Statutory Interpretation Rules of Interpretation

www.thelawbank.co.uk - The second of a series of videos looking at Statutory Interpretation. This one looks at the rules of interpretation and although long and at times complex tries to deal with all the key issues in one hit.

[@Joat_ent]

I really wish for more thorough videos like this one, it really helps when someone who actually understands the law teaches you about it.

[@pweddilana9261]

This series on statutory interpretation was very very helpful! Thank you so much!

[@nairnshelly]

I wish you were my lecturer. Excellent presentation. I have a clearer understanding of the approach. Thank you.

[@zerojokez]

Thank GOD!!!! For the Law Bank!!!! seriously

[@jamesbogart]

Your two lectures on this subject are quite brilliant in transparency .

[@iammcwaffles5514]

This video truly helped me understand this part of the law. Thank you so much!

[@TheLawBank]

I will try and get them all done before your exams in May

[@user-qj5pc4pj9k]

Your videos are brilliant. All books go into the bin. Merry Christmas and happy new year to you and your family.

[@amyxox]

This lecture is great! Saving GDL students 7 years on! 😅

[@esmeevestjens9456]

This is very helpful, thank you for clearing this up!

[@elle_la_vie]

this is so good. thank you very much for doing this video. this topic is now a lot clearer to me cause of your video. your explanation is very direct.

[@latifah2163]

Omg I have heard a teacher so clear like you, its been so helpful, thank you.

[@mrs.lorijohnson]

Great channel, Clearer understanding for Statutory Interpretation. Thank You :)

[@mzeesafaritv850]

Awesome delivery. Very Impressive!

[@DJE9684]

Brilliant lecture. Thank you.

[@jammymancy8637]

Great channel, huge help. Mocks tomorrow and this has been perfect!

[@rwhale6339]

This is really helpful, thank you!

[@sorankurdi]

great video, will look out for more of your videos

[@shafiqs2561]

YOU ARE NO DOUBT A BOSS ON INTERPRETATION...

[@yesk2318]

👌👍❤️ awesome session. Love from an India law student.

[@akashameer2271]

What an outstanding explanation, thank you Sir

[@faridqasimy5351]

Thanks this is a great channel.

[@TravelousA]

You are great lecturer. Thanks

[@keilanatalierose]

Thank you for this, so helpful

[@TheLawBank]

No it is the next one to be done in the next week.

[@beckyjohn6127]

Have you done a video on aids to statutory Interpretation and also the rule of language?

[@jujuaddo2531]

thank you very much

[@JustAnotherThisDJ]

Thank you this was really helpful

[@cutefluffball]

Needed this

[@konhunmaye9861]

Thank you!

[@hazelkmorgan]

AWESOME! AWESOME! AWESOME!

[@ludamcmullan8339]

Brilliant! Thank you!

[@sihemotmanetelba9655]

Thank you very much.

[@weixian.tan.99]

Thank you 🙏

[@lostheroes8704]

Amazing!

[@CafeMelal]

Thank you

[@josephusplutocrat4550]

Thanks Law Bank

[@s.plunkett8051]

Thank you ❤

[@dadddydm]

Wow,nicely explained

[@123vic321vic]

Hi, please can you make a video on aids to interpretation?

[@tacoadele7877]

so helpful!

[@abokefredamary6910]

best explanations ever

[@mayeeviee223]

You are amazing!

[@prophetaaron5170]

This is Helpful

[@arthurchakanyuka496]

brilliant

[@xTenshiAi]

this is very helpful thanks!! please make one on aids

[@girlygirly382]

great video xxx

[@jujuaddo2531]

however, can you please elaborate more on the purposive approach

[@deimantesidla7094]

Have you published the aids that they use already ? I cant seem to find it...

[@JustAnotherThisDJ]

Hey, do you have a citation for whitely v chappell? I can not find this on Westlaw, and want to use it as an example of the literal rule. ANYONE?.....

[@ss-3662]

Thank you so much. I have a final exam tomorrow. Wish me luck

[@hazelkmorgan]

Has the one on aids been posted?

[@elliemorley8302]

This is super clear, helped me with understanding the rules. But still struggling to identify these rules when looking at case reports, any advice?

[@TheLawBank]

What do you mean? Do mean when reading a case you don’t know which rule has been used?

[@elliemorley8302]

@@TheLawBank Sorry reading that back I realised I was super vague! When reading the decisions of judges is case reports we're asked to identify which rules of construciton the judges have applied. I struggle with identifying these, do you have any advice? Should I be looking for keywords?

[@CassandraLoizou]

I might actually pass my exam now lol

[@seweetgirlnay]

God bless you!!

[@rozalina531]

💕🙏🏻💕

[@francollins4036]

Excellent

[@TheLawBank]

Thanks

[@cilama2174]

are judges obliged to follow these rules?

[@JoshGProductions]

Aids to Interpretation?

[@khevishgopaul1983]

aids to statutory int??

[@londonrider3219]

thank you

[@TheLawBank]

😊

[@mohsinalikhan625]

Why did he stopped making vedios ?

[@saraswatkin9226]

Since Brexit EU law does not apply does it?

[@irdinajailani6360]

Wonderful explanation! Thank you very much :)

[@TheLawBank]

You're very welcome!

[@evajayme7746]

Can you give me. Certificate after I study and pay to you? Because I simply understand you clearly. Thank u

[@evajayme7746]

Dear Sir. I like to study with you Directly. How much. Sir. In 80 credits?

[@antibreeder1m]

Who here is full of mischief? We have a rule for that!! haha

[@mohammedjunaid9630]

got exam in 2 days

[@simm8602]

The literal rule is meant to be used even if it leads to an absurdity, but the golden rule can be used if the use of the literal rule would lead to an absurdity. Does this mean that the judges can decide how big of an absurdity there would have to be before using the golden rule ?

[@christinemomanyi3544]

I wanted to answer you but this is from three years ago😭😭

[@Growwitholiviar]

@@christinemomanyi3544please answer it

[@TheLawBank]

Judges have discretion to decide what counts as an “absurdity” . So the threshold may vary from judge to judge. This is often a criticism of using anything but the literal rule as it makes the law hard to predict and possibly inconsistent. I hope that helps.

[@Petitz]

Yall tryna be legal practitioners or sumn? Brazy

[@lordmountbatten154]

Thank you!

[@TheLawBank]

You're welcome!