Statement and Arguments - Tricks & Shortcuts for Placement tests, Job Interviews & Exams

[@goluguripadma7269]

It's like when my mind says yes the ans is no and when it is yes my mind says no😂😂very confusing but still understood thanq...

[@meghapai1691]

Yes u are rgt 😂😂😂

[@nikitawadhwa2440]

Ryt...

[@fanailalchhuanawma3252]

😄😄😄😄😄😂😂😂😀😃🙂🙂🙃🙃

[@Gramsciii]

confidemce gir gaya

[@laxmikantadash2202]

😃😃

[@BankerLokesh]

Best trick from me : If you are 100% sure option A is the answer. Then Blindly mark Option B and u will be right. Yu al are welcome. 😂

[@Jaisriram843]

Who are you bro😂😂😂

[@AdvitiyaJakhar-u9c]

Idiot

[@adityabhadauria4892]

That's actually work 😂

[@avishholkar760]

It is definitely a confusing topic but the way you have taught makes it simple and to think in the right direction.....Your gentle voice again made me to hear the complete video. Thank you Sir 👍

[@ayushnayak6138]

These questions are literally playing with our emotions

[@dasarisrikanth8047]

Same here

[@muskanshivhare626]

True😔

[@Sunny_67346]

Weak statement..

[@ayushnayak6138]

@@Sunny_67346 bro are you a robot or something 😂😂

[@dipeshmandanka]

@@Sunny_67346 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@gowthamiraj9939]

I like the way you teach. It is very clear and clarity. Keep posting more videos on various topics. You are doing a wonderful job. Thank you ☺

[@vnagabhushanam]

Amazingly u made I try easy. I put what u said in my understanding- While analysing argument one should think "can the contrary to this happen". If yes then it is a weak arg. If the substantiation is not given in arg then it is a weak arg Containingng the words may, might will make arg weak. Question the arg - is this based on emotion. If yes it is weak arg

[@toppojohn4773]

1st time I have seen such trick ,how to solve logical Reasoning ...thank you sir for efforts ...and nicely u have explained it.... I hope that many students will make their dreams in reality... through this step...Thank u ..

[@CareerRideOfficial]

Thanks for your kind words. They are our dose of motivation :)

[@studyinsight9089]

​@@CareerRideOfficialI have a question that in question number 6 , 20:14 you have said that 1 is strong argument but the argument is not related to the statement then how it became strong argument, please help me with this doubt sir.

[@priscillahkakyo4385]

One of the best things i have seen today! And with a good sense of humor too. Keep up the good work, very good teacher!

[@CareerRideOfficial]

Thanks for writing in, Priscillah. Every feedback from our viewers is very important to us. Please subscribe for more career related videos and stay connected :)

[@letitbe3494]

Such questions should be banned from asking in exams ? Statement 1 : Yes , these are irrevelent and debatable they can't have any absolute answers , every human mind interpret the things differently unless they are facts Statement 2: No; such kind of questions help in decision making power hence should be made compulsory

[@GreenHavens2020]

😂

[@saleehamarriyam2153]

*IF ONLY ARGUMENT 1 IS STRONG* ain't no way I'm choosing the other option 😂😭

[@rahulchakraborty9037]

Either 1 or 2 is strong 😂

[@aishwaryanagane6382]

Argument 2is strong (educational development)

[@firdousahmadkatari8950]

B

[@pradnyagiramkar2171]

This is my starting for competitive exams and I really clear so many things ...so thank u so much sir...if u provide any classes or course please update me on this ....

[@digambermeena1638]

Pick up good question

[@stark7412]

These questions are like my wife and mother in law...when i think its a strong argument, its a weak one, when i think its a weak argument, its a strong one...when my wife says no, its mean yes, when her mom says yes, for me its maybe....

[@nishatk.4817]

Thanks fr a wonderful explanation Sir.my reasoning part is cleard ad free frm fear oly bcz of u.great job well done.keep motivating by lots of practice

[@naturerelaxation6994]

Sir in question no 9-in first argument, country is mentioned so it might be strong and in 2nd argument,every is mention so it might be week argument

[@sadangani233]

Mera bhi same question hai

[@clashwithdaddy291]

You have to be an astrologer to find the correct answer in these types of questions

[@AMANJASS5221]

yeah bro , first argument is linked to security , development , art 21 right to internet etc its strong argument and 2 nd was weak as without satellite how development occurs , we not lived in isolated world or other planet

[@Danibhat05]

Exceptional, the best video I got on arguments on YT. Thankyou.❤

[@gowshikes6560]

27:48 Here where and why is coming sympathy or morality? Each question has own rules

[@hrushikeshthorat1433]

lol.. the second line of the first argument clearly says that no state has authority to takes someone's life (which is an instruction from supreme authority even though it is not mentioned but it is a fact)

[@vimalpan8172]

@@hrushikeshthorat1433 life is the gift of the god ? Is this factual as well?

[@tanishkagupta386]

Question 3, 14.55 why can't the question be taken as 'first statement being an advantage and the second being a disadvantage, this way the answer is C'

[@vimalpan8172]

@@tanishkagupta386 yes but statement 2 is not having a certain statement that the fares will increase , that's why it's a weak statement.

[@jesikalalwani]

​@@tanishkagupta386 In that case first India has to adopt something as a trial and error type of equations as a Policies. If it works then it may be an advantage as a country development but if not then a vulnerable situation may arise so Only 2 can follow.

[@iqraraziznaikoo2187]

Sir ji we cant assume your look as your voice , we fell love with you , we are eager to see you ... Our only hope is always you when it comes to logical reasoning .... Stay blessed always .... Love from Kashmir .....🤗

[@mobiletube1165]

Thanks sir... The way teach is awesome... Plz sir make another video regarding Assertion and Reason type Statement qustns 🙏🙏🙏

[@jenthoiliurongmei9250]

Thank you sir for making it clear with a simple but valuable explanation...

[@lusidagina]

26:32 : dont get emotional..you got me there😄🤦‍♀️

[@thewhitene9746]

For the "basic computer knowledge" question you consider the real life scenario that computer is needed in today's era by yourself but for the next "space mission" question you didn't use you gk that space mission will help in connectivity. So when should we use our GK of real life and when to just follow the statement blindly????

[@adarshgireesh1764]

Ok Thanks Sir , You cleared my doubts on all logical reasoning (conclusion/assumption/coa/arguement) , this video series is fantastic but sometimes your answers are contradicting to rules

[@CareerRideOfficial]

You're welcome, Adarsh! Stay connected :)

[@atelele7167]

Please updated more video sir The way u teach is so clear😊

[@dineshkumararumugam6435]

Oh my god, completely confusing, for each question you r giving new rules and different different explanation. Confused a lot. Please in this same topic, solve more 20 questions.

[@rahulnarulaa]

Hainaaa sachii

[@shaquibkhan1895]

Exactly your are saying right

[@kutakhanni9245]

Thank you soo much for your support and guidance your content turned out to be very helpful for me and i have finally made it to Christ University's ncr campus delhi

[@maryjhonabing6941]

i will never get tired thanking you, Sir! ❤

[@K21-r4i]

Q9 argument 1 should be strong as Spacemissions help not only in generating employment to some extent but also in improvement of technology.

[@Prityush93]

But I think there is no surity that will always succeed so it may be the reason to mark it as weak argument

[@tejdalwadi492]

see if theyhave mentioned it or not dont assume it a half truth

[@siddhantsaxena2294]

The 2nd argument states everybody which is a part of weak argument . So can we mark 2nd one is a weak argument ? Correct me plz if I am wrong

[@arunsolanki1088]

Similar question to No. 10 Here in your explanation option 2 is strong but when I gave the test online it says no 2 is week. I'm totally confused. Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises? Arguments: 1. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do? 2. Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'. A. Only argument I is strong B. Only argument II is strong C. Either I or II is strong D. Neither I nor II is strong E. Both I and II are strong Answer: Option A Explanation: Closing down public-sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged persons out of employment. So, argument 1 holds. Also, closing down is no solution for a loss-making enterprise. Rather, its causes of failure should be studied, analyzed and the essential reforms implemented. Even if this does not work out, the enterprise may be privatized. So, argument II is vague.

[@shaikthahera7407]

I also got the same problem

[@babymuff2000]

Same doubt

[@aditijain2461]

Sir Q7 the ans should be either 1 or 2 because both the points are strong. The 1st point is also strong because the statement is asking for relax fdi and having fdi is enough to get competition and technology there's no need to give more relaxation because it really effects domestic trader's

[@sankeolsimicklepcha9703]

No. One 1 is a super weak argument. If you have a slight idea about FDI it is blatant that argument 1 is weak.

[@jainarayansingharoy5880]

One of the awesome videos went through in this topic on youtube... Thanks for clarifying the doubts.

[@vidyadwivedi1887]

Thanks for this video sir, it helps me a lot to clear my doubts

[@naveenreddy6225]

3 months ago i have accenture exam i learned from ur videos but i had failed because of less practice , now again i had applied to accenture , i got exam mail this time iam practicing everything let's see what happens

[@CareerRideOfficial]

All the best!

[@shalleyahirwar6547]

Sir you explained questions number 5 that if both statment go in opp direction whether they are strong we should Mark option I or II is strong. I have a problem in my book as follows - STATEMENT : Should a blanket ban be put on hunting of wild animals? ARGUMENT : I. Yes. The natural food chain is disrupted. II. No. It provides a cheap source of protein to the poor. So it means tha ans should either I or II. But the ans given is - both arguments are strong. So sir please explain this question humble request.

[@uthpalsoni9903]

Sir, there is a problem in que no 10 in that que argument 1. No, all employes will lose there jobs But it is said that if public sector is loss making then it is said that gov is doing something good for people I toto public sector motto is not to earn profit

[@aritrabhattacharyya2374]

What an explanation.... fantastic... I'm watching for CGL MAINS

[@prshantmalodia]

i mean this has to be the most confusing topic. like you said we have to use our common sense. in basic computer question we said it is important for future where as we dicarded space exploration as weak when every article says it is the need of the hour and huanity cannot survive in future without extending our horizon. secondly there is no evidence capital punishments decreases crime, its very common to find countries with higher frequency of capital punishments having higher crime rates eg. afghanistan and also historicaly in medieval and ancient time capital punishments were quite common but still had more crime rate than modern times. im confused how much of logic and common sense do we have to put in. thanks tho youve been very helpful made me a master in conclusion and cause and effect

[@ashwinimondukar9518]

Your way of explanation is too good .sir I think no need to read any book for understand concept .just u rs video is enough .just we go through books for the purpose of practice not for concept thanks lot sir

[@CareerRideOfficial]

Thanks for the kind words, Ashwini. For online practice of questions, you can follow this link on our website: www.careerride.com/online-aptitude-test.aspx

[@smritimedhi8587]

For Indian Cricket should there be different captains for different formats of game? Argument 1: Yes, different formats need different mindset and planning Argument 2: No, one and the same captain will do Sir what will be the answer for this

[@vidhyutgadia4566]

only 1 is strong?

[@rahulchakraborty9037]

Only 1 strong For the second statement, no logical reason is given

[@15-aiml-gouravkumar20]

Okay, Now i understand one important concept, when my mind say yes i have to opt no 😂 and vice versa. As i observe this everytime 😁

[@jesikalalwani]

27:59 where the second argument says that, to reduce the crime rate the "specific" capital punishment is necessary but here are they didn't mentioned anything. Because this is not the only way to reduce the crime rate there also some other methods which can be adopted. I think 2nd is weak argument. Let me know.

[@pradheedhingra4288]

Sir, in question number 4, why can we not mark option(c)? Because the coming of the private sector would either bring about development or would lead to exploitation... Hence I thought this was an advantage/disadvantage question and thought option(c) looks correct. Kindly clarify.

[@sakshatbhatia5302]

the second argument cannot be considered a disadvantage until or unless it is a strong argument. In this case we cannot conclude that private sector will lead to exploitation ( it may or may not ). its not an actual fact or universal truth rather a vague statement so thats why second argument is weak. I hope it helps😇

[@souviktapadar7050]

In qsn 4 arg 1 is also a kind of assumption we can't assure it will be more feasible for the public

[@saadh2916]

thank u sir...your videos on logical reasoning are very helpful...very few content on logical reasoning is available at youtube nd most of it is not that much understandable ...the one you are providing is very apt nd to the points ....thanks for that sir..muje laga ki i should thank you ..soo

[@sumits.5070]

The topic itself is comfusing , but the tricks are really good. 👌👍

[@anshumansaini4314]

Sir! Please make a video on puzzles and pseudocodes. Thank you!

[@queenacrasta7544]

Sir your explanation is really good . Can you please explain how to do either or case questions in syllogism. Please sir

[@sachinb4651]

In ques no 10 i think 1st one is strong argument because government have to take responsibility or take care of all the employers who are working in public sector that is why it is government he cant remove employers if it is in private sector then 2nd one will be strong.....

[@rameshraja8663]

It's more about to check if we are logical or emotion.

[@MadDash84]

This makes total sense considering these questions are used to test candidates during job applications. Employers do not want to hire people who base decisions on emotions.

[@akashsinghchandel2972]

Best video for the topic on KZbin till date 😎

[@balajikiranmanne5536]

Public sector is not only to earn but to serve public

[@K21-r4i]

Balajikiran Manne As well as there should be some change in management policies and governance , Closing them downn is a bit too much of a extreme measure.

[@akshitajain8654]

In Q11 When we talk about Capital punishment it means we are talking in terms of money then how it is connected with taking ones life?

[@faizahmedsarosh2729]

Excellent explanation, sir! I am looking for Watson glaser test, is there any other way to practice for it.

[@dasdebadatta420]

Question.number 6 talk about relaxing FDI, if FDI relaxed then local industry suffer just like IKEA in India

[@krishnavinoth1446]

No words to about say your teaching, sir please put more videos like statement type reasoning & data sufficiency

[@CareerRideOfficial]

Thanks, Krishna! We'll get other videos soon. In the meanwhile please take advantage of all other videos :). Good luck.

[@Akshaydeep92]

I might be wrong.. But I think that in 9th question Arg 1 is strong n Arg 2 is weak

[@anjananair3737]

Exactly

[@sakshinalamwar7611]

Me too

[@keerthanag1178]

I like the way you teach naresh sir..I can understand also 🥳

[@Vedanshi-f4s]

Q11. even though its not directly saying advantage or disadvantage , both the arguments are doing in opposite directions so why aren't we choosing Either 1 or 2?

[@shirishachirra8718]

Truly it will soo help ful to everyone sir 👍really great taught sir 🙏👏

[@AMITSINGH-zp5cx]

Can u explain question 11 taking example of railways. Railway always incurs loss in passenger train. But we can't think of stopping it.

[@amitkaushik6356]

Sir in Question no. 9 amount spending on space mission is also a development....then why it's is a weak argument

[@robot3.077]

25:51 According to india bix argument 1st is strong Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises? Arguments: 1)No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do? 2)Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'. Only argument I is strong Only argument II is strong Either I or II is strong Neither I nor II is strong Both I and II are strong Explanation: Closing down public-sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged persons out of employment. So, argument I holds. Also, closing down is no solution for a loss-making enterprise. Rather, its causes of failure should be studied, analyzed and the essential reforms implemented. Even if this does not work out, the enterprise may be privatized. So, argument II is vague,

[@robot3.077]

Please sir reply??

[@amritabanerjee6086]

Thank you ...I learned a lot from this video..... thank u once again

[@vishrutshah4659]

Sir your video helped a lot. But sir, I am still confused between Either and Both. Can you please tell, when to choose either and when to choose both.

[@thestudymaniac_]

The questions that you have solved are given in books also but the answers do not match..it's really confusing

[@Threestriker7532]

In this video i think in few questions sir have made some mistakes in answers... book can be right

[@thestudymaniac_]

@@Threestriker7532 I agree

[@Threestriker7532]

@@thestudymaniac_ thnku

[@rinnivatsa4569]

@@Threestriker7532 which book u guys follow

[@Threestriker7532]

@@rinnivatsa4569 u can go to the official website of this channel...there will be pdf of this solved problems and also other solved problems.

[@archanasonar9457]

Thank you sir for explaining soo easily..🙏🙏

[@kkrishnanandasingh2816]

Very enriching.... Thank you!!

[@smitamahajan6944]

Thankyou so much sir for this awesome information in a very simple way🙏🏻

[@theurbanmonk7563]

Hey, I had a doubt in the second question. You said 'abortion is kind of a murder' is a weak argument because it is not backed up by a fact or proof like it affects the sex ratio, But at the same time we know that murder is wrong irrespective of it being of any gender, So wouldn't it be a strong argument to just consider it a murder? Thanks for the informational video.

[@ankitmafia]

Nice work sir very helpfull. Thank you

[@shwetabharti645]

Sir in question no. 6....it is not the 1st fundamental right in constitution ...although it is a FR under article 21 but in absolute statement it is wrong...please suggest right answer while clearing my doubt. Thanks

[@sribhargav1009]

We must assume that the both arguments are true even if the argument was wrong.

[@adrikagarg7360]

Could not find these tricks anywhere. hashtags for OMETS exams should be used. It would really help other aspirants.

[@siddhi9174]

The video is really really helpful for competitive exams👍

[@sumittawani]

In Q.11 In 2nd argument (All) is mentioned so how come it will be strong ? For each question you are giving ur own ruless

[@sakshinalamwar7611]

It talks on the serious thing crime that's why strong All is there but it is not main word ..

[@Namangen]

Q 9) space missions are important as colonization of space is the going to be a real thing in future .....how is it a weak argument. It stands with country's reputation and technological advancement??????

[@sukanyadas4968]

You explained very easily ......thank you ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@vanadasanathkumar4732]

superb sir neat and clean explanation

[@sonysk8529]

Please paste the link where we need to practice in the career ride website

[@CareerRideOfficial]

Practice Questions: i.) Reasoning: www.careerride.com/pcategory/logical-reasoning-for-job-interviews-and-exams-25.aspx ii.) Quantitative Aptitude: www.careerride.com/online-aptitude-test.aspx

[@audiblelyrics8383]

Best video on KZbin ❤

[@prernasharma8288]

in question 4- shouldn't argument 1 be weak because where is it written that private companies will definitely provide better service than govt? isn't this comparing private and govt services and hence should be weak?

[@janhvimore25]

this questions make me question my existence

[@adityachandak4687]

Sir in the 5th question at 18.20mins., the second argument is going against the development of the country then it should be considered as a weak argument?

[@thejasp4838]

Sir how we will understand that the argument is ambiguous or conspicuous....in the last case you told that corollary of capital punishment had reduced the crime rate..but paradox can also be thought no???😅

[@bipinsingh8374]

Great Teaching style Teacher.

[@saumyalal6568]

Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises? Arguments: No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do? Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'. Other site's are showing a different answer in this question

[@LakshmiKiranmaiNulu]

according to the table when every is given it must be considered as weak argument right... but in question 6 in argument 1 every is present and marked as a strong argument why??

[@tejaswisweety6155]

Can you upload videos on cryptorithms, data interpretation,

[@fahadfahad-mp8om]

Sir plz make video on Input-output , drawing symbolic conclusions & out one out

[@sakk2549]

thankyou so much sir. your efforts are appreciated

[@ujjwalsoni5866]

Question 7 explanation is completely wrong..it is talking about relaxation which mean making FDI less intense

[@harshdevpura96]

Relaxation in this case refers to relaxing the regulations and making fdi easy

[@rashika9162]

Last question-> statement 2 seems weak. since,there are many other forms of punishment and law enforcement procedures to ensure reduction in crime rate! kindly consider. Thank you for the quality stuff!! :))

[@sayantandey1022]

Yes I also thought same ..because they should be punished but not necessarily capital punishment

[@AhsanMohmmed]

Conclusion is just learn the method remaining part is your own as their is no set of regulations for result .

[@nitinhinge5360]

Wow apne English bolna kaise sikha sir 🥰

[@aysenav]

Very nicely explained!!❤❤

[@liquorish8]

thorough and well explained quite basic breakdown thanks

[@ethanpattem4378]

Me pone una cerveza

[@TanvirAhmed-hx2bv]

It's very confusing. Question 10 is in a book from McGraw hills publication of reasoning where the given answer is neither statement 1 nor statement 2.

[@atulshah5665]

Do you have pdf of macgraw hill reasoning?

[@prajwalrahangdale5838]

@@atulshah5665 did you got the pdf?

[@prajwalrahangdale5838]

@@atulshah5665 can you send me, please

[@BankerLokesh]

When i was answering i was only thinking of that meme 'Kehna Kya Chahte Ho'?

[@sannyabasco528]

So can I say these questions are like debates? The ones with strong arguments win the ones with weak arguments? And strong arguments come with evidence and facts. That's how we should answer such questions.

[@priyankaraman8343]

in qst 9 , it is mention everybody and as per your rule everybody is weaker argument please clear the doubt

[@heenabhatia2238]

Sir Drawing inference ka bhi video bna dijiye

[@y_yashika]

u have made such a helpful video....tysm❤️

[@Vedanshi-f4s]

in Qs 6, the first argument isn't even that much related to the given argument, it is indirectly related to it, so why have we considered it to be a strong argument?