Would *you* call it a microscope? The sponsor is Jane Street. Find out about their Academy of Math and Programing here: janestreet.com/amp
@whyiseverysinglehandletaken22 жыл бұрын
have used janestreet before
@franzalex2 жыл бұрын
Well, I wouldn't classify it as an imaging microscope. However, given that it's capable of allowing users to view and take very minute measurements, I think I'll categorise it as a profiling microscope. I guess that still makes it a microscope 😁🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️
@Regularsshorts2 жыл бұрын
Micro thigmoscope
@merc7222 жыл бұрын
Hey, at 3:05, I'd recommend you edit that part out, putting out your fingerprint like that might not be safe. Edit: Yeah, we don't know who it's from or which finger it might be, so it can still be safe. Just wanted to let you know though.
@vennic2 жыл бұрын
Well microscopes touch objects with light or electrons so why not?
@cptairwolf2 жыл бұрын
I'd love to know more about the gel they are using, It seems absolutely incredible that a gel would conform to such small details so perfectly and yet have no memory in that it returns to it's original shape.
@zaprodk2 жыл бұрын
I'll bet you there's some nice patents on the gel.
@blechtic2 жыл бұрын
Either the video codec has an echo or the gel does have some memory.
@PS-bc5qt2 жыл бұрын
You can see on the lego that it has some issues with cornering. Around the base of the lego nubs it has some issues. Stuff like that may get worked out though in the future.
@roseroserose5882 жыл бұрын
@@PS-bc5qt I think that tracks with what the guy was saying about the limitations - it won't perfectly show sharp angles but for the application it's not a huge issue as you're not looking at that directly
@JustOneAsbesto2 жыл бұрын
My guess is nanoparticles, and the size of the nanoparticles determines the resolution.
@hereandnow31562 жыл бұрын
I could probably watch about 12 hours of Steve pressing various objects into the gel and just describing what they are before moving onto the next one.
@JHaven-lg7lj Жыл бұрын
Right? I wonder what various kinds of feathers would look like - flight feathers vs down, etc
@Omnissiah2-gn8qb6 ай бұрын
Then do it.
@HarnaiDigital2 жыл бұрын
As a 3D artist myself this was one of the most fascinating things I have ever seen in a long while. If produced massively across the globe. It could be really helpful in 3D Film Industry.
@Spudcosmiccc2 жыл бұрын
Could you elaborate on why you think this microscope could be helpful to 3D artists?
@theaveragepro17492 жыл бұрын
@@Spudcosmiccc maybe creating normal or roughness materials? its a bit too small though I think
@cyberwomble75242 жыл бұрын
Considering the human brain's ability to extract a sense of 3D from watching 2D movies, it might explain the abysmal failure of of 3D movies and TV sets every time there's been a push in that direction. If this can help 3D movies improve on a human's innate ability (and be anything more than a gimmick) I'm all for it.
@TheScarvig2 жыл бұрын
this is litterally comercially available since 2015 kzbin.info/www/bejne/jH-cenapZZepmbs with full on 3d measurements since 2019
@thetechconspiracy22 жыл бұрын
@@Alan_Berger It's $500, which is actually pretty reasonable (by that I mean somebody who has a use for something like this can actually get one)
@ewak.11552 жыл бұрын
The wierd neon-colored image you can see used to create 3D model is called a normal map and it's meant to hold information about height of the object using different colours for different light angles. It is used widely in video games to create detail in low poly objects by changing how light reflects off of the surface. I find it fascinating they used normal map and not a regular height map but given the technology of 6 light sources it makes all the sense
@BiffGheek Жыл бұрын
Height maps contain less information than normal maps. Each pixel's color channel in a normal map contains information on the normal (orientation) of the surface, whereas a height map only contains direct vertical information.
@BurningApple Жыл бұрын
@@BiffGheek Paradoxically heightmaps can be said to have "more" information - you cannot recover height from normal, but you can generate normals from height - a 90 degree drop would not appear in a normal map.
@0x1EGEN Жыл бұрын
@@BiffGheek It's possible to obtain the normal vector from a heightmap. It was a common trick in computer graphics to use the depth buffer for things like ambient occlusion, an algorithm which needed normal vectors but didn't need to be 100% accurate.
@quantumblur_314511 ай бұрын
@@0x1EGENall I know about Ambient Occlusion is how it lags my computer more thany other graphics setting
@Jake-kb2le4 ай бұрын
Normal map doesn't hold information about the height, it holds information about the angle :)
@michaelnelson29762 жыл бұрын
This has WILD implications as a mobile highly accurate surface measurer. Damn, I want one just to have. I bet they're expensive. Industry really needs to have this. Feels revolutionary.
@davidmiller92202 жыл бұрын
That zigzag motion of the print head is "boustrophedonic". It is a literal reference to the motion of an ox ploughing a field, and you still usually see it in patents to describe print heads, scanners, etc.
@andriypredmyrskyy77912 жыл бұрын
I'm here to learn words like boustrophedonic
@hetzz2 жыл бұрын
This concludes my night, I've learnt enough. Thank you for that nugget of information.
@MrMctastics2 жыл бұрын
I'm here to learn where you learned this
@georgesamaras29222 жыл бұрын
Space filling curves
@WarpedWartWars Жыл бұрын
I learned what that word meant in the context of writing systems.
@jonathanperreault45032 жыл бұрын
im a 3d artist and i want one of these to make instant normalmaps from objects ,these look great
@trucid22 жыл бұрын
Yes! Inagine having super accurate normal maps in games. It would look amazing.
@MBaadsgaard2 жыл бұрын
You can make normal maps of objects by taking 4 pictures with light from up, down, left and right and then composing them manually. Like this thing but of course without the whole "immune to transparency/reflection" thing. The composing would be inverting right and blending with left 50%, put in red channel, invert down and blend with up 50% and put in green. For blue, Nvidia's old normal map plugin for Photoshop could get close with its "normalize" feature from the red and green channel.
@budgetcoinhunter2 жыл бұрын
I know. The moment I saw that coin being lit from different sides, I immediately knew it was compiling a normalmap. I'd love this ability too, especially because I like making normalmaps of coins.
@multiarray23202 жыл бұрын
it instantly reminded me of normal maps as well xD
@drpenguin572 жыл бұрын
there's already plenty of software now that can use multiple images to "scan" and object and make a 3d model of it. i'd be surprised if there wasn't similar software that makes normal maps as well
@S65Trev5 ай бұрын
For those wondering, the tool he is using is called GelSight. We use them often in aerospace to measure the depth of damage on metal surfaces. Very cool piece of gear, and not as expensive as you would imagine.
@TheDiggus5 ай бұрын
Cool Ai comment, for the people that couldn't watch the video for literally one minute.
@bombexplosion694204 ай бұрын
Actually it is very expensive the smallest one called the gelsight mini is about the size of a quarter and costs usd$499 and you have to request a quote to get the gelsight mobile and gelsight max so they are at least usd$1500+
@S65Trev3 ай бұрын
@@bombexplosion69420 in the big scheme of things, for how capable this device is, that’s very cheap. This is an invaluable tool for many industries, including aerospace.
@olivercharles29303 ай бұрын
@@bombexplosion69420 Tbf, I would've assumed the cost to be much higher than that. This looks the type of stuff you find in some high tech lab testing prototypes
@exhaustedeloise2 ай бұрын
@@bombexplosion69420i mean, OP just said ‘not as expensive as you’d imagine’ and i honestly thought this would be like £5000 at least, so to hear that it’s £500 instead makes a huge difference
@option_n2 жыл бұрын
We could actually use that almost every day at work to measure engravings on the toolings for chocolate moulds. Would safe us a lot of time. Super interesting 🧐👌🏼
@jezusmylord Жыл бұрын
what
@jameswhee7 ай бұрын
I just got sent to Sempre on a training course and got trained to use the GelSight. Lovely bunch of guys! Very nice of you to boost them with this video.
@ADRIAAN10072 жыл бұрын
Its incredible how well that gel conforms to objects
@devrim-oguz2 жыл бұрын
I think it is the 80% of that technology.
@ionut-cristianratoi76922 жыл бұрын
@MEMES FROM DEEP SPACE He actually did say that in the video, on the part with the stickiness. He said that it becomes sticky and needs replacing :)
@lotmom2 жыл бұрын
I was expecting a video on an Atomic Force Microscope, but this is far more fascinating! What a novel way to collect 3d data!
@koharaisevo36662 жыл бұрын
You beat me, I am also expect an AFM.
@al-aurum24572 жыл бұрын
yes exactly!
@CDCI32 жыл бұрын
I also thought it was AFM.
@hpekristiansen2 жыл бұрын
I was thinking STM, but AFM makes more sense.
@Bobbias2 жыл бұрын
Yeah same here. Well played on his part.
@valliemcc83522 жыл бұрын
Steve: this needs a sound effect Me: schlorp Steve: schlorp
@pablox1406 Жыл бұрын
I feel it shoud soun like a ruber balloon crackling while it deflates beside an object
@quantumblur_314511 ай бұрын
Being animals, some noises are built into the experience.
@xitheris1758 Жыл бұрын
The gel pad is a hexagon, and that fact just makes my brain light up in excitement and happiness all on its own. Hexagons are the best!
@JordanBeagle8 ай бұрын
The bestagons indeed!
@michaelsimms7396 Жыл бұрын
This is insane. We are getting to watch the first steps of an entire new tool that will change entire fields of study. It is amazing. I'm probably way more hyped about this then I should
@MTG_CMG Жыл бұрын
Not at all! We're curious beings and seeing new innovations inspires our mindset!
@deathofallthingspotato99192 жыл бұрын
With the crater illusion, I saw it as a mountain the whole time, even after seeing the shadows falling on it like a crater - the look of the inside of the crater looks so plateu like. Same with the indented text, in fact I think the top light source makes it stronger, and I did eventually recognise the crater, but I had to look closely at the shadows, and looking at the light side makes it look like a mountain no matter what.
@mskiptr2 жыл бұрын
I otoh saw the concave text immediately (after rotation), yet can't see the crater at all. It's always a mountain | plateau for me.
@realtechhacks2 жыл бұрын
Same for me.
@AsuraTheNoble2 жыл бұрын
same
@f.f.s.d.o.a.72942 жыл бұрын
I had to work hard to see it as a crater, including switching to only one eye or looking away for a while. Even then, it would pop back up to mountain pretty quickly. I think it's because I saw it as mountain before rotation.
@Jallorn2 жыл бұрын
Yeah- I was able to resolve the crater in the second position and not the first, but even after resolving a crater, it was still more natural to see a mountain in both. And that's ignoring that my brain thought it was something small in the gel at the first glance.
@young-stove2 жыл бұрын
This would be an incredible medium to make some kind of animated movie, even just a short little thing. What i'm imagining is in the same vein as the "A Boy And His Atom" animation made with individual atoms.
@JustOneAsbesto2 жыл бұрын
This is nowhere, anywhere, even remotely close to having the resolution to see atoms.
@young-stove2 жыл бұрын
@@JustOneAsbesto I was not suggesting that it did, thanks though.
@nickcoleman27652 жыл бұрын
‘A Boy and His Micron’ maybe?
@young-stove2 жыл бұрын
@@nickcoleman2765 yo thats perfect!
@Golden_Projects2 жыл бұрын
@@JustOneAsbesto I mean isn't technically everything that it sees made of atoms?
@harithatheawesomeguy2 жыл бұрын
I work with lots of 3D LIDAR scans and one huge issue for us is the reflection off of reflective surfaces such as mirrors. Interseting how this gets rid of that, at least on a micro scale.
@edgars95812 жыл бұрын
Just tape a gel cube to the sensor and drive into things!
@DrJimmyBob2 жыл бұрын
Would training an algorithm be easier using this technique as a source of truth? Small images, and maybe large images later, could be developed accurately with this, but would that information from this technique help you train a model faster? And further, would information about small things like the quarter or matchhead be useful for larger scale applications of LIDAR such as autonomous vehicles?
@thomaswilliams22732 жыл бұрын
Mirrors look really interesting in a 3D picture. They're kind of like a hole.
@Hadanelith1 Жыл бұрын
what a *fascinating* tool. I personally don't have a lot of use for it, but I can just imagine machinists being absolutely delighted at the details and measurements you can get from it.
@invictusdomini8624 Жыл бұрын
5:00 Thanks for making the left/right arrangement compatible with the cross-eye technique! 😸👍
@contrarian88702 жыл бұрын
@05:38 I see a mountain in both cases. The shading in the detail around the perimeter comes from bulging shapes, not depressions. Also, if cast shadows are present in such cases, they clarify the situation.
@noakuu3932 жыл бұрын
Uh, no, I clearly see a crater
@hamuelagulto7962 жыл бұрын
I agree. I think I've seen something like this before that actually flips between being a depression and a bulge, but in this specific photo, it's both a bulge for me. I can't make my brain think that it's a crater.
@YASxYT2 жыл бұрын
@@hamuelagulto796 same
@tombrandis2 жыл бұрын
Maybe it's because you already saw it as a mountain first?
@GileadMaerlyn2 жыл бұрын
Same here.
@Dziaji2 жыл бұрын
Mould is on another level with his science videos. He always finds the most interesting and obscure stuff.
@dharma42482 жыл бұрын
Every one of your videos is a treasure. Thank you
@bencheevers66932 жыл бұрын
Was really wondering about how easily it was contaminated and how frequently you would need to replace the gel, how expensive is the replacement and how easy is the process? It looked like everything you had on there had some dust or hairs, it seemed like it wasn't like you were constantly scanning dirty pieces but instead that the microscope itself had issue. Incredibly cool technology, I even want one but the dirt issue seems hard to deal with.
@quantumblur_314511 ай бұрын
Also if the subject's too fragile, the scope itself might impact and disrupt it. This'd be useless for microscopic stuff
@splitt_1923 Жыл бұрын
As a mechanic this would be really useful to check for wear on parts quickly because most parts that we check for normal wear that occurs during the engine's lifetime is layered and sometimes you may be searching for a deeper scratch in the middle of thousands and it would eliminate the need to send parts for measurements in some cases.
@roochiecooch2 жыл бұрын
Nearly every mundane object under that type of imaging looks quite mesmerizing! I actually thought your stubble was one of the more interesting ones. It really shows just how cleanly the blades cut the hairs at the ends. The draping problem was the first thing that came to mind as someone who has done a lot of vacuum forming. But that’s very interesting that it’s not much of an issue as long as they can get the depth value. And as long as it’s not deeper than it is wide.
@somdudewillson2 жыл бұрын
4:37 That's called monocular depth estimation and it very much already exists. There are quite a few open-source models that can estimate depth fairly well from a single flat image, and if you have multiple images from different angles there are neural networks that can build up an accurate model of the entire scene, sufficient to move a virtual "camera" around and through the scene and create new views in the process.
@Biru_to2 жыл бұрын
But how reliable and accurate are they? Probably not good enough for the purposes these camera gel deforming sensing things are bought for?
@whyiseverysinglehandletaken22 жыл бұрын
uploaded 57 seconds ago, gotta binge this up
@jojjo223 Жыл бұрын
I work with 3D making games for a living. Seeing those 3D models being created was so cool. Essentially using the same information that's used to generate and render normal and displacement maps.
@Ani28_032 жыл бұрын
So cool. Its like making a normal map of a object 😍
@axelmeysmans15302 жыл бұрын
This would be great for artefact studies in archaeology
@DagorDraug2 жыл бұрын
I was just thinking about that! I believe it would be amazing for understanding markings, but, if the resolution is enough, even some features of the fabrics of materials
@abydosianchulac22 жыл бұрын
So much easier to look for tooling marks and scratches to see how things were made
2 жыл бұрын
I'm doubtful about the willingness of the archaeologists to press the artifacts into a gel. Things could easily break from the force.
@DagorDraug2 жыл бұрын
@ well I can imagine a lot of situation in which force it's not a problem. There are some artifacts, like terra sigillata (I don't remember now the english name, sorry) which may not suffer. Or stoneware
@axelmeysmans15302 жыл бұрын
@ I was mainly thinking about markings on rustued metal, but on the other hand if you take (for example) a coin, you just scan both sides and you don't have to handle the coin nearly as much, which would make it far less likely to crumble.
@Shadow__X2 жыл бұрын
I saw this (specifically the tiny GelSight mini) recently and thought "what would anyone use this for?". Now that I actually see the accuracy and resolution it has it makes sense
@metropolis102 жыл бұрын
Really cool that it showed the depth of your mouse cursor in so many shots!
@FrederickDunn2 жыл бұрын
Ok, Steve, I'm so glad that youtube thought to put your video in my path. That's an odd microscope indeed, and the gel is strangely sensitive. Removing color does indeed leave us with form, texture, and shadow. Photometric Stereo? Ok then. I wonder what insects would look like with this system? Does that gel wear out? So it has a quality control inspection use, also interesting. Jane Street Academy... sounds excellent. Thank you for all of this information. Well done. But then you already know that.
@DerSolinski2 жыл бұрын
Never knew such thing existed. But this is really a valuable tool for a lot of people who do precision work. So thank you for brining it to my attention it deserves that.
@frogandspanner2 жыл бұрын
0:15 Miyota 2035 quartz watch movement, as used in countless cheap and cheerful plastic watches. To the left is the stepper coil, to the upper right is the quartz crystal.
@SamYoder6102 жыл бұрын
I work at a jet engine company and we use these all the time! So cool to see!
@brianwareham29332 жыл бұрын
to what end? wear inspection?
@10yrs.istillcantthinkupawi112 жыл бұрын
4:23 "Your brain doesn't think 'Oh, This region is dark because it's facing away from the light source.' You know that it's:" PAINT "The eyeball!" FUCK
@NoviceIdiot Жыл бұрын
I would love a larger scale of this, it would be amazing for modelling small electronics where the manufacturer doesn't provide 3d files
@maymayman0 Жыл бұрын
I would sit on it
@CHECKERCE2 жыл бұрын
now we have your fingerprint and can unlock your phone
@MyNameisWatt910 ай бұрын
😂
@ganeshsaithala39659 ай бұрын
I had a stroke trying to read this
@MatthewWongYY2 жыл бұрын
8:54 Love Steve for moments like these
@ChongMcBong2 жыл бұрын
wow, what an awesome tool :) thanks Semper Group for letting Steve play with it, maybe send him more stuff to test eh 👍
@dillbourne2 жыл бұрын
"No one would see this face as concave" 6:27 Steve how dare you put this curse on me. You just made a bowl out of a human
@ImBarryScottCSS Жыл бұрын
It's a watch! I've had to replace those little buggers one times too many.
@seantiz Жыл бұрын
The same thing happens when I press my face into a big bowl of Jello.
@TLguitar2 жыл бұрын
6:03 "Yeah, it does look like it's sticking out!" 6:12 "Yeah, it does look like it's sticking out!"
@barneytrubble2 жыл бұрын
lol, same!😁
@That_Awesome_Guy12 жыл бұрын
It's kind of the same for me. Except I see it as indented for a few seconds and then it starts to look like it's sticking out again.
@TLguitar2 жыл бұрын
@@That_Awesome_Guy1 "Just when I thought I was in, they pull me back out"
@timmermanneke51492 жыл бұрын
8:55 I was not ready for this...
@JordanBeagle8 ай бұрын
Had to rewatch this, I could watch Steve put items on this and guess what they are for hours, I love this little machine
@jpjapers Жыл бұрын
This multi-light setup that generates the depth and normal maps is the same method that is used to generate many textures and material used in games and film. You can do it yourself with a camera, a light and either free software or Adobe Substance. You can also remove the reflection from the images using cross polarisation by putting a polarising gel on your light source and in a different orientation on your camera.
@lordcola-33242 жыл бұрын
The Crater illusion doesn't work for me. Neither in the crater image nor with the letters. Both times it just looks like it's sticking out. Never do I perceive an indentation
@JustOneAsbesto2 жыл бұрын
After it is rotated, the light is actually coming from the top-left. You can clearly see shadows being cast into the crater from the lip of the crater in the top-left.
@gdclemo2 жыл бұрын
@@JustOneAsbesto my brain almost always interprets it as an extrusion, even when skipping straight to the crater image, except only once I managed to see it as a crater. I have much better luck with the preview thumbnail though.
@SaadGamerTubeHD2 жыл бұрын
0:02 ah yes! The polo mint!
@cavemann_2 жыл бұрын
This is honestly amazing! You're so lucky to be able to play with. Is there any information on whether this is going to be sold commercially? I'd love to get my hands on this.
@JeffBilkins2 жыл бұрын
In the intro he shows a picture of the company 'The Sempre Group' and their website. The device is there, no price listed but "contact us" so probably very expensive.
@pierrotA2 жыл бұрын
@TigerGold 59 It depend... What's the resolution of the camera ? What's the focal point of the camera ? What's the material of the pad ? How many time did the software got developped ? Without thoses anwsers, you cannot estimate the price. It's like saying that VR headset do not look so expensive... Yeah but it's a small 2k screen, a very narrow focal point, and a very difficulte to make tracking device. I'm pretty sure that given the software and the regular change of the pad, it's not sold but got offer at a service.
@barrieshepherd76942 жыл бұрын
@TigerGold 59 Probably isn't expensive to make but they will want to recoup all their research and software development.
@randallrun2 жыл бұрын
TigerGold59, I definitely think you should make one! Maybe sell it at a lower price then this one.
@unliving_ball_of_gas2 жыл бұрын
@TigerGold 59 It's a device made for industrial and commercial use, not consumer use. It will be expensive. I'd estimate around at least 15K USD. Especially with a new technology. My father works in the industrial sector, you'd be surprised by how much the industrial version of something costs vs the consumer version. They're usually 10x more expensive. For example, he once showed me a thermal camera his company was using, it looked like a gun and had a small screen at the back. The price? 5K USD. For comparison you can get a cheap consumer thermal camera for 400 USD. And the 5K USD thermal cam was only the entry-level version, the next better model was 7K USD. The reason these things are so expensive is because industrial tools are made with precision, consistency, and durability in mind. I mean, you wouldn't care much if your toaster shows up as 10°C colder than it is in your consumer thermal camera (I've checked, my toaster goes up to 700+°C), but if an engineer thinks that an electrical cable is 20°C colder than it is....the company can lose millions of $ from the resulting damage. That's why 5K$ to a serious company seems so small in the long run. My advice is to wait for a consumer version of this touch microscope to come up. That might take 5-15 years but unless you got a thick wallet, it's the only option.
@finnf90513 ай бұрын
5:03 I cross eyed for that section. Super cool!
@geccpls2 жыл бұрын
I think my reaction to your example at 6:00 brings up an interesting point. See, I DIDNT experience the crater illusion when you used the touch microscope, and I think it's because humans are VERY good at context clues and learning; Because you'd shown me other visuals of the touch microscope, I was able to tell from the patterning around the letters that a flat, intended surface was pressed against the microscope, and that the letters were smooth because nothing was touching the gel surface. If they really had been protruding from the block, it would be the letters that had texturing, not the background.
@Halvkyrie Жыл бұрын
I imagine this could be incredibly useful for making normal maps for added detail in 3d modeling
@LydianMelody2 жыл бұрын
Complete side note: The free software “Materialize” does an okay job at taking a single color image and extracting depth, reflectivity, and other properties. It was used to remaster the Uncharted game series.
@zach1231012 жыл бұрын
8:20 you should do all the numbers on the front and back next time too that'd be fun
@koreyDorey2 жыл бұрын
Funni
@DJ_not_DJ2 жыл бұрын
Omg this is a genius way to finish a step of creating ultra realistic 3D models and CGI renders, that’s very epic
@FictionCautious2 жыл бұрын
Coolest technology I've seen in years. Makes you think about what else might be out there and kept from the public.
@sinisterthoughts28962 жыл бұрын
No money in keeping it from the public.
@contrarian88702 жыл бұрын
What if you press two of these against each other? Will the universe achieve singularity?
@SerajEmad2 жыл бұрын
Now we have your fingerprints
@Tryh4rd3rr5 ай бұрын
Lol
@natalieschweizer56642 жыл бұрын
I tried diverging my eyes on the octopus images to see them in 3d (Magic Eye style) and it worked! Except the images are in the wrong order so the depth was reversed making the octopus more distant than the background which looks trippy. This means that if you cross your eyes the 3d image would look correct, but I have more trouble crossing my eyes vs diverging, so I wasn’t able to do it. Maybe try it out for yourself at 5:00
@Absolotle2 жыл бұрын
Yes - it's a cross view stereo 3d image (video). Works very well. Not an octopus though.
@ShirinRose2 жыл бұрын
I managed it with crossed eyes. Very cool 🤩
@coreblaster68092 жыл бұрын
The reason why it was reversed for you was because you crossed your eyes the wrong way, outward, rather than inward, which is very difficult to do, impressive! Go the other way and it'll be normal though
@Absolotle2 жыл бұрын
@@coreblaster6809 that's exactly what he said. You can either cross your eyes (inward) or diverge them (outward). But it's more difficult for him to cross them.
@aimilios4392 жыл бұрын
For me crossing its always easier, so it's very nice.
@XxProudxGamerxX Жыл бұрын
This is the type of rediscovery we need on current technology!
@GamerX-20002 жыл бұрын
5:45 I can’t really see the crater. I understand why the human mind SHOULD think that it’s a crater, but I can’t see the crater. Sometimes I get the slightest illusion it might be dipping down, but it doesn’t hold.
@insertgamertag53692 жыл бұрын
Same
@zweks Жыл бұрын
I think it's because the perimeter of the crater is all lit
@Odihmantich5 ай бұрын
I neither see the crater nor understand why would anyone assume it’s a crater!!!
@gamekiller01232 жыл бұрын
Weirdly, the lettering at 6:13 looks like it's sticking out to me, and at first the lettering before it looked like it was indented. Afterwards the first case is ambiguous (I can switch it in my head), but I still can't see the second case as indented.
@singerofsongss2 жыл бұрын
Weird, at 5:23 I got a sudden urge to throw my computer off a high counter or something. This is such a cool device! I was thinking from the thumbnail and title that we’d be looking at an AFM or something. What a fun surprise!
@timeastman83192 жыл бұрын
Yeah, *somebody* has a bead-chain fixation!
@j3en534 Жыл бұрын
Hey man I’m an aircraft tech and just wanted to give some input on other ways we can measure damage nondestructively. We have ultrasonic testers that work much like ultrasound. We also have eddy current which is extremely interesting. We have blanks of different materials; aluminum, titanium, magnesium, steel, and others. We use a calibrated head on the tool that uses electromagnetic eddy currents that are then disrupted by the damage. Using those methods we can actually measure and find cracks and scratches which may not even be visible!
@screebgaming8454 Жыл бұрын
This is like real life normal mapping. Super cool
@killingpanda55302 жыл бұрын
Okay at 6:13 im seeing it as opposite of what you said and its confusing me as to which is real now
@joshw71522 ай бұрын
0:17 is it inside a watch??
@luhanswart2 жыл бұрын
If I'm not wrong, there already exists an AI tool that can scan transparent/reflective objects quite well. They're called Neural Radiance Fields (NeRFs) and the Corridor Crew did an amazing video on it.
@littlesnowflakepunk8552 жыл бұрын
NeRFs arent *accurate,* they're what I would call "true." They can guess at the shape and make it *look* right, but due to the nature of the input they're not going to be useful for any precise measurement.
@JimC2 жыл бұрын
That was a very interesting video. For those who haven't see it: kzbin.info/www/bejne/j4mYcqKXjNeirbs
@testhandle15372 жыл бұрын
Not at this scale and level of accuracy (yet)
@luhanswart2 жыл бұрын
@@testhandle1537 Yea definitely not. But its cool to see that we're making advancements in that direction.
@just2607 Жыл бұрын
That concave face is the most horrifying thing I've seen in a long time. Thanks Steve for putting me onto the phenomenon of seeing faces as being concave when lit from below
@Ramius1172 жыл бұрын
My past 5+ years of EM experience using various electron detectors approves this video on a fundamental level.
@coasterairtime2 жыл бұрын
5:50 I still see a mountain :()
@DisassemblyDrone-T Жыл бұрын
Same,
@otsoscars Жыл бұрын
Me too
@Schroeder99992 жыл бұрын
There seems to be some limitations when used for surface features with high aspect ratio. For example, it wasn't able to discern the vertical fall off from the edges of the Lego brick pegs But none the less very interesting and could be very useful in a lot of scenarios By the way, what's the MTBF of the gel? (i.e. how many times can it be used)
@Schroeder99992 жыл бұрын
Oh... you mentioned it towards the end of the video... hahaha
@Schroeder99992 жыл бұрын
I'd probably call it a profilometer more than a microscope. But then again it can be one
@justinjones29782 жыл бұрын
Does the gel leave a residue behind to the point to where you have to refill the gel over time?
@klashnacovak47 Жыл бұрын
The amount of detail was impressive.
@CheeseVRC Жыл бұрын
Companies allowing intrigued individuals to try out their machines is honestly the most wholesome thing in existence
@Nawaf- Жыл бұрын
5:38 I can’t see a crater…
@signalshift66762 жыл бұрын
Thats amazing. It's like a digital terrain model, but for tiny things
@MagusApex2 жыл бұрын
5:45 I can not see the crater RIP Q_Q
@JordanBeagle8 ай бұрын
This is so cool, I think in many ways it's more incredible and useful than a light microscope because it shows 3D info on common objects without having to use a electron microscope.
@falxonPSN Жыл бұрын
I have absolutely no practical use for a device like this, and yet I absolutely must have it!!!
@adeus111-p7r2 жыл бұрын
0:27 I didn’t watch the video but I know that this is a watch mechanism
@pastek9572 жыл бұрын
The gel specifically is really impressive, but I really feel like it's a solution to a problem no one has
@ZephyrinSkies2 жыл бұрын
For regular consumers, but people in manufacturing, engineering, even digital 3D artists could make use of this. He explained an example application with how instead of taking molds of scratches to measure they can use this and get the data instantly.
@pastek9572 жыл бұрын
@@ZephyrinSkies No, even for engineering, between making a mold once every blue moon or using a reusable-but-not-really gel pad of fixed size, I feel it is not a significant advantage (esp since cracks have to be more wide than deep which is rare) The only point I'd give would be the way it isn't affected by shine and transparency, but I'm sure some clever signal processing can manage that as well
@MackieC007JR2 жыл бұрын
better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it...
@76Arfa2 жыл бұрын
@@pastek957 and what about checking for tolerances on CNC biomed parts which can have tolerances in the microns sometimes?
@pastek9572 жыл бұрын
@@76Arfa If it's just one measurement you can use a micrometer (the tool), if you want full 3D there are microtomography scanners, and in-between there are probably several tools I don't know to make cheaper specific measurements Maybe this gel-scope fits in-between, but I'd be very surprised if we don't already have several tools doing similar things without the drawbacks
@thechoripankiller2 жыл бұрын
8:36 YO HOLD UP
@gkrees95092 жыл бұрын
Why is literally no one else talking about this !?😂
@wagomus43232 жыл бұрын
Tes5icle
@polymations3 ай бұрын
💀💀💀💀💀
@rashkavar2 жыл бұрын
Nailed it! I recognized the battery from the mystery device after a bit of pondering, and then just guessed the most common application of that kind of battery.
@scottowens398 Жыл бұрын
I replaced a watch battery a month ago and remembered that. Lol
@MatSmithLondon Жыл бұрын
This video was absolutely fascinating. Superb. Really nicely pitched script.
@fred405872 жыл бұрын
does the gel have any memory and would that effect tolerances?
@Kargoneth2 жыл бұрын
@0:20 I am going to guess a wristwatch!
@duckonquack0o0132 жыл бұрын
Whats the gel pad made of?
@dailydoseofbenadryl50962 жыл бұрын
this is really interesting! I just learned about vanta-black objects. humans cant exactly figure out what shape vanta black is just by looking at it so it would be nice seeing vanta-black objects being used
@Jaelismyhomegirl9 ай бұрын
I saw another one that vibrates a microscopic filament over a surface to create a microscopic 3D model of it. Really cool!
@adamms962 жыл бұрын
0:47 well that's in interesting fleshlight...
@GertvandenBerg2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if 1:40 has enough data to unlock Steve's phone...
@heavy0119 Жыл бұрын
Probably not. It’s only a partial fongerprint
@TheWorldsLargestOven Жыл бұрын
3:07
@mikeligammare5773 Жыл бұрын
When creating CG(3D) Objects like for video games. You use something called a normal map. A normal map creates small surface details like little cracks in a wall. It takes 3 different light sources and puts them into the Red, Green, and Blue channels of an image, in the end comes out in this purplish looking image. It is essentially what that microscope does, but that uses 6 light sources instead of 3. Very Cool gadget.
@zanderdevinci81989 ай бұрын
Fascinatingly, when he explains the crater illusion, i actually saw a mountain when he said i should see a crater, and the reverse
@joshd108 Жыл бұрын
I wish my brain could be “tricked” to be fully immersed in VR again.