Actor George Clooney and filmmaker Steven Soderbergh discuss their new film, "Solaris." Join us on Patreon! / manufacturingintellect Donate Crypto! commerce.coinb... Share this video!
Пікірлер: 38
@ManufacturingIntellect3 жыл бұрын
Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259 Share this video!
@thelifeandtimes.ofazombiegirl4 жыл бұрын
I definitely over thought it, but I enjoyed doing so! I adore this film for all the reasons it alienated a lot of people. I love movies that make you really feel & think without laying the answers at your feet. For me, this is definitely one of those films. I was absolutely enchanted by everything about it the first time I watched it in 2009 & it still hasn't lost it's appeal or it's wonder for me. Thanks for posting this interview!!!
@ourson66 Жыл бұрын
This was a great, slow-revealing, thoughtful, utterly gorgeous film that stacked ideas in ways that makes you see things in a whole different way. I remember sitting in the theatre at the end, and going: "I didn't think Soderbergh had it in him..."
@RaysDad Жыл бұрын
Solaris was one of the best novels of the twentieth century, and Tarkovsky's film was one of the best ever. No one in Hollywood could live up to such standards.
@alexb66956 ай бұрын
Yes, I'm surprised they never mentioned him. Presented like Steven created all by himself: "WRITTEN n Directed".😊
@vgstb4 ай бұрын
It's not a competition. Soderbergh wanted and (I think) made a completely different film than Trakovsky. For me the Soderbergh interpretation of Lem's book is the more interesting one.
@RaysDad4 ай бұрын
@@vgstb I think Lem and Tarkovsky were pretty much on the same page. To them Solaris questioned whether or not people can ever really understand alien life forms, or even each other. Soderbergh used Solaris to tell a love story with a Hollywood ending in which a suicide is undone and all is forgiven. I would have liked the Soderbergh film more if I hadn't seen Tarkovsky's version first.
@chrisw4439 ай бұрын
My favorite movie which still has no complete HD release.
@darkpatches9 ай бұрын
Not in the US, at least. You might know that. And there are HD versions to be found online, which you also might know. One of my very favorites, too.
@brentulstad3275 Жыл бұрын
One of the few American remakes that is as good or actually better than the original film.
@Omnicient.5 жыл бұрын
Their film is a cult (one of many) fav of mine. I agree with critics who say we don't really 'learn' what Solaris is but then who could create what it is?
@kimberlyjohnson1571 Жыл бұрын
Why are these 2 men dressed EXACTLY alike? Including both t-shirts hanging out. Did they "plan" this? Is this "twin day?"
@fcc9502 ай бұрын
i don't know
@DeviantDeveloper4 жыл бұрын
Harvey Winestein, Charlie Rose..... Wink.
@PrestigeWorldwide-XXII8 ай бұрын
They met in a gay club in West Hollywood
@dodadodahАй бұрын
McElhone was obviously only there for her good looks, should have had a real actor...
@AussoOnePlus3 жыл бұрын
Did they even fuking mentioned that this is a remake of Tarkofsky and they ruined it?!!!!
@benijager1372 Жыл бұрын
Steven said "Tarkovsky couldn't direct anything, some of his movies are interesting but he ruined those ideas, a proof that communism doesn't work, the Russo Brothers should remake his movies so they can make them better like I did"
@saran5263 Жыл бұрын
@@benijager1372 that just sounds like something a dumbass like you would say.
@darkpatches9 ай бұрын
Did you even watch the video? At 32:10 Soderburgh specifically states that he made the film solely to ruin it in comparison to Solyaris.
@alexb66956 ай бұрын
@@darkpatchesthis video is only 31 min long lol
@alexb66956 ай бұрын
@@benijager1372😂 communism n Tarkovsky?😂😂 Guy was totally against communism
@mariarahelvarnhagen27292 жыл бұрын
Last
@mariarahelvarnhagen27292 жыл бұрын
#2:14 Under 3 Minutes
@Mamba4.85 жыл бұрын
Always thought Soderbergh was overrated, and his Solaris completely lacks everything that made Tarkovskys original great. He's talking about it being ambitious but doesn't reach the ambition of the original, and talks about 2001 and making a movie with that impact, his movie doesn't even breath the same air as neither movie.
@glennfleming5 жыл бұрын
I think they're two different films; both stand out separately from each other. Tarkovsky's original is quite 'raw'. Soderbergh's 'Solaris' is sharp and clean, but beautifully photographed with great looking people. Neither effort is near the book; Lem never watched any of the films lifted from his work and all three are different. All work.
@YhuMum5 жыл бұрын
Facts
@TheJonnyEnglish4 жыл бұрын
So? He had ambitions that you personally believe he didn't make. Of course many would see Kubrick better then Sodenberg, yet that doesn't discredit Sodenbergs work. It's like comparing Joyce Carol Oats to Jon Steinbeck. Both amazing writers yet completely different writing styles.
@blekfut57634 жыл бұрын
Why do you call Tarkovsky's movie "original"?! The original is the novel written by Stanislaw Lem.
@Mamba4.84 жыл бұрын
@@blekfut5763I know. I was using "original" for lack of a better term. Tarkovskys take and movie was just way better is what I'm trying to say.