Steven Strogatz’s Secrets of Math Communication

[@QuantaScienceChannel]

Subscribe to "The Joy of Why," a new podcast from Quanta Magazine and Steven Strogatz: link.chtbl.com/the-joy-of-why-youtube

[@ridasadam1919]

Our

[@farhanaf832]

Can u make video about Boinc distributed computing software?

[@leontedumitru]

This channel is just on another level. Great content

[@maxtsivourakis137]

Steven is an amazing human being.

[@energyeve2152]

I had applied to the program in Cornell and I somehow got in contact with him and had a phone call with him. He’s very generous and great to speak to. I feel blessed and lucky to have gotten a moment to speak to such a great teacher.

[@bendavis2234]

I wish I had a teacher like Steven for my calculus class. It’s so important that the teacher actually loves their subject!

[@davyroger3773]

This guy is spot on about loving a topic! Unfortunately too many teachers actually make students not only feel dumb but hate a subject. Once curiosity is engaged and the student starts to derive pleasure from the problems it self, the job of the teacher is completed

[@abhijitpradhan9831]

Beautiful talk by Steven strogatz .

[@othmanelkaddioui4364]

I admire how honest this man is and i would like to thank quanta magazine for this content

[@belalsherif553]

Infinite powers: best intro to calculus ever. Strogatz is a great man

[@energyeve2152]

The dictation function for writing sounds like such a great idea for people that struggle to write like myself. Thank you for sharing that!

[@avinkon]

Humble and a great story teller

[@prelude2752]

Thank you Steven for your honest and inspiring words.Thanks to the interviewer for his well chosen questions.

[@anirbanc88]

i have tried to learn math in so many ways, and this session gave me a porfound change, thank you! loved this!

[@dylanparker130]

Really enjoyed this & love the channel!

[@loranelizabeth9148]

Such a terrific, engaging, FUN, interview! Thank you so much, Steven!

[@lucytkmts]

More and more I realize that EACH people is different in everything, in any aspect of human actions and thinking. So what is most challenging is how to describe or simply talk what each wants to have understood. In this internet world knowlege is not a big challenge but HOW to describe is, which is as he says to intrigue his or her love on what we want to share. It should start with one simple sentence: What is it that you feel you would dream to have right now?

[@davidwilkie9551]

Thank Steven's Wife and Daughter for Sync, it's good to read along with Professor Susskind's lectures that tend toward Holographic Principle Perspective Imagery. GD&P Actuality here-now-forever helps.

[@lucytkmts]

There are not many people who can talk genuinely honestly out of his or her own heart and Steven is the one

[@sweetbluealien]

Brilliant interview! ♾️❤️

[@bpolat]

Great content. Thank you.

[@KaiseruSoze]

I do hope to see "the joy of why" on youtube.

[@QuantaScienceChannel]

We don't plan to release episodes of the podcast on KZbin, but you can find them here: link.chtbl.com/the-joy-of-why-youtube

[@MarcosBitachi]

@@QuantaScienceChannel Thank you very much

[@voroldrwarfff8858]

Its on spotify too !

[@myhumblebeginnings]

Steven Strogatz is a humble guy.

[@uasserkamal2002]

this magazine gives me a different look to science

[@voroldrwarfff8858]

What a man

[@mustbegross]

I can relate to him on how you would gradually fall in love with something difficult in the first place.

[@bygabop9368]

The most striking feature of exp(at) is that it is the eigenfunction of the linear operator, I believe.

[@j.p.mccarthy9713]

Of "a" linear operator. Which one?

[@bygabop9368]

Of any linear operator, I mean all of them.

[@bygabop9368]

Any order derivative or any order integral….

[@j.p.mccarthy9713]

There are linear operators that are not differentiation.

[@bygabop9368]

@@j.p.mccarthy9713 choose a generic one, for instance T{x} = a x If T is any linear operator than x is a comple exponential.

[@jurgenstephanopolus5095]

"help the student fall in love with the question" That's it.

[@austingonzalez1148]

9:27. We're overproducing and failing at distribution? Sounds like he's a mathematics Karl Marx! haha. Proofs from each according to their ability, to each according to their proof need.

[@dipmadk.b5774]

777👍 bring more content on mathematics

[@mahkhi7154]

Your Math does Not have the CONSTRUCTS to describe Complicated Software Involving 100's of Variables. Your Math can do: Y=2X - A 2D Graph. Y=2X+3Z - a 3D Graph. If you develop that math for Complex Software you'll Get UML and Programming Languages such as ADA, C++ and Visual Basic. A programming Language is Formal. if it was Informal, the Computer wouldn't Know how to Run it.

[@prostatecancergaming9531]

He’s the Feynman of math

[@teslasam2713]

Hello 🥰guyzs

[@Rigel_nz]

Hallo

[@chief-men-no1186]

.124500+.542100=.6666 Forwards+backward^values=values^backwards+forwards Forwards and backwards truth read makes truth read backwards and forward. (F+B)read^truth=truth^read(B+F) All rights reserved. No rights waived for creative material with comments.

[@ScottDBowen]

Test

[@gmaf79]

Math is the only thing that can't be copyrighted or patented. This fact greatly reduces the number of people researching math to only mathematicians, who get paid handsomely to do math. Creativity will very rarely blossom from this structure making mathematics greatly handicapped.

[@Flaystray]

Math can't be patented, making the only people who do it those who like it, therefore it's greatly handicapped. Got it 👍

[@gmaf79]

@@Flaystray Wrong. Making only people who get paid do it.

[@adityakhanna113]

Oh math can very well be patented. Algorithms are patented all the time. Theorems can probably come under Intellectual property and if mathematicians wanted the y could patent their findings. But math people are too nice to do that

[@chief-men-no1186]

Grammatically-correct-sentence-expression 5+5=10=5+5. complete-sentence-showing-fact-showing-sentence-complete. 1+1=2=1+1=2 Complete-sentence-showing+complete-sentence-showing+complete-sentence-showing=fact showing sentences complete Be to-show must-show-to-be 1=1. 👈complete sentence Complete sentence shows cause=cause shows sentence complete. Complete sentence shows facts 10=10. 👈 does that show to-be Complete sentence Verb shows-&-says what noun says-&-does. Verb-speaks-&-says what-noun-say-&-does=(=)make/equal/show/says/amount-to-value-to-amount/fact=correct-expression-grammar Subject(fact)-verb(does)-what ? Does(what)what(shows)does Does(when) Does(how) ---(line(string)from/for cause)storyline Conjunction=+=connection🪢(connects-&-makes-connection-for) 5🪢5=10 Subject-verb-connection(conjunction)- 1--fact(value)noun(subject) +=conjunction-to-preposition=+ 1--value(fact)subject(noun) =(=)2 values of 1 value of 2 value Shows/declares/states/storyline All rights reserved. No rights waived for creative material from comments.