaxers claim exposes a fake)

[@tpstrato2270]

The Soviets were able to track the Apollo missions to the Moon using their own advanced deep space tracking facilities, which were equipped with the latest intelligence-gathering technology, effectively verifying the American moon landings; they monitored the missions through their "Space Transmissions Corps" and could track the spacecraft's trajectory and signals throughout the journey to and from the lunar surface, even though they did not publicly acknowledge this monitoring.

[@ABBATributeNZ]

So, no evidence at all for this then. The Soviets tracked but didn't tell. OK then. Sounds like something NASA the propaganda arm of the USA would say.

[@clarencewoodbine6266]

Oddly enough - i heard that BOTH opinions are correct. there WAS an actual moon landing with people. And it was successful. However- the US govt ALSO shot a studio version to have a “back up” if anything went sideways with the moon landing mission. Also much released footage came from the studio shoot because no US gov t high ranking brass wanted the actual footage televised and distributed. My source is an Admiral in the family who i will NOT name, however he laughed at the prospect of actually sharing ANY mission details with reporters or news networks or similiar, and said they NEVER do that for ANY reason. And thats that. i believe him. yet make up your own mind?

[@narajuna]

Sidesway..... with a full frontway? Like them dead? Never to be seen again. Or they had Doubles? Instead of Mission better Footage, kaput.

[@ABBATributeNZ]

@@clarencewoodbine6266 temperature on the moon during the day 250f -205 at night. The spacesuit designer did not design with this in mind, said they weren't ask to deal with temperature extremes. 🤔

[@alanellrich5184]

That is exactly what I always wondered about! No way those suits or even the craft were made for those extreme high and low temperatures! That is in my uneducated opinion!​@@ABBATributeNZ

[@leeinwis]

A fake pretending to expose an actual fake..tricky

[@thetruthnothingelse5033]

Gobbels; repeat a lie and it will become the truth

[@SkepticAurora]

You mean the LIE that the moon landing was faked in a studio or a desert or whatever it is? Yeah, I AGREE. A lie is a lie no matter how many people repeat it.

[@JohnM3665570]

The Moon landings aren't a lie. That quote applies to Moon landing deniers.

[@wildboar7473]

😄😄has moon hoax become official Truth already? 🤗 At last! No help from MS MEDIA for sure, just poor mom basement voices... And the debunking goes on and on.... as censorship on public free YT.....

[@Pair-O-Bulls]

​@@JohnM3665570 But it doesn't apply to your own view ? You're defending something just because you were programmed to. You didn't go to the moon, and neither did I. But you believe it happened simply because that's the narrative we've been presented. That's not good enough for me. I'm not saying it did or didn't happen, but there's been WAY too many red-flags for me to just take it "on faith"

[@marksprague1280]

And the con men who infest the Landing Denial Cult take full advantage of Goebbels' tactics.

[@markbaker8607]

Another way for everyone to keep their eyes off of the Elephant in the room on Earth.

[@paullewis6213]

Had no idea the CIA produces documentaries and then releases them to the public 😂

[@ABBATributeNZ]

Hmmm, no they didn't, but someone sent the "not for public" clip of the Buzz, Neil and John faking halfway to the moon. Hopefully you have seen "A Funny thing Happened on the way to the Moon" and the Joe Rogan interview with him recently.

[@paullewis6213]

@@ABBATributeNZ There was no astronaut named John on the Apollo 11 mission. By muddling basic facts and throwing in a CIA visual at the start of your video you’ve shown how sloppy with the facts conspiracy theorists have to be to make their case.

[@generalkang1969]

@@ABBATributeNZ Joe Rogan, you say? Well, if it was on HIS show, it MUST be God's honest truth!

[@denniss1044]

They also produced the JFK Assassination Documentary, "How to overthrow the US Government ".

[@TheStockwell]

While you're at it, why not upload footage of Tom Mayk doing his inept Kubrick impression in T. Patrick Murray's clumsy 2015 hoax video? It's conspiracy comedy gold! 😸

[@ABBATributeNZ]

Yes, that was so dumb, the guy looked nothing like him.

[@TheStockwell]

@@ABBATributeNZ "Fake Kubrick makes fake confession about fake moon landing." Yeah, it was pretty awful. The greatest filmmaker of all time allows himself to be filmed - by the absolute WORST filmmaker ever? Blimey! Have you seen the phony French documentary, "Dark Side of the Moon"? Totally fake, but the work and skill put into it is amazing. If you're going to do a phony-ass documentary about Kubrick, do what they did: get the real Henry Kissinger and Kubrick's widow to show up! Best wishes from Vermont 🍁

[@dansv1]

@@ABBATributeNZ There is also the ever popular Wikileaks Release Cut Scenes Of The Moon Landing Filmed In The Nevada Desert

[@ABBATributeNZ]

@@TheStockwell No I haven't, this "documentary" was also French, interesting, I will look it up.

[@dansv1]

@@ABBATributeNZ Also look up the 2002 mockumentary Dark Side Of The Moon by William Karel. Another “exposé” of Stanley Kubrick’s involvement in the moon landing.

[@jasondizconaut]

The Eagle has landed...........with the help of a crane truck .

[@SkepticAurora]

What "crane truck", liar?

[@narajuna]

Sounds like advance modern nasa 2012+ Morpheus lander.

[@fredcannon1765]

The eagle has landed? What about the eagle has lifted off the moon to return home? Didn’t you see the footage? NASA left that unsuspecting camera man on the moon for the return footage. That my friend is how the moon landing is debunked. FAKE !!!

[@fredcannon1765]

The eagle has landed? What about the eagle has lifted off the moon to return home? Didn’t you see the footage? NASA left that unsuspecting camera man on the moon for the return footage. That my friend is how the moon landing is debunked. FAKE !!!

[@andreaspease9935]

Do you have Von Broun talking more about the problems they had to get to the moon ?

[@wildboar7473]

Before or after joining NASA? Van Alan talk changed after flirting on that side...

[@DAVIDFARMER-d9e]

I spotted clips from Diamonds Are Forever and Capricorn One in that!! haha 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@ABBATributeNZ]

Correct.

[@sintezator1331]

Актёрские костюмы отличаются от реальных лунных скафандров. На скафандрах спереди была прикреплена фотокамера Hasselblad, а костюмы актёров больше похожи на реквизит фантастических фильмов про космос из 1950-х.

[@willibrordusa.vanderweide2962]

The whole Apollo NASA show was on earth only

[@trohlack5150]

As an engineer not in the class that designed the rockets seen by millions - it would be impossible to pull off a fake like that. Too many great minds would have seen thru it. No way.

[@ABBATributeNZ]

Yes, governments are so truthful. You must in reality, understand doubt.

[@trohlack5150]

@ABBATributeNZ doubt yes. But willful ignorance not so much.

[@TATNThisAintThatNetwork]

Like the brilliant minds who did not know they were building an atomic bomb 💣 😂

[@yazzamx6380]

@@TATNThisAintThatNetwork - Completely different in every way :-)

[@TATNThisAintThatNetwork]

@@yazzamx6380 everyone doesn’t have to be aware and or part of the deception. Suppose that I told you I need a round trip ride to the bank to make a withdrawal. I go rob the bank. You took me there but you didn’t know what I was truly up too. The only people who have to know about the fake are the astronauts (spooks) (none suffered any effects from the radiation apparently…the same radiation that allegedly damaged the film), film crew (spooks), and whatever deep state entity devised the scheme. Magicians deceive folks constantly via misdirection. The most baffling thing about the fake theory, is that all the other scientists/ nations, quit after we went? Being first is great but being best is better imo

[@roycek8461]

And everyone in NASA which is in the thousands have never admitted that it was fake

[@davidmclachlan6592]

..... because they weren't aware it was fake.

[@ABBATributeNZ]

Compartmentalization. Need to know. Above my pay grade. All those things. Even on 9/11 media were fed only what they needed to know to perform their part.. Some out of sync, like announcing the destruction of building 7 on TV with it still standing behind them oops

[@thetruthnothingelse5033]

This world is full of lies The same evolution theory fake impossible not proven at all

[@jasondizconaut]

@@roycek8461 Beware the CIAs

[@AaronJoseph-t4b]

Yazza, sincere people sometimes don't realize the true meaning of Humility until they reach their limit,while others would rather live in denial, NASA reached an all time low with The Space Shuttle fiasco,they are very smart,clever,& shrewd individuals that milk the economy, we have so many problems here on Earth why do we have "a need to know" about outer Space, the disparity continues

[@sheldonrigsby3523]

Why don't the moon landing hoax types ever have anything to say about Apollo 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10? 8 and 10 went around the moon.

[@BrookDesHarnais]

Maybe they had to set up the camera on the moon to fake it that the cameraman was not the first one on the moon, but everything else just has to be real.

[@2seconds992]

You good folks might as well keep posting this stuff. There's no limits to the st*pid*ty of most people, but now & again you might wake someone up.

[@dansv1]

Did you notice Alfred Hitchcock’s cameo appearance at 3:21?

[@2seconds992]

@@dansv1 Ahh 👉 Same aims. Same club. I never did like either one. (Although Mr H. had good taste in women 😳)

[@BradleyRussell82]

Please don't bust my eggs over it, but I read somewhere on the internets, "the origional moon landing footage was destroyed by radiation as the mission returned to earth (bla, bla, something about 'space radiation') so NASA had to reproduce the footage on earth (cause the time constraints of The Space Race with "The Reds")". Most of thats paraphrasing with atrocities in the gramner, punctuation and spelling* At any rate, men walked on the moon but the footage may be a dramatization or reenactment (so parts of internets suggest). Cheers, this is both silly and riveting with a slice of "I don't trust the governments, and why should I".

[@narajuna]

You got Eggs? Not during the outside walks /skips /hops filming but on Return. Interesting, (Magazines were changed during Evas) and a rush *after* mission footage.... after the *"LIVE"* ? Interesting. Walking on MOON no big deal half a Century ago, but golfing and buggy rides! That is Drama! Easier to do or to fake that is Thee Question 🤔

[@ABBATributeNZ]

Always thought "it would be harder to fake than actually go to the moon" was a ludicrous go to take by NASA. Of course it's easier to fake.

[@markbaker8607]

Exactly!!! Thank you.

[@jonharry6293]

Did they land on the desert?

[@narajuna]

Full of hate, the Wokes identified that site as MOON, all that matters, holistic!

[@jonharry6293]

@ With a nice pie?

[@willymueller3278]

No, in the studio.

[@denniswinters3096]

Considering the complexities and machinations that would've been involved in trying to fake it, they probably decided it would be a lot easier to just GO TO THE MOON !

[@ABBATributeNZ]

This has got to be one of the dumbest theories. Did you not see how crappy and low quality the footage is. In 1939 The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind were made in full glorious colour. In 1969 grainy black and white footage was purposely degraded by projecting onto a wall before broadcast to further degrade it. And the astronauts actually had colour cameras with them as seen when they were faking being halfway making the close earth look further away. They were in low earth orbit for those days. You could film the landing for a few hundred bucks! And the Joe 90 in space footage? Laughable.

[@doctorlonganiza]

well, none of those shots look like the actual real shots. They are training the choreography because there is limited amount of resources and time. Thats all.

[@TheKaiser-pf8fr]

Dude, this has to be satire. Can you not see how fake the shots of Kubrick are with him standing around apollo equipment and other people? Most of this footage is from training videos, and educational videos made showing the progress of research, development, and construction of the apollo spacecraft. One of those shots I'm pretty sure was from the movie first man with Ryan Gosling lmao

[@dansv1]

And at 3:21 Alfred Hitchcock makes his cameo appearance from Frenzy.

[@narajuna]

He sure worked with them on *2001* even thou the impossible normal walking, if only; hopping. bouncing, skipping, kagarooing, falling.... had been filmed to make look real :) Doubt he was directly involved with NASA Productions, Many knew the tricks, and the Budget was there.... with assistance of all GOV Agencies.

[@Terry-q7y]

They looked like they were in low gravity when walking and jumping because they were attached to helium balloons

[@dansv1]

This is the comedy montage film Moon Shining by Fabrice Mathieu.

[@dansv1]

As shown at 5:08

[@ABBATributeNZ]

I heard that. How did they get Stanley to take part?

[@dansv1]

@@ABBATributeNZ He didn’t take part in it. He is photoshopped in.

[@marioceva7163]

Never in the moon.

[@marioceva7163]

​@@dansv1how do you know?

[@boongoon92]

😮 ayo yall denying this is crazy!!! Yall donr see the movie being mad😂😂😂

[@blueticecho5690]

I never did believe any of this nonsense but I still want to fly on Fireball XL5...

[@realityAXIS]

All of the scenes shown here were extracted from two documentaries on the subject of the production of Kubrick's movie: 2001 A Space Odyssey. By interposing them into this sequence - designed to support the idea that the moon landings were faked, ... is pure propaganda. After watching this, I am inclined to believe that the landings may have actually happened.

[@generalkang1969]

...truly a great leap of faith on your part!

[@realityAXIS]

@@generalkang1969 you are right! A leap of faith, ... or a leap of propaganda, ... it's not much of a choice. .. I'm sure you can see that science is not involved in either of these two influences. We need to get away from the belief that is derived out of the bias of faith, ... and we need to deflect from the belief that is induced by clever propaganda. We can do better!

[@generalkang1969]

@@realityAXIS Seriously - I have no idea what you are trying to say. The scientific record is REPLETE with evidence that we landed people on the Moon and brought them back... are you REALLY just dismissing that scientific record as "propaganda"? AND are you using an obviously faked video here as evidence of that? Who do you think you are fooling, exactly?

[@SB-bc1nw]

Wernher Von Braun said to Hitler "Ich werde niemals eine Mondlandung vortäuschen" and when someone made a promise to Hitler they usally kept it.

[@Paul-nj5cr]

this is from a mockumentary LOL

[@ABBATributeNZ]

@@Paul-nj5cr how did a mockumentry maker get Von Braun to appear in it?🤔 Dear oh dear. Think before posting maybe?

[@thejohhny2943]

@@ABBATributeNZ Editing footage of him into it? lmao

[@wildboar7473]

just the fake Kubrick entertainment, have to have fun, with all the hate and persecution by Apolloists, government Agents, YT censorship to please Authorities, and it give something to the smart knowledge Winners to input.

[@denniss1044]

Ive heard that astronauts could not have survived the intense radiation in traveling beyond the Earth atmosphere.

[@thegreatdivide825]

You heard wrong

[@tedchristian2235]

Actually you're thinking of the dose acquired when transiting the Van Allen Radiation Belts, and I'm telling you it's quite survivable. So I guess now you're 50/50 on it.

[@OhhGeee]

@@thegreatdivide825 Keep drinking that Kool-Aid like a good little sheep.

[@OhhGeee]

@@tedchristian2235 Where did you hear that humans could survive that level of radiation? It's so high that it literally fried several probes sent into it so they started shielding them with lead and eventually made it through. Damn you're stupid.

[@thetruthnothingelse5033]

@@denniss1044 gamla rays, no one survived those, why dident they sent an animal first,? Because it was fakes only performed in earth low level orbit

[@markgramm8448]

nice bit of fakery

[@eddierae8945]

Ok quiet on set, take 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 , roll cameras and action Mankinds biggest deception for sure.

[@ABBATributeNZ]

Yep. Once they did that, they knew they could get anything past the public, false flags, propaganda.

[@markbaker8607]

History is repeating itself over and over and...

[@iomio3598]

Did they get their covid shot?

[@ABBATributeNZ]

Clot shot in 1969?

[@ajarivas72]

The Trump shot?

[@SkepticAurora]

What are you even yapping about?

[@rapiddog1491]

"At this point what difference does it make." Sorry but I had to try to be funny.

[@mnamhie]

That’s pretty much how it went down 😂

[@MikeLeePhoto]

So all the other apollo missions were faked as well????????????

[@ABBATributeNZ]

All I know is some photos were faked. Some footage faked. Footage lost. All telemetry and "technology" lost as were tapes 🤔 Make of it what you will. Moon rocks were found to be of earthly origin (petrified wood to the Dutch ambassador). I have a huge book on space exploration. All the science becomes non existent once it gets into the moon landing. At a certain point NASA knew it was impossible so they decided to go another way. The honourable astronauts were dragged into it, NDAs all round.

[@willymueller3278]

They had to put a man on the moon, because JFK said so ! But, at that time, in the 60ties, they did not have the technology, so they asked Kubrik, to fake a nice movie of it. Men in spacesuits, hanging and jumping on steelcables like puppets. 😂

[@RobertRoth-oj6zz]

It can be true since its not that far ny spaceship.

[@lrg3834]

You deniers are overlooking a critical detail. To maintain Earth orbit, no power is required after a certain point. The high velocity of a satellite/vehicle is enough to keep it in a state of balanced attraction and free fall; just ask Elon Musk or anybody involved with satellite deployment. Therefore, a little more power would EASILY send a satellite/vehicle beyond the free fall state. After a while, you're far enough away from the Earth's gravitation pull to continue to the Moon at a very fast velocity without any expenditure of propellant. And remember.... your Moon craft is travelling over 25,000 miles an hour! Some satellites orbit 1,200 miles above the Earth at a speed of 17,500. If you sling your object/vehicle carefully, you can overcome the Earth's gravitation pull without any difficulty. NOTE: the Apollo Saturn V rocket weighed 6.2 million pounds at launch. The Gemini Titan II rocket weighed 340,000 pounds. The latter had no problem putting objects in low Earth orbit. Slowing down is merely putting Newton's third law in play, namely for every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction. Firing propellant in the opposite direction of motion will slow down an object regardless of atmosphere. Why? Because your object is fighting against the opposing force of the propellant. In other words, you don't need an atmosphere to slow down or speed up! Also, getting astronauts down to the surface of the Moon does not require nearly as much power as on Earth due to 1/6 gravity. Last, but not least, other less technically advanced nations have landed on the Moon with unmanned contraptions, namely China and India. Why would they lie? With the amount of people involved with the Moon landing space program (I believe around 400,000), you could not hide such an alleged fraud for long. Nevertheless, it remains a mystery why Stanley Kubrick did those shoots. Training reels? Back up footage? Simulation shots for TV, like CBS did? Who knows?

[@BradleyHovey]

But what about the Van Allen belt where I learned not that I believe everything that we cannot travel pass the Van Allen belt due to the fact that we don't have a material that wouldn't stop the speed of the debris even a grain of salt would penetrate

[@wildboar7473]

actual....point detail yes i overlooked checking that out next time I go up. Nothing like falling with Earth gravity holding 240,000 miles MOON 👍 YES just ask Elon or any grounded Earthling sitting at a desk 👌 SO nice free spin Slingshot to MOON (3 DAYS 580,000MPH) with just a little unbalance 🤗 from our no roof, dome, open air water & gas flying dirt ship. ...little more power easy sane rational 🤔

[@BradleyHovey]

@wildboar7473 another question I have if we are moving in space and the North Star is fixed in the sky and if we're supposed to be moving out in the universe then how come the North Star isn't getting smaller then it means it's not fixed in the sky NFL star is fixed in the sky when that mean that's the center point I'm just asking I don't know but I am so curious about space I just know and all the research I've done I found so many contradicting points so it's hard to believe anything

[@lrg3834]

@@BradleyHovey , hey, I want answers for Stanley Kubrick's part in all of this, but nobody in official circles has come forth with specifics. My take. We can get objects orbiting the Moon, and drop some of them to the surface, but perhaps that's it. Russia has done it. China too. India also. So I don't see why America couldn't. However, perhaps the only people who have walked on the Moon have done so on movie sets. Again, STANLEY KUBRICK. Lastly, if this is the case, no one is going to Mars because Stanley Kubrick is dead.

[@BradleyHovey]

@lrg3834 and once again I don't believe everything I I hear but recently on the History channel they had a woman saying now that our moon is inside our Earth's atmosphere the only frustrating thing is is that there is people that know the truth and for some reason they think that they have the right to hold it over everybody

[@spbryant]

Amazing how many people actually believe it was faked.

[@ted_talks]

Because it was faked!

[@spbryant]

@ you should have listened in school

[@thetruthnothingelse5033]

@@spbryant why is it so silent about the Orion capsule comming trips to the moon, its more difficult now since people are more sceptical

[@Tomc528]

Why have we not gone back?

[@zoggin4181]

Because we collected all the knowledge we needed from the six Apollo missions. Going to the moon is very expensive and Congress cut the budget.

[@TATNThisAintThatNetwork]

@@zoggin4181congress cut Russia, India, & Chinas budget too😂

[@TATNThisAintThatNetwork]

Buzz aldrin explains it to a child. Google it

[@Scarhead_Ed]

Lmfao

[@rapiddog1491]

Price of fuel too high right now.

[@theaardee]

With the amount of poeple involved humans being humans someone would have spilled the beens. Whisteblowers the new....I think it musta happened? ?

[@ABBATributeNZ]

This is one of the most naive arguments. If you don't know by now that the majority of people, even in government, do not know what the aims are of those above them by now, I guess you never will. Project Manhattan, for example, had thousands working on it, creating the atomic bomb, mostly compartmentalised and very few people knowing what the overall aim was. Most of the actual USA government didn't even know! Another thing, people watching monitors of the space journey progression would have no idea whether they were watching real data or not. Compartmentalisation - need to know basis - is another way of saying it, is the key.

[@wilf609]

@@ABBATributeNZ The Soviets did, tney had several spies inside the project!

[@generalkang1969]

@@ABBATributeNZ Sorry if that is a ridiculous argument for trying to get people to believe in this clearly artificially assembled crap. That scene where some yahoo is talking to Kubrick face to face... wowzer, does THAT look real...

[@ABBATributeNZ]

​@@generalkang1969this documentary is "fake", however it was easier to fake than actually go to the moon. Do you think USA would allow astronauts to die live on air to millions? Think about it. Why 4th generation footage? A projection on a wall then beamed to viewers.

[@moonwatch7963]

montauk projected....we live in the matrix.

[@dougcooper3495]

You know you guys are really amazing . There are 2 films both fiction and I re agonize footage from both !!!!! One was made in the 1970’s called Capricorn one and the other more recent is called” Operation Avalanche” why do t you just go Spit on the American Flag ?? That’s be about the same difference ….. You think you can fool everybody like We are all IDIOTS ?? Think again mad 😡

[@ABBATributeNZ]

Yes, we know there's film footage in there, Capricorn One is obvious. Written by someone who actually wrote it about the moon, but it was too on the nose to be put out there as about the moon. You should watch "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon". Fakery at it's finest.

[@bagdadskilopov7757]

The first man on the moon were three soviet cosmonaut,and they are still there. Americans never been to the moon.

[@jayman252]

please tell me no one buys this bs!! We went to the moon people, just quit it!

[@Moonlightshadow-lq4fr]

Lead acid batteries in space 🤣😂🤣

[@ABBATributeNZ]

@@Moonlightshadow-lq4fr and 250 Fahrenheit on the moon during the day - 205 at night. No one mentioned any discomfort in that regard. Spacesuit had no mechanism to cope with this. 🤔🤔🤔🤔

[@hermanschweizer9717]

They went to the moon, but the filming could not be done, it had to be faked. But it was necessary.

[@jamesalexander5623]

Riiiiiiiiiiight .........

[@Richard-b5r9v]

Neil Armstrong remained a recluse because of the shame

[@SelwynRewes]

a condom would have stopped this comment...

[@gavinv]

this is fake 😂 the landings were real!

[@ABBATributeNZ]

Anyone who thinks the USA would allow the entire world to watch them try and achieve something live to air that had only a tiny chance of succeeding - in their own estimation btw - needs to think again. Imagine the horror and damage of watching astronauts die live on air. I hate to say it, but Bart Sibrel is correct. It was a managed illusion - 4th generation black and white filming in 1969? Gone with the Wind and The Wizard of Oz, beautiful high resolution full colour in 1939.

[@papavalium]

@@ABBATributeNZ Astronauts died in Apollo 1, the Challenger and Columbia, all were public info and we are still launching into space daily. Your comment really goes against reality.

[@papavalium]

@@ABBATributeNZ Exactly what you said wouldn't ever happen, happened with the Challenger. lol I guess reality is sicker then fiction.

[@JN003]

@@ABBATributeNZ what about the photos of the rover tracks on the moon and the other objects left behind (taken by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter)

[@chrisantoniou4366]

@@ABBATributeNZ Are you fucking serious!? What a moron!

[@earlworley-bd6zy]

Commie web-sites?

[@earlworley-bd6zy]

& by the way there was a animated moon landing.,Why has no one shown that?

[@keeponrollin7922]

NAShA= deceive

[@yazzamx6380]

NASA= lift up, carry

[@moshe_dillinger738]

Was soll der Mist???

[@papavalium]

Kubrick stuff was so fake looking, makes the moon landing look like HD 2024 movies.

[@RemyRAD]

I'm wondering why he's asking me that question? I'm just a stupid, Broadcast Engineer with only a GED. And my first thought was, the Launch Switch. But of course. I knew it couldn't possibly be that. That would be ridiculous. And so I just said, I don't know? He replied it was the Launch Switch. The launch switch? I asked, you didn't have a backup for that switch? He said no they did not. And the switch was in front of him. As he was to pilot the Lunar Module back to the, Columbia, Command Module. Since, Neil had, landed it. And there was no backup secondary launch switch. He told me. He went on to tell me. That he and Neil. Talked about the very real possibility. They are not going back. There is no backup plan. For a broken launch switch. And they only had a few hours left of oxygen. And battery power. And it will not be a pleasant end. There was no contingency plan for that kind of, calamity. And they would be dead in hours. Freeze-dried monuments on the moon. For all eternity to come. But then he tells me. That a Pencil. Saved their lives. A pencil? By that time. The Scotch and Rocks was working. And I laughed. And asks, so what did you do then? Write out some, Mathematical Formulas? He said no. He tells me it was a brand-new, Yellow, No. 2, pencil. Just like the kind we all used in school, he said. And asks me. What holds the eraser on? I said that little metal band. He said right. And it looked like. The pencil. Could fit into that hole in the panel. And if he pulls the eraser out with his big bulky gloves on. Perhaps that metal band might, connect. With the internal context within the switch. And maybe the launch rocket will, ignite? But they had no way of testing that. Until they were ready to lift off. He told me. And it was uncertain. Whether it would work? He went on to say to me. Of course it did work. We are sitting here talking. And told me. He had to hold it in place. During the entire ascent back to the CM. And Neil would pilot it back. As he had to hold onto the pencil the whole time. To keep the rocket burning. As they could just switch it on and switch it off. So he couldn't let go. Oh my God! That is beyond harrowing. These Astronauts were just Incredible Human Beings. And he has, 4 PhD's. And I'm a high school dropout with the GED. Sitting there speaking with this, Great American Historic Hero. I mean who am I? I'm just a Audio Broadcast Engine here. And I had the honor. To sit and speak with Buzz Aldrin. For it must've been at least a 20 minute conversation we had. While everybody else is having a great time, schmoozing, rubbing elbows, having conversation. And I got to sit and speak with, Buzz Aldrin. Over Scotch and Rocks. How prophetic. It was such an incredible honor for me. It was like meeting God. Only in the flesh and alive. To tell about it. And I got it from the horses mouth it happened to. And because I, called him/them/NASA. On the carpet over not testing that one thing. When they tested everything else for, years. That's one of the creepiest stories I have ever heard told to me. I'm so grateful, happy, relieved. They were able to make it back. And you don't think a story like that. Unless it actually happened. It's part of the trip. They really don't want people to know about. Though it has been covered. In one documentary, I watched. But they got the information wrong. In that documentary. They mentioned the switch failure. And they said a ballpoint pen, saved their lives. Nope! He was very clear about that brand-new Yellow No. 2 pencil. And said to me. Just like the one you used in school. That's not a ballpoint pen. So I know that we went. I know the risks. All of these guys took with their own lives. For the betterment of Science and the USA. These guys are the True Patriots. And they do not mess around. They had a Mission to Perform for the USA. And they Dedicated their lives to Science and the USA. These guys do not Brag. About what they didn't accomplish. They are very Proud. Of what they Did Accomplish. And while I believe, Buzz Aldrin, is a Republican. He is a very Progressive Lincoln Republican. And he's interested in Facts, Knowledge, Numbers. Not fairytales. And while he was most obviously also, Christian. I think he knew. It wasn't, Lord God Jesus Christ. Looking over them. It was their own brains. Their talents. Their education. What they learned. What they did. And lived to tell about it. Of those who lived. As there were those losses. From stupid mistakes by, Rocket Scientists. Because they had, No Quality Control Manager in charge of the Production Floor. Like me. Some people are learned with advanced college degrees. Other people are just incredibly intelligent, like myself. I think, Craig Ventnor and I have similar backgrounds. That included a GED.. And that's about it. I mean unless you want to become a medical doctor or a rocket scientist, astronaut, geologist, electrical engineer. Those require college degrees. But for The Recording Arts & Sciences. And Broadcasting. You merely need, Talent.. And that, sound travels at, 1100 feet, per second. At sea level. At 72°F. And light goes a little faster at 186,000 mi./s. At sea level or space level. It goes that speed. A little slower makes it, red. A little faster makes it, blue. But always that speed. And whether it's coming or going. Maybe sideways? I don't know? I'm just a GED Engineer. I mean I went to the, University of Marijuana. U of Mmmmm… Look! A chicken! It's a bitch having, ADD. Otherwise Astronaut would have been good. Had I been able to get through a few, college degrees. But ADD will do that to you. As I couldn't learn through conventional means. And you don't get a degree unless you play the game their way. And hand over all your money. When you are not a 4.0 average student. I never wanted to work for NBC-TV News. That wasn't my style. I was hired for NBC Radio, FM, Rock and Roll Music Group. I worked for, 3 years. When they then discovered. They had a Hottie Audio Engineer, in their midst. And took me out of radio. I wanted to do, SNL. But no! They wanted me doing the News and Political Shows. I said no no no please don't! You don't want me doing those shows. I am not the right candidate for those shows. But they didn't care. They said you're a good engineer you'll do fine. And they said it just that way. Unfortunately they were correct. And I did, too fine. Which got me to that, Elitist Washington DC Social Gathering. Because I was also friends with the Host of the, John McLaughlin Shows. That's who was throwing this exclusive party. He would always invite the crew. Nobody would ever show up except the director. Who told me he felt obligated. I was not obligated. I was the Party Girl. As he also knew me. And I worked with him. When I was still a Guy. And I'm fun at parties. This is all a very real story. About Buzz Aldrin and my conversation with him. Just an incredible honor. I freak out to this very day. Just recalling that conversation. How close it came to a total disaster. That was no disaster. We really did it. And multiple times over. But so close to death. Each time. RemyRAD

[@RemyRAD]

I can certainly understand why Stanley Kubrick would want to, Re-create. This historical and momentous occasion. For a movie he was contemplating, making. As a sequel to, 2001. And you have to set up shots. And try them out. Take a look at them. See how they play. And who knows? He may have been standing by. As if something went terribly wrong on the moon. They could switch to his Set. To change the narrative as to what happened. As I'm also sure. The US Government and NASA had a, PR, Contingency Plan. In case the very worst, happened. We would have face, to save. And to let our Russian adversaries, know what wasn't happening. At that kind of Propaganda is important to have ready. Have it, at the ready. For the other subsequent, landings. Since he had an example of the first to view. And try to match up. It may have been over 50 years ago. But Hollywood was still quite capable. At creating make-believe, scenarios. Through Hollywood Movie Magic. As we really had no, CG (Computer Graphics), quite yet. It all had to be prepared on set, with the camera, first. And Stanley Kubrick was very good at that. He was a Visionary. Just like Arthur C Clarke was. These men were incredible. As incredible as the astronauts, themselves. And Stanley was British, not Californian. Where was Orson Welles? He made a very believable movie. Just a couple of decades earlier. People jumped out of windows over that one. Hey buddy it's only a movie! Whoops too late. Maybe that's why they didn't get Orson Welles? And Edgar Allan Poe was already dead, so? They grabbed Stanley Kubrick. He was the New Hot Movie Director. Before George Lucas was old enough. Who never had an original thought of his own. Even stealing the name, Star Trek-Star Wars. Give me a break? Just another Hollywood rich kid. That also never had to work for a living. As he was born in Hollywood. He didn't have to go far to get there. Yes it happened. We landed. We had to beat the Russians. We really had no choice. And we had the best Scientists. We always have. As they care more about human life. Than, Russians ever did. That's why we were running behind. And in our rush. We lost Gus Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee. As haste makes waste. NASA discovered. And then they got lax again in 1986. Being warned not to launch the Challenger. But they were impatient and couldn't wait. Haste makes waste. And look at all the people that got wasted. Without Pot! Yet, Pot. Could have prevented that. Because anybody high on Pot. Would've said… Yeah it's a bit too cold. Hey don't Bogart that joint! And they would still be alive, today. But no! NASA scientists went Brain Dead. As they were all sober and thought it would work. So much for sobriety. They would have delayed it for a warmer sunny day. Because that's what people on Pot, like. Especially at the beach. But no! Nobody listened to the smart ones. Telling them not to launch. So really what it comes down to is? I should be in charge of NASA. We would have government Pot to hand out to everybody. And take a vote. Smoke another joint or launch? And they would still be alive today. As I felt the worst for, Christia McAuliffe and her family. That was just the worst! I mean it was bad enough they killed all of those scientists. But to kill an innocent passenger who was a beloved teacher and mom. No extra precautions were considered. No extra care, taken. Their lives, taken, instead. Through Stupidity from Rocket Scientists. And that's why they need a Proper Quality Control Manager, like myself. I'm just an, Engineer. I'm not a scientist. I am Practical and Pragmatic. And I won't fly in bad weather, either. Unless it's for life or death. Mostly, it never is for that. Unless you got an, Organ Transplant, waiting. Then you might risk life and limb to save another life. Not just for a Joy Ride! And I know that we went. How do I know? I got invited to an, Exclusive, Elitist, Washington DC, social gathering. And there he was. Oh my God! I not only have to say hi to this guy. I want to, speak with him. And who was it? I sat down with, my scotch and rocks. Along with another guy who had rocks. Also with his scotch. Not the ones that he and Neil Armstrong. Brought back from the moon. I'm having conversations with, Buzz Aldrin. Oh my God! I was only 13 years old when they landed. I am then in my, early 30s. Working as a Top Engineer for NBC-TV News, in Washington DC. When I got invited to this, private gathering. When I posed to, Buzz Aldrin. That you guys. Did not test everything before you landed. To which. He replied. They tested everything, before they landed. I said no you did not. He started getting irritated at that, accusation. And asked me. What do you think we didn't test? I said to him. Apollo, 8-9 and 10. All had a Lunar Module, with them. And while they did not plan. To land a human on the moon yet. You guys. Never flew that Lunar Module. Via remote control. To, land it, on the moon. And then lift it off. By remote control. You guys did not do that. At that moment. He realized I was right. And he verified that. And said. They had a Simulator they used here on earth. I said yeah. Famous footage we've all seen. It's that flying spider. That suddenly, tilts over 45°. A puff of smoke comes out the top. And it smashes into the ground in a burst of flames. And you see a parachute with somebody landing near the flames. And we all know now. That was Neil Armstrong almost getting killed in the simulator. He said yes I was right about what I had said. He said the had no way. To land it by remote control. And then lift it off from the moon. Via remote control. They had no ability to do that. Which kind of blew my mind. I wanted to say… What you mean you didn't have any ability to do that? But I didn't say that. He went on to tell me. They had High Confidence. The, Lunar Module would work as designed. And felt they had nothing to worry about. But then he said something. He then told me. You're right. We almost did not make it back alive. He said. But not for the reasons of not testing stuff. No. He went on to tell me. He said he they did not know. Whether it was him or Neil? But because they are spacesuits were so large and bulky. One of them bumped into a switch. On their control panel. Which was a Toggle Switch. He told me. And broke it right off. There was merely a, hole in the panel. Where the switch mechanism once was. And the parts sitting on the floor. They could do nothing about. He said he didn't know which one of them bumped into it? And then he asked me. Which switch do you think got broken? (More Cosmic Vibrations in following post)

[@dansv1]

That was an entertaining read. Apollo 10 did test all of the landing procedures while in lunar orbit. “Stafford and Cernan entered the LM and prepared for the undocking maneuver that occurred on the 12th revolution, a little more than 98 hours into the flight. At about 100 hours, on May 22, the vehicles separated and briefly flew a station-keeping lunar orbit of 66.7 by 71.5 miles. To achieve a simulation of the future Apollo 11 landing, the LM descent engine fired for 27.4 seconds, with 10 percent thrust for the first 15 seconds and 40 percent thrust for the rest. This brought the LM to a new orbit of 9.7 by 70.5 miles. The LM flew over Landing Site 2 in the Sea of Tranquility. During this run, the LM landing radar was tested for altitude functioning, providing both “high gate” and “low gate” data. Following a 7.5-second firing of the LM reaction control system, or RCS, thrusters, the descent engine fired in two bursts for 40.1 seconds - at 10 percent and at full throttle - placing the LM into an orbit of 13.7 by 219 miles. On the 14th revolution, it reached a pericynthion of 12.7 miles and was “staged.” The descent stage jettisoned on a second attempt and an uncontrollable gyration of the ascent stage occurred. It was later attributed to an error in a flight-plan checklist, causing an incorrect switch position. The ascent engine fired for 15 seconds, lowering the LM apocythion to 53.8 miles, 230 miles behind and below the CSM. The RCS thrusters fired for 27.3 seconds when the LM was 16.9 miles below the CSM and 170.4 miles behind, yielding an orbit of 54.5 by 48.1 miles. To prepare for the terminal phase of rendezvous, the RCS fired again, resulting in an orbit of 17.2 by 81.7 miles. Stafford sighted the CSM’s running lights at about 48 miles. The 15-second terminal phase initiation firing reduced velocity as the LM entered an intercept trajectory and the two vehicles achieved station-keeping of the 16th lunar revolution. With Young in the CSM taking on an active rendezvous role, the vehicles were re-docked on May 23, slightly more than 106 hours into the mission. The LM ascent stage jettisoned and its engine fired to depletion.”